Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorFayard, Nicole
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-22T13:52:15Z
dc.date.available2019-11-22T13:52:15Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn2084-574X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/30842
dc.description.abstractThe article explores the potential “healing” role performance art can have when representing disabling trauma, and engaging, as part of the creative process, participants who have experienced in their lives significant trauma and physical, as well as mental health concerns arising from gender violence. It focuses on the show cicatrix macula, performed during the exhibition Speaking Out: Women Healing from the Trauma of Violence (Leicester, 2014). The exhibition involved disabled visual and creative artists, and engaged participants in the process of performance making. It was held at the Attenborough Arts Centre in Leicester (UK), a pioneering arts centre designed to be inclusive and accessible. The show cicatrix macula focused on social, cultural, mental, and physical representations of trauma and disability, using three lacerated life-size puppets to illustrate these depictions. Working under the direction of the audience, two artists attempted to “repair” the bodies. The creative process was a collaborative endeavour: the decision-making process rested with the audience, whose privileged positions of witness and meaning-maker were underscored. Fayard demonstrates the significance of cicatrix macula in debunking ablist gender norms, as well as in highlighting the role played by social and cultural enablers. She calls attention to its potential for mobilizing positive identity politics, including for viewers who had experienced trauma. For example, the environment of the participatory performance space offered some opportunities for the survivor to become the author or arbiter of her own recovery. In addition, the constant physical exchange of bodies within this space of debate was well-suited to the (re)connection with the self and with others.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesText Matters: A Journal of Literature, Theory and Culture; 9
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.en_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0en_GB
dc.subjectgender violenceen_GB
dc.subjectperformance arten_GB
dc.subjectdisabilityen_GB
dc.subjecttraumaen_GB
dc.subjectidentity politicsen_GB
dc.titleSpaces of (Re)Connections: Performing Experiences of Disabling Gender Violenceen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.page.number273-291
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Leicester
dc.identifier.eissn2083-2931
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnoteNicole Fayard is Associate Professor in French and Translation Studies at the University of Leicester. Her research focuses on the history and politics of gender violence, trauma and feminist activism in France. She has written widely on the subject, including Speaking Out. Women Healing From the Trauma of Violence (2014). Fayard’s other research interests include the politics of the performance, translation and adaptation of Shakespeare in France and Europe, with particular reference to cultural memory and transnational identities. Editor or co-editor of Comparative Drama: Over His Dead Body (2016) and Multicultural Shakespeare: Shakespeare in/ out of Europe: Connecting Voices (2019), she is also the author of The Performance of Shakespeare in France since the Second World War: Re-Imagining Shakespeare (2006).en_GB
dc.referencesBarnes, Colin. “A Legacy of Oppression: A History of Disability in Western Culture.” Disability Studies: Past, Present and Future. Ed. Len Barton and Michael Oliver. Leeds: Disability, 1997. 3–24. Print.en_GB
dc.referencesBarnes, Colin. Cabbage Syndrome: The Social Construction of Dependency. London: Faber, 1990. Print.en_GB
dc.referencesBarrett, Kirsten A., et al. “Intimate Partner Violence, Health Status, and Health Care Access among Women with Disabilities.” Women’s Health Issues 19.2 (2009): n. pag. Web. 15 Jan. 2016.en_GB
dc.referencesBarton, Len, ed. Disability and Society: Emerging Issues and Insights. London: Longman, 1996. Print.en_GB
dc.referencesBoltanski, Luc. Distant Suffering: Morality, Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1999. Print.en_GB
dc.referencesBorsay, Anne. “Personal Trouble or Public Issue.” Disability Studies: Past, Present and Future. Ed. Len Barton and Michael Oliver. Leeds: Disability, 1997. 115–37. Print.en_GB
dc.referencesBracken, Patrick, and Christopher Petty, eds. Rethinking the Trauma of War. London: Free Association, 1998. Print.en_GB
dc.referencesBraidotti, Rosi. “Affirming the Affirmative: On Nomadic Affectivity.” Rhizomes 11/12 (2006): n. pag. Web. 30 Apr. 2016.en_GB
dc.referencesBurke, Donncha, et al., eds. Family Resources Survey 2013/14. Department for Work and Pensions 2015. Web. 10 Jan. 2016.en_GB
dc.referencesCampbell, Jacquelyn C. “Health Consequences of Intimate Partner Violence.” The Lancet 359.9314 (2002): 1331–36. Web. 30 Apr. 2016.en_GB
dc.referencesCarden-Coyne, Ana. “Ghosts in the War Museum.” Re-presenting Disability. Activism and Agency in the Museum. Ed. Richard Sandell, Jocelyn Dodd and Rosemarie Garland-Thomson. Abingdon: Routledge, 2010. 64–78. Print.en_GB
dc.referencesCattalini, Helen. Access to Services for Women with Disabilities who Are Subjected to Violence. Canberra: AGPS, 1993. Print.en_GB
dc.referencesCoombes, Annie. History after Apartheid: Visual Culture and Public Memory in a Democratic South Africa. Johannesburg: Wits UP, 2003. Print.en_GB
dc.referencesCrow, Liz. “Renewing the Social Model of Disability.” Coalition (Jul. 1992): 5–9. Print.en_GB
dc.referencesDockerty, Colleen, Justin Varney, and Rachel Jay-Webster. “Disability and Domestic Abuse. Risks, Impacts and Response.” Public Health England (Nov. 2015): 1–25. Web. 20 Apr. 2016.en_GB
dc.referencesDodd, Jocelyn, et al. Buried in the Footnotes: The Representation of Disabled People in Museums and Gallery Collections. Leicester: Research Centre for Museums and Galleries/ U of Leicester Research Archive, 2004. Web. 10 Jan. 2016.en_GB
dc.referencesEdgerton, Robert. The Cloak of Competence: Stigma in the Lives of the Mentally Retarded. Berkeley: U of California P, 1967. Print.en_GB
dc.referencesFawcett, Barbara. Theorising Postmodern Feminism and Disability: A Qualitative and Deconstructive Study of Disability amongst Disabled People. Manchester: Manchester UP, 1999. Print.en_GB
dc.referencesFayard, Nicole. “‘Faire parler ces femmes, [ . . . ] les libérer. Parce que dans les quartiers, on ne dit rien:’ Alienation, Sexual Violence and Textual Survival in the Work of Jamila Aït-Abbas, Samira Bellil, Leila and Loubna Méliane.” Alienation and Alterity: Otherness in Modern and Contemporary Francophone Contexts. Ed. Helen Fayard, Nicole. . Oxford: Peter Lang, 2009. 181–200. Print.en_GB
dc.referencesFayard, Nicole. “Rape, Trauma and Shame in Samira Bellil’s Dans l’enfer des tournantes.” The Female Face of Shame. Ed. Erica Jonson and Patricia Moran. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 2013. 34–47. Print.en_GB
dc.referencesFayard, Nicole. Speaking Out. Women Healing from the Trauma of Violence. Leicester: U of Leicester P, 2014. Print.en_GB
dc.referencesFlax, Jane. “The End of Innocence.” Feminists Theorize the Political. Ed. Judith Butler and Joan Scott. London: Routledge, 1992. 445–63. Print.en_GB
dc.referencesFook, Jan. “Deconstructing and Reconstructing Professional Expertise.” Researching and Practising in Social Work: Postmodern Feminist Perspectives. Ed. Barbara Fawcett et al. London: Routledge, 1999. 104–19. Print.en_GB
dc.referencesFrench, Sally. “Disability, Impairment, or Something in Between.” Disabling Barriers—Enabling Environments. Ed. John Swain et al. London: Sage, 2014. 17–25. Print.en_GB
dc.referencesHague, Gill, et al., eds. Making the Links Disabled Women and Domestic Violence Final Report. 2008. Web. 1 Feb. 2016.en_GB
dc.referencesHerman, Judith. Trauma and Recovery: From Domestic Abuse to Political Terror. New York: Basic, 1992. Print.en_GB
dc.referencesHughes, Rachel. “Nationalism and Memory at the Tuol Sleng Museum of Genocide Crimes, Cambodia.” Contested Pasts: The Politics of Memory. Ed. Katharine Hodgkin and Susannah Radstone. London: Routledge, 2003. 175–92. Print.en_GB
dc.referencesHumphreys, Cathy, and Stephen Joseph. “Domestic Violence and the Politics of Trauma.” Women’s Studies International Forum 27.5–6 (2004): 559–70. Web. 10 Jan. 2016.en_GB
dc.referencesKudlick, Catherine. “Disability History: Why We Need Another ‘Other.’” American Historical Review 108.3 (2003): 763–93. Web. 10 Jan. 2016.en_GB
dc.referencesMays, Jennifer. “Feminist Disability Theory: Domestic Violence against Women with a Disability.” Disablity & Society 21.2 (2006): 147–58. Web. 10 Jan. 2016.en_GB
dc.referencesMezey, Gillian, et al. “Domestic Violence, Lifetime Trauma and Psychological Health of Childbearing Women.” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 112 (2005): 197–204. Web. 10 Dec. 2016.en_GB
dc.referencesNosek, Margaret, et al. “Abuse of Women with Disabilities: Policy Implications.” Journal of Disability Policy Studies 8 (1997): 157–76. Print.en_GB
dc.referencesNosek, Margaret, et al.“Disability, Psychosocial, and Demographic Characteristics of Abused Women with Physical Disabilities.” Violence Against Women 12.9 (2006): 838–50. Print.en_GB
dc.referencesOliver, Michael. Social Work with Disabled People. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1983. Print.en_GB
dc.referencesOliver, Michael. The Politics of Disablement. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1990. Print.en_GB
dc.referencesOliver, Michael. Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1996. Print.en_GB
dc.referencesPearson, Chris, Nicola Harwin, and Marianne Hester, eds. Making an Impact: Children and Domestic Violence. A Reader. London: Jessica Kingsley, 2007. Print.en_GB
dc.referencesPlummer, Sara-Beth, and Patricia Findley. “Women with Disabilities’ Experience with Physical and Sexual Abuse: A Review of the Literature and Implications for the Field.” Trauma, Violence, & Abuse 13.1 (2012): 15–29. Web. 10 Jan. 2016.en_GB
dc.referencesRossiter, Amy, Issac Prilleltensky, and Richard Walsh-Bowers. “A Postmodern Perspective on Professional Ethics.” Researching and Practising in Social Work: Postmodern Feminist Perspectives. Ed. Barbara Fawcett et al. London: Routledge, 1999. 83–103. Print.en_GB
dc.referencesSandell, Richard, and Jocelyn Dodd. “Activist Practice.” Re-presenting Disability. Activism and Agency in the Museum. Ed. Richard Sandell, Jocelyn Dodd and Rosemarie Garland-Thomson. Abingdon: Routledge, 2010. 1–22. Print.en_GB
dc.referencesShakespeare, Tom. Disability Rights and Wrongs. London: Routledge, 2006. Print.en_GB
dc.referencesShakespeare, Tom, and Nicholas Watson. “The Social Model of Disability: An Outdated Ideology?” Exploring Theories and Expanding Methodologies: Where We Are and Where We Need to Go. Ed. Sharon N. Barnartt and Barbara M. Altman. Amsterdam: JAI, 2002. 2–28. Print.en_GB
dc.referencesShildrick, Margrit. Dangerous Discourses of Disability, Subjectivity and Sexuality. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. Print.en_GB
dc.referencesSilverman, Lois. “The Therapeutic Potential of Museums as Pathways to Inclusion.” Museums, Society, Inequality. Ed. Richard Sandell. London: Routledge, 2002. 69–83. Print.en_GB
dc.referencesStanley, Liz, and Sue Wise. Breaking Out Again: Feminist Ontology and Epistemology. London: Routledge, 1993. Web. 8 Jan. 2016.en_GB
dc.referencesStone, Philip. “A Dark Tourism Spectrum: Towards a Typology of Death and Macabre Related Tourist Sites, Attractions and Exhibitions.” Tourism: An Interdisciplinary International Journal 52.2 (2006): 145– 60. Web. 12 Jan. 2016.en_GB
dc.referencesStuckey, Heather, and Jeremy Nobel. “The Connection between Art, Healing and Public Health: A Review of Current Literature.” American Journal of Public Health 100.2 (2010): 254–63. Web. 11 Jun. 2016.en_GB
dc.referencesSummerfield, Derek. “Effects of War: Moral Knowledge, Revenge, Reconciliation, and Medicalised Concepts of ‘Recovery.’” British Medical Journal 322 (2002): 95–98. Print.en_GB
dc.referencesSwain, John, et al., eds. Disabling Barriers—Enabling Environments. London: Sage, 2014. Print.en_GB
dc.referencesThe Nia Project. Double Oppression: Violence against Disabled Women. 2008. Web. 11 Jun. 2012.en_GB
dc.referencesThomas, Carol. Female Forms: Experiencing and Understanding Disability. Buckingham: Open UP, 1999. Print.en_GB
dc.referencesThomas, Carol. “How is Disability Understood? An Examination of Sociological Approaches.” Disability & Society 19.6 (2004): 569–83. Print.en_GB
dc.referencesThomas, Carol. Sociologies of Disability and Illness: Contested Ideas in Disability Studies and Medical Sociology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. Print.en_GB
dc.referencesThomas, Carol. “Theorising Disability and Chronic Illness: Where Next for Perspectives in Medical Sociology?” Social Theory & Health 10.3 (2012): 209–28. Print.en_GB
dc.referencesWalmsley, Jan. “Including People with Learning Difficulties: Theory and Practice.” Disability Studies: Past, Present and Future. Ed. Len Barton and Michael Oliver. Leeds: Disability, 1997. 82–77. Print.en_GB
dc.referencesWilliams, Paul. Memorial Museums: The Global Rush to Commemorate Atrocities. Munich: Prestel-Verlag/New York Jewish Museum, 2007. Print.en_GB
dc.referencesWisconsin Coalition against Sexual Assault. “People with Disabilities and Sexual Assault.” 2011. Web. 10 May 2016.en_GB
dc.referencesZelizer, Barbie. Remembering to Forget: Holocaust Memory through the Camera’s Eye. Chicago: Chicago UP, 1998. Print.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorEmailnf11@le.ac.uk
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/2083-2931.09.17


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.