Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTrillò, Tommaso
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-05T12:08:25Z
dc.date.available2019-08-05T12:08:25Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn0208-600X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/29912
dc.description.abstractThis paper sets off to outline some reflections on the subject position occupied by pro-equality men’s groups within overarching discourses of gender equality. Discussion makes reference to the cases of Men Engage Europe and Maschile Plurale, two loosely organized networks of men that support gender equality in different ways at the EU supranational-level and the Italian national-level respectively. Fragments of the voices of these organizations were gathered during two semi-structured interview conducted in the context of my doctoral fieldwork. This paper argues that men supporting gender equality attempt to participate in feminism from the difficult position of ‘unspoken’ subjects. More specifically, I argue that the tension between narrative of inclusion and narratives of ‘sisterhood’ within feminism produce overarching discourses of gender equality in which men’s subject position is unspoken. Based on these premises, I attempt to offer some reflections on what is gained and what is perhaps lost in the process.en_GB
dc.description.abstractPraca ta ma na celu zarysowanie pozycji zajmowanej przez grupy mężczyzn z prorównościowych organizacji podczas dyskusji odwołujących się do tematu równości płci. Dyskusja odnosi się do przypadków Men Engage Europe i Maschile Plurale, dwóch luźno zorganizowanych grup mężczyzn, które wspierają równouprawnienie płci na różne sposoby, na poziomie ponadna­rodowym Unii Europejskiej, a także odwołując się do realiów panujących we włoskich miastach. Część głosów obu organizacji została zebrana podczas dwóch częściowo ustrukturyzowanych wywiadów przeprowadzonych w ramach mojej pracy doktorskiej. Praca argumentuje, że mężczyźni popierający równouprawnienie płci próbują uczestniczyć w feminizmie z trudnej pozycji „cichych” podmiotów. Mówiąc dokładniej, twierdzę, że podejście „siostrzanego ruchu” w feminizmie prowadzi do nadrzędnych dyskusji na temat równości płci, w których pozycja mężczyzny jest niewypowiedziana. Opierając się na tych przesłankach, staram się przedstawić pewne refleksje na temat tego, co zostało osiągnięte i co być może zagubiło się w tym procesie.pl_PL
dc.description.sponsorshipThis project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 675378en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesActa Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Sociologica; 69
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.pl_PL
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0pl_PL
dc.subjectgender equalityen_GB
dc.subjectsubjectivityen_GB
dc.subjectmasculinityen_GB
dc.subjectdiscourse studiesen_GB
dc.subjectrówność płcipl_PL
dc.subjectpodmiotowośćpl_PL
dc.subjectmęskośćpl_PL
dc.subjectstudia dyskursywnepl_PL
dc.titleKłopotliwe koalicje. Kilka uwag na temat (ledwo słyszalnego) głosu prorównościowych grup męskich w propagowaniu równości płcipl_PL
dc.title.alternativeTroubling coalitions. Some remarks on the (hardly audible) voice of pro-equality men’s groups in gender equality advocacyen_GB
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.page.number71-89
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Lodz, Women Studies Centre
dc.identifier.eissn2353-4850
dc.referencesBacchi C. (1999), Women, policy and politics: The construction of policy problems, Sage, London.pl_PL
dc.referencesBaxter J. (2017), Women leaders and gender stereotyping in the UK Press: A poststructuralist approach, Springer, New York.pl_PL
dc.referencesBruce T. (2016), New rules for new times: Sportswomen and media representation in the third wave, “Sex Roles”, no. 74(7–8), pp. 361–376, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0497-6pl_PL
dc.referencesByerly C. M., Ross K. (2008), Women and media: A critical introduction, John Wiley & Sons, London.pl_PL
dc.referencesCavaghan R. (2017), Bridging rhetoric and practice: New perspectives on barriers to gendered change, “Journal of Women, Politics & Policy”, no. 38(1), pp. 42–63. doi: 10.1080/1554477X.2016.1198209.pl_PL
dc.referencesConnell R. W. (2005), Masculinities (2nd ed.), Polity, Cambridge.pl_PL
dc.referencesElomäki A. (2015), The economic case for gender equality in the European Union: Selling gender equality to decision-makers and neoliberalism to women’s organizations, “European Journal of Women’s Studies”, no. 22(3), pp. 288–302. doi: 10.1177/1350506815571142.pl_PL
dc.referencesFraser N. (1994), After the family wage: Gender equity and the welfare state, “Political Theory”, no. 22(4), pp. 591–618.pl_PL
dc.referencesFuchs C. (2013), Social media: A critical introduction, Sage, London.pl_PL
dc.referencesKantola J. & Lombardo E. (2017), Feminist political analysis: Exploring strengths, hegemonies and limitations, “Feminist Theory”, no. 18(3), pp. 323–341. doi: 10.1177/1464700117721882.pl_PL
dc.referencesKantola J. & Squires J. (2012), From state feminism to market feminism?, “International Political Science Review”, no. 33(4), pp. 382–400. doi: 10.1177/0192512111432513.pl_PL
dc.referencesKantola J. & Verloo M. (2018), Revisiting gender equality at times of recession: A discussion of the strategies of gender and politics scholarship for dealing with equality, “European Journal of Politics and Gender”, no. 1(1–2), pp. 205–222.pl_PL
dc.referencesKhosraviNik M. (2017), Social Media Critical Discourse Studies (SM-CDS), [in:] J. Flowerdew & J. E. Richardson (eds.), Handbook of Critical Discourse Analysis, Routledge, London, pp. 582–596.pl_PL
dc.referencesKhosraviNik M. & Unger J. W. (2015), Critical discourse studies and social media: Power, resistance and critique in changing media ecologies, [in:] R. Woodak & M. Meyer (eds.), Methods of critical discourse studies, Sage, London, pp. 205–233.pl_PL
dc.referencesLombardo E. & Meier P. (2016), The symbolic representation of gender: A discursive approach, Routledge, New York.pl_PL
dc.referencesLombardo E., Meier P. & Verloo M. (eds.) (2009), The discursive politics of gender equality: Stretching, bending and policy-making, Routledge, New York.pl_PL
dc.referencesMavin S. A., Elliott C., Stead V. & Williams J. (2016), Women managers, leaders and the media gaze: Learning from popular culture, autobiographies, broadcast and media press, “Gender in Management: An International Journal”, no. 31(5/6), pp. 314–321. doi: 10.1108/GM-05-2016-0105.pl_PL
dc.referencesOutshoorn J. & Kantola J. (eds.) (2007), Changing state feminism, Springer, London.pl_PL
dc.referencesPonterotto D. (2014), Trivializing the female body: A cross-cultural analysis of the representation of women in sports journalism, “Journal of International Women’s Studies”, no. 15(2), pp. 94–111.pl_PL
dc.referencesPrügl E. (2015), Neoliberalising feminism, “New Political Economy”, no. 20(4), pp. 614–631. doi: 10.1080/13563467.2014.951614.pl_PL
dc.referencesReisigl M. & Wodak R. (2015), The discourse-historical approach (DHA), (in:) R. Wodak & M. Meyer (eds.) Methods of critical discourse studies, Sage, London, pp. 23–61.pl_PL
dc.referencesRoss K. & Carter C. (2011), Women and news: A long and winding road, “Media, Culture & Society”, no. 33(8), pp. 1148–1165. doi: 10.1177/0163443711418272.pl_PL
dc.referencesRoss K., Boyle K., Carter C. & Ging D. (2018), Women, men and news: It’s life, Jim, but not as we know it, “Journalism Studies”, no. 19(6), pp. 824–845. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2016.1222884.pl_PL
dc.referencesShoaf N. R. F. & Parsons T. N. (2016), 18 Million cracks, but no cigar: News media and the campaigns of Clinton, Palin, and Bachmann, “Social Sciences”, no. 5(3), pp. 1–15. doi: 10.3390/socsci5030050.pl_PL
dc.referencesShor E., van de Rijt A., Miltsov A., Kulkarni V. & Skiena S. (2015), A Paper ceiling: Explaining the persistent underrepresentation of women in printed news, “American Sociological Review”, no. 80(5), pp. 960–984. doi: 10.1177/0003122415596999.pl_PL
dc.referencesTrillò T. (2018), The “Non Una di Meno” feminist movement in Italy: Connective or collective?, [in:] E. Romero Frias & L. Bocanegra Barbecho (eds.), Applied digital humanities and social science: Case studies and critical perspectives, Granada University Press, Granada, pp. 87–112.pl_PL
dc.referencesvan Leeuwen T. (2007), Legitimation in discourse and communication, “Discourse & Communication”, no. 1(1), pp. 91–112.pl_PL
dc.referencesVerloo M. (ed.) (2007), Multiple meanings of gender equality. A critical frame analysis of gender policies in Europe, Central European University Press, Budapest.pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorEmailtommaso.trillo@uni.lodz.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/0208-600X.69.05


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.