Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorDeyassa, Kassaye
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-23T12:39:11Z
dc.date.available2019-08-23T12:39:11Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1641-4233
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/30021
dc.description.abstractChina’s role as an emerging aid provider and the concept of a social plan in Africa has led to polarised responses in the West. Several say that this “productivist” strategy is much less determined by the concepts of citizenship, legal, social rights, and much more regarding building functions. The purpose of this study is to examine whether the welfare and social policy ideas that characterize Chinese aid in Africa are influencing traditional donors and becoming global. The article utilised a qualitative study that has two main components. First, a comprehensive content analysis of over 50 key Sino-African, Chinese and Western policy documents from 2000 (since cooperation between Beijing and African countries first became institutionalised). Second, there were semi-structured interviews with Chinese, African and Western stakeholders in Addis Ababa, (Ethiopia), who was directly involved in the relationship between China and Africa and related development issues. The result of documentation and interview analyses show that there are currently significant differences between Chinese and Western approaches. China has made much stronger and more explicit links between development aid and economic activity than most Western donors. The aid is usually implemented through specific projects rather than broader programs or policies.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherLodz University Pressen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInternational Studies. Interdisciplinary Political and Cultural Journal; 1
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.en_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0en_GB
dc.subjectAfricaen_GB
dc.subjectChinaen_GB
dc.subjectOECD-DACen_GB
dc.subjectSouth-South cooperationen_GB
dc.titleDoes China’s Aid in Africa Affect Traditional Donors?en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.page.number199-215
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Bergen, Centre for the Study of the Sciences and the Humanities Global Development, Norway
dc.identifier.eissn2300-8695
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnoteKassaye Deyassa is studying Global Development at the University of Bergen and working as a consultant at Hordaland County. He has MSc in Environmental and Energy Management from the University of Twente, The Netherlands.en_GB
dc.referencesAlexia Delclaux Gaytán de Ayala. Just give money to the poor. The Development Revolution from the Global South. “Comillas Journal of International Relations”, no. (2), (1 February 2015), Issue 2.en_GB
dc.referencesAhmad, M. Social Protection for the Poor and Poorest: Concepts, Policies, and Politics. “Development in Practice”, no. 23(1) (2013), pp. 151–152.en_GB
dc.referencesAnon. China in Africa: why the West is worried. “New African”, no. (471) (2008), p. 12.en_GB
dc.referencesAnon. China issues white paper on foreign aid. “Xinhua Economic News”, (April 21, 2011).en_GB
dc.referencesAnon. Constructing National Interests. In Constructing National Interests: The United States and the Cuban Missile Crisis. Minneapolis, London: University of Minnesota Press, 1999, p. 97.en_GB
dc.referencesAnon. From ‘safety nets’ back to ‘universal social provision’: is the global tide turning? [in:] The global social policy reader. Bristol, UK; Chicago, IL, USA: Policy Press, 2009, p. 371.en_GB
dc.referencesAnon. Global Social Policy & Governance. “Reference and Research Book News”, vol. 22(3), no. 22(3) (Aug, 2007).en_GB
dc.referencesAnon. Rogue to vogue? Aid. “The Economist”, no. 425(9062) (2017), p. 38.en_GB
dc.referencesAsche, H. China Returns to Africa: A Rising Power and a Continent Embrace. “The Journal of African History”, no. 50(3) (2009), pp. 461–462.en_GB
dc.referencesDarrow, M. The Millennium Development Goals: Milestones or Millstones? Human Rights Priorities for the Post-2015 Development Agenda”. “Yale Human Rights and Development Law Journal”, vol. 15 (2012), p. 55.en_GB
dc.referencesDreher, A., Fuchs, A. and Nunnenkamp, P. New Donors. “International Interactions”, no. 39(3) (2013), pp. 402–415.en_GB
dc.referencesDuncan, G. After Neo-Liberalism, What Could Be Worse? “New Zealand Sociology”, no. 29(1) (2014), pp. 15–39.en_GB
dc.referencesDu Plessis, A. The Forum on China–Africa Cooperation, Ideas and Aid: National Interest(s) or Strategic Partnership? “Insight on Africa”, no. 6(2) (2014), pp. 113–130.en_GB
dc.referencesEconomy EC. The game changer. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 89(6) (2010), pp. 142–52.en_GB
dc.referencesEmery, T. Comparative Welfare Capitalism in East Asia: Productivist Models of Social Policy, eds. Mason M.S. Kim. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. ISBN 978‐1‐137‐47184‐0; £60 (hbk). “Social Policy & Administration”, no. 52(3) (2018), pp. 831–832.en_GB
dc.referencesFoli, R. “Understanding Global Social Policy”, no. 45(4) (2016), pp. 765–766.en_GB
dc.referencesGolley, J. The Dragon’s Gift: The Real Story of China in Africa. “Economic Record”, no. 87(278) (2011), pp. 501–502.en_GB
dc.referencesGoodman, R., White, G. and Kwŏn, H.-J. The East Asian welfare model: welfare Orientalism and the state. London: Routledge, 1998.en_GB
dc.referencesGumede, V. Social policy for inclusive development in Africa. “Third World Quarterly”, no. 39(1) (2018), pp. 122–139.en_GB
dc.referencesHopf, T. The promise of constructivism in international relations theory. “International Security”, no. 23(1) (1998), pp. 171–200.en_GB
dc.referencesJean-Michel, S. and Ray, O. The End of ODA: Death and Rebirth of a Global Public Policy. “IDEAS Working Paper Series from RePEc” (2010).en_GB
dc.referencesKjollesdal, Kristian and Welle-Strand, Anne. Foreign aid strategies: China taking over? (Report). “Asian Social Science”, no. 6(10) (2010), pp. 3–13.en_GB
dc.referencesKnight, B. China as a Developmental State. “World Economy”, no. 37(10) (2014), pp. 1335–1347.en_GB
dc.referencesLacayo, C. Comparative Analysis about the Monitoring and Evaluation Systems: Debate about the Social Protection Policy and System – The Case of the Social Protection Net Program from Nicaragua (RPS) and a Proposal about a System of Unique Register of Poverty Family Beneficiaries, 2016.en_GB
dc.referencesLafargue, F. China in Africa: A Limited Conquest. “China Perspectives”, no. (1) (2009), pp. 80–86.en_GB
dc.referencesMardell, J. Foreign Aid with Chinese Characteristics. “The Diplomat” (Aug 7, 2018).en_GB
dc.referencesMidgley, J. Insecurity and Welfare Regimes in Asia, Africa and Latin America. “Journal of Social Policy”, no. 34 (2005), pp. 311–312.en_GB
dc.referencesMkandawire, T. Social policy in a development context. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, 2001.en_GB
dc.referencesMooij, J. Reclaiming Social Policy: Globalization, Social Exclusion and New Poverty Reduction Strategies by Arjan de Haan. “Development and Change”, no. 40(2) (2009), pp. 391–393.en_GB
dc.referencesOECD. DAC Chair Calls on Donors to Deliver on their Gleneagles Commitments, 2006. Web.12 September 2018, http://www.oecd.org/general/dacchaircallsondonorstodeliverontheirgleneaglescommitments.htm.en_GB
dc.referencesOECD. Promoting Pro-Poor Growth: Social Protection, 2009. Web. 12 September 2018, https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/iesf/document/promoting-pro-poor-growth-social-protection-oecd-2009.en_GB
dc.referencesPempel, T.J. Global Social Policy: International Organizations and the Future of Welfare (Book Review). “The Journal of Politics”, no. 62(1) (2000), pp. 310–312.en_GB
dc.referencesPolat, N. European integration as colonial discourse. “Review of International Studies”, no. 37(3) (2011), pp. 1255–1272.en_GB
dc.referencesReilly, J. A Norm-Taker or a Norm-Maker? Chinese aid in Southeast Asia. “Journal of Contemporary China”, no. 21(73) (2012), pp. 71–91.en_GB
dc.referencesRodrik, D. Growth versus poverty reduction: a hollow debate. ”Finance and development“ (trykt utg.) (2007), no. 37(4), pp. 8–9.en_GB
dc.referencesSaavedra, M. The New Sinosphere: China in Africa. “The China Quarterly”, no. 190 (2007), pp. 478–480.en_GB
dc.referencesSamy, Y. China’s Aid Policies in Africa: Opportunities and Challenges. “The Round Table”, no. 99(406) (2010), pp. 75–90.en_GB
dc.referencesSchemeil, Y. et al. Bringing International Organization In: Global Institutions as Adaptive Hybrids. “Organization Studies”, no. 34(2) (2013), pp. 219–252.en_GB
dc.referencesUrbina-Ferretjans, M. and Surender, R. Social Policy in the Context of New Global Actors: How Far is China’s Developmental Model in Africa Impacting Traditional Donors? “Global Social Policy”, no. 13(3) (2013), pp. 261–279.en_GB
dc.referencesThe World Health Report. Health Systems Financing: the Path to Universal Coverage. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2010.en_GB
dc.referencesYeh, H.-J. Social Issues and Policies in Asia: Family, Ageing and Work, eds. Raymond K.H. Chan, Lih-Rong Wang and Jens O. Zinn. “International Journal of Care and Caring”, no. 2(2) (2018), pp. 297–299.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorEmailKassaye.Deyassa@student.uib.no
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1641-4233.23.13
dc.relation.volume23en_GB


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.