Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKumor, Michał
dc.contributor.authorPorada, Stanisław
dc.description.abstractThe construction of the North-South Gas Corridor, regional energy integration and international cooperation in the Visegrad Group (Poland, Hungary, Czech Republic and Slovakia) can be determinants for the creation of a common gas market for four Eastern Europe countries (V4). The starting point for this work is concerned with the technical possibilities, chances, threats and necessary steps for the development of the existing infrastructure. The import capacities of countries neighbouring the V4 territory and the internal gas transmission potential inside the indicated group of countries have been presented in this paper. Special attention was paid to the international possibilities of using underground gas storage. The V4 countries, in particular, were examined due to their location between the Russian Federation and Western European gas consumers, and due to the need to ensure the security of supply, volumes and directions of import and export for each from. The bringing online of the gas connection between Norway and Poland, along with the construction of the Croatian LNG terminal, and the establishment of a common gas market for deliveries inside V4 may significantly contribute to determining a new physical direction of the gas flow in this part of Europe.en
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEastern Reviewpl
dc.subjectgas marketen
dc.subjectnatural gasen
dc.subjectVisegrad Groupen
dc.titleA common gas market for Visegrad Group countriesen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationKumor, Michał - AGH University of Science and Technology, Cracow, Poland, Faculty of Energy and Fuelsen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationPorada, Stanisław - AGH University of Science and Technology, Cracow, Poland, Faculty of Energy and Fuelsen
dc.references160a href=""> (accessed 20.03.2020).en
dc.referencesBP Statistical Review of World Energy. 2018, (accessed 7.03.2020).en
dc.referencesBudowa gazociągu Polska-Słowacja oficjalnie rozpoczęta. 2019, (accessed 1.03.2020).en
dc.referencesEuropean Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas. 2020, (accessed 11.03.2020).en
dc.referencesFGSZ International Projects. 2020, (accessed 30.03.2020).en
dc.referencesGas Infrastructure Europe. 2020, (accessed 12.03.2020).en
dc.referencesGas Interconnection Poland-Lithuania (GIPL) Backbone of Regional Market Development, 2012, (accessed 1.03.2020).en
dc.referencesHudec, M. 2016. Development of the Visegrad Group in the Context of Efforts to Accelerate the Convergence Processes by Joining the European Union. Studia commercialia Bratislavensia 9/33(1), pp. 26–35.en
dc.referencesHungary & Slovakia to Boost Gas Interconnector Capacity. 2019, (accessed 30.03.2020).en
dc.referencesHungary, Slovakia sign MoU on gas interconnector expansion. 2020, (accessed 30.03.2020).en
dc.referencesJakstas, T. 2019. Creation of regional gas market in the Baltic States and Finland: Challenges and opportunities. BSR Policy Briefing series 8, p. 10.en
dc.referencesJirusek, M. 2020. The attitude of the Visegrad Group Countries towards Russian Infrastructural Projects in the gas sector. Energy Policy 139, pp. 1–10.en
dc.referencesKochanek, E. 2019. Regional cooperation on gas security in Central Europe. Polityka Energetyczna – Energy Policy Journal 22(1), pp. 19–38.en
dc.referencesOsicka, J., Lehotsky, L., Zapletalova, V., Cernoch, F., Dancak, B. 2018. Natural gas market integration in the Visegrad 4 region: An example tofollow or to avoid? Energy Policy 112, pp. 184–197.en
dc.referencesOTE Short-Term Markets, Rynek Dnia Następnego, (accessed 1.03.2020).en
dc.referencesPlatforma informatyczna GAZ-SYSTEM do zakupu przepustowości na połączeniach między systemami Polski i Niemiec. 2018, (accessed 12.02.2020).en
dc.referencesPOWERNEXT Spot Market Data,
dc.referencesCEEGEX Day Ahead (accessed 1.03.2020).en
dc.referencesProgram rozbudowy terminalu LNG. 2020, (accessed 30.03.2020).en
dc.referencesRuszel, M. 2015. Wpływ rosyjsko-ukraińskich kryzysów gazowych na politykę energetyczną UE – ujęcie teoretyczne. Przegląd Politologiczny 2, pp. 49–58.en
dc.referencesRuszel, M. 2017. Ocena bezpieczeństwa dostaw gazu ziemnego do Polski – stan obecny i perspektywa do 2025 r. Polityka Energetyczna 1, pp. 5–22.en
dc.referencesSchmidt, A. 2017. Friends forever? The Role of the Visegrad Group and European Integration. Politics in Central Europe 12(3), pp. 113–140.en
dc.referencesSkrzyński, M. 2020. The role of underground gas storage facilities in the continuous supply of natural gas to domestic recipients based on the example of the Visegrad Group. Polityka Energetyczna – Energy Policy Journal 23(3), pp. 21–40.en
dc.referencesSPP – distribúcia, Słowacki system dystrybucji gazu. 2020, (accessed 20.03.2020).en
dc.referencesTrubalska, J. 2016. Trans-european energy infrastructure projects. The case of the north-south gas corridor. Humanities and Social Science XXI/23(1), pp. 191–202.en
dc.referencesWyganowski, J. 2019. Jednolity (prawie) bałtycki rynek gazu. Energia Gigawat 2,,176913,2,jednolity-prawie-baltycki-rynek-gazu.html (accessed 20.03.2020).en
dc.referencesZajdler, R. 2014. Polski rynek hurtowy gazu ziemnego na tle rynków Unii Europejskiej. Warszawa: Robert Zajdler Kancelaria Radcy Prawnego.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailKumor, Michał -
dc.contributor.authorEmailPorada, Stanisław -

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as