Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSadłocha, Jarosław
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-23T12:39:12Z
dc.date.available2019-08-23T12:39:12Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1641-4233
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/30023
dc.description.abstractThe category of a national interest is one of the most popular notions used in international relations. It has a polysemic character and is differently interpreted by various scientific perspectives. The purpose of this article is to provide a brief analysis of selected approaches of the theory of international relations to defining interests and correlating the interpretations of national interests of the Russian Federation performed on their bases. The choice of case study concerning the foreign policy of the Russian Federation is not accidental because in countries aspiring to gain world power the concept of national interest is raised while explaining the motives of decisions taken by their leaders exceptionally often. In this article, Russia’s interests will be discussed in reference to the annexation of the Crimea and Russia’s actions towards Ukraine. Those events vividly show the specificity of defining the national interests, based on one hand on the pursue to being a powerhouse and understanding the interests in the category of power and, on the other hand, resulting from the political identity of Russian elites. As a result, an assessment of the scientific utility of selected theoretical paradigms and their use in the analyses of Russia’s foreign policy will be outlined.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis article has been written within a research program financed by National Science Centre granted based on the decision number DEC-2011/03/N/HS5/00986.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherLodz University Pressen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInternational Studies. Interdisciplinary Political and Cultural Journal; 1
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.en_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0en_GB
dc.subjectnational interesten_GB
dc.subjecttheory of international relationsen_GB
dc.subjectRussia’s foreign policyen_GB
dc.subjectthe annexation of the Crimeaen_GB
dc.titleHeterogeneity of the Notion of Interest in Accordance with the International Relations Theory: A Study of Russia’s National Interestsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.page.number235-259
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Wroclaw, Institute of International Studies
dc.identifier.eissn2300-8695
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnoteJarosław Sadłocha – a PhD in social sciences, graduate of the University of Wroclaw. Author of the publication Critical Analysis of the Category of Interest in the Theory of International Relations and co-author of The Nobel Prize as a Symbol of Global Norms and Social Ideas. Scientific interests: theory of international relations, national security, category of interest.en_GB
dc.referencesArbatov, A. Pochemu my ne ponimaem drug druga?”. “Voenno-promyshlenny Kurier”, no. 28(344), 2010.en_GB
dc.referencesAreshev, A. DOVSE. Ustarevshii Dogovor i Novye Realii. “Mezhdunarodnaia Zhizn”, no. 12, 2007.en_GB
dc.referencesBaker, P. Pressure Rising as Obama Works to Rein In Russia. “The New York Times”, 2.03.2014.en_GB
dc.referencesBeom, S.S. Russia‘s Perspectives on International Politics: A Comparison of Liberalist, Realist and Geopolitical Paradigms. “Acta Slavica Iaponica”, no. (26), 2007.en_GB
dc.referencesBogaturov, A. Kontrrevolutsiia tsennostei i mezhdunarodnaia bezopasnost. “Mezhdunarodnyie Protsessy”, no. 8(324), 2010.en_GB
dc.referencesBordachev, T. The limits of rational choice Russia in Global Affairs, 4 October 2008.en_GB
dc.referencesBurchill, S. The National Interest in International Relations Theory. London, 2005.en_GB
dc.referencesCarr, E.H., The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939. New York: Perennial, 2001.en_GB
dc.referencesChazbijewicz S. Adwet czyli powrót. Walka polityczna Tatarów krymskich o zachowanie tożsamości narodowej i niepodległość państwa po II wojnie Światowej.Olsztyn, 2001.en_GB
dc.referencesClunan, A. The Social Construction of Russia’s Resurgence: Aspirations, Identity, and Security Interests. Baltimore MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009.en_GB
dc.referencesCox, R. Social Forces, States, and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. “Millennium: Journal of International Studies”, no. 10, 1981.en_GB
dc.referencesDonnelly, J. Realism and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.en_GB
dc.referencesFinnemore, M. National Interests in International Society. New York, 1996.en_GB
dc.referencesGilpin, R. War and Change in World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981.en_GB
dc.referencesGostkiewicz, M. Dwa obozy, które mówią różnymi językami. Jak Rosja i Zachód bawią się w propagandowy głuchy telefon. „Gazeta Wyborcza”, 28 March 2014.en_GB
dc.referencesHall, R.B. Moral Authority as a Power Resource. “International Organization”, no. 51(4), 1997.en_GB
dc.referencesHamilton, College Levitt Poll. The Russian Elite 2016. Web. https://www.hamilton.edu/documents/russian%20elite%202016%20final%20ppt.pdf.en_GB
dc.referencesHopf, T. Crimea is ours: A discursive history. “International Relations”, no. 30(2), 2016.en_GB
dc.referencesHopf, T. Social Construction of International Politics: Identities & Foreign Policies, Moscow, 1955 and 1999. London: Cornell University Press, 2002.en_GB
dc.referencesJusufaj, E. The Kosovo Precedent in the Secession and Recognition of Crimea. “ILIRIA International Review”, 01, 2015.en_GB
dc.referencesKapuśniak, T. Ukraina jako obszar wpływów międzynarodowych po zimnej wojnie, Warsaw, 2008.en_GB
dc.referencesKaraganov, S. Lucky Russia. Russia in global affairs. 23 March 2011. Web. http://eng.globalaffairs.ru/pubcol/Lucky-Russia-15154.en_GB
dc.referencesKelly, L., Carbonnel Alissa de. Russian markets plunge as Putin tightens Crimea grip. Web. http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/03/us-ukraine-crisis-idUSBREA1Q1E82014030.en_GB
dc.referencesKeohane, R.O. Joseph S. Nye, Power and Interdependence. New York, 2001en_GB
dc.referencesKropatcheva, E. Russian Foreign Policy in the Realm of European Security through the Lens of Neoclassical Realism. “Journal of Eurasian Studies”, no. 3, 2012.en_GB
dc.referencesLevada Center Poll. Russia’s role in the world. Web. 25 March 2015, https://www.levada.ru/en/2015/03/25/russia-s-role-in-the-world.en_GB
dc.referencesLevada Center Poll. Sankcii: ocenki i ożydanija. Web. 28 August 2014, http:levada.ru/2014/08/28/sanktsii-otsenki-i-ozhidaniya/.en_GB
dc.referencesLobell, S.E., Ripsman, N.M, Taliaferro, J.W. (eds.). Neoclassical realism, the State, and foreign policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.en_GB
dc.referencesMakarychev, A. Russia, Ukraine and the Eastern Partnership: From Common Neighborhood to Spheres of Influence? “Insight Turkey”, no. 16(3), 2014. Web. http://file.insightturkey.com/Files/Pdf/russia-ukraine.pdf.en_GB
dc.referencesMoravscik, A. Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. “International Organization”, vol. 51, no. 4, 1997.en_GB
dc.referencesMorgenthau, H.J. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Knopf, 1985.en_GB
dc.referencesMurray, R. The Return of the Problem-Solvers. Web. http: e-ir.info/2014/03/19/the-return-of-the-problem-solvers/.en_GB
dc.referencesPrimakov, Y. Rossiya ishchet novoe mesto v mire. “Izvestiya”, 6 March 1996.en_GB
dc.referencesPutin, V. Address by President of the Russian Federation. 18.03.2014. Web. http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/20603.en_GB
dc.referencesPutin, V. Putin deplores collapse of USSR. “BBC News”. Web. 25. April 2005, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/4480745.stm.en_GB
dc.referencesPutin, V. Reception to Mark 1000 Years since the Death of St. Vladimir, Equal-to-the-Apostles. Web. 28 July 2015, http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/50068.en_GB
dc.referencesPutin, V. Vladimir Putin has been Sworn in as President of Russia. Web. 7 May 2018, http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/57416.en_GB
dc.referencesRuggie, J.G. Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization. London, 1998.en_GB
dc.referencesRussian National Security Strategy. Web. December 2015, http://www.ieee.es/Galerias/fichero/OtrasPublicaciones/Internacional/2016/Russian-National-Security-Strategy-31Dec2015.pdf.en_GB
dc.referencesSadłocha, J. Krytyczna analiza kategorii interesu w teorii stosunków międzynarodowych. Wrocław, 2015.en_GB
dc.referencesSchweller, R.L., Deadly Imbalances: Tripolarity and Hitler’s Strategy of World Conquest. New York, 1998.en_GB
dc.referencesShea, A. Ukraine: Putin’s postmodern moment and the politics of truth. Web. 11 March 2014, http://conflictandsecurity.com/blog/ukraine-putins-postmodern-moment-and-the-politics-of-truth.en_GB
dc.referencesSinger, J.D., The Level-of-Analysis Problem in International Relations, [in:] K. Knorr and S. Verba (eds.)., The International System: Theoretical Essays. New York, 1961.en_GB
dc.referencesSlobodchikoff, M.O., Douglas Davis, G. Roots of Russian Soft Power: Rethinking Russian National Identity. “Comparative Politics Russia”, no. 2, 2017.en_GB
dc.referencesStrategiya natsional’noy bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii do 2020 goda. Web. 12 May 2009, http://www.kremlin.ru/supplement/424.en_GB
dc.referencesTsygankov, A. Russia’s Foreign Policy: Change and Continuity in National Identity. New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2010.en_GB
dc.referencesTsygankov, A. Russia’s Power and Alliances in the 21st century. “Politics”, no. 30(4), 2010.en_GB
dc.referencesVasquez, J. The Power of Power Politics: From Classical Realism to Neotraditionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.en_GB
dc.referencesWaltz, K. Struktura teorii stosunków międzynarodowych. Warsaw: Scholar, 2010.en_GB
dc.referencesWeldes, J. Constructing National Interests: the United States and the Cuban missile crisis. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.en_GB
dc.referencesWendt, A. Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics. “International Organization”, vol. 46, no. 2, 1992.en_GB
dc.referencesWendt, A. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.en_GB
dc.referencesWielomski, A. Putinowska inna rzeczywistość. Web. http://www.konserwatyzm.pl/artykul/11851/putinowska-inna-rzeczywistosc.en_GB
dc.referencesWierzbowska-Miazga, A. Konsekwencje aneksji Krymu. Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich, Web. 19 March 2014, http://www.osw.waw.pl/pl/publikacje/analizy/2014–03–19/konsekwencje-aneksji-krymu.en_GB
dc.referencesWilliams, M. The Realist Tradition and Limits of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.en_GB
dc.referencesWohlforth, W.C., The Elusive Balance: Power and Perceptions During the Cold War. Ithaca, 1993.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorEmailjsadlocha@wp.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1641-4233.23.15
dc.relation.volume23en_GB


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.