Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorStawasz-Grabowska, Ewa
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-01T13:31:47Z
dc.date.available2021-04-01T13:31:47Z
dc.date.issued2020-09-21
dc.identifier.issn1508-2008
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/34903
dc.description.abstractThe euro area crisis was characterised by a negative feedback loop between banks and sovereigns. The paper aims to indicate the genesis of this phenomenon and to determine the scale of its operation during the crisis and post-crisis conditions, as well as to identify the threats it brings. In addition, the paper discusses the actions that have been taken so far at the euro area level to reduce the feedback loop and the existing challenges in this area. The following hypothesis has been formulated: in the post-crisis conditions the euro area remains vulnerable to the sovereign-bank nexus, which in particular stems from the very legacy of the crisis, bank-based financial system, as well as incomplete reforms of the euro area institutional architecture. The research methods include data selection and evaluation as well as descriptive statistics. The main contribution of the study stems from the adoption of a post-crisis perspective and the assessment of the loop with the use of the most recent data and in relation to the crisis period. The results show that in the post-crisis period, a reduction in interconnectedness has been observed, although it has not been evenly experienced by all euro area countries. At the same time, despite some progress in recent years, institutional reforms aimed at breaking the sovereign-bank nexus are far from complete.en
dc.description.abstractPrzebieg kryzysu w strefie euro charakteryzowało zjawisko negatywnych sprzężeń zwrotnych między sektorem bankowym a sektorem finansów publicznych. Silne zależności między tymi sektorami warunkowała m.in. dominująca rola banków w systemie finansowym UGiW, narastające nierównowagi makroekonomiczne, a także „braki” w architekturze instytucjonalnej strefy euro. W artykule przedstawiona jest geneza omawianego zjawiska w UGiW, a także istota i skala obustronnego transferu ryzyka w czasie kryzysu i w latach pokryzysowych. Dodatkowo, omówiono dotychczasowe działania w kierunku ograniczenia negatywnych sprzężeń, a także wskazano pozostające wyzwania w tym obszarze.pl
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesComparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe;3pl
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectbank-sovereign nexusen
dc.subjecteuro area crisisen
dc.subjectcontagion risken
dc.subjectsafe assetsen
dc.subjectefekt zarażaniapl
dc.subjectkryzys w strefie europl
dc.subjectaktywa bezpiecznepl
dc.titleNegative Feedback Loop between Banks and Sovereigns in the Euro Area – Experience of the Crisis and Post-Crisis Perspectiveen
dc.title.alternativeNegatywne sprzężenia zwrotne między sektorem bankowym i sektorem finansów publicznych w strefie euro. Doświadczenia kryzysu i perspektywa pokryzysowapl
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number41-61
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology International Finance and Investment Department, Lodz, Polanden
dc.identifier.eissn2082-6737
dc.referencesAcharya, V., Steffen, S. (2015), The “greatest” carry trade ever? Understanding eurozone bank risks, “Journal of Financial Economics”, 115 (2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.11.004en
dc.referencesAcharya, V., Drechsler, I., Schnabl, P. (2014), A Pyrrhic Victory? Bank Bailouts and Sovereign Credit Risk, “The Journal of Finance”, 69 (6). https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12206en
dc.referencesAltavilla, C., Pagano, M., Simonelli, S. (2016), Bank exposures and sovereign stress transmission, ECB Working Paper 1969, October 2016. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2848937en
dc.referencesAlter, A., Schüler, Y. (2012), Credit spread interdependencies of European states and banks during the financial crisis, “Journal of Banking & Finance”, 36 (12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.08.002en
dc.referencesAsonuma, T., Bakhache, S., Hesse, H. (2015), Is Banks Home Bias Good or Bad for Public Debt Sustainability?, IMF Working Paper WP/15/44. IMF. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781498323505.001en
dc.referencesAttinasi, M., Checherita, C., Nickel, C. (2009), What explains the surge in euro area sovereign spreads during the financial crisis of 2007–09?, ECB Working Paper Series, Frankfurt am Main: ECB.en
dc.referencesBekooij, J., Frost, J., van der Molen, R., Muzalewski, K. (2016), Hazardous tango: Sovereign-bank interdependencies across countries and time, DNB Working Paper No. 541/ December 2016, Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2891296en
dc.referencesBIS (2017). The regulatory treatment of sovereign exposures.en
dc.referencesBordo, M., Jonung, L. (1999), The Future of EMU: What Does the History of Monetary Unions Tell Us?, NBER Working Paper No. 7365. https://doi.org/10.3386/w7365en
dc.referencesBrunnermeier, M., Langfield, S., Pagano, M., Reis, R., Van Nieuwerburgh, S., Vayanos, D. (2016), ESBies: Safety in the tranches, Working Paper Series No. 21 / September 2016. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2840935en
dc.referencesCorsetti, G., Feld, L., Koijen, R., Reichlin, L., Reis, R., Rey, H., Weder, B. (2016), Reinforcing the Eurozone and Protecting an Open Society, London: CEPR.en
dc.referencesCour-Thimann, P., Winkler, B. (2013), The ECB’s non-standard monetary policy measures: the role of institutional factors and financial structure, ECB Working Paper Series No. 1528 / April 2013, Frankfurt am Main: ECB.en
dc.referencesDe Marco, F., Macchiavelli, M. (2016), The Political Origin of Home Bias: the case of Europe, Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2016–060, Washington: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. https://doi.org/10.17016/feds.2016.060en
dc.referencesDe Paoli, B., Hoggarth, G., Saporta, V. (2009), Output costs of sovereign crises: some empirical estimates, Bank of England Working Paper No. 362 / February 2009, London: Bank of England. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1344294en
dc.referencesDell’Ariccia, G., Ferreira, C., Jenkinson, N., Laeven, L., Martin, A., Minoiu, C., Popov, A. (2018), Managing the sovereign-bank nexus, Working Paper Series No. 2177/ September 2018. Frankfurt am Main: ECB. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484359624.087en
dc.referencesEC (2011), The effects of temporary State aid rules adopted in the context of the financial and economic crisis, Commission Staff Working Paper October 2011, Brussels.en
dc.referencesEC (2015), A stronger Banking Union: New measures to reinforce deposit protection and further reduce banking risks. https://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-15-6152_pl.htm (accessed: 30.09.2019).en
dc.referencesEC (2019), Eurostat Supplementary Table For Reporting Government Interventions To Support Financial Institutions, Background note (April 2019).en
dc.referencesECB (2018a), ECB Economic Bulletin, Issue 6/2018, Frankfurt am Main: ECB.en
dc.referencesECB (2018b), Financial integration in Europe, May 2018, Frankfurt am Main: ECB.en
dc.referencesESRB (2018), Sovereign bond-backed securities: a feasibility study, Frankfurt am Main: ESRB.en
dc.referencesEuro Area Summit Statement (2012).en
dc.referencesFlejterski, S. (2008), Zaufanie do instytucji bankowo-finansowych jako fundament stabilnego systemu finansowego [in:] J. Nowakowski, T. Famulska (eds), Stabilność i bezpieczeństwo systemu bankowego, Difin S.A., Warszawa.en
dc.referencesGennaioli, N., Martin, A., Rossi, S. (2014), Sovereign Default, Domestic Banks, and Financial Institutions, “The Journal of Finance”, 69 (2). https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12124en
dc.referencesGerlach, S., Schulz, A., Wolff, G. (2010), Banking and sovereign risk in the euro area, Discussion Paper Series 1: Economic Studies No. 09/2010, Frankfurt am Main: Deutsche Bundesbank.en
dc.referencesGómez-Puig, M., Sosvilla-Rivero, S., Singh, M. (2015), Sovereigns and Banks in the Euro Area: A Tale of Two Crises, SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2548460en
dc.referencesGrigorian, D., Manole, V. (2017), Sovereign risk and deposit dynamics: evidence from Europe, “Applied Economics”, 49 (29). https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2016.1248358en
dc.referenceshttps://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/scoreboard/index_en.html (accessed: 20.08.2019)en
dc.referencesIMF (2012), Global Financial Stability Report – The Quest for Lasting Stability, Washington, DC: IMF.en
dc.referencesLuitel, P., Vanpée, R., De Moor, L. (2016), Pernicious effects: How the credit rating agencies disadvantage emerging markets, “Research in International Business and Finance”, 38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2016.04.009en
dc.referencesMerler, S., Pisani-Ferry, J. (2012), Hazardous tango: sovereign-bank interdependence and financial stability in the euro area, Financial Stability Review No.16 April 2012, Banque de France.en
dc.referencesMody, A. (2009), From Bear Stearns to Anglo Irish: How Eurozone Sovereign Spreads Related to Financial Sector Vulnerability, IMF Working Paper WP/09/108. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451872552.001en
dc.referencesNavaretti, G., Calzolari, G., Pozzolo, A. (2016), Diabolic Loop or Incomplete Union? Sovereign and Banking Risk, “European Economy”, 1.en
dc.referencesNBP (2014), Ekonomiczne wyzwania integracji Polski ze strefą euro, Warszawa: NBP.en
dc.referencesOngena, S., Popov, A., Van Horen, N. (2016), The invisible hand of the government: “Moral suasion” during the European sovereign debt crisis, ECB Working Paper No. 1937 / July 2016. Frankfurt am Main: ECB. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2745767en
dc.referencesReinhart, C., Rogoff, K. (2011), From Financial Crash to Debt Crisis, “American Economic Review”, 101 (5). https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.5.1676en
dc.referencesSingh, A., Ulargui, I., Sabbione, P., Jezek, M., Hanamante, A., O-Toole, C. (2019), How to fix European banking … and why it matters, Thematic Research, Deutsche Bank.en
dc.referencesStângă, I. (2014), Bank bailouts and bank-sovereign risk contagion channels, “Journal of International Money and Finance”, 48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2014.07.005en
dc.referencesVéron, N. (2017), Sovereign Concentration Charges: A New Regime for Banks Sovereign Exposures, Brussels: European Parliament.en
dc.referencesYu, S. (2017), Sovereign and bank Interdependencies–Evidence from the CDS market, “Research in International Business and Finance”, 39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2016.07.033en
dc.contributor.authorEmailewa.grabowska@uni.lodz.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1508-2008.23.19
dc.relation.volume23


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0