Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorFeltynowski, Marcin
dc.contributor.authorKronenberg, Jakub
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-23T17:21:05Z
dc.date.available2020-11-23T17:21:05Z
dc.date.issued2020-11-17
dc.identifier.citationFeltynowski, M.; Kronenberg, J. Urban Green Spaces An Underestimated Resource in Third-Tier Towns in Poland. Land 2020, 9, 453, https://doi.org/10.3390/land9110453, http://hdl.handle.net/11089/32584pl_PL
dc.identifier.issn2073-445X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/32584
dc.description.abstractUrban green spaces are frequently presented as being important for urban quality of life and urban development in general, but more detailed interpretations and discussions are typically confined to large urban centers, the so-called first- and second-tier cities. Not enough attention has been paid to smaller urban units, the third-tier towns. The main goal of this article is to investigate the share and types of urban green spaces in five selected towns in Poland. We compare different sources of data based on satellite imagery and land-use maps with those used in public statistics, to check whether town authorities are managing all potential green spaces or only a selected part of them. We find that the predominantly used data, based on what is classified as “urban green space” for the purposes of public statistics, obscure the complexity of urban green spaces and focus on the narrowly understood formally managed public green spaces (which occupy 3.5–5.7% of town areas). Meanwhile, based on other sources, such as the national land-use map (BDOT10k), Urban Atlas, and satellite imagery (Landsat 8), what is considered to be green space turns out to cover 50–80% of the town area. The latter large numbers are associated with the predominance of arable land, grasslands, and forests, overlooked in any green space management practices based on data and definitions adopted for the purposes of public statistics. The situation found in our five case study towns resembles that identified in larger cities in Poland, and it exhibits the inadequacy of public statistics definitions and the related management practices, hindering the management of urban green spaces as an interconnected system of urban green infrastructures.pl_PL
dc.description.sponsorshipFunding This research was funded through the 2015–2016 BiodivERsA COFUND call for research proposals, by the national funders: the Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences, and Spatial Planning, the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, the German Aeronautics and Space Research Centre, the National Science Centre (Poland) (grant no. 2016/22/Z/NZ8/00003), the Research Council of Norway, and the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness. Acknowledgments Some desk research analysis was carried out within the MINIATURA 3 project, funded by the National Science Centre (Poland) entitled Evidence-based spatial planning—sources of greenery data in cities (grant no. 2019/03/X/HS4/00060).pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesLand;9
dc.rightsAttribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectgreen space availabilitypl_PL
dc.subjectgreen space datapl_PL
dc.subjectgreen space classificationpl_PL
dc.subjectgreen infrastructurepl_PL
dc.subjectremote sensing in public administrationpl_PL
dc.subjecturban planningen_GB
dc.titleUrban Green Spaces—An Underestimated Resource in Third-Tier Towns in Polanden_GB
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.page.number1-19pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationFaculty of Economics and Sociology, University of Lodzpl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationFaculty of Economics and Sociology, University of Lodz
dc.referencesElmqvist, T.; Fragkias, M.; Goodness, J.; Güneralp, B.; Marcotullio, P.J.; McDonald, R.I.; Parnell, S.; Schewenius, M.; Sendstad, M.; Seto, K.C.; et al. Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges And Opportunities; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2013; ISBN 978-94-007-7087-4.pl_PL
dc.referencesAndersson, E.; Langemeyer, J.; Borgström, S.; McPhearson, T.; Haase, D.; Kronenberg, J.; Barton, D.N.; Davis, M.; Naumann, S.; Röschel, L.; et al. Enabling green and blue infrastructure to improve contributions to human well-being and equity in urban systems. BioScience 2019, 69, 566–574.pl_PL
dc.referencesStigsdotter, U.K.; Urban Green Space and Health Related Quality of Life. Cheonen International Conference Citizens’ Quality of Life. 2012, pp. 91–108. Available online: http://curis.ku.dk/ws/files/45861594/Stigsdotter_2012.pdfpl_PL
dc.referencesPeschardt, K.K.; Stigsdotter, U.K. Associations between park characteristics and perceived restorativeness of small public urban green spaces. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2013, 112, 26–39.pl_PL
dc.referencesBaycan-Levent, T.; Nijkamp, P. Planning and management of urban green spaces in Europe: Comparative analysis. J. Urban Plan. Dev. 2009, 135, 1–12.pl_PL
dc.referencesHaaland, C.; van den Bosch, C.K. Challenges and strategies for urban green-space planning in cities undergoing densification: A review. Urban For. Urban Green. 2015, 14, 760–771.pl_PL
dc.referencesBowler, D.E.; Buyung-Ali, L.; Knight, T.M.; Pullin, A.S. Urban greening to cool towns and cities: A systematic review of the empirical evidence. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2010, 97, 147–155.pl_PL
dc.referencesCharlesworth, S.M.; Booth, C.A. The Benefits of Green Infrastructure in Towns and Cities. In Solutions for Climate Change Challenges in the Built Environment; Booth, C.A., Hammond, F., Lamond, J., Proverbs, D., Eds.; Wiley-Blackwell: Chichester, UK, 2012; pp. 163–180.pl_PL
dc.referencesPauleit, S.; Slinn, P.; Handley, J.; Lindley, S. Promoting the natural greenstructure of towns and cities: English Nature’s Accessible Natural Greenspace Standards model. Built Environ. 2003, 29, 157–170.pl_PL
dc.referencesSwanwick, C.; Dunnett, N.; Woolley, H. Nature, Role and Value of Green Space in Towns and Cities: An Overview. Built Environ. 2003, 29, 94–106.pl_PL
dc.referencesKendal, D.; Egerer, M.; Byrne, J.A.; Jones, P.J.; Marsh, P.; Threlfall, C.G.; Allegretto, G.; Kaplan, H.; Nguyen, H.; Pearson, S.; et al. City-size bias in knowledge on the effects of urban nature on people and biodiversity. Env. Res. Lett. 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesLuederitz, C.; Brink, E.; Gralla, F.; Hermelingmeier, V.; Meyer, M.; Niven, L.; Panzer, L.; Partelow, S.; Rau, A.-L.; Sasaki, R.; et al. A review of urban ecosystem services: Six key challenges for future research. Ecosyst. Serv. 2015, 14, 98–112.pl_PL
dc.referencesMcConnachie, M.; Shackleton, C.M. Public green space inequality in small towns in South Africa. Habitat Int. 2010, 34, 244–248.pl_PL
dc.referencesShackleton, C.M.; Blair, A.; De Lacy, P.; Kaoma, H.; Mugwagwa, N.; Dalu, M.T.; Walton, W. How important is green infrastructure in small and medium-sized towns? Lessons from South Africa. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2018, 180, 273–281.pl_PL
dc.referencesEurostat. Urban Europe—Statistics on Cities, Towns and Suburbs; Publications office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2016.pl_PL
dc.referencesBiejat, K. Zarządzanie Oraz Ochrona Zieleni W Polskich Miastach; Fundacja Sendzimira: Warsaw, Poland, 2018. (In Polish)pl_PL
dc.referencesFongar, C.; Randrup, T.B.; Wiström, B.; Solfjeld, I. Public urban green space management in Norwegian municipalities: A managers’ perspective on place-keeping. Urban For. Urban Green. 2019, 44, 126438.pl_PL
dc.referencesStatistics Poland. Concise Statistical Yearbook of Poland; Statistics Poland: Warsaw, Poland, 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesBiernacka, M.; Kronenberg, J.; Łaszkiewicz, E. An integrated system of monitoring the availability, accessibility and attractiveness of urban parks and green squares. Appl. Geogr. 2020, 116, 102152.pl_PL
dc.referencesKronenberg, J.; Krauze, K.; Wagner, I. Focusing on ecosystem services in the multiple social-ecological transitions of Lodz. In Urban Sustainability Transitions; Frantzeskaki, N., Castan Broto, V., Coenen, L., Loorbach, D., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 331–345.pl_PL
dc.referencesŁaszkiewicz, E.; Czembrowski, P.; Kronenberg, J. Creating a map of social functions of urban green spaces in a city with poor availability of spatial data—Sociotope for Lodz. Land 2020, 9, 183.pl_PL
dc.referencesPietrzyk-Kaszyńska, A.; Czepkiewicz, M.; Kronenberg, J. Eliciting non-monetary values of formal and informal urban green spaces using public participation GIS. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2017, 160, 85–95.pl_PL
dc.referencesSzulczewska, B.; Kaliszuk, E. Challenges in the planning and management of “Greenstructure” in Warsaw, Poland. Built Environ. 2003, 29, 144–156.pl_PL
dc.referencesFeltynowski, M.; Kronenberg, J.; Bergier, T.; Kabisch, N.; Łaszkiewicz, E.; Strohbach, M. Challenges of urban green space management in the face of using inadequate data. Urban For. Urban Green. 2018, 31, 56–66.pl_PL
dc.referencesLipińska, H.; Łojek, A.; Kościk, S. Ecosystem services of street trees on the example of Puławy. Archit. Kraj. 2017, 56, 44–67.pl_PL
dc.referencesChmielewski, P.J.; Wysocka, P.; Matczak, P.; Mączka, K.; Krzyżyńska, H. Connection between ecosystem services of woody plants in the municipality of Czerwonak and administrative decisions on felling trees and shrubs. Ekon. I Środowisko 2016, 59, 223–234.pl_PL
dc.referencesŁowicki, D.; Piotrowska, S. Monetary valuation of road noise. Residential property prices as an indicator of the acoustic climate quality. Ecol. Indic. 2015, 52, 472–479.pl_PL
dc.referencesStatistics Poland. Local Data Bank. 2020. Available online: https://bdl.stat.gov.pl/BDL/start (accessed on 5 October 2020).pl_PL
dc.referencesSikorska, D.; Łaszkiewicz, E.; Krauze, K.; Sikorski, P. The role of informal green spaces in reducing inequalities in urban green space availability to children and seniors. Environ. Sci. Policy 2020, 108, 144–154.pl_PL
dc.referencesMoreno, A.J.P.; De Larriva, J.E.M. Comparison between new digital image classification methods and traditional methods for land-cover mapping. In Remote Sensing of Land Use and Land Cover. Principles and Applications; Giri, C.P., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2012; pp. 137–152.pl_PL
dc.referencesPiech, I.; Drozdz, B. Obrazy satelitarne jako źródło informacji o krajobrazie. Infrastrukt. I Ekol. Teren. Wiej. 2010, 3, 41–54. (In Polish)pl_PL
dc.referencesTso, B.; Mather, P. Classification Methods for Remotely Sensed Data; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2016; ISBN 978-1-4200-9074-1.pl_PL
dc.referencesBoulton, C.; Dedekorkut-Howes, A.; Byrne, J. Factors shaping urban greenspace provision: A systematic review of the literature. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2018, 178, 82–101.pl_PL
dc.referencesTaylor, L.; Hochuli, D.F. Defining greenspace: Multiple uses across multiple disciplines. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2017, 158, 25–38.pl_PL
dc.referencesKronenberg, J.; Łaszkiewicz, E.; Sziło, J. Voting with one’s chainsaw: What happens when people are given the opportunity to freely remove urban trees? Landsc. Urban Plan. 2020. forthcoming.pl_PL
dc.referencesGreen, T.L.; Kronenberg, J.; Andersson, E.; Elmqvist, T.; Gómez-Baggethun, E. Insurance value of green infrastructure in and around cities. Ecosystems 2016, 19, 1051–1063.pl_PL
dc.referencesPeroni, F.; Pristeri, G.; Codato, D.; Pappalardo, S.E.; De Marchi, M. Biotope Area Factor: An Ecological Urban Index to Geovisualize Soil Sealing in Padua, Italy. Sustainability 2020, 12, 150.pl_PL
dc.referencesKim, M.; Rupprecht, C.D.D.; Furuya, K. Residents’ perception of informal green space—A case study of Ichikawa City, Japan. Land 2018, 7, 102.pl_PL
dc.referencesRupprecht, C.; Byrne, J.A. Informal urban greenspace: A typology and trilingual systematic review of its role for urban residents and trends in the literature. Urban For. Urban Green. 2014, 13, 597–611.pl_PL
dc.referencesWłodarczyk-Marciniak, R.; Sikorska, D.; Krauze, K. Residents’ awareness of the role of informal green spaces in a post-industrial city, with a focus on regulating services and urban adaptation potential. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 59, 102236.pl_PL
dc.referencesEuropean Union. Mapping guide for a European Urban Atlas; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2016.pl_PL
dc.referencesRozporządzenie Ministra Administracji i Cyfryzacji z Dnia 2 Listopada 2015 r. w Sprawie Bazy Danych Obiektów Topograficznych Oraz Mapy Zasadniczej. Dz. Ustaw. 2015; Volume 2028, pp. 1–332. Available online: http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20150002028 (accessed on 14 November 2020). (In Polish)pl_PL
dc.referencesBreuste, J.; Haase, D.; Elmqvist, T. Urban landscapes and ecosystem services. In Ecosystem Services in Agricultural and Urban Landscapes; Wratten, S., Sandhu, H., Cullen, R., Costanza, R., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013; pp. 83–104. ISBN 978-1-118-50627-1.pl_PL
dc.referencesHaase, D.; Schwarz, N.; Strohbach, M.; Kroll, F.; Seppelt, R. Synergies, trade-offs, and losses of ecosystem services in urban regions: An integrated multiscale framework applied to the Leipzig-Halle Region, Germany. Ecol. Soc. 2012, 17, 22.pl_PL
dc.referencesRudd, H.; Vala, J.; Schaefer, V. Importance of Backyard Habitat in a Comprehensive Biodiversity Conservation Strategy: A Connectivity Analysis of Urban Green Spaces. Restor. Ecol. 2002, 10, 368–375.pl_PL
dc.referencesElmqvist, T.; Setälä, H.; Handel, S.N.; van der Ploeg, S.; Aronson, J.; Blignaut, J.N.; Gómez-Baggethun, E.; Nowak, D.J.; Kronenberg, J.; De Groot, R.S. Benefits of restoring ecosystem services in urban areas. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2015, 14, 101–108.pl_PL
dc.referencesMills, J.G.; Weinstein, P.; Gellie, N.J.C.; Weyrich, L.S.; Lowe, A.J.; Breed, M.F. Urban habitat restoration provides a human health benefit through microbiome rewilding: The Microbiome Rewilding Hypothesis. Restor. Ecol. 2017, 25, 866–872.pl_PL
dc.referencesBrears, R.C. Blue and Green Cities: The Role of Blue-Green Infrastructure in Managing Urban Water Resources; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; ISBN 978-1-137-59258-3.pl_PL
dc.referencesSinnett, D.; Smith, N.; Burgess, S. Handbook on Green Infrastructure: Planning, Design and Implementation; Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA, 2015; ISBN 978-1-78347-400-4.pl_PL
dc.referencesBiernacka, M.; Kronenberg, J. Classification of institutional barriers affecting the availability, accessibility and attractiveness of urban green spaces. Urban For. Urban Green. 2018, 36, 22–33.pl_PL
dc.referencesBarron, S.; Sheppard, S.R.J.; Condon, P.M. Urban Forest Indicators for Planning and Designing Future Forests. Forests 2016, 7, 208.pl_PL
dc.referencesKabisch, N.; Strohbach, M.; Haase, D.; Kronenberg, J. Urban green space availability in European cities. Ecol. Indic. 2016, 70, 586–596.pl_PL
dc.referencesKenney, W.A.; van Wassenaer, P.J.; Satel, A.L. Criteria and indicators for strategic urban forest planning and management. Arboric. Urban For. 2011, 37, 108–117.pl_PL
dc.referencesKorwel-Lejkowska, B.; Topa, E. Dostępność parków miejskich jako elementów zielonej infrastruktury w Gdańsku. Rozw. Reg. I Polityka Reg. 2017, 37, 63–75. (In Polish)pl_PL
dc.referencesStaszek, W. Wskaźniki udziału obszarów zieleni w wybranych miastach województwa pomorskiego jako podstawa działań programowych i planistycznych. Rozw. Reg. I Polityka Reg. 2017, 37, 51–61. (In Polish)pl_PL
dc.referencesCzekajlo, A.; Coops, N.C.; Wulder, M.A.; Hermosilla, T.; Lu, Y.; White, J.C.; van den Bosch, M. The urban greenness score: A satellite-based metric for multi-decadal characterization of urban land dynamics. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2020, 93, 102210.pl_PL
dc.referencesWellmann, T.; Lausch, A.; Andersson, E.; Knapp, S.; Cortinovis, C.; Jache, J.; Scheuer, S.; Kremer, P.; Mascarenhas, A.; Kraemer, R.; et al. Remote sensing in urban planning: Contributions towards ecologically sound policies? Landsc. Urban Plan. 2020, 204, 103921.pl_PL
dc.referencesWellmann, T.; Schug, F.; Haase, D.; Pflugmacher, D.; van der Linden, S. Green growth? On the relation between population density, land use and vegetation cover fractions in a city using a 30-years Landsat time series. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2020, 202, 103857.pl_PL
dc.referencesSzulczewska, B.; Giedych, R.; Maksymiuk, G. Can we face the challenge: How to implement a theoretical concept of green infrastructure into planning practice? Warsaw case study. Landsc. Res. 2017, 42, 176–194.pl_PL
dc.referencesBruszewska, K. Tereny rolne w polskich miastach jako potencjał do kształtowania zielonej infrastruktury. Probl. Ekol. Kraj. 2013, 36, 15–22. (In Polish)pl_PL
dc.referencesPieńkowski, P.; Podlasiński, M.; Dusza-Zwolińska, E. Evaluation of the location of cities in terms of land cover on the example of Poland. Urban Ecosyst. 2019, 22, 619–630.pl_PL
dc.referencesYacamán Ochoa, C.; Ferrer Jiménez, D.; Mata Olmo, R. Green Infrastructure Planning in Metropolitan Regions to Improve the Connectivity of Agricultural Landscapes and Food Security. Land 2020, 9, 414.pl_PL
dc.referencesCieślak, I.; Biłozor, A.; Szuniewicz, K. The use of the CORINE Land Cover (CLC) database for analyzing urban sprawl. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 282.pl_PL
dc.referencesCongedo, L.; Marinosci, I.; Ritano, N.; Strollo, A.; De Fioravante, P.; Munafò, M. Monitoring of land consumption: An analysis of loss of natural and agricultural areas in Italy. Ann. Di. Bot. 2017, 7, 1–9.pl_PL
dc.referencesPetrescu, F. Urban sprawl from Urban Atlas data: Romanian case study. Manag. Res. Pract. 2019, 11, 21–30.pl_PL
dc.referencesKronenberg, J.; Haase, A.; Łaszkiewicz, E.; Antal, A.; Baravikova, A.; Biernacka, M.; Dushkova, D.; Filčák, R.; Haase, D.; Ignatieva, M.; et al. Environmental justice in the context of urban green space availability, accessibility, and attractiveness in postsocialist cities. Cities 2020, 106, 102862.pl_PL
dc.referencesSiddique, G.; Roy, A.; Mandal, M.H.; Ghosh, S.; Basak, A.; Singh, M.; Mukherjee, N. An assessment on the changing status of urban green space in Asansol city, West Bengal. GeoJournal 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesColding, J.; Gren, Å.; Barthel, S. The incremental demise of urban green spaces. Land 2020, 9, 162.pl_PL
dc.referencesFeltynowski, M. The use of geoinformation in rural and urban-rural gminas of Zgierz poviat—A pilot survey. Bull. Geogr. Socio-Econ. Ser. 2013, 22, 47–53.pl_PL
dc.referencesBaravikova, A. The uptake of new concepts in urban greening: Insights from Poland. Urban For. Urban Green. 2020, 56, 126798.pl_PL
dc.referencesČada, V.; Janečka, K. The fundamental spatial data in the public administration registers. Isprs. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2016, XLI-B4, 171–174.pl_PL
dc.referencesFeltynowski, M. Miejscowe plany zagospodarowania przestrzennego a zmiana przeznaczenia gruntów leśnych w gminach miejskich w Polsce. Sylwan 2015, 159, 252–258. (In Polish)pl_PL
dc.referencesPașca, A.; Năsui, D. The use of Corine Land Cover 2012 and Urban Atlas 2012 databases in agricultural spatial analysis. Case study: Cluj county, Romania. Res. J. Agric. Sci. 2016, 48, 314–322.pl_PL
dc.referencesFuller, R.A.; Gaston, K.J. The scaling of green space coverage in European cities. Biol. Lett. 2009, 5, 352–355.pl_PL
dc.referencesKabisch, N.; Haase, D. Green spaces of European cities revisited for 1990–2006. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2013, 110, 113–122.pl_PL
dc.referencesBadiu, D.L.; Iojă, C.I.; Pătroescu, M.; Breuste, J.; Artmann, M.; Niță, M.R.; Grădinaru, S.R.; Hossu, C.A.; Onose, D.A. Is urban green space per capita a valuable target to achieve cities’ sustainability goals? Romania as a case study. Ecol. Indic. 2016, 70, 53–66.pl_PL
dc.referencesKronenberg, J. Why not to green a city? Institutional barriers to preserving urban ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv. 2015, 12, 218–227.pl_PL
dc.referencesKronenberg, J.; Pietrzyk-Kaszyńska, A.; Zbieg, A.; Żak, B. Wasting collaboration potential: A study in urban green space governance in a post-transition country. Environ. Sci. Policy 2016, 62, 69–78.pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorEmailmarcin.feltynowski@uni.lodz.plpl_PL
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/land9110453
dc.disciplineekonomia i finansepl_PL
dc.disciplinegeografia społeczno-ekonomiczna i gospodarka przestrzennapl_PL


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe