Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJanušauskienė, Diana
dc.description.abstractThis article presents original research concerning subjective security and the perception of security threats in Lithuania. It is based on an analysis of data collected during qualitative interviews conducted in 2016 within the framework of a project titled Subjective Security in Volatile Geopolitical Context: Traits, Factors, and Individual Strategies. The investigation resides upon individual-based human security theory, and it addresses the threats that individuals consider to be important, as well as the ways in which various perceptions of security form within society.en_GB
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesExpanding Social Interactionist Horizons: Bridging Disciplines and Approaches; 2
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.en_GB
dc.subjectSubjective Securityen_GB
dc.subjectSecurity Threatsen_GB
dc.subjectQualitative Interviewsen_GB
dc.titleThe Perception of Security Threats in Lithuania: A Human Security Perspectiveen_GB
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationInstitute of Sociology, Lithuanian Social Research Centre, Lithuania
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnoteDr. Diana Janušauskienė, a political sociologist, is currently a Senior Researcher at the Institute of Sociology of the Lithuanian Social Research Centre. Her main research interests are democratization, ethnicity, gender, and subjective security. She has over 25 publications in English, Lithuanian, and Polish, including Post-Communist Democratisation in Lithuania: Elites, Parties, and Youth Political Organisations (2011), Political Transformation and Changing Identities in Central and Eastern Europe (2008), and Values and Ideologies in Central Eastern Europe (in print), the latter two co-edited with Andrew Blasko. She has also contributed the chapter “The Metamorphosis of the Communist Party of Lithuania” to Communist Successor Parties in Central and Eastern Europe (2002), edited by A. Bozóki and J. T. Ishiyama. Dr. Janušauskienė’s most recent research has focused on subjective security and discrimination.en_GB
dc.referencesAsher, Arian. 1995. Security Threatened: Surveying Israeli Opinion on Peace and War. Tel Aviv: Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies, Tel Aviv University; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesAsher, Arian. 2003. Israeli Public Opinion on National Security 1999. Tel Aviv: Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies, Tel Aviv University. Retrieved October 06, 2016 (
dc.referencesBenforado, Adam and Jon Hanson. 2012. “Seeing Bias: Discrediting and Dismissing Accurate Attributions.” Pp. 453-498 in Ideology, Psychology, and Law, edited by J. Hanson. New York: Oxford University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesBuzan, Barry. 2009. People, States and Fear. An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era. Colchester: ECPR Press.en_GB
dc.referencesDavis, Darren W. and Brian D. Silver. 2004. “Civil Liberties vs. Security: Public Opinion in the Context of the Terrorist Attacks on America.” American Journal of Political Science 48(1):28-46.en_GB
dc.referencesGamson, William A. et al. 1992. “Media Images and the Social Construction of Reality.” Annual Review of Sociology 18(1):373-393.en_GB
dc.referencesHerron, Kerry G. and Hank C. Jenkins-Smith. 2014. “Public Perspectives on Nuclear Security.” Risk, Hazards and Crisis in Public Policy 5(2):109-133.en_GB
dc.referencesHuddy, Leonie, Stanley Feldman, and Christopher Weber. 2007. “The Political Consequences of Perceived Threat and Felt Insecurity.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 614(1):131-153.en_GB
dc.referencesHuman Development Report. 1994. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Published for the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Retrieved December 14, 2016 (
dc.referencesHuysmans, Jef. 2002. “Defining Social Constructivism in Security Studies: The Normative Dilemma of Writing Security.” Alternatives 27:41-62.en_GB
dc.referencesJenkins-Smith, Hank C. 2006. Critical Masses and Critical Choices: Evolving Public Opinion on Nuclear Weapons, Terrorism, and Security. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.en_GB
dc.referencesKimhi, Shaul and Michal Shamai. 2006a. “Are Women at Higher Risk than Men; Determinants of Students’ Perceptions of Conventional and Unconventional War Threats.” Women and Health 43(3):1-19.en_GB
dc.referencesKimhi, Shaul and Michal Shamai. 2006b. “Exposure to Threat of War and Terror, Political Attitudes, Stress, and Life Satisfaction among Teenagers in Israel.” Journal of Adolescence 29(2):165-176.en_GB
dc.referencesLahav, Gallya and Marie Courtemanche. 2012. “The Ideological Effects of Framing Threat on Immigration and Civil Liberties.” Political Behavior 34(3):1-29.en_GB
dc.referencesMaslow, Abraham H. 1943. “A Theory of Human Motivation.” Psychological Review 50(4):370-396.en_GB
dc.referencesSaar Poll OÜ. 2014. Public Opinion and National Defence. Commissioned by the Ministry of Defense, Republic of Estonia. Retrieved September 20, 2016 (
dc.referencesStatistics Lithuania 2016. Retrieved February 28, 2017 (

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.