Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorYamada, Masahiro
dc.contributor.editorMierzejewski, Dominik
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-18T12:29:06Z
dc.date.available2019-09-18T12:29:06Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationYamada M., Didn’t it mean a thing fit ain’t got that swing? Swing Voters and Accountability Mechanism in the Japanese Lower House Election 2009, [w:] Dimensions of Development. East Asia in the Process of Changes, Mierzejewski D. (red.), Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2013, s. 183-198, doi: 10.18778/7525-935-3.16pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn978-83-7525-935-3
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/30215
dc.description.abstractThis paper investigates the democratic accountability mechanism. It is essential to democracy that voters are able to create a shift in national political power through an election when they are dissatisfied with the performance of the current government. The question is who can trigger such a shift in Japan’s 2009 LH election: knowledgeable or uninformed voters? Our result shows that swing voters are neither outstandingly knowledgeable nor ideal citizens. The study’s findings on political knowledge indicate that they are very ordinary people. On the other hand, the DPJ stayers in the study were more knowledgeable than average voters, and the LDP stayers and swing voters followed the DPJ stayers. Given the unpopularity of the cabinet at the time of the election, some people who regarded the DPJ as more capable of managing government swung from the LDP to the DPJ. Thus, swing voters in 2009 made the same voting choice as the DPJ stayers, who were the most politically knowledgeable. Should their decision be criticized, or did it make sense in terms of political knowledgeability?pl_PL
dc.description.sponsorshipUdostępnienie publikacji Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego finansowane w ramach projektu „Doskonałość naukowa kluczem do doskonałości kształcenia”. Projekt realizowany jest ze środków Europejskiego Funduszu Społecznego w ramach Programu Operacyjnego Wiedza Edukacja Rozwój; nr umowy: POWER.03.05.00-00-Z092/17-00.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofMierzejewski D. (red.), Dimensions of Development. East Asia in the Process of Changes, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2013;
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectSwing Voterspl_PL
dc.subjectaccountability mechanismpl_PL
dc.subjectJapanese Lower House Election 2009pl_PL
dc.titleDidn’t it mean a thing fit ain’t got that swing? Swing Voters and Accountability Mechanism in the Japanese Lower House Election 2009pl_PL
dc.typeBook chapterpl_PL
dc.page.number183-198pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationKwansei Gakuin Universitypl_PL
dc.referencesAchen, Christopher H., and Larry M. Bartels. (2002). “Blind Retrospection: Electoral Responses to Drought, Flu, and Shark Attacks.” Prepared for the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, USA.pl_PL
dc.referencesAida, Masahiko., and Ken’ichi Ikeda. (2005). “Non-response and Unequal Sampling Probability in Longitudinal Election Survey.” Review of Electoral Studies (5): 5–21.pl_PL
dc.referencesClarke, Harold D., David Sanders, Marianne C. Stewart., and Paul F. Whiteley. (2009). Performance Politics and the British Voter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesFiorina, Morris P. (1981). Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. Yale University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesHutchings, Vincent. 2003. Public Opinion and Democratic Accountability: How Citizens Learn about Politics. Princeton University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesIida, Takeshi. (2010). “Disappointment, Hope, and Voting Behavior in the 2009 Japanese General Election.” Prepared for the Annual Meeting of Japanese Association of Electoral Studies, Tokyo, Japan.pl_PL
dc.referencesIkeda, Ken’ichi. (2002). “Social Capital and Social Communication in Japan: Analysis on Survey Data on Political Participation Before and During the General Election 2000.” Japanese Journal of Electoral Studies (17):5–18.pl_PL
dc.referencesIkeda, Ken’ichi. (2004). “Japanese House of Councilors Election in 2001 and “Koizumi Prime Minister Effect.” Japanese Journal of Electoral Studies (19):29–50.pl_PL
dc.referencesIkeda, Ken’ichi. (2007). Political Reality and Social Psychology: The Dynamics of the Koizumi Years. Bokutakusha, Tokyo, Japan.pl_PL
dc.referencesIkeda, Ken’ichi, James H. Liu, Masahiko Aida., and Marc Wilson. (2005). “Dynamics of Interpersonal Political Environment and Party Identification: Longitudinal Studies of Voting in Japan and New Zealand.” Political Psychology (26;4): 517–542.pl_PL
dc.referencesImai, Ryosuke. (2008b). “The “Conditioning” Effect of Political Knowledge on Voting Behavior.” The Annuals of Japanese Political Science Association (2008- I):283–305.pl_PL
dc.referencesKobayashi, Yoshiaki. (2008). Is Democracy Working in Japan After the Political Reform. Bokutakusha, Tokyo, Japan.pl_PL
dc.referencesLong, J. Scott, and Jeremy Freese. (2003). Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata, Revised Edition. Stata Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLupia, Arthur. (1994). “Shortcuts versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections.” American Political Science Review (88):63–76.pl_PL
dc.referencesLupia, Arthur. (2006). “How Elitism Undermines the Study of Voter Competence.” Critical Review (18): 217–232.pl_PL
dc.referencesLupia, Arthur. (2010). “Did Bush Voters Cause Obama’s Victory?” PS: Political Science & Politics (43): 239–241.pl_PL
dc.referencesLupia, Arthur., and Mathew D. McCubbins. (1998). The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLupia, Arthur, Mathew D. McCubbins., and Samuel L. Popkin (eds.). (2000). Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLuskin, Robert C. (1987). “Measureing Political Sophistication.” American Journal of Political Science (31): 856–899.pl_PL
dc.referencesLuskin, Robert C. (2002). “From Denial to Extenuation (and Finally Beyond): Political Sophitication and Citizen Performance.” In James H. Kuklinski (ed.) Thinking About Political Psychology. Cambridge University Press: 281–305.pl_PL
dc.referencesMori, Hiroki. (2006). “The 2005 General Election and the State of the Party System in Japan.” Leviathan (39): 70–99.pl_PL
dc.referencesMori, Hiroki. (2011). “2009 nen Sou-senkyo no Tokuhyou Bunseki. (Analysis of Party Votes in the 2009 Lower House Election).” Doshisha Hougaku (347): 595–629.pl_PL
dc.referencesOtake, Hideo. (2003). Nihon-gata Populism (Japanese Way of Populism). Tokyo: Chuo-Koron-sha.pl_PL
dc.referencesPopkin, Samuel L. (1994). The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns, second edition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesPowers, Edward A., Willis J. Goudy., and Pat M. Keith. (1978). “Congruence Between Panel and Recall Data in Longitudinal Research.” Public Opinion Quarterly (42;3): 380–389.pl_PL
dc.referencesWeisberg, Herbert F. (2005). The Total Survey Error Approach: A Guide to the New Science of Survey Research. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.pl_PL
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/7525-935-3.16


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe