Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorGonul, Dilcu
dc.contributor.authorErkut, Gulden
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-05T11:23:33Z
dc.date.available2019-08-05T11:23:33Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1231-1952
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/29907
dc.description.abstract The main focus of this study is on understanding the importance of social dynamics of cities for attracting human capital to urban regions. The principal research question of the article is “if there is a spatial dependency on neighbouring provinces’ social environmental qualities in human capital at­traction for Turkey.” It is believed that developmental disparities among regions can be overcome with a balanced distribution of human capital. In this article, first the concept and importance of human capital and its evolution throughout economic history are explained in order to emphasize the relationship between development and human capital for urban regions. The literature review consists of migration models developed and used in previous studies and recent literature that together consider human capital and its flow with spatial analysis. A review of migration models helps structure the quantitative models’ building blocks, or the concepts to be quantified. Literature that discusses human capital and spatial analysis, at the same time, guides the study in implementing the most appropriate analysis technique. The literature discussed in the paper is focused on human capital migration and urban attractiveness. Its similarity with the current study work is the focus on the relationship between urban environment components and human capital. However, the cited studies lack the “spatial/relational” approach to urban regions which means that the effects of developments in settlements neighbouring the region were ignored. The contribution which we intend to make with the current study is to adapt the spatial econometric analysis to the problem of human capital attraction. Literature review is followed by data used in the empirical part of the study, and brief information on spatial econometric analysis. Next, findings of the empirical spatial econometric analysis of Turkey’s 81 urban regions are provided. Overall, the analysis indicated that undergraduate and post-graduate migrants care about the social prosperity of the neighbouring environment of destination province. The last part concludes with an interpretation of empirical study findings and discusses relevant urban and regional policy instruments.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEuropean Spatial Research and Policy; 1
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.en_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0en_GB
dc.subjectHuman capitalen_GB
dc.subjecthuman capital attractionen_GB
dc.subjectrelational approachen_GB
dc.subjectspatial econometricsen_GB
dc.subjectTurkeyen_GB
dc.subjectregional developmenten_GB
dc.subjectspillover Effectsen_GB
dc.titleWhy do skilled people migrate to cities? A spatial econometric analysis for understanding the impact of the social environment on the attraction of human capital to cities in Turkeyen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.page.number127-148
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationIstanbul Technical University, Institute of Science and Technology
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationIstanbul Technical University, Urban and Regional Planning Department
dc.identifier.eissn1896-1525
dc.referencesALTAY, H. and ÇELEBIOĞLU, F. (2015), ‘The impacts of political terrorism on gross domestic product in Eurasia: A spatial data analysis’, Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics, 8 (15), pp. 21–37.en_GB
dc.referencesAMIN, A. (2004), ‘Regions unbound: Towards a new politics of place’, Geogr. Ann., 86B (1): 3344.en_GB
dc.referencesAMIN, A. (2007), Re-thinking the urban social, City, 11 (1).en_GB
dc.referencesANDERSSON, A. (1985), ‘Creativity and Regional Development’, Papers of the Regional Science Association, 56, pp. 5‒20.en_GB
dc.referencesANDERSSON, R., QUIGLEY, J. M. and WILHELMSSON, M. (2005), Agglomeration and the spatial distribution of creativity, RSAI, pp. 445‒464.en_GB
dc.referencesANSELIN, L. (2005), Exploring Spatial Data with GeoDa: a workbook, Spatial Analysis Laboratory, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 6180, http://sal.uiuc.edu/ Center for Spatially Integrated Social Science, http://www.csiss.org/ Revised Version, March 6, 2005.en_GB
dc.referencesANSELIN, L. and BERA, A. K. (1998), ‘Spatial Dependence in Linear Regression Models with an Introduction to Spatial Econometrics’, [in:] ULLAH A. and GILES D. E. A. (eds.) Handbook of Applied Statistics, Marcel Dekker, NY, pp. 237‒289.en_GB
dc.referencesANSELIN, L., SYABRI, I. and KHO, Y. (2006), GeoDA: ‘An introduction to spatial data analysis’, Geographical Analysis, 38, pp. 5‒22.en_GB
dc.referencesARMSTRONG, H. and TAYLOR, J. (2000), Regional Economics and Policy, Third Edition, Blackwell Publishers LTD., UK (chapter 6: interregional migration, pp. 141‒165).en_GB
dc.referencesARVANTIDIS, P., PETRAKOS, G. and PAULEAS, S. (2007), Determinants of Economic Growth: the experts’ view, Paper presented in ERSA-2007, Paris.en_GB
dc.referencesBARRO, R. (1991), ‘Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries’, Journal of Political Economy, 106.2, pp. 407‒443.en_GB
dc.referencesBAUDINO, M. (2016), ‘The impact of human and physical accumulation on Chinese growth after 1994: A spatial econometric approach’, World Development Perspectives, 2, pp. 11‒16.en_GB
dc.referencesBECKER, G. S. (1993), Human Capital: A theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education, Third Edition, The University of Chicago, Chicago and London.en_GB
dc.referencesBENHABIB, J. and SPIEGEL, M. (1994), ‘The Role of Human Capital in Economic Development: Evidence from Aggregate Cross-Country Data’, Journal of Monetary Economics, 34, pp. 143‒173.en_GB
dc.referencesBRUNETTI, A. (1997), ‘Political Variables in Cross-Country Growth Analysis’, Journal of Economic Surveys, 11.2, pp. 163‒190.en_GB
dc.referencesCHEN, J. and ZHOU, Q. (2017), ‘City size and urban labor productivity in China: New evidence from spatial city-level panel data analysis’, Economic Systems, 41, pp. 165‒178.en_GB
dc.referencesCONIGLIO, N. D. (2008), ‘Human Capital Accumulation and Migration in a Peripheral EU Region: the case of Basilicata’, Papers in Regional Science, 87 (1), pp. 77‒95.en_GB
dc.referencesÇELEBIOĞLU, F. (2017), ‘Women Employment in terms of gender inequality across the provinces of Turkey’, Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics, 10 (19), pp. 61‒80.en_GB
dc.referencesÇETIN, D. and KALAYCI, E. (2016), ‘Spatial Econometric Analysis of R&D Spillovers in Turkey’, Journal of Applied Economics and Business Research, 6 (1), pp. 55‒72.en_GB
dc.referencesEGAN, K., (1992), Imagination in Teaching and Learning, London: Routledge.en_GB
dc.referencesERDEM, U. (2016), ‘Regional Human Capital Distribution and Disparities in Turkey’, Review of Urban and Regional Development studies, 8 (1), pp. 16‒31.en_GB
dc.referencesEVANS, R. and HARDING, A. (1997), ‘Regionalization, regional institutions and economic development’, Policy and Politics, 25, pp. 19‒30.en_GB
dc.referencesFAGGIAN, A. and MCCANN, P. (2006), ‘Human Capital Flows and Regional Knowledge Assets: a Simultaneous Equation Approach’, Oxford Economic Papers, 52, pp. 475‒500.en_GB
dc.referencesFAGGIAN, A. and MCCANN, P. (2009), ‘Human capital, graduate migration and innovation in British Regions’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33, pp. 317‒333.en_GB
dc.referencesFLORIDA, R. (2003), ‘Cities and the Creative Class’, City & Community, 2 (1), pp. 3‒19.en_GB
dc.referencesGEZICI, F. and HEWINGS, G. J. D. (2004), ‘Regional convergence and the economic performance of peripheral areas in Turkey’, Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, 16, pp. 113–132.en_GB
dc.referencesGLAESER, E. (1998), ‘Are Cities Dying?’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12, pp. 139‒160.en_GB
dc.referencesGLAESER, E. and SAIZ, A. (2004), ‘The Rise of the Skilled City’, Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs, pp. 47‒105.en_GB
dc.referencesHANUSHEK, E. A. and KIMKO, D. D. (2000), ‘Schooling, Labor-Force Quality and the Growth of Nations’, The American Economic Review, 90 (5), pp. 1184‒1208.en_GB
dc.referencesHUNT, E. K. (2002), History of Economic Thoughts, Updated Second Edition.en_GB
dc.referencesJACOBS, J. (1984), Cities and the Wealth of Nations. New York: Random House.en_GB
dc.referencesJESSOP, B. (1998), ‘The rise of governance and the risks of failure: the case of economic development’, Int. Soc. Sci. J., 155, pp. 365‒378.en_GB
dc.referencesJONES, M. (2009), ‘Phase space: geography, relational thinking, and beyond’, Progress in Human Geography, 33 (4), pp. 487–506.en_GB
dc.referencesKARAHASAN, B. C. and UYAR, E. (2009), ‘Spatial Distribution of Education and Regional Inequalities in Turkey’, MPRA Paper 30130, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2011.en_GB
dc.referencesKARLSSON, C. and ZHANG, W. (2001), ‘The Role of Universities in Regional Development-Endogenous Human Capital and Growth in a Two-region Model’, The Annals of Regional Science, 35, pp. 179‒197.en_GB
dc.referencesKIRDAR, M. and SARAÇOĞLU, Ş. (2007), ‘Migration and Regional Convergence: an empirical investigation for Turkey’, Munich Personal RePEc Archive, Paper No. 2648.en_GB
dc.referencesKNIGHT, J. (1992), Institutions and Social Conflict, Cambridge University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesLESAGE, J. P. and PACE, R. K. (2010), ‘Spatial Econometric Models’, [in:] Fischer M. and Getis A. (eds.) Handbook of Applied Spatial Analysis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.en_GB
dc.referencesLIPSET, S. M. (1959), ‘Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy’, American Political Science Review, 53 (1), pp. 69‒105.en_GB
dc.referencesLIU, Z., LIU, S., JIN, H. and QI, W. (2017), ‘Rural population change in China: Spatial differences, driving forces and policy implications’, Journal of Rural Studies, 51, pp. 189‒197.en_GB
dc.referencesLUCAS, R. E. (1988), ‘On the Mechanics of Economic Development’, Journal of Monetary Development, 22, pp. 3‒42.en_GB
dc.referencesMCCANN, E. and WARD, K. (2010), Relationality/territoriality: Toward a conceptualization of cities in the world, Geoforum, 41, pp. 175–184.en_GB
dc.referencesMORGAN, K. (1996), ‘An Endogenous Approach to Regional Economic Development: The Emergence of Wales’, European Planning Studies, 4 (6), pp. 705–716.en_GB
dc.referencesMORGAN, K. (1997), ‘The learning region: institutions, innovation and regional renewal’, Regional Studies, 31 (5), pp. 491‒503.en_GB
dc.referencesMUNRO, J. M. (1974), ‘Migration in Turkey’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 22 (4), pp. 634‒653.en_GB
dc.referencesMURDOCH, J. (2006), Post-structuralism and relational space. In Post-structuralist geography: A guide to relational space. London: SAGE Publications Ltd (pp. 1–26).en_GB
dc.referencesRITSILA, J. and OVASKAINEN, M. (2001), ‘Migration and regional centralization of human capital’, Applied Economics, 33, pp. 317‒325.en_GB
dc.referencesROMER, P. (1990), ‘Endogenous technical change’, Journal of Political Economy, 94, pp. 1002‒1037.en_GB
dc.referencesSIMON, C. (1998), ‘Human Capital and Metropolitan Employment Growth’, Journal of Urban Economics, 43, pp. 223‒243.en_GB
dc.referencesSJAASTAD, L. A. (1962), ‘The Costs and Returns of Human Migration’, Journal of Political Economy, 70 (5), Part 2, pp. 80‒93.en_GB
dc.referencesTUNALI, İ. (1996), ‘Migration and Remigration of Male Household Heads in Turkey, 1963–1973’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 45 (1), pp. 31‒67.en_GB
dc.referencesVAN DER GAAG, N. and VAN WISSEN, N. (2008), ‘Economic Determinants of Internal Migration Rates: A comparison across five European countries’, Journal of Economic and Social Geography, 99 (2), pp. 209‒222.en_GB
dc.referencesVITON, P. (2010), Notes on spatial econometric models, http://facweb.knowlton.ohio-state.edu/pvi-ton/courses2/crp8703/spatial.pdf, (9.08.2017).en_GB
dc.referencesWARD, K. (2010), ‘Towards a relational comparative approach to the study of cities’, Progress in Human Geography, 34 (4), pp. 471–487.en_GB
dc.referencesYÜCEŞAHIN, M. M. and KC, S. (2015), ‘Demographic and Human Capital Heterogeneity in Selected Provinces of Turkey: A Scenario Analysis Using Multidimensional Population Projection Model’, Economics and Sociology, 8 (3), pp. 215‒244.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorEmaildilcugonul@gmail.com
dc.contributor.authorEmailgerkut@itu.edu.tr
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1231-1952.26.1.07
dc.relation.volume26en_GB


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.