Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Metakolaż. O kanonie myślenia metaforycznego

dc.contributor.authorRybarkiewicz, Dorota
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-06T10:14:30Z
dc.date.available2021-05-06T10:14:30Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationRybarkiewicz D., Metakolaż. O kanonie myślenia metaforycznego, WUŁ, Łódź 2018, https://doi.org/10.18778/8142-362-5pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn978-83-8142-362-5
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/35411
dc.description.abstractAutorka przybliża metakolaż, omawiając hybrydową koncepcję metafory oraz sposoby myślenia metaforycznego w filozofii, nauce czy ideologii. Wielowątkowy opis różnych metafor, pełniących funkcję modeli myślenia, ukazuje ich podobieństwo do szyby. Patrzymy przez nią, poznając świat, ale nie wiemy, czy jest ona całkiem przeźroczysta, porysowana, a może matowa lub mająca własne rysunki i barwy, które nakładają się na to, co usiłujemy przez nią zobaczyć. Metafory bowiem tworzą kategorie poznawcze, które stanowią źródło interpretacji napływających danych. Ta ich podwójna rola stawia nas wobec pytania o prawdziwość poznania opartego na tym mechanizmie oraz o zakres niepewności poznawczej, czyli tzw. manowców. Autorka podaje wiele przykładów dochodzenia do takich granic poznania i próbuje zgłębić zagadnienia dotyczące roli tego mechanizmu w myśleniu, również naukowym, jego wpływu na poznanie i ocenę jego wartości. Lektura publikacji pozwala nie tylko na teoretyczne zapoznanie się z metakolażem, lecz także, dzięki podjęciu własnych przemyśleń, może przyczynić się do udoskonalenia tego procesu poznawczego i do zwiększenia szans na lepszą interpretację zmiennej rzeczywistości.pl_PL
dc.language.isoplpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectmetakolażpl_PL
dc.subjectmetaforologiapl_PL
dc.subjectmetaforapl_PL
dc.subjectproces poznawczypl_PL
dc.subjectmyślenie metaforycznepl_PL
dc.titleMetakolaż. O kanonie myślenia metaforycznegopl_PL
dc.typeBookpl_PL
dc.page.number191pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniwersytet Łódzki, Wydział Filozoficzno-Historyczny, Instytut Filozofii, Katedra Logiki i Metodologii Naukpl_PL
dc.identifier.eisbn978-83-8142-363-2
dc.referencesAbbate J., 1994, Analogy is destiny: The role of metaphor in defining a new technology, MEPHISTOS conference, Cambridge, MA, February, (za: Wyatt, 2004), http://www. exeter.ac.uk/media/universityofexeter/internationalexeter/documents/iss/Wyatt_danger-metaphors_(3).pdf (dostęp 13.05.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesAddleson M., 1998, Language of Possessing and Participation: Traps, Tropes and Trapezes of Organizational Discourse, „Proceedings of the Conference Held at the Management Centre King’s College”, s. 1–42.pl_PL
dc.referencesAnderson M. L., 2003, Embodied Cognition: A Field Guide, „Artificial Intelligence”, 149(1), s. 91–130.pl_PL
dc.referencesArendt H., 1989, O myśleniu, Aletheia, Wydawnictwo Europa, Londyn, (tłum. H. Buczyńska-Garewicz).pl_PL
dc.referencesBailer-Jones D., 2001, Models, Metaphors, and Analogies, [w:] P. Machamer, M. Silberstein (red.), Guide to the Philosophy of Science, Oxford: Blacwell Publishers, s. 108–127.pl_PL
dc.referencesBailer-Jones D., 2009, Scientific Models in Philosophy of Science, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburg Press, http://digital.library.pitt.edu/cgi-bin/t/text/pageviewer-idx?c= pittpress;cc=pittpress;q1=2012;rgn1=citation;idno=31735062137009;rgn=works;- didno=31735062137009;view=image;seq=11;node=31735062137009%3A1;page= root;size=s;frm=frameset (dostęp 20.04.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesBalkin J. M., 2002, (1998), Cultural Software: A theory of Ideology, Yale University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBańka J., 2008, O dwuświatowej ontologii w „Enneadach” Plotyna, „Lingua ac Communitas”, s. 115–125, http://www.lingua.amu.edu.pl/Lingua_9/BANKA.pdf (dostęp 08.04.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesBarberousse A., Pascal L., 2009, Fictions and Models, [w:] M. Suárez (red.), Fictions in Science, Philosophical Essays on Modelling and Idealisation, London: Routledge, s. 56–75.pl_PL
dc.referencesBarnden J. A., Wallington A. M., 2010, Metaphor and its unparalleled meaning and truth, [w:] A. Burkhardt, B. Nerlich (red.), Tropical Truths: The Epistemology of Metaphor and Other Tropes, De Gruyter, Berlin, s. 85–121.pl_PL
dc.referencesBarnes B., Bloor D., 1993, Relatywizm, racjonalizm a socjologia wiedzy, (tłum. J. Niżnik), [w:] B. Barnes, D. Bloor, Mocny program socjologii wiedzy, Warszawa, Wydawnictwo IFIs PAN, s. 1–37.pl_PL
dc.referencesBarnes T. J., 1997, Theories of Accumulation and Regulation: Bringing Life Back into Economic Geography Introduction to Section Three, [w:] Wills J., Lee R. (red.), Geographies of Economies, London: Arnold, s. 231–248.pl_PL
dc.referencesBarsalou L. W., 1999, Perceptual symbol systems, „Behavioral and Brain Sciences”, 22, s. 577–666.pl_PL
dc.referencesBarsalou L. W., 2008, Grounded cognition, „Annual Review of Psychology”, 59, s. 617–645.pl_PL
dc.referencesBateman J., Hois J., Ross R., Tenbrink T., 2010, A Linguistic Ontology of Space for Natural Language Processing, „Artificial Intelligence”, 17(14), s. 1027–1071.pl_PL
dc.referencesBayram F., 2010, Ideology and Political Discourse: a Critical Discourse Analysis of Erdogan’s Political Speech, „Annual Review of Education, Communication and Language Sciences”, 7, s. 23–40.pl_PL
dc.referencesBeardsley M. C., 1958, Aesthetics, Harcourt, Brace & Co., New York.pl_PL
dc.referencesBeardsley M. C., 1962, The metaphorical twist, „Philosophy and Phenomenological Research”, 22(3), s. 293–307, DOI: 10.2307/2104415.pl_PL
dc.referencesBehe M., 1996, Darwin’s Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution, New York: Touchstone.pl_PL
dc.referencesBell D., 1960, The End of Ideology: On the Exhaustion of Political Ideas in the Fifties, Glencoe, IL: Free Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBen-Jacob E., Becker I., Shapira Y., Levine H., 2004, Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence, „Trends Microbiol” 12(8), s. 366–372.pl_PL
dc.referencesBerdayes V., Esposito L., Murphy J. W., 2004, The Body in Human Inquiry: Interdisciplinary Explorations of Embodiment, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press Inc.pl_PL
dc.referencesBergmann M., 1982, Metaphorical Assertions, „The Philosophical Review”, 91(2), s. 229–245.pl_PL
dc.referencesBhushan B., 2012, Biomimetics Bioinspired Hierarchical-Structured Surfaces for Green Science and Technology, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.pl_PL
dc.referencesBlack M., 1962a, Metaphor, [w:] A. Ortony (red.), Models and Metaphors, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, s. 25–47.pl_PL
dc.referencesBlack M., 1962b, Models and Archetypes, [w:] A. Ortony (red.), Models and Metaphors, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, s. 219–243.pl_PL
dc.referencesBlack M., 1979, More about Metaphor, [w:] A. Ortony (red.), Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press, s. 19–41.pl_PL
dc.referencesBlackburn S., 1984, Spreading the Word: Groundings in the Philosophy of Language, Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBloor D., 1993, Wittgenstein i Mannheim o socjologii matematyki, (tłum. W. Szydłowska, Z. Jankiewicz), [w:] Silny program socjologii wiedzy, Wyd. IFiS PAN, Warszawa.pl_PL
dc.referencesBlumenberg H., 2010, Paradigms for a Metaphorology, Cornell University Press: Ithaca, New York, s. 178; (tłumacz. z niemieckiego Robert Savage), oryginał niemiecki: 1960, Paradigmen zu einer Metaphorologie, Suhrkamp Verlag Frankfurt am Main.pl_PL
dc.referencesBoers F., 1999, When a Bodily Source Domain Becomes Prominent: the Joy of Counting Metaphors in the Socio-Economic Domain, [w:] R. W. Gibbs, G. Steen (red.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics, John Benjamins, Amsterdam and Philadelphia, s. 47–56.pl_PL
dc.referencesBohm D., 1988, Ukryty porządek, Pusty Obłok, Warszawa.pl_PL
dc.referencesBohm D., Hiley B., 1993, The Undivided Universe: An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Theory, Routledge, London.pl_PL
dc.referencesBorbely A. F., 2008, Metaphor and Psychotherapy, [w:]: R. W. Jr. Gibbs (red.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press, New York, s. 412–424.pl_PL
dc.referencesBoroditsky L., 2000, Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors, „Cognition”, 75(1), s. 1–28.pl_PL
dc.referencesBoroditsky L., 2001, Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time, „Cognitive Psychology”, 43(1), s. 1–22.pl_PL
dc.referencesBoroditsky L., Ramscar M., 2002, The Roles of Body and Mind in Abstract Thought, „Psychological Science”, 13(2), s. 185–189.pl_PL
dc.referencesBowdle B., Gentner D., 1997, Informativity and asymmetry in comparisons, „Cognitive Psychology”, 34(3), s. 244–286.pl_PL
dc.referencesBowdle B., Gentner D., 2005, The Career of Metaphor, „Psychological Review”, 112(1), s. 193–216, http://groups.psych.northwestern.edu/gentner/papers/BowdleGentner05.pdf (dostęp 23.06.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesBraithwaite R., 1954, The Nature of Theoretical Concepts and the Role of Models in an Advanced Science, „Revue Internationale de Philosophie”, 8(1/2), s. 34–40.pl_PL
dc.referencesBrandl M. S., Metaphor(m) and Foundational Metaphors in Vincent van Gogh, http://www.metaphorandart.com/articles/vangoghmet.html (dostęp 08.06.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesBreakwell G. M., 2001, Mental models and social representations of hazards: The significance of identity processes, „Journal of Risk Research”, 4, s. 341–351.pl_PL
dc.referencesBronk R., 2009, The Romantic Economist: Imagination in Economics, Cambridge University Press, New York, zob. także Richard Bronk, Cover Interview of May 22, 2009, http://rorotoko.com/interview/20090522_bronk_richard_romantic_economist_imagination_economics/?page=4 (dostęp 12.04.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesBrown T. L., 2003a, Making Truth: Metaphor in Science, Chicago: University of Illinois Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBunge M., 1973, Philosophy of Physics, Dordrecht: Reidel, s. 126.pl_PL
dc.referencesBurkhardt A., 1990, Speech Acts, Meaning, and Intentions: Critical Approaches to the Philosophy of John Searle, Berlin and New York: W. de Gruyter.pl_PL
dc.referencesBushe G. R., 2013, Generative process, generative outcome: The transformational potential of appreciative inquiry, [w:] D. L. Cooperrider, D. P. Zandee, L. N. Godwin, M. Avital, B. Boland (red.), Organizational Generativity: The Appreciative Inquiry Summit and a Scholarship of Transformation (Advances in Appreciative Inquiry, vol. 4, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, s. 89–113.pl_PL
dc.referencesBushman B. J., 2002, Does venting anger feed or extinguish the flame? Catharsis, rumination, distraction, anger and aggressive responding, „Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin”, 28(6), s. 724–731.pl_PL
dc.referencesCalbris G., 1990, The Semiotics of French Gestures, Bloomington, IN: IU Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesCalbris G., 2003, L’expression gestuelle de la homme politique, Paris: CNRS Éditions, Collection CNRS pensée d’un Communication.pl_PL
dc.referencesCalbris G., Porcher L., 1989, Geste et communication, Paris: Hatier-Crédif.pl_PL
dc.referencesCaldwell J., Caldwell P., 1987, The Cultural Context of High Fertility in sub-Saharan Africa, „Population and Development Review” 13(3), s. 409–437.pl_PL
dc.referencesCaldwell J., Caldwell P., Quiggin P., 1989, The Social Context of AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa, „Population and Development Review”, 17, s. 185–234.pl_PL
dc.referencesCarnap R., 1938, Foundations of Logic and Mathematics, [w:] O. Neurath, C. Morris and R. Carnap (red.), International Encyclopaedia of Unified Science, vol. 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, s. 139–213.pl_PL
dc.referencesCasasanto D., 2007, Space for Thinking, [w:] Vyvyan Evans, Paul Chilton (red.), Language, Cognition and Space: the state of the art and new directions, Equinox Publishing, London.pl_PL
dc.referencesCharteris-Black J., 2005, (2011) Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor, London, Palgrave Macmillan.pl_PL
dc.referencesCharteris-Black J., 2004, Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.pl_PL
dc.referencesChase W. G., Simon H. A., 1973, Perception in chess, „Cognitive Psychology”, 4, s. 55–81.pl_PL
dc.referencesChilton P., Lakoff G., 1995, Foreign policy by metaphor, [w:] C. Schäffner, A. Wenden (red.), Language and Peace, Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers, s. 37–60.pl_PL
dc.referencesChlewiński Z., 1999, Umysł. Dynamiczna organizacja pojęć, Biblioteka Psychologii Współczesnej, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.pl_PL
dc.referencesChomsky N., 2011, Semantics. An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, oprac. Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger, Paul Portner, Walter de Gruyter, s. 466.pl_PL
dc.referencesCienki A., 1997, Motion in the metaphorical spaces of morality and reasoning as expressed in language and gesture, „International Journal of Communication”, 7, s. 85–98.pl_PL
dc.referencesCienki A., 1998, Metaphoric gestures and some of their relations to verbal metaphorical expressions, [w:] J. P. Koenig (red.), Discourse and Cognition: Bridging the Gap Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information, s. 189–204.pl_PL
dc.referencesCienki A., Müller C., 2008, Metaphor, gesture and thought, [w:] R. W. Gibbs Jr. (red.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press, s. 483–501.pl_PL
dc.referencesClark H. H., 1973, Space, time, semantics, and the child, [w:] T. E. Moore (red.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language, New York: Academic Press, s. 27–83, (za: Boroditsky, 2000).pl_PL
dc.referencesClark A., 2008, Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension, New York: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesCohen J., 1967, Psychological time in health and disease, Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.pl_PL
dc.referencesContessa G., 2010, Scientific models and fictional objects, „Synthese”, 172(2), s. 215–229, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9503-2.pl_PL
dc.referencesCooke N., 1999, Knowledge elicitation, [w:] F. T. Durso, R. S. Nickerson, S. T. Dumais, S. Lewandowsky, T. J. Perfect (red.), Handbook of applied cognition, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, s. 479–509.pl_PL
dc.referencesCoulehan J., 2003, Metaphor and Medicine: Narrative in Clinical Practice, „Humanities and Medicine, Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 76, s. 87–95.pl_PL
dc.referencesCowart M., Embodied Cognition, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://www.iep. utm.edu/embodcog/ (dostęp 14.02.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesCraik K. J. W., 1943, The nature of explanation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.pl_PL
dc.referencesCsordas T., 1994, Embodiment and Experience. The existential ground for culture and self, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesDamasio A. R., 1999, The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness, New York: Harcourt Brace & Co.pl_PL
dc.referencesDamasio A. R., 2003, Looking for Spinoza: Joy, sorrow, and the feeling brain, New York: Hartcourt, Inc.pl_PL
dc.referencesDanblon E., 2010, Persuasion: between trope and truth, [w:] A. Burkhardt, B. Nerlich, Tropical Truth(s): The Epistemology of Metaphor and Other Tropes, s. 73–84.pl_PL
dc.referencesDavidson D., 1978, What Metaphors Mean, On Metaphor, Sacks, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, s. 29–45.pl_PL
dc.referencesDavidson D., 1992, Eseje o prawdzie, języku i umyśle, PWN, Warszawa.pl_PL
dc.referencesDawkins R., 2012, The Selfish Gene, Oxford University Press, Samolubny gen, (tłum. M. Skoneczny), Prószyński i Spółka.pl_PL
dc.referencesDeacon T. W., 2012, Incomplete Nature: How Mind Emerged from Matter, Norton & Company, New York, London.pl_PL
dc.referencesDeLong A. J., 1981, Phenomenological space-time toward an experimental relativity, „Science”, 213, s. 681–681.pl_PL
dc.referencesDerrida J., 1986, Biała mitologia: metafora w tekście filozoficznym, „Pamiętnik Literacki”, 77/3, s. 283–318, (tłum. W. Krzemień, według: J. Derrida, Marges de la philosophie, Paris, 1972, s. 247–324), http://bazhum.muzhp.pl/media//files/ (dostęp 07.03.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesDe Vreese C., 2005, News framing: Theory and typology, „Information and Design Journal”, 13, s. 51–62.pl_PL
dc.referencesDeYoung D. B., Hobbs D., 2009, Discovery of Design: Searching Out the Creator’s Secrets, New Leaf Publishing Group.pl_PL
dc.referencesDirven R., Frank R., (red.), 2001, Language and Ideology, vol. II: Descriptive Cognitive Approaches, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesDove J. E., Everett L. A., Preece P. F., 1999, Exploring a hydrological concept through children’s drawings, „International Journal of Science Education”, 21, s. 485–497.pl_PL
dc.referencesEagleton T., 1991, Ideology. An Introduction, London–New York: Verso.pl_PL
dc.referencesEfland A. D., 2002, Art and cognition: integrating the visual arts in the curriculum, New York: Teachers College Press, (za: D. Serig).pl_PL
dc.referencesEliasmith C., 2010, How We Ought to Describe Computation in the Brain, „Studies in History and Philosophy of Science”, 41, s. 313–320.pl_PL
dc.referencesEvans V., 2004, The structure of time: Language, meaning and temporal cognition, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesFairclough N., 1989, Language and Power, London: Longman.pl_PL
dc.referencesFairclough N., 1992, Discourse and Social Change, Cambridge: Polity Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesFauconnier G., Turner M., 1998, Conceptual integration networks, „Cognitive Science”, 22(2), s. 133–187.pl_PL
dc.referencesFauconnier G., Turner M., 2002, The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities, New York: Basic Books.pl_PL
dc.referencesFeldman J. A., 2006, From Molecule to Metaphor: A Neural Theory of Language, A Bradford Book The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London.pl_PL
dc.referencesFeser E., (red.), 2013, Aristotle on Method and Metaphysics, Palgrave Macmillan, London, New York.pl_PL
dc.referencesFillmore C., 1976, Topics in lexical semantics, [w:] P. Cole (red.), Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, s. 76–138.pl_PL
dc.referencesFillmore C., 1982a, Frame semantics, [w:] Linguistic Society of Korea, Linguistics in the Morning Calm, Seoul: Hashin, s. 111–138.pl_PL
dc.referencesFillmore C., 1982b, Towards a descriptive framework for spatial deixis, [w:] R. J. Jarvell, W. Klein (red.), Speech, Place and Action: Studies in Deixis and Related Topics, London: Wiley, s. 31–59.pl_PL
dc.referencesFillmore C., 1985, Frames and the semantics of understanding, „Quaderni Di Semantica”, 6, s. 222–254.pl_PL
dc.referencesFine A., 1993, Fictionalism, „Midwest Studies in Philosophy”, 18, s. 1–18, http://faculty. washington.edu/afine/Fictionalism.pdf (dostęp 06.04.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesFlusberg S. J., Matlock T., Thibodeau P. H., 2017, Metaphors for the War (or Race) against Climate Change, „Environmental Communication”, 11(6), s. 769–783, https://doi.org/ 10.1080/17524032.2017.1289111 (dostęp 25.06.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesFojt T., 2009, The Construction of ScientiKnowledge through Metaphor, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika, Toruń.pl_PL
dc.referencesForceville C., Urios-Aparisi E., 2009, Multimodal Metaphor, Walter de Gruyer.pl_PL
dc.referencesForster M., 2004, Theories, Models and Curves, http://philosophy.wisc.edu/forster/520/ Chapter%202.pdf (dostęp 15.02.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesFowler R., 1987, The Intervention of the Media in the Reproduction of Power, [w:] I. M. Zavala, T. A. Van Dijk, M. Diaz-Diocaretz, (red.), Approaches to discourse, poetics and psychiatry, Amsterdam: Benjamins, s. 67–80.pl_PL
dc.referencesFrigg R., 2010a, Fiction in Science, [w:] John Woods (red.), Fictions and Models: New Essays, Munich: Philosophia Verlag, s. 247–287.pl_PL
dc.referencesFrigg R., 2010b, Models and Fiction, „Synthese”, 172(2), s. 251–268.pl_PL
dc.referencesFrigg R., Hartmann S., 2012, Models in Science, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/models- science/#OntWhaMod (dostęp 11.03.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesGallistel C. R., 1993, The organization of learning, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesGay W. C., 1992, Ricoeur on Metaphor and Ideology, „Darshana International”, 32(1), s. 59–70, http://www.philosophy.uncc.edu/wcgay/pubricoeur.htm (dostęp 21.04.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesGeeraerts D., Grondelaers S., 1995, Looking back at anger: Cultural traditions and metaphorical patterns, [w:] J. R. Taylor, R. E. MacLaury (red.), Language and the Cognitive Construal of the World, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, s. 153–179 (za: Kövecses, 2010, s. 171).pl_PL
dc.referencesGeertz C., 2005, Ideologia jako system kulturowy, Interpretacja kultur, (tłum. M. M. Piechaczek), Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, s. 225–267.pl_PL
dc.referencesGentner D., 2002, Psychology of Mental models, [w:] N. J. Smelser, P. B. Bates (red.), International encyclopedia of social and behavioral sciences, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, s. 9683–9687.pl_PL
dc.referencesGentner D., Gentner D. R., 1983, Flowing waters or teeming crowds: Mental models of electricity, [w:] D. Gentner, A. L. Stevens (red.), Mental models, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, s. 99–129.pl_PL
dc.referencesGentner D., Bowdle B. F., Wolff P., Borobat C., 2001, Metaphor is like analogy, [w:] D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, B. K. Kokinov (red.), Perspectives from cognitive science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, s. 199–254.pl_PL
dc.referencesGevaert C., 2001, Anger in Old and Middle English: a ‘hot’ topic? „Belgian Essays on Language and Literature”, s. 9–101 (za: Kövecses, 1995).pl_PL
dc.referencesGevaert C., 2005, The ANGER IS HEAT question: Detecting cultural influence, [w:] N. Deelbecque, J. van der Auwera, D. Geeraerts (red.), Perspectives on variation: Sociolinguistic, historical, comparative, Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, s. 195–208.pl_PL
dc.referencesGibbs R. W. Jr., 1992, Categorization and metaphor understanding, „Psychological Review”, 99(3), s. 572–577.pl_PL
dc.referencesGibbs R. W. Jr., 1994a, The poetics of mind: figurative thought, language and understanding, Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesGibbs R. W. Jr., 1994b, Figurative thought and figurative language, [w:] M. Gernsbacher (red.), Handbook of psycholinguistics, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, s. 411–446.pl_PL
dc.referencesGibbs R. W. Jr., 1996, Why many concepts are metaphorical, „Cognition”, s. 61, 309–319, http://psychology.illinoisstate.edu/jccutti/psych480_24/readings/gibbs1996.pdf (dostęp 23.06.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesGibbs R. W. Jr., 1999, Taking metaphor out of our heads and putting it into the cultural world, [w:] R. W. Gibbs Jr., G. J. Steen (red.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics, Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, s. 145–166.pl_PL
dc.referencesGibbs R. W. Jr., 2006, Embodiment and Cognitive Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesGibbs R. W. Jr., 2008, The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press, s. 474.pl_PL
dc.referencesGibbs R. W. Jr., 2011, Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory, „Discourse Processes”, 48(8), s. 529–562.pl_PL
dc.referencesGibbs R. W. Jr., Colston H., 1995, The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations, „Cognitive Linguistics”, 6, s. 347–378.pl_PL
dc.referencesGiere R. N., 1988, Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach, Science and Its Conceptual Foundations series, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, s. 78–86.pl_PL
dc.referencesGiere R. N., 2006, Scientific Perspectivism, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesGierulanka D., 1962, Zagadnienie swoistości poznania matematycznego, PWN, Warszawa.pl_PL
dc.referencesGillespie N. C., 1990, Divine Design and the Industrial Revolution: William Paley’s Abortive Reform of Natural Theology, „Isis”, 81, s. 214–229 (za: Recker).pl_PL
dc.referencesGlenberg A. M., Robertson D. A., 2000, Symbol grounding and meaning, A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning, „Journal of Memory and Language”, 43, s. 379–401.pl_PL
dc.referencesGlennan S., 2000, A Model of Models, http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/1134/1/Models1.4. pdf? (dostęp 18.02.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesGlicksohn J., 2001, Temporal Cognition and the Phenomenology of Time: A Multiplicative Function for Apparent Duration, „Consciousness and Cognition”, 10(1), s. 1–25.pl_PL
dc.referencesGlucksberg S., 2001, Understanding Figurative Language: from Metaphors to Idioms, New York: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesGlucksberg S., Haught C., 2006a, Can Florida become like the next Florida? When metaphoric comparisons fail, „Psychological Science”, 17, s. 935–938.pl_PL
dc.referencesGlucksberg S., Haught C., 2006b, On the relation between metaphor and simile: When comparison fails, Mind and Language, 21(3), s. 360–378.pl_PL
dc.referencesGlucksberg S., Keysar B., 1990, Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity, „Psychological Review”, 97, s. 3–18.pl_PL
dc.referencesGoatly A., 2007, Washing Brain: Metaphor and Hidden Ideology, Amsterdam, Philadelphia, John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesGobet F., Clarkson G., 2004, Chunks in expert memory: Evidence for the magical number four… or is it two?, „Memory”, 12, s. 732–747.pl_PL
dc.referencesGodfrey-Smith P., 2006, The Strategy of Model-based Science, „Biology and Philosophy”, 21, s. 725–740.pl_PL
dc.referencesGodfrey-Smith P., 2009, Models and Fictions in Science, „Philosophical Studies”, 143, s. 101–116.pl_PL
dc.referencesGold B., 2001, ‘Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being’, http://www.maa.org/reviews/wheremath.html (dostęp 04.05.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesGoodman N., 1976, Languages of Art: An Approach to A theory of Symbols, (2 wydanie) Indianopolis: Hackett Publishing Company.pl_PL
dc.referencesGould S. J., Vrba E. S., 1982, Exaptation-A Missing Term in the Science of Form, „Paleobiology”, 8(1), s. 4–15, http://www2.hawaii.edu/~khayes/Journal_Club/ fall2006/Gould_&_Vrb_1982_Paleobio.pdf (dostęp 05.04.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesGrady J., 1997a, Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes, University of California at Berkeley (unpublished doctoral dissertation).pl_PL
dc.referencesGrady J., 1997b, THEORIES ARE BUILDINGS revisited, „Cognitive Linguistics”, 8(4), s. 267– 290, DOI:10.1515/cogl.1997.8.4.267.pl_PL
dc.referencesGrady J., 1999, A typology for conceptual metaphor: Correlation vs. resemblance, [w:] R. W. Gibbs, G. Steen (red.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins, s. 79–100.pl_PL
dc.referencesGrady J., 2005, Primary metaphors as inputs to conceptual integration, „Journal of Pragmatics”, 37, s. 1595–1614, DOI:10.1016/j.pragma.2004.03.012.pl_PL
dc.referencesGrice P., 1975, Logic and conversation, [w:] P. Cole, J. L. Morgan (red.), Syntax and semantics, 5(3), New York: Academic Press, s. 41–58; (tłumaczenie polskie: Logika i konwersacja, 1977, „Przegląd Humanistyczny”, 6, s. 85–99 oraz 1980, [w:] B. Stanosz (red.), Język w świetle nauki, Czytelnik, Warszawa, s. 91–114), http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ ls/studypacks/Grice-Logic.pdf (dostęp 28.06.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesGriesemer J., 1990, Modeling in the Museum: On the Role of Remnant Models, „Biology and Philosophy”, 5, s. 3–36.pl_PL
dc.referencesGroseclose T., Milyo J., 2005, A Measure of Media Bias, „The Quaterly Journal of Ecnomics”, 120(4), s. 1191–1237.pl_PL
dc.referencesGruber J., 1965, Studies in Lexical Relations, MIT, Cambridge.pl_PL
dc.referencesHaglund J., 2013, Collaborative and self-generated analogies in science education, „Studies in Science Education”, 49(1), s. 35–68, DOI: 10.1080/03057267.2013.801119 http:// www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:621708/FULLTEXT01.pdf (dostęp 13.06. 18).pl_PL
dc.referencesHall R. I., Aitchison P. W., Kocay W. L., 1994, Causal policy maps of managers: formal methods for elicitation and analysis, „Systems Dynamics Review”, 10, s. 337–360.pl_PL
dc.referencesHawk O., Johnsrude J., Pulvermüller F., 2004, Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex, „Neuron”, 41(2), s. 301–307.pl_PL
dc.referencesHawking S., Mlodinow L., 2010, The Grand Design, New York: Bantam Books.pl_PL
dc.referencesHedblom M. M., Kutz O., Neuhaus F., 2016, Image schemas in computational conceptual blending, „Cognitive Systems Research”, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys (dostęp 12.01.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesHefferman P., 1976, Jobs for the Environment: The Coming Green Collar Revolution, [w:] Jobs and Prices in the West Coast Region: Hearing before the Joint Economic Committee, Congress of the United States.pl_PL
dc.referencesHeisenberg W., 1970, Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science, Harper & Row, Fizyka a filozofia, (tłum. S. Amsterdamski), http://filozofiauw.wdfiles.com/ local--files/teksty-zrodlowe/Heisenberg%20W.%20C%20-%20Fizyka%20a%20filozofia. pdf (dostęp 02.03.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesHellingwerf K. J., 2005, Bacterial observations: a rudimentary form of intelligence? „Trends Microbiol”, 13(4), s. 152–158.pl_PL
dc.referencesHelmreich S., 2011, What is Life? Answers from Three Limit Biologies, Critical „Inquiry”, 37, University of Chicago, s. 671– 696.pl_PL
dc.referencesHempel C. G., 1965, Aspects of Scientific Explanation and other Essays in the Philosophy of Science, New York: Free Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesHenderson D. W., 2002, Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being, „The Mathematical Intelligencer”, 24(1), s. 75–76.pl_PL
dc.referencesHenderson W., 1982, Metaphor in economics, „Economics”, 18, s. 147–157.pl_PL
dc.referencesHesse M. B., 1953, Models in Physics, „British Journal for the Philosophy of Science”, 4, s. 198–214.pl_PL
dc.referencesHesse M. B., 1966, Models and Analogies in Science, Notre Dame, Ind. University of Notre Dame Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesHeßler M., 2006, (red.), Konstruierte Sichtbarkeiten. Wissenschafts und Technikbilder seit der Frühen Neuzeit, Verlagsort: München.pl_PL
dc.referencesHiggins E. T., 1996, Knowledge Activation: Accessibility, Applicability, and Salience, [w:] E. T. Higgins, A. Kruglansky (red.), Social Psychology: Handbook of basic principles, New York: Guilford Presss, s. 133–168.pl_PL
dc.referencesHimma K. E., 2005, The Application-Conditions for Design Inferences: Why the Design Arguments Need the Help of Other Arguments for God’s Existence, „International Journal for Philosophy of Religion”, 57, s. 1–33 (za: Recker).pl_PL
dc.referencesHinman L. M., 1982, Nietzsche, Metaphor, and Truth, „Philosophy and Phenomenological Research”, 43(2), s. 179–199.pl_PL
dc.referencesHintzman D. L., 1986, Schema Abstraction’ in a Multiple-Trace Memory Model, „Psychological Review”, 93, s. 328–338.pl_PL
dc.referencesHiraga M., 1991, Metaphors Japanese women live by, „Working Papers on Language, Gender and Sexism” 1(1), s. 38–57, (AILA Commission on Language and Gender).pl_PL
dc.referencesHodgkinson G. P., Maule A. J., Brown N., 2004, Causal cognitive mapping in the organizational strategy field: A comparison of alternative elicitation procedures, „Organizational Research Methods”, 7, s. 3–26.pl_PL
dc.referencesHofstadter D. R., 2001, Epilogue: Analogy as the Core of Cognition, [w:] D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, B. K. Kokinov (red.), The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science, s. 499–539.pl_PL
dc.referencesHofstadter D. R., 2013, The nature of categories and concepts, Stanford Symbolic Systems Distinguished Speaker Lecture (opublikowany 07.03.2014), https://www.youtube. com/watch?v=Kr3QDMkMGmQ&list=RDKr3QDMkMGmQ#t=4341 (dostęp 21.06.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesHolyoak K. J., Thagard P., 1995, Mental Leaps, Analogy in Creative Thought. A Bradford Book, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England.pl_PL
dc.referencesHorgan J., 1999, Koniec nauki, czyli o granicach wiedzy schyłku ery naukowej, Prószyński i S-ka, Warszawa.pl_PL
dc.referencesHumphreys P., 2002, Computational Models, „Philosophy of Science”, 69, s. 1–11.pl_PL
dc.referencesHutcheon P. D., 2012, A Critique of ‘Biology as Ideology: The Doctrine of DNA’ http://www. humanists.net/pdhutcheon/humanist%20articles/lewontn.htm (dostęp 08.06.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesJames W., 1890, Principles of Psychology, vol. I, London: Macmillan.pl_PL
dc.referencesJames W., 1974, Pragmatism and Four Essays from The Meaning of Truth, New American Library, New York, reprint: Pragmatism (1907) oraz The Meaning of Truth (1909); (tłum. W. N. Kozłowski), Pragmatyzm. Kraków, vis-a-vis/Etiuda, 2016, Znaczenie prawdy, (tłum. Michał Szczubiałka), Warszawa: KR, 2000.pl_PL
dc.referencesJohanson M., Papafragou A., 2014, What does children’s spatial language reveal about spatial concepts? Evidence from the use of containment expressions, „Cognitive Science”, 38(5), s. 881–910.pl_PL
dc.referencesJohnson M., 1987, The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesJohnson M., 2007, The meaning of the body: Aesthetics of human understanding, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesJohnson P. E., 1991, Darwin on Trial, Washington DC: Regnery Gateway Publishing Company, 1991, http://www.maxddl.org/Creation/Darwin%20On%20Trial.pdf (dostęp 14.05.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesJohnson-Laird P. N., 2004, The history of mental models, [w:] K. Manktelow, M. C. Chun (red.), Psychology of Reasoning: Theoretical and Historical Perspectives, New York: Psychology Press, s. 179–212. http://mentalmodels.princeton.edu/papers/2005HistoryMentalModels. pdf (2005) (dostęp 15.06.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesJohnson-Laird P. N., 2005, Mental models in thought, [w:] K. Holyoak, R. J. Sternberg (red.), The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, s. 179–212.pl_PL
dc.referencesJohnson-Laird P. N., 2010, Mental models and human reasoning, www.pnas.org/cgi/ doi/10.1073/pnas.1012933107 (dostęp 14.02.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesJones N. A., Ross H., Lynam T., Perez P., Leitch A., 2011, Mental Models: An Interdisciplinary Synthesis of Theory and Method, „Ecology and Society”, 16(1), art. 46, http:// www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art46/ (dostęp 13.05.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesKampis G., 1991, Self-modifying systems in biology and cognitive science. A New Framework for Dynamics, Information and Complexity, Pergamon Press, Oxford (za: Marques i Brito, s. 81).pl_PL
dc.referencesKauffman S. A., 2000, Investigations, Oxford University Press, Oxford.pl_PL
dc.referencesKeller E. F., 1995, Refiguring Life: Metaphors of Twentieth century Biology, Columbia University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesKelley R. E., 1985, The Gold-Collar Worker: Harnessing the Brainpower of the New Work Force, Reading, MASS: Addison-Wesley.pl_PL
dc.referencesKelling G., 1991, Crime and Metaphor: Towards a New Concept of Policing, „City Journal” 1, www.city-journal.org/html/issue1 (dostęp 08.05.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesKendall J. E., Kendall K. E., 1993, Metaphors and Methodologies: Living Beyond The System Machine, „MIS (Management Information System) Quarterly”, 17(2), s. 149–171.pl_PL
dc.referencesKintsch W., 2000, Metaphor comprehension: A computational theory, „Psychonomic Bulletin & Review”, 7, s. 257–266.pl_PL
dc.referencesKittay E. F., Lehrer, A., 1981, Semantic fields and the structure of metaphor, „Studies in Language”, 5, 31–63, DOI: 10.1075/sl.5.1.03kit.pl_PL
dc.referencesKlamer A., Leonard T. C., 1994, So what’s an economic metaphor?, [w:] P. Mirowski (red.), Natural Images in Economic Thought: Markets Read in Tooth and Claw, Cambridge University Press, s. 20–52, https://www.princeton.edu/~tleonard/papers/metaphor. pdf (dostęp 06.04.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesKleider H. M., Pezdek K., Goldinger S. D., Kirk A., 2008, Schema-driven source misattribution errors: Remembering the expected from a witnessed event, „Applied Cognitive Psychology”, 22(1), s. 1–20, DOI:10.1002/acp.1361.pl_PL
dc.referencesKlein G., 1998, Sources of Power, How People Make Decisions, MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesKnuuttila T., Loettgers A., 2012, The productive tension, [w:] P. Humphreys, C. Imbert, (red.), Models, Simulations and Representations, London: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesKnuuttila T., 2009, Isolating Representations vs. Credible Constructions?, „Erkenntnis”, 70, s. 59–80.pl_PL
dc.referencesKnuuttila T., 2011, Modelling and Representing, „Studies in History and Philosophy of Science”, 42, s. 262–271.pl_PL
dc.referencesKoestler A., 1964, The Act of Creation, London: Hutchinson & Co. (przedruk: Penguin Books: Arcana, 1989).pl_PL
dc.referencesKoller V., 2004, Metaphor and Gender in Business Media Discourse: A Critical Cognitive Study, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.pl_PL
dc.referencesKövecses Z., 1995, Anger: Its language, conceptualization, and physiology in the light of cross-cultural evidence, [w:] J. R. Taylor, R. E. MacLaury (red.), Language and the Cognitive Construal of the World, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, s. 79–92.pl_PL
dc.referencesKövecses Z., 2000, Metaphor and Emotion, Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesKövecses Z., 2005, Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation, New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesKövesces Z., 2006, Language, Mind and Culture, Oxford, Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesKrąpiec M. A., 1993, Teoria analogii bytu, Dzieła, t. I, Lublin, s. 315.pl_PL
dc.referencesKuhn T., 1979, Metaphor in Science, [w:] A. Ortony (red.), Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Presss, s. 409–419.pl_PL
dc.referencesKuhn W., 2002, Modeling the semantics of geographic categories through conceptual integration, International Conference on Geographic Information Science, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, s. 108–118.pl_PL
dc.referencesKuhn W., 2007, An Image-Schematic Account of Spacial Categories, [w:] S. Winter, M. Duckham, L. Kulik, B. Kuipers (red.), Spatial Information Theory, vol. 4736, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Berlin: Springer, s. 152–168.pl_PL
dc.referencesKuorikoski J., Lehtinen A., Marchionni C., 2010, Economic modelling as robustness analysis, „British Journal for the Philosophy of Science”, 61, s. 541–567.pl_PL
dc.referencesKuypers J. A., 1997, Agenda-setting, Agenda-Extension, and Framing Analysis, [w:] J. A. Kuypers, Presidential Crisis Rhetoric and the Press in the Post-cold War World, Greenwood Publishing Group.pl_PL
dc.referencesKuypers J. A., 2006, Bush’s War: Media Bias and Justifications for War in a Terrorist Age, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.pl_PL
dc.referencesLakoff G., 1987, Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind, Chicago: Chicago University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLakoff G., 1990, The Invariance Hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schema?, „Cognitive Linguistics”, 1(1), s. 39–74, https://georgelakoff.files.wordpress. com/2014/11/invariance-hypothesis-lakoff-1990.pdf (dostęp 23.06.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesLakoff G., 1990, The Invariance Hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas?, „Cognitive Linguistics”, 1(1), s. 39–74.pl_PL
dc.referencesLakoff G., 1993, The contemporary theory of metaphor, [w:] A. Ortony (red.), Metaphor and thought (wydanie drugie), Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, s. 202–215.pl_PL
dc.referencesLakoff G., 1993, The contemporary theory of metaphor, [w:] A. Ortony (red.), Metaphor and Thought (wydanie drugie), Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, s. 202–251.pl_PL
dc.referencesLakoff G., 1995, Metaphor, Morality, and Politics, Or, Why Conservatives Have Left Liberals in the Dust, „Social Research”, 62(2), s. 177–214.pl_PL
dc.referencesLakoff G., 1996, Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think, University of Chicago Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLakoff G., 2004 (2008), Don’t Think of an Elephant!: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate: the Essential Guide for Progressives, Chelsea Green Publishing.pl_PL
dc.referencesLakoff G., 2008, The political mind: Why you can’t understand 21st-century American politics with an 18th-century brain, New York, NY: Penguin Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLakoff G., Johnson M., 1980, Metaphors We Live By, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, Metafory w naszym życiu, (tłum. T. Krzeszowski), Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy, 1988.pl_PL
dc.referencesLakoff G., Turner M., 1989, More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to poetic Metaphor, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLakoff G., Johnson M., 1999, Philosophy In the Flesh: The Embodied Mind And Its Challenge To Western Thought, New York, NY: Basic Books.pl_PL
dc.referencesLakoff G., Núñez R., 2000, Where Mathematics Comes From. How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being, New York: Basic Books.pl_PL
dc.referencesLakoff G., Espenson J., Schwartz A., 1991, Master metaphor list, second draft copy, http://araw.mede.uic.edu/~alansz/metaphor/METAPHORLIST.pdf (dostęp 25.06.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesLandau M. J., Sullivan D., Greenberg J., 2009, Evidence that self-relevant motives and metaphoric framing interact to influence political and social attitudes, „Psychological Science”, 20, s. 1421–1427, DOI:10.1111/j.1467–9280.2009.02462.pl_PL
dc.referencesLapin S., 1981, Sorts, Ontology, and Metaphor, Berlin and New York: Waiter de Gruyter.pl_PL
dc.referencesLeDoux J., 2002, Synaptic self, New York: Penguin.pl_PL
dc.referencesLeng M., 2010, Mathematics and Reality, Oxford, Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLeśmian B., 1983, W malinowym chruśniaku, Poezje wybrane, Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, Wrocław–Warszawa, s. 92.pl_PL
dc.referencesLevins R., 1966, The Strategy of Model Building in Population Biology, „American Scientist”, 54, s. 421–431.pl_PL
dc.referencesLévi-Strauss C., 1962, La Pensée sauvage, Paris: Plon, Myśl nieoswojona, (tłum. A. Zajączkowski), 1969, PWN.pl_PL
dc.referencesLewontin R. C., 1991, The doctrine of DNA: Biology as ideology, New York: Harper Perennial.pl_PL
dc.referencesLewontin R. C., 2004, Gene, Organism and Environment: Bad Metaphors and Good Biology with UC Berkeley Graduate Lectures, http://www.uctv.tv/shows/Gene-Organism -and-Environment-Bad-Metaphors-and-Good-Biology-with-Richard-Lewontin-8393 (dostęp 17.01.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesLima P. L. C., 2006, About primary metaphor, „Delta”, 22, s. 109–122, DOI:10.1590/ S0102-44502006000300009.pl_PL
dc.referencesLinden A., 2008, Mindworks: An introduction to NLP, Crown House Publishing.pl_PL
dc.referencesLlewellyn Karl N., 1930, A Realistic Jurisprudence – The New Step, „Columbia Law Review”, 30(4), s. 431–46.pl_PL
dc.referencesLocke J., 1690, Rozważania dotyczące rozumu ludzkiego, Księga III, rozdz. 3, art. 15; za: Encyklopedia Stanford http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/sortals/ (dostęp 05.03.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesLovelock J., 1991, Gaia, The practical science of planetary medicine, London: Gaia Books.pl_PL
dc.referencesLovelock J., 1995, The ages of Gaia, (wydanie drugie), Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLowe T. D., Lorenzoni I., 2007, Danger is all around: eliciting expert perceptions for managing climate change through a mental models approach, „Global Environmental Change”, 17, s. 131–146.pl_PL
dc.referencesLyon P., 2015, The cognitive cell: bacterial behavior reconsidered, „Frontiers in Microbiology”, 6, s. 264, DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2015.00264, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pmc/articles/PMC4396460/ (dostęp 28.06.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesMaalej Z. A., Yu N., 2011, Embodiment Via Body Parts: Studies from Various Languages and Cultures, John Benjamins Publishing.pl_PL
dc.referencesMacCormac E., 1985, A cognitive theory of metaphor, Cambridge, MA: Mit Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesMachamer P., 2000, The Nature of Metaphor and Scientific Description, [w:] F. Hallyn (red.), Metaphor and Analogy in the Sciences, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, s. 35–52.pl_PL
dc.referencesMackie J. L., 1982, The Miracle of Theism: Arguments For and Against the Existence of God, Oxford: Oxford University Press, (za: Recker).pl_PL
dc.referencesMacWhinney B., 2008, How mental models encode embodied linguistic perspectives, [w:] R. Klatzky, B. MacWhinney, M. Behrmann (red.), Embodied cognition, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, s. 365–405.pl_PL
dc.referencesMadsen M. W., 2016, Cognitive Metaphor Theory and the Metaphysics of Immediacy, „Cognitive Science”, 40, s. 881–908.pl_PL
dc.referencesMandler J. M., 1992, How to build a baby: Conceptual primitives, „Psychological Review”, 99(4), s. 587–604.pl_PL
dc.referencesMandler J. M., 2008, On the Birth and Growth of Concepts, „Philosophical Psychology”, 21(2), s. 207–230.pl_PL
dc.referencesMandler J. M., Canovas C. P., 2014, On defining image schemas, „Language and Cognition”, 6(4), s. 510–532.pl_PL
dc.referencesMarciszewski W., 1994, Sztuka rozumowania w świetle logiki, Aleph, Warszawa.pl_PL
dc.referencesMarcus H., Zajonc R. B., 1985, The Cognitive Perspective in Social Psychology, [w:] G. Lindzey, E. Aronson (red.), The Handbook of Social Psychology, (wydanie trzecie), New York: Random House, s. 137–229.pl_PL
dc.referencesMargulis L., Sagan D., 1995, What is Life?, Berkeley: University of California Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesMarijuán P. C., Navarro J., del Moral R., 2010, On prokaryotic intelligence: strategie for sensing the environment, „Biosystems”, 92(2), 94–103.pl_PL
dc.referencesMarkman A. B., Dietrich E., 2000, Extending the classical view of representation, „Trends in Cognitive Science”, 4, s. 470–475.pl_PL
dc.referencesMarques V., Brito C., 2014, The Rise and Fall of the Machine Metaphor: Organizational Similarities and Differences between Machines and Living Beings, „Verifichte”, 43(1/3), s. 77–111.pl_PL
dc.referencesMartinich A. P., 1984, A Theory for Metaphor, „Journal of Literary Semantics”, 13, s. 34–56, https://www.msu.edu/~orourk51/360-Phil/Spring2015/Readings/Martinich.pdf (dostęp 31.03.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesMatlock T., Coe C., Westerling L., 2017, Monster wildfires and metaphor, „Metaphor and Symbol”, 32(4), s. 250–261.pl_PL
dc.referencesMaturana H. R., Varela F. J., 1980, Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living (1991, 2012), Springer Science & Business Media Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing., 2012, seria: „Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science”, t. 42.pl_PL
dc.referencesMayr E., 1985, How biology differs from the physical sciences, [w:] D. J. Depew, B. H. Weber (red.), Evolution at a Crossroads: The New Biology and the New Philosophy of Science, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, s. 43–63.pl_PL
dc.referencesMayr E., 2004, What Makes Biology Unique, Considerations on the Autonomy of a Scientific Discipline, Rozdział 3, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, s. 39–66.pl_PL
dc.referencesMazodier P., Davies J., 1991, Gene Transfer between Distantly related Bacteria, „Annual Review of Genetics”, 25, s. 147–171, http://web.mit.edu/kdrinkwa/Public/tklab/for-mfpapers/Mazodier91.pdf (dostęp 05.04.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesMcCloskey D. N., 1986, The Rhetoric of Economics, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesMcGlone M. S., 2011, Hyperbole, homunculi and hindsight bias: An alternative evaluation of conceptual metaphor theory, „Discourse Processes”, 48(8), s. 563–574.pl_PL
dc.referencesMcNeill D., Duncan S., 2000, Growth Points in Thinking-for-Speaking, [w:] D. McNeill (red.), Language and Gesture, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, s. 141–161.pl_PL
dc.referencesMcNeill D., Cassell J., Levy E. T., 1993, Abstract deixis, „Semiotica”, 95, s. 5–19.pl_PL
dc.referencesMcRae K., Jones M., 2013, Semantic Memory, [w:] D. Reisberg (red.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Psychology, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, s. 206–216.pl_PL
dc.referencesMerleau-Ponty M., 1945, Phénoménologie de la perception, Paris: Gallimard, Fenomenologia percepcji, (tłum. M. Kowalska, J. Migasiński), Warszawa, Aletheia, 2016.pl_PL
dc.referencesMiller G. A., 1956, The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information, „Psychological Review”, 63(2), s. 81–97.pl_PL
dc.referencesMorgan M. G., Fischhoff B., Bostrom A., Atman C., 2002, Risk communication: a mental models approach, Cambridge University Press, New York, USA.pl_PL
dc.referencesMoss L., 2004, What Genes Can’t Do, MIT Press, Cambridge.pl_PL
dc.referencesMossio M., Moreno A., 2010, Organisational Closure in Biological Organisms, „History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences”, 54(32), s. 269–288.pl_PL
dc.referencesMüller C., 1998, Iconicity and gesture, [w:] S. Santi et al. (red.), Oralité et Gestualité: Communication Multimodale, Interaction, Montréal, Paris: L’Harmattan, s. 321–328.pl_PL
dc.referencesMüller C., 2004, Forms and uses of the Palm Up Open Hand: A case of a gesture family? [w:] C. Müller, R. Posner (red.), The Semantics and Pragmatics of Everyday Gestures, Berlin: Weidler, s. 233 –256.pl_PL
dc.referencesMurdock. B. B., Jr., 1974, Human memory: Theory and data, Potomac, MD: Lawrence Erlbclum Associates.pl_PL
dc.referencesMurphy G. I., 2002, The Big Book of Concepts, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.pl_PL
dc.referencesMusolff A., 2004, Metaphor and Political Discourse: Analogic Reasoning in Debates about Europe, New York: Palgrave.pl_PL
dc.referencesNagel E., 1961, The Structure of Science. Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation, New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, Struktura nauki, zagadnienia logiki wyjaśnień naukowych, (tłum. J. Giedymin, B. Rassalski, H. Eilstein), 1970, PWN.pl_PL
dc.referencesNegro A. I., 2011, Metaphor and ideology in the business press: The case of the Endesa take over, „Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies”, 43, s. 73–85.pl_PL
dc.referencesNeisser U., 1967, Cognitive Psychology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.pl_PL
dc.referencesNeisser U., 1976, Cognition and Reality, Freeman, San Francisco, CA.pl_PL
dc.referencesNersessian N. J., 2002, The cognitive basis of model-based reasoning in science, [w:] P. Carruthers, S. Stich, M. Siegal, (red.), The cognitive basis of science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, s. 133–153.pl_PL
dc.referencesNicholson D. J., 2013, Organisms ≠ Machines, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 44(4), s. 669–678, http://www.academia.edu/3448382/ Organisms_Machines (dostęp 15.02.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesNietzsche F., 2004, Przedstawienie retoryki antycznej, Pisma pozostałe, Kraków.pl_PL
dc.referencesNoë A., 2004, Action in Perception, The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts, London.pl_PL
dc.referencesNosofsky R. M., 1986, Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship, „Journal of Experimental Psychology: General”, 115(1), s. 39–57.pl_PL
dc.referencesNúñez R. E., Sweetser E., 2006, With the Future Behind Them: Convergent Evidence From Aymara Language and Gesture in the Crosslinguistic Comparison of Spatial Construals of Time, „Cognitive Science”, 30, s. 401–450, http://www.cogsci.ucsd.edu/~nunez/web/FINALpblshd.pdf (dostęp 30.04.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesO’Mara Shimek M., Guillen-Para M., Ortega-Larrea A., 2015, Stop the bleeding or weather the storm? Crisis solution marketing and the ideological use of metaphor in online financial reporting of the stock market crash of 2008 at the New York Stock Exchange, „Discourse & Communication”, 9(1), s. 103–123.pl_PL
dc.referencesOakley T., 2007, Image schema, [w:] D. Geeraerts, H. Cuyckens (red.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Oxford University Press, s. 214–235.pl_PL
dc.referencesOdenbaugh J., 2003, Complex Systems, Trade-Offs, and Theoretical population Biology, „Philosophy of Science”, 70, s. 1496–1507.pl_PL
dc.referencesOrtiz M. J., 2010, Primary metaphors and monomodal visual metaphors, „Journal of Pragmatics”, 43(6), s. 1568–1580, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.12.003.pl_PL
dc.referencesOrnstein R., 1969, On the experience of Time, Hammondsworth: Penguin.pl_PL
dc.referencesOrtony A., 1993, Metaphor, language and thought, [w:] A. Ortony (red.), Metaphor and thought, Cambridge University Press, s. 1–16, (wyd. drugie), http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.003 (dostęp 25.06.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesOrzack S., Sober E., 1993, A Critical Assessment of Levins’s ‘The Strategy of Model Building (1966)’, „Quarterly Review of Biology”, 68, s. 534–546.pl_PL
dc.referencesOsborne R. J., Cosgrove M. M., 1983, Children’s conceptions of the changes of the state of water, „Journal of Research in Science Teaching”, 20, s. 825–838.pl_PL
dc.referencesOverton W. F., Müller U., Newman J. L., 2008, Developmental Perspectives on Embodiment and Consciousness, Taylor & Francis Group, New York.pl_PL
dc.referencesPaley W., [1802] 1809, Natural Theology, or Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity. Collected from the Appearances of Nature, [w:] G. W. Meadley (red.), The Works of William Paley, t. 1, (za: Recker, s. 648–649).pl_PL
dc.referencesPapafragou A., Massey C., Gleitman L., 2002, Shake, rattle ‘n’ roll: the representation of motion in language and cognition, „Cognition”, 84, s. 189–219.pl_PL
dc.referencesPattee H. H., 1971, Physical theories of biological co-ordinatio, „Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics”, 4(2/3), s. 255–276, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/quarterly -reviews-of-biophysics/article/physical-theories-of-biological-co-ordination/75476C2 D9241B0ED0670DD84811505C6 (dostęp 07.04.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesPayne B. K., Gawronski B., 2010, A History of Implicit Social Cognition: Where Is It Coming From? Where Is It Now? Where Is It Going? [w:] B. Gawronski, B. K. Payne (red.), Handbook of Implicit Social Cognition: Measurement, Theory, and Applications. New York, NY: Guilford Press, s. 1–15.pl_PL
dc.referencesPeirce C. S., 1906, Prolegomena to an Apology for Pragmatism, „The Monist”, 16(4), s. 492–546, https://archive.org/details/jstor-27899680 (dostęp 12.02.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesPeirce C. S., 1997, Wybór pism semiotycznych, (tłum. R. Mirek, A. Nowak), Polskie Towarzystwo Semiotyczne, Warszawa.pl_PL
dc.referencesPenson R. T., Schapira L., Daniels J., Lynch T. J., Cancer as Metaphor, „The Oncologist”, (6), s. 708–716, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/8165170_Cancer_as_Metaphor (dostęp 25.06.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesPepper S., 1942, World Hypotheses, Berkeley: University of California Press, (za: Klamer, Leaonard).pl_PL
dc.referencesPercy E. J., Hoffmann J. L., Sherman S. J., 2011, Sticky Metaphors and the Persistence of the Traditional Voluntary Manslaughter Doctrine, „Journal of Law Reform”, 44(2), s. 383–427.pl_PL
dc.referencesPinker S., 1994, The Language Instinct: The New Science of Language and Mind, London: Penguin.pl_PL
dc.referencesPinker S., 1997, How the mind works, New York: Norton.pl_PL
dc.referencesPinker S., 2007, The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window into Human Nature, Penguin, New York.pl_PL
dc.referencesPinker S., 2007, The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window into Human Nature, New York: Penguin Group Viking Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesPlutynski A., 2001, Modeling Evolution in Theory and Practice, „Philosophy of Science”, 68, s. 225–236.pl_PL
dc.referencesPogonowski J., 2011, Geneza matematyki wedle kognitywistów, „Investigationes Linguisticae”, 23, s. 106–147, http://inveling.amu.edu.pl/ http://www.logic.amu.edu.pl/ images/3/3c/Littlejill01.pdf (dostęp 28.06.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesPogonowski J., 2012, Matematyczne metafory kognitywistów, http://www.logic.amu. edu.pl/images/0/0e/M„mk2012.pdf (dostęp 28.06.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesPogonowski J., Wrocław, 2013, Matematyczne fantazje kognitywistów, http://logic.amu. edu.pl/images/3/32/Mfk2013.pdf (dostęp 28.06.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesPortides D. P., 2008, Models, [w:] S. Psillos, M. Curd (red.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science, New York: Routledge, s. 383–395.pl_PL
dc.referencesPriest G., Routley R., 1989, The History of Paraconsistent Logic, [w:] G. Priest, R. Routley, J. Norman, Paraconsistent Logic: Essays on the Inconsistent, München: Philosophia Verlag, Rozdział 1.pl_PL
dc.referencesPulaczewska H., 1999, Aspects of metaphor in physics: Examples and case studies, Tübingen, Germany: Max Niemeyer Verlag.pl_PL
dc.referencesPutnam H., 1975, The Meaning of ‘Meaning’, „Language, mind, and knowledge. Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science”, t. 7, s. 131–193.pl_PL
dc.referencesQuine W., 1953, On What There Is, [w:] From a Logical Point of View, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, O tym, co istnieje, [w:] Z punktu widzenia logiki, (tłum. B. Stanosz), PWN, Warszawa, 1969.pl_PL
dc.referencesQuine W., 1960, Word and Object, Cambridge MA: MIT Press; Słowo i przedmiot (tłum. C. Cieśliński), Warszawa: Fundacja Aletheia, 1999.pl_PL
dc.referencesRaerinne J., 2013, Robustness and sensitivity of biological models, Philosophical Studies, 166(2), s. 285–303.pl_PL
dc.referencesRamsey W., 2007, Representation Reconsidered, Cambridge University Press, New York.pl_PL
dc.referencesRecker D., 2010, How to Confuse Organisms with Mousetraps: Machine Metaphors and Intelligent Design, The Design Metaphor, „Zygon”, 45(3), s. 647–664, doi/10.1111/j. 1467-9744.2010.01119.x/pdf www.zygonjournal.org (dostęp 12.03.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesReddy J. M., 1979, The Conduit Metaphor – A case of Frame Conflict in Our Language about Language, [w:] A. Ortony (red.), Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, s. 284–310.pl_PL
dc.referencesReid J. N., Katz A. N., 2018, Something false about conceptual metaphors, „Metaphor and Symbol”, 33(1), s. 36–47.pl_PL
dc.referencesRichards I. A., 1936, The Philosophy of Rhetoric, Oxford University Press, London, New York.pl_PL
dc.referencesRicoeur P., 1975, La métaphore vive, Paris: Seuil; The Rule of Metaphor; Multi-Disciplinary Studies in the Creation of Meaning, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1978.pl_PL
dc.referencesRoot-Bernstein R. S., Root-Bernstein M., 2003, Innovative Tools for Innovative Thinking, [w:] L. V. Shavinina (red.), International Handbook of Innovation, Oxford: Elsevier Science, s. 377–387.pl_PL
dc.referencesRorty R., 1995, Filozofia jako nauka, jako metafora i jako polityka, [w:] A. Szahaj (red.), Między pragmatyzmem a postmodernizmem, Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UMK, s. 13–36.pl_PL
dc.referencesRorty R., 2003, Zmierzch prawdy ostatecznej i narodziny kultury literackiej, (tłum. A. Szahaj), „Teksty Drugie”, 6, s. 113–130.pl_PL
dc.referencesRosaldo M. Z., 1980, Knowledge and passion. Ilongot notions of self and social life, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, (za: Kövecses, 2010, s. 171).pl_PL
dc.referencesRosch E., 1978, Principles of categorization, [w:] E. Rosch, B. B. Lloyd (red.), Cognition and Categorization, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, s. 27–48.pl_PL
dc.referencesRosen R., 1991, Life Itself: A Comprehensive Inquiry into Nature, Origin and Fabrication of Life, Columbia University Press, New York.pl_PL
dc.referencesRuiz de Mendoza F. J., 1998, On the nature of blending as cognitive phenomenon, „Journal of Pragmatics”, 30(3), s. 259–274.pl_PL
dc.referencesRumelhart D. E., Abrahamson A. A., 1973, A model for analogical reasoning, „Cognitive Psychology”, 5, s. 1–28.pl_PL
dc.referencesRybarkiewicz D., 1997, Three Aspects of Metaphor, „Logica Trianguli”, 1, s. 93–103.pl_PL
dc.referencesRybarkiewicz D., 1998, The Structure of Metaphor: Towards a Pragmatic Approach, „Logica Trianguli”, 2, s. 103–115.pl_PL
dc.referencesRybarkiewicz D., 2002, Is Metaphor an Illocutionary Act?, „Bulletin of the Section of Logic”, 31(1), s. 47–57.pl_PL
dc.referencesRybarkiewicz D., 2015a, Out of the box thinking, [w:] P. Łukowski, A. Gemel, B. Żukowski (red.), Cognition, Meaning, and Action: Lodz – Lund Studies in Cognitive Science, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź, Kraków, s. 152–167.pl_PL
dc.referencesRybarkiewicz D., 2015b, Rozumowanie metaforyczne, czyli ‘metaforą po oczach’, „Acta Universitatis Lodziensis, Folia Iuridica”, 75, s. 207–225.pl_PL
dc.referencesRybarkiewicz D., 2017, Metafora w działaniu, Wydawnictwo Uniwerstetu Łódzkiego.pl_PL
dc.referencesRyle G. 1970 (1949), Czym jest umysł, (tłum. W. Marciszewski) PWN, Warszawa.pl_PL
dc.referencesSamarapungavan A., Vosniaudou S., Brewe W. F., 1996, Mental models of the earth, sun and moon, „Cognitive Development”, 11, s. 491–521.pl_PL
dc.referencesSchmidt S. R., 2012, Extraordinary Memories for Exceptional Events, Psychology Press: Taylor & Francis Group, New York, London.pl_PL
dc.referencesSchneider S. H., 1997, Laboratory Earth: The planetary gamble we can’t afford to lose, New York: Basic Books.pl_PL
dc.referencesSchön D. A., 1993 [1979], Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy, [w:] A. Ortony (red.), Metaphor and Thought (wyd. drugie) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Mass., s. 137–163.pl_PL
dc.referencesSearle J. R., 1980, Metaphor, [w:] A. Ortony (red.), Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, s. 92–124.pl_PL
dc.referencesShackle G. L. S., 1965, A scheme of economic theory, London, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesShanks N., 2004, God, the Devil, and Darwin: A Critique of Intelligent Design Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press, (za: Recker).pl_PL
dc.referencesShapir L., 2011, Embodied cognition, New York: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesShapiro L., 2004, The Mind Incarnate, Cambridge, MA, and London, UK: The MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesShapiro L., 2010, Embodied cognition, [w:] E. Margolis, R. Samuels, S. Stich (red.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Cognitive Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesSharifan F., Driven R., Yu N., Niemeier S., 2008, Culture, body, and language: Conceptualizations of internal body organs across cultures and languages, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.pl_PL
dc.referencesSheldrake R., 1988, The Presence of the Past: morphic resonance and the habits of nature, New York, NY: Times Books.pl_PL
dc.referencesSilaski N., 2012, Metaphors and ideology: Gendered metaphors in economic discourse, „Versita”, DOI: 10.2478/V10320–012–0019–4.pl_PL
dc.referencesSinha C., Jensen de López K., 2000, Language, culture and the embodiment of spatial cognition, „Cognitive Linguistics”, 11(1/2), s. 17–41.pl_PL
dc.referencesSober E., 2000, Philosophy of Biology, (wydanie drugie), Boulder, Colo.: Westview, (za: Recker).pl_PL
dc.referencesSoreanu R., 2010, Metaphor in the Social Sciences: Creative Methodologies and Some Elements for an Epistemological Reconstruction, „Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai, Sociologia”, 55(1), s. 239–254.pl_PL
dc.referencesSowa J., 1984, Conceptual Structures: Information Processing in Mind and Machine, Boston: Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., s. 4.pl_PL
dc.referencesSperber D., Wilson D., 1986, Relevance, Communication and Cognition, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.pl_PL
dc.referencesSterman J. D., 2000, Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world, Irwin McGraw-Hill, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.pl_PL
dc.referencesStillwagon E., 2012, The Background to Behavior Modification Strategies for Fighting Aids in Africa, [w:] K. Anyidoho, H. Lauer (red.), Reclaiming the Human Sciences and Humanities Through African Perspectives, vol. 2, Sub-Saharan Publishers Accra, Ghana, s. 997–1016.pl_PL
dc.referencesStrawson P. F., 1980, Indywidua: Próba metafizyki opisowej, PAX, Warszawa, (tłum. B. Chwedeńczuk), Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics [1959].pl_PL
dc.referencesSuppe F., 1989, The Semantic Conception of Theories and Scientific Realism, Urbana: University of Illinois Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesSuppes P., 1960, A Comparison of the Meaning and Uses of Models in Mathematics and the Empirical Sciences, „Synthese”, 12(2/3), s. 287–300.pl_PL
dc.referencesSwan J., Newell S., 1998, Making sense of the technological innovation: The political and social dynamics of cognition, [w:] C. Eden, J. C. Spencer (red.), Managerial and organizational cognition, Sage Publications, London, UK, s. 108–129.pl_PL
dc.referencesSypnowich C., 2014, Law and Ideology, [w:] Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https:// plato.stanford.edu/entries/law-ideology/ (dostęp 12.05.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesTaverniers M., 2002, Metaphor and Metaphorology: A Selective Genealogy of Philosophical and Linguistic Conceptions of Metaphor from Aristotle to the 1990s, Gent, Academia Press, Studia Germanica Candensia.pl_PL
dc.referencesTendahl M., 2009, A hybrid theory of metaphor: Relevance theory and cognitive linguistics, London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.pl_PL
dc.referencesThagard P., 2005, Mind: Introduction to Cognitive Science (wydanie drugie), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.pl_PL
dc.referencesThagard T., Toombs E., 2005, Atoms, categorization and conceptual change, [w:] H. Cohen, C. Lefebvre (red.), Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science, Elsevier Science B. v, s. 243–254.pl_PL
dc.referencesThelen E., Smith, L., 1994, A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesThibodeau P. H., Durgin F. H., 2011, Metaphor aptness and conventionality: A processing fluency account, „Metaphor and Symbol”, 26, s. 206–226.pl_PL
dc.referencesThibodeau P., Boroditsky L., 2011, Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning, „Plos One”, 6(2), E16782, http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016782 oraz http://lera.ucsd.edu/papers/crime-metaphors.pdf (dostęp 02.04.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesThompson E., 2007, Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesThompson J. B., 1990, Ideology and Modern Culture: Critical Social Theory in the Era of Mass, Communication Cambridge: Polity Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesTinbergen N., 1963, On the aims and methods of ethology, „Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie”, 20, s. 410-163.pl_PL
dc.referencesTomasz z Akwinu, Komentarz do Sentencyj; cyt. za: M. A. Krąpiec, Teoria analogii bytu, Dzieła, t. I, Lublin, 1993, s. 315.pl_PL
dc.referencesTonneau F., 2011/2012, Metaphor and Truth: A Review of Representation Reconsidered by W. M. Ramsey, „Behavior and Philosophy”, 39/40, s. 331–343.pl_PL
dc.referencesToon A., 2010, Models as Make-Believe, [w:] R. Frigg, M. Hunter (red.), Beyond Mimesis and Convention: Representation in Art and Science, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science: Springer, s. 71–96.pl_PL
dc.referencesTurbayne C. M., 1970, The Myth of Metaphor, Columbia, South Carolina: University of South Carolina Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesTversky A., 1977, Features of Similarity, „Psychological Review”, 84, s. 327–352.pl_PL
dc.referencesValenzuela J., 2009, What empirical work can tell us about Primary Metaphors, „Quaderns de Filologia Estudis Linguistics”, 14, s. 235–249.pl_PL
dc.referencesVan Benthem J., Minica S., 2012, Toward a Dynamic Logic of Questions, „Journal of Philosophical Logic”, 41, s. 633–669, DOI: 10.1007/s10992-012-9233-7.pl_PL
dc.referencesVan Dijk T. A.,1998, Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach, London: SAGE.pl_PL
dc.referencesVan Fraassen B. C., 1980, The Scientific Image, The Clarendon Library of Logic and Philosophy, Clarendon Press, Oxford.pl_PL
dc.referencesVanderveken D., 1985, Non-literal Speech Acts, „Cahiers d’Epistemologie”, Universite de Quebec, Montreal.pl_PL
dc.referencesVanderveken D., 1990, Meaning and Speech Acts, Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesVarela F., 1979, Principles of biological autonomy, Elsevier North Holland, New York.pl_PL
dc.referencesVarela F., Thompson E., Rosch E., 1991, The Embodied Mind: Cognitive science and human Experience, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.pl_PL
dc.referencesVico G., 1966, Nauka nowa, (tłum. J. Jakubowicz), oprac. S. Krzemień-Ojak, Warszawa.pl_PL
dc.referencesVoorhees B., 2004, Embodied Mathematics, „Journal of Consciousness Studies”, 11(9), s. 83–88.pl_PL
dc.referencesVosgerau G., 2006, The Perceptual Nature of Mental Models, [w:] C. Held, M. Knauff, G. Vosgerau (red.), Mental Models and the Mind, Oxford: Elsevier B. V, s. 255–275, https://www.phil-fak.uni-duesseldorf.de/fileadmin/Redaktion/Institute/Philosophie/ Theoretische_Philosophie/Vosgerau/MM_vosgerau.pdf (dostęp 15.02.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesVosniaudou S., Brewer W. F., 1992, Mental models of the earth: a study of conceptual change in childhood, „Cognitive Psychology”, 24, s. 535–585.pl_PL
dc.referencesWalton K. L., 1990, Mimesis as Make-believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesWatkins K. W., 1989, Chemical metaphors, „Journal of Chemistry Education”, 66(12), 1020 DOI:10.1021/ed066p1020.pl_PL
dc.referencesWeisberg M., 2013, Simulation and Similarity: Using Models to Understand the World, Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesWeiss G., Haber H. F., 1999, Perspectives on Embodiment: The Intersection of Nature and Culture, Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesWen L., Weaver J. C., Lauder G. V., 2014, Biomimetic shark skin: design, fabrication and hydrodynamic function, „Journal of Experimental Biology”, 217, s. 1656–1666, DOI: 10.1242/jeb.097097 http://jeb.biologists.org/content/217/10/1656 (dostęp 07.04.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesWertheimer M., 1958, Principles of perceptual organization, [w:] D. C. Beardslee, M. Wertheimer (red.), Readings in perception, Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand, s. 115–135, (za: M. J. Ortiz, 2010, Visual Rhetoric: Primary Metaphors and Symmetric Object Alignment, „Metaphor and Symbol”, 25(3), s. 162–180).pl_PL
dc.referencesWheeler M., 2005, Reconstructing the Cognitive World, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesWhorf B. L., 1956 [1940], Science and Linguistics, „Technology Review”, 42, s. 229–231. (Nauka a językoznawstwo. Fragmenty trzech tekstów ogłoszonych w latach 1940– 1941 na łamach „Technology Review”, w przekładzie Teresy Hołówki), http://www. sady.up.krakow.pl/antfil.whorf.htm (dostęp 05.04.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesWiggins D., 1967, Identity and Spatio-Temporal Continuity, Oxford, B. H. Blackwell.pl_PL
dc.referencesWilson D., Carston R., 2006, Metaphor, Relevance and the ‘Emergent Property’ Issue, „Mind & Language”, 21(3), s. 404–433.pl_PL
dc.referencesWilson D., Carston R., 2007, A unitary approach to lexical pragmatics: relevance, inference and ad hoc concepts, [w:] N. Burton-Roberts (red.), Pragmatics, (Palgrave Advances in Linguistics), Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, s. 230–260.pl_PL
dc.referencesWilson M., 2002, Six views of embodied cognition, „Psychonomic Bulletin and Review”, 9, s. 625–636.pl_PL
dc.referencesWinner E., 1988, The point of words: Children’s understanding of metaphor and irony, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesWoleński J., 2005, Epistemologia, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.pl_PL
dc.referencesWong R., 2013, The Fiction of the Science (Future of StoryTelling), https://www.youtube. com/watch?v=FvgdKfWnYCg (dostęp 11.04.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesWyatt S., 2004, Danger! Metaphors at work in Economics, Geophysiology, and the Internet, „Science, Technologies, & Human Values”, 29(2), s. 242–261, DOI: 10.1177/0162243903261947.pl_PL
dc.referencesWygotski L. S., 2002, Wybrane prace psychologiczne II. Dzieciństwo i dorastanie, Wydawnictwo Zysk i S-ka, Poznań.pl_PL
dc.referencesZajonc R. B., 1985, Emotion and facial efference: A theory reclaimed, „Science”, 228, s. 15–21.pl_PL
dc.referencesZakay D., Block R. A., 1997, Temporal cognition, „Current Directions in Psychological Science”, 6, s. 12–16.pl_PL
dc.referencesZałazińska A., 2001, Schematy myśli wyrażane w gestach, Kraków: Uniwersytet Jagielloński.pl_PL
dc.referencesZeidler P., 2013, Models and Metaphors as Research Tools in Science, LIT Verlag Münster, (Series: Development in Humanities, vol. 10).pl_PL
dc.referencesZemach E., 1994., Metaphors and ways of life, [w:] J. Hintikka (red.), Aspects of Metaphor, Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht, Netherlands, s. 243–254.pl_PL
dc.referencesZiemke T., 2003, What is that thing called embodiment?, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/ download?doi=10.1.1.529.2280&rep=rep1&type=pdf (dostęp 12.04.18).pl_PL
dc.referencesZiemke T., Frank R. M., 2007, Introduction: The body eclectic, [w:] T. Ziemke, J. Zlatev, I. R. M. Frank (red.), Body, Language and Mind. vol. 1: Embodiment, Berlin, New York: Mouton dr Gruyter, s. 1–13.pl_PL
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/8142-362-5


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Nazwa:
Rybarkiewicz_Metakolaż.pdf
Rozmiar:
1.930MB
Format:
PDF
Oglądaj/Otwórz
Thumbnail
Nazwa:
OKŁADKA_.jpg
Rozmiar:
330.3KB
Format:
Obraz JPEG
Oglądaj/Otwórz
Thumbnail
Nazwa:
license_rdf
Rozmiar:
805bajtów
Format:
application/rdf+xml
Oglądaj/Otwórz

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe