Zjawisko preferencji techniki sondażu w kontekście badań reprezentatywnych w schemacie mieszania technik

Rybak, Adam

dc.contributor.author	Rybak, Adam
dc.contributor.editor	Piekarski, Jacek
dc.contributor.editor	Urbaniak-Zając, Danuta
dc.contributor.editor	Pasikowski, Sławomir
dc.date.accessioned	2020-01-24T17:23:59Z
dc.date.available	2020-01-24T17:23:59Z
dc.date.issued	2019
dc.identifier.citation	Rybak A., Zjawisko preferencji techniki sondażu w kontekście badań reprezentatywnych w schemacie mieszania technik, [w:] Krytyka metodologiczna w praktyce tworzenia wiedzy, J. Piekarski, D. Urbaniak-Zając, S. Pasikowski (red.), WUŁ, Łódź 2019, doi: 10.18778/8142-715-9.11.	pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn	978-83-8142-715-9
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11089/31289
dc.description.abstract	The aim of this chapter is to show the state of knowledge in the field of mixed-mode survey design methodology, the known theoretical and practical issues in its use, and to highlight knowledge gaps on this subject. Inclusion of survey mode preference hypothesis in this context is particularly interesting because of possible positive effects of its proper implementation on increasing response rates and measurement quality and lowering survey costs. However, this phenomenon is still not deeply understood and lacks a well-developed theoretical context. This chapter connects it with a wider range of theories of survey participation and gathers the elements of possible future theory. In conclusion, it presents a possible strategy for the utilization of knowledge about participants’ preferences concerning a mode in survey research.	pl_PL
dc.language.iso	pl	pl_PL
dc.publisher	Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego	pl_PL
dc.relation.ispartof	Krytyka metodologiczna w praktyce tworzenia wiedzy;
dc.rights	Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe	*
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/	*
dc.subject	mixed-mode survey	pl_PL
dc.subject	representative research	pl_PL
dc.subject	survey mode preference	pl_PL
dc.subject	research methodology	pl_PL
dc.title	Zjawisko preferencji techniki sondażu w kontekście badań reprezentatywnych w schemacie mieszania technik	pl_PL
dc.type	Book chapter	pl_PL
dc.page.number	173-194	pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation	Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu	pl_PL
dc.identifier.eisbn	978-83-8142-716-6
dc.references	Brick, J.M., Cervantes, I.F., Lee, S., Norman, G. (2011). Nonsampling Errors in Dual Frame Telephone Surveys. Survey Methodology, 37(1), 1–12.	pl_PL
dc.references	Cialdini, R. (1984). Influence: The New Psychology of Modern Persuasion. New York: Quill.	pl_PL
dc.references	Constantinidou, F., Baker, S. (2002). Stimulus Modality and Verbal Learning Performance in Normal Aging. Brain and Language, 82(3), 296–311.	pl_PL
dc.references	Couper, M.P. (2011). The Future of Modes of Data Collection. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(5), 889–908.	pl_PL
dc.references	Czapiński, J., Panek, T. (2011). Social Diagnosis 2011: Objective and Subjective Quality of Life in Poland. Contemporary Economics, 5(3), 1.	pl_PL
dc.references	de Leeuw, E.D. (2005). To Mix or Not to Mix Data Collection Modes in Surveys. Journal of Official Statistics, 21(2), 233–255.	pl_PL
dc.references	de Leeuw, E.D. (2008). Choosing the Method of Data Collection (s. 113–135). W: E.D. de Leeuw, J.J. Hox, D.A. Dillman (eds.), International Handbook of Survey Methodology. New York: L. Erlbaum Associates.	pl_PL
dc.references	de Leeuw, E.D., Hox, J.J., Dillman, D.A. (2008). Mixed-mode Surveys: When and Why (s. 299–316). W: E.D. de Leeuw, J.J. Hox, D.A. Dillman (eds.), International Handbook of Survey Methodology. New York: L. Erlbaum Associates.	pl_PL
dc.references	Dillman, D.A. (2007). Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. Hoboken: Wiley.	pl_PL
dc.references	Dillman, D.A., Smyth, J.D., Christian, L.M. (2014). Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (4th ed.). Hoboken: John Wiley Sons Inc.	pl_PL
dc.references	Dillman, D.A., Phelps, G., Tortora, R., Swift, K., Kohrell, J., Berck, J., Messer, B.L. (2009). Response Rate and Measurement Differences in Mixed-mode Surveys Using Mail, Telephone, Interactive Voice Response (IVR) and the Internet. Social Science Research, 38(1), 1–18.	pl_PL
dc.references	Diment, K., Garrett-Jones, S. (2007). How Demographic Characteristics Affect Mode Preference in a Postal/Web Mixed-Mode Survey of Australian Researchers. Social Science Computer Review, 25(3), 410–417.	pl_PL
dc.references	Edwards, M.L., Dillman, D.A., Smyth, J.D. (2014). An Experimental Test of the Effects of Survey Sponsorship on Internet and Mail Survey Response. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78(3), 734–750.	pl_PL
dc.references	Groves, R. (2006). Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys: What Do We Know About the Linkage Between Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias? Public Opinion Quarterly, 70(5), 646–675.	pl_PL
dc.references	Groves, R.M. (2011). Three Eras of Survey Research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(5), 861–871.	pl_PL
dc.references	Groves, R.M., Couper, M.P. (1998). Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys. New York: John Wiley Sons.	pl_PL
dc.references	Groves, R.M., Kahn, R.L. (1979). Surveys by Telephone: A National Comparison with Personal Interviews. New York: Academic Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Groves, R.M., Lepkowski, J.M. (1985). Dual Frame, Mixed Mode Survey Designs. Journal of Official Statistics, 1(3), 263–286.	pl_PL
dc.references	Groves, R.M., Singer, E., Corning, A. (2000). Leverage-Saliency Theory of Survey Participation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64(3), 299–308.	pl_PL
dc.references	Groves, R.M., Fowler Jr., F.J., Couper, M.P., Lepkowski, J.M., Singer, E., Tourangeau, R. (2004). Survey Methodology (t. 2). Hoboken: Wiley.	pl_PL
dc.references	Grzeszkiewicz-Radulska, K. (2009). Respondenci niedostępni w badaniach sondażowych. Łódź: Wydawnictwo UŁ.	pl_PL
dc.references	Haan, M., Ongena, Y.P., Aarts, K. (2014). Reaching Hard-to-survey Populations: Mode Choice and Mode Preference. Journal of Official Statistics, 30(2), 355–379.	pl_PL
dc.references	Hochstim, J.R. (1967). A Critical Comparison of Three Strategies of Collecting Data from Households. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62(319), 976–989.	pl_PL
dc.references	Jabkowski, P. (2015). Reprezentatywność badań reprezentatywnych: analiza wybranych problemów metodologicznych oraz praktycznych w paradygmacie całkowitego błędu pomiaru. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.	pl_PL
dc.references	Jäckle, A., Lynn, P., Burton, J. (2015). Going Online with a Face-to-Face Household Panel: Effects of a Mixed Mode Design on Item and Unit Non-response. Survey Research Methods, 9(1), 57–70.	pl_PL
dc.references	Kumar, N., Priyadarshi, B. (2013). Differential Effect of Aging on Verbal and Visuo-spatial Working Memory. Aging and Disease, 4(4), 170–177.	pl_PL
dc.references	Medway, R.L., Fulton, J. (2012). When More Gets You Less: A Meta-analysis of the Effect of Concurrent Web Options on Mail Survey Response Rates. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(4), 733–746.	pl_PL
dc.references	Millar, M.M., Dillman, D.A. (2011). Improving Response to Web and Mixed-mode Surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(2), 249–269.	pl_PL
dc.references	Millar, M.M., O’Neill, A.C., Dillman, D.A. (2009). Are Mode Preferences Real?. Pullman, WA: Social and Economic Sciences Research Center at Washington State University.	pl_PL
dc.references	Olson, K., Smyth, J.D., Wood, H.M. (2012). Does Giving People Their Preferred Survey Mode Actually Increase Survey Participation Rates? An Experimental Examination. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(4), 611–635.	pl_PL
dc.references	Piekarzewska, M., Wieczorkowski, R., Zajenkowska-Kozłowska, A. (2016). Stan zdrowia ludności Polski w 2014 r., Warszawa: GUS.	pl_PL
dc.references	Porter, S.R., Whitcomb, M.E. (2007). Mixed-mode Contacts in Web Surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(4), 635–648.	pl_PL
dc.references	Rosenfeld, B., Imai, K., Shapiro, J.N. (2016). An Empirical Validation Study of Popular Survey Methodologies for Sensitive Questions. American Journal of Political Science, 60(3), 783–802.	pl_PL
dc.references	Rossi, P.H., Wright, J.D., Anderson, A.B. (1983). Handbook of Survey Research. New York, N.Y.–London: Academic Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Rybak, A. (2019). Komunikacja oparta na kanale wizualnym i audialnym a jakość pomiaru sondażowego. W stronę nowego ujęcia hipotezy preferencji techniki przy wykorzystaniu koncepcji pamięci roboczej. Przegląd Socjologiczny, 68(3), 207–227.	pl_PL
dc.references	Sakshaug, J.W., Yan, T., Tourangeau, R. (2010). Nonresponse Error, Measurement Error, and Mode of Data Collection: Tradeoffs in a Multi-mode Survey of Sensitive and Non-sensitive Items. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74(5), 907–933.	pl_PL
dc.references	Smyth, J.D., Olson, K., Kasabian, A. (2014). The Effect of Answering in a Preferred Versus a Non-Preferred Survey Mode on Measurement. Survey Research Methods, 8(3), 137–152.	pl_PL
dc.references	Smyth, J.D., Olson, K., Millar, M.M. (2014). Identifying Predictors of Survey Mode Preference. Social Science Research, 48, 135–144.	pl_PL
dc.references	Sztabiński, F., Żmijewska-Jędrzejczyk, T. (2012). Mixed Mode Survey Design: problem efektu techniki. Przegląd Socjologiczny, 61(1), 31–63.	pl_PL
dc.references	Sztabiński, F., Sztabiński, P.B., Przybysz, D. (2007). Are Non-Respondents Similar to Respondents? Findings from the ESS-2004 in Poland. ASK. Społeczeństwo, Badania, Metody, 16(16), 25–54.	pl_PL
dc.references	Tourangeau, R., Couper, M.P., Steiger, D.M. (2003). Humanizing Self-administered Surveys: Experiments on Social Presence in Web and IVR Surveys. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(1), 1–24.	pl_PL
dc.references	Tourangeau, R., Rips, L.J., Rasinski, K.A. (2000). The Psychology of Survey Response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Verma, S.K., Courtney, T.K., Lombardi, D.A., Chang, W.R., Huang, Y.H., Brennan, M.J., Perry, M.J. (2014). Internet and Telephonic IVR Mixed-mode Survey for Longitudinal Studies: Choice, Retention, and Data Equivalency. Annals of Epidemiology, 24(1), 72–74.	pl_PL
dc.identifier.doi	10.18778/8142-715-9.11