Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYashkina, Daria
dc.description.abstractThis article examines the phenomenon of solitary living as a consequence of the processes of individualization that are characteristic of the entire modern world. The urgency of this problem arises from the increase in the number of individuals who prefer to live alone. Although this trend is typical for Eastern Europe, as it is for the rest of the world, it is not widely considered in scientific circles. Whilst analyzing scientific literature in different spheres (philosophy, economics, psychology, sociology) and statistical data on solitary living, the author has come to the conclusion that to describe the phenomenon in a sociological vein, it is most appropriate to consider solitary living as a “solo-living” lifestyle. The article also examines the main studies of solitary living in Eastern Europe, and through such work, it was concluded that there is not enough research: current research mainly considers single living among the older generation, despite the fact that the number of young people who prefer this lifestyle continues to grow. In the course of the study, the author was faced with the problem of layering related concepts: solos, singles, solo-living, single-person households, and others. To avoid this problem, the author distinguishes between these concepts and makes an attempt to conceptualize the concept of “solo-living”, offers the author’s definition, and outlines further research prospects.en
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEastern Reviewpl
dc.titleA sociological perspective on the phenomenon of solo-living in Eastern Europe: An attempt at conceptualizationen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationV.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Ukraine, Department of Political Sociologyen
dc.referencesAbanokova, K. 2015. Izmeneniye struktury domokho zyaystva kak strategiya preodoleniya makroekonomicheskogo shoka. Moskva, (accessed 20.02.2021).en
dc.referencesBaranwal, J., Ram, B. 1985. Societal Development, Familialism and Solo Living: A Cross-National Study. Journal of Comparative Family Studies 16(1), pp. 61–73, (accessed 20.02.2021).en
dc.referencesBauman, Z. 2008. Tekuchai︠a ︡Sovremennost’ (Liquid modernity). Moskva: Piter.en
dc.referencesBellani, D., Esping-Andersen, G., Nedoluzhko, L. 2017. Neverpartnered: A multilevela-nalysisoflifelongsinglehood. Demographic Research 37, pp. 53–100. DOI:
dc.referencesBerdyaev, N. 1994. I and the world of objects. I am loneliness and society, (accessed 20.02.2021).en
dc.referencesBurova, C. 2010. Sotsiologiyabraka i sem’i: istoriya, teoreticheskiye osnovy, personalii. Belorusskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet. Minsk: Pravo i ekonomika, (accessed 20.02.2021).en
dc.referencesCabalza, Ch. 2018. Goin’ Solo: A Study on Singlehood and Viewson ‘Sologamy’ in the Contemporary Philippine Society. University of the Philippines, Diliman, (accessed 20.02.2021).en
dc.referencesChandler, J., Williams, M., Maconachie, M., Collett, T., Dodgeon, B. 2004. Living Alone: Its Place in Household Formationand Change. Sociological Research Online 9(3), pp. 42–54. DOI:
dc.referencesDemey, D., Berrington, A., Evandrou, M., Falkingham, J., 2013. Path ways into living alone in mid-life: Diversity and policy implications. Advances in Life Course Research 18(3), pp. 161–174. DOI:
dc.referencesDuncan, S., Phillips, M. 2008. Newfamilies? Tradition and changein partnering and relationships. In: A. Park, J. Curtice, K. Thomson, M. Phillips, M.C. Johnson, E. Clery (eds.). British Social Attitudes: the 24th Report. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. DOI:
dc.referencesDurkheim, E. 1996. O Razdelenii Obshchestvennogo Truda. Moskva: Kanon.en 2020a. Household Composition Statistics – Statistics Explained, (accessed 31.08.2020).en 2020b. Rising Proportion of Single Person Households in the EU,,in%202017%20in%20the%20EU (accessed 31.08.2020).en 2005. Solo-living across the adult life course, (accessed 31.08.2020).en
dc.referencesGarthwaite, K. 2012. Home Alone? Practitioners’ Reflections on the Implications of Young People Living Alone. Youth and Policy 108, pp. 73–87.en
dc.referencesGross, J. 2020. The Price of Being (accessed 31.08.2020).en
dc.referencesHall, R., Ogden, P. 2003. The Rise of Living Alone in Inner London: Trends among the Population of Working Age. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 35(5), pp. 871–888. DOI:
dc.referencesHärkönen, J., Billingsley, S. Hornung, M. 2020. Divorce Trends in Seven Countries Over the Long Transition from State Socialism: 1981–2004. European Studies of Population, pp. 63–89. DOI:
dc.referencesJamieson, L., Wasoff, F., Simpson, R. 2009. Solo-Living, Demographic and Family Change: The Need to know more about men. Sociological ResearchOnline 14(2), pp. 20–35. DOI:
dc.referencesJurkane-Hobein, I. 2015. I imagine you here now. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Uppsalienis.en
dc.referencesKhayyek, F. 2000. Individualizm i ekonomicheskiy poryadok (Individualism and economical paradoxes).Tekst. Moskva: Izograf: Nachala-Fond.en
dc.referencesKlinenberg, E. 2016. Social Isolation, Loneliness, and Living Alone: Identifying the Risks for Public Health. American Journal of Public Health 106(5), pp. 786–787. DOI:
dc.referencesKlinenberg, E. 2018. Going solo: The Extraordinary Rise and Surprising Appeal of Living Alone. Moscow: ANF.en
dc.referencesKrapf, S. 2017. Movinginor Breaking Up? The Role of Distance in the Development of Romantic Relationships. European Journal of Population 34(3), pp. 313–336. DOI:
dc.referencesLyubimova Ye. 2018. Ponyatiye i analiz issledovaniy zhizni solo. XXI Ural’skiye sotsiologicheskiye chteniya. Sotsial’noye prostranstvo i vremya regiona: problemy ustoychivogo razvitiya: materialy Mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya (Yekaterinburg, 15–16.03.2018). Yekaterinburg: Gumanitarnyy universitet, pp. 294–297, (accessed 20.02.2021).en
dc.referencesMagun, V., Pudnev, M. 2011. Bazovyye tsennosti: skhodstva i razlichiya mezhdu rossiyanami i drugimi yevropeytsami,Магун,%20Руднев%20БАЗОВЫЕ%20ЦЕННОСТИ%20СХОДСТВА%20..ДРУГИМИ%20ЕВРОПЕЙЦАМИ%20_симпозиум_pdf (accessed 20.02.2021).en
dc.referencesMikulionienė, S., Rapolienė, G. 2019. Older people living alone: trends, profiles and challenges of intergenerational integration, (accessed 20.02.2021).en
dc.referencesMironova, A., Prokof’yeva, L. 2018. Sem’ya i domokhozyaystvo v Rossii: demograficheskiy aspekt. Demograficheskoye obozreniye 5(2), pp. 103–121.en
dc.referencesOECD. 2019. Social Policy Division – Directorate of Employment, Labour and Social Affairs. Living arrangements by age groups.en
dc.referencesOffice for national statistic. 2019. Families and Households in the UK – Office for National Statistics, (accessed 20.02.2021).en
dc.referencesOffice for national statistic. 2020. Families and Households in the UK – Office for National Statistics, (accessed 31.08.2020).en The Cost of Living Alone – Office for National Statistics, (accessed 31.08.2020).en
dc.referencesPanina, N. 2008. Izbrannyye trudy po sotsiologii: V trekh tomakh. Teoriya, metody i rezul’taty sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniya obraza zhizni, psikhologicheskogo sostoyaniya i sotsial’nogo samochuvstviya naseleniya. Kiev: FAKT.en
dc.referencesPiekut, M. 2020. Living Standardsin One-Person Households of the Elderly Population. Sustainability 12(3), p. 992, (accessed 20.02.2021).en
dc.referencesRobila, M. 2004. Families in Eastern Europe: Context, Trends and Variation S. Contemporary Perspectives in Family Research pp. 1–14. DOI:
dc.referencesSimmel, G. 1909. The Problem of Sociology. American Journal of Sociology 15(3), pp. 289–320, (accessed 20.02.2021).en
dc.referencesSmith, K., Victor, C. 2018. Typologies of loneliness, living alone and social isolation, and their associations with physical and mental health. Ageing and Society 39(8), pp. 1709–1730. DOI:
dc.referencesStatista. 2020a. Norway: Population by Type of Household 2020|Statista, (accessed 31.08.2020).en
dc.referencesStatista. 2020b. Single-Person Households United States 2019|Statista, (accessed 31.08.2020).en 2020. Living Solo — Unmarried Equality, (accessed 31.08.2020).en
dc.referencesVershinina, I. 2012. Sociology of the city by Richard Sennett: Transformation of the Public Sphere. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Sotsiologiya i politologiya – Journal of Moscow University. Sociology and Political Science 18(4), pp. 154–161, [in Russian] (accessed 20.02.2021).en
dc.referencesVictor, C., Scambler, S., Bond, J., Bowling, A. 2000. Being alone in later life: loneliness, social isolation and living alone. Reviews in Clinical Gerontology 10(4), pp. 407–417.en
dc.referencesWilkinson, K., Tomlinson, J., Gardiner, J. 2018. The perceived fairness of work-life balance policies: A UK case study of solo-living managers and professionals without children. Human Resource Management Journal 28(2), pp. 325–339.en
dc.referencesYashkina, D. 2020. Heuristic potential of emotional labor concepts, trust and public space in the study of solo-living. Ukrainian Society 1, pp. 41–51.en
dc.referencesYeung, W. 2020. Who Will Live Alone in China? One-Person Households in China, 2010 to 2050, (accessed 20.02.2021).en

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as