Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorKoblianska, Inna
dc.contributor.authorKalachevska, Larysa
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-03T10:08:28Z
dc.date.available2019-04-03T10:08:28Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1508-2008
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/27369
dc.description.abstractThe article investigates the “systemic” dimension of the existing institutional‑legal and organizational peculiarities of the innovation policy in Ukraine, based on the IS approach, which is seen as one of the main guidelines for the innovation policy formation, and, in particular, underlies the Ukrainian framework as well. The authors found that state strategic documents do not sufficiently reflect the systemic character of the NIS, nor do they place linkages or firms at the core of the national innovation system. Areas are determined where the innovation policy cannot be realized completely because of the current organization of activities and powers of the central executive authorities in this field, specifically: the impact on business, the formation of infrastructure, and the development of linkages. European countries’ experience in the field of innovation policy implementation is explored, particularly, the creation and operating of the models of the national innovation agencies as well as the spectrum of their functions. Based on the European experience, it is proposed that a State Agency for Innovation and Development in Ukraine be created that will integrate the functions of regional project funding, provide advice, and realize the basic functions of the innovation intermediary.en_GB
dc.description.abstractW artykule dokonano analizy „systemowego” wymiaru istniejących instytucjonalno‑prawno‑organizacyjnych osobliwości polityki innowacyjnej na Ukrainie, w oparciu o podejście SI (SI – System Innowacji), które jest uważane za jedną z głównych wytycznych dla kształtowania polityki innowacyjnej, w tym w szczególności również na Ukrainie. Stwierdzono, że państwowe dokumenty strategiczne w niewystarczający sposób odzwierciedlają systemowy charakter NSI (NSI – Narodowy System Innowacji), ani też nie sytuują powiązań ani przedsiębiorstw w centrum narodowego systemu innowacji. Określono obszary, w których polityka innowacyjna nie może być w pełni realizowana ze względu na obecny sposób organizacji działań i uprawnienia centralnych organów wykonawczych w tej dziedzinie, a w szczególności na ich wpływ na biznes, tworzenie infrastruktury i rozwój powiązań. Przedmiotem analizy są doświadczenia krajów europejskich w zakresie wdrażania polityki innowacyjnej, w szczególności w zakresie tworzenia i funkcjonowania modeli krajowych agencji innowacji, a także spektrum ich funkcji. W oparciu o doświadczenia europejskie proponuje się utworzenie Państwowej Agencji ds. Innowacji i Rozwoju na Ukrainie, która będzie integrować funkcje finansowania projektów regionalnych, udzielać porad i realizować podstawowe funkcje instytucji wspomagającej innowacje. pl_PL
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesComparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe; 1
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.en_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0en_GB
dc.subjectinnovationen_GB
dc.subjectinnovation systemen_GB
dc.subjectinnovation development institutionsen_GB
dc.subjectinnovation intermediaryen_GB
dc.subjectinnovation policyen_GB
dc.subjectinnowacjepl_PL
dc.subjectsystem innowacjipl_PL
dc.subjectinstytucje wprowadzające innowacjepl_PL
dc.subjectinstytucje wspomagające innowacjepl_PL
dc.subjectpolityka innowacyjnapl_PL
dc.titleProblems of the Institutional‑Legal and Organizational Provision of Systemic Innovation Policy: the Case of Ukraineen_GB
dc.title.alternativeProblemy instytucjonalno‑prawne i organizacyjne zapewnienia systemowej polityki innowacji: przypadek Ukrainypl_PL
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.page.number53-73
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUkraine, Sumy, Sumy National Agrarian University, Economics Department
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUkraine, Sumy, Sumy National Agrarian University, Foreign Economic Activity and Eurointegration Department
dc.referencesAsheim, B.T. & Coenen, L.J (2006), Contextualizing regional innovation systems in a globalizing learning economy: on knowledge bases and institutional frameworks, ‘Technology Transfer’, Vol. 31, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961–005–5028–0pl_PL
dc.referencesAssociation Agreement between Ukraine, on the one hand, and the European Union, the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, on the other side, International document, a Statement Ratified by Law of Ukraine from 16 September 2014, # 1678‑VII.pl_PL
dc.referencesAutio, E., Kenney, M., Mustar, Ph., Siegel, D. & Wright, M. (2014), Entrepreneurial innovation: the importance of context, ‘Research Policy’, Vol. 43, Is. 7, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014. 01.015pl_PL
dc.referencesBudget Code, the Law of Ukraine from 8 July 2010, # 2456‑VI.pl_PL
dc.referencesCoenen, L., Asheim, B., Bugge, M.M. & Herstad, S.J. (2016), Advancing Regional Innovation Systems: What Does Evolutionary Economic Geography Bring to the Policy, ‘Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space’, Vol. 35, Is. 4, https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0263774X16646583pl_PL
dc.referencesCooke, P. (2001), Strategies for regional innovation systems: learning transfer and applications. Centre for Advanced Studies, Cardiff University, Cardiff.pl_PL
dc.referencesDaniluk, A. (2017), Cooperation between Business Companies and the Institutions in the Context of Innovations Implementation. Procedia Engineering, 182, DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.138pl_PL
dc.referencesEuropean Innovation Scoreboard 2018: Ukraine profile (2018), European Commission, https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/30705pl_PL
dc.referencesFagerberg, J. (2015), Innovation policy, national innovation systems and economic performance: in search of a useful theoretical framework, Working Papers on Innovation Studies 20150321, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.pl_PL
dc.referencesFedulova, L. (2012), Problems of forming the institutional environment of innovation systems in Ukrainian regions, ‘Economic bulletin of the university’, State higher educational institution “Pereyaslav‑Khmelnytsky State Pedagogical University named after Grigory Skovoroda”, Vol. 18–1.pl_PL
dc.referencesFeinson, S. (2003), National Innovation Systems Overview and Country Cases. Vol. 1, Sec. 1, Knowledge Flows and Knowledge Collectives: Understanding the Role of Science and Technology Policies in Development. Center for Science, Policy and Outcomes, Columbia University.pl_PL
dc.referencesHladchenko, M. & Pinheiro, R. (2018), Implementing the Triple Helix Model: Means‑Ends Decoupling at the State Level?, ‘Minerva’, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024–018–9355–3pl_PL
dc.referencesIsaksen, A. (2001), Building regional innovation systems: is endogenous industrial development possible in the global economy?, ‘Canadian Journal of Regional Science’, 24 (1).pl_PL
dc.referencesIssues of the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade, the Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine from 20 August 2014, # 459.pl_PL
dc.referencesIssues of the State Innovation Finance and Credit Institution, the Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine from 13 April 2000, # 654.pl_PL
dc.referencesJurkovičova, L., Kubiniy, N. & Hotra, V. (2014), The role of the state in the sphere of innovative development of the agricultural complex of Ukraine, ‘Studia commercialia Bratislavensia’, Vol. 7, No. 27, DOI: 10.2478/stcb–2014–0034pl_PL
dc.referencesKasych, А.О. & Voсhozka, M. (2017), Conceptual provisions of the development of Ukrainian national innovation system, ‘Scientific bulletin of Polissia’, No. 2 (10), DOI: 10.25140/2410–9576–2017–2–2 (10)16–23pl_PL
dc.referencesKhaustova, K.M. (2016), Estimation the impact of macroeconomic factors on the innovation activities of enterprises in Ukraine, ‘Marketing and Management of Innovations’, Vol. 3.pl_PL
dc.referencesKlein Woolthuis, R.J.A., Lankhuizen, M., & Gilsing, V. (2005), A system failure framework for innovation policy design, ‘Technovation’, 25 (6). DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2003.11.002pl_PL
dc.referencesKlerkx, L. & Leeuwis, C. (2009), Establishment and embedding of innovation brokers at different innovation system levels: insights from the Dutch agricultural sector, ‘Technological Forecasting & Social Change’, Vol. 76, DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2008.10.001pl_PL
dc.referencesLundin, N. & Serger Schwaag, S. (2018), Agenda 2030 and A Transformative Innovation Policy – Conceptualizing and experimenting with transformative changes towards sustainability, Work in process WP 2018–01. Lund University.pl_PL
dc.referencesLundvall Bengt‑Ake (2007), National innovation systems – analytical concept and development tool, ‘Industry and innovation’, Vol. 14, No. 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710601130863pl_PL
dc.referencesMaloney, W.F. (2017), Revisiting the national innovation system in developing countries (No. 8219). The World Bank.pl_PL
dc.referencesMartin, S. & Scott, John T. (2000), The nature of innovation market failure and the design of public support for private innovation, ‘Research Policy’, No. 29.pl_PL
dc.referencesMazzucato, M. (2017), Mission‑oriented Innovation Policy: Challenges and Opportunities. UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose Working Paper Series, (IIPP 2017–01), https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/public‑purpose/wp2017–01 (accessed: 29.08.2018)pl_PL
dc.referencesOn Agricultural Advisory Activities, the Law of Ukraine from 17 June 2004, # 1807‑IV.pl_PL
dc.referencesOn Approval of the Concept for the Development of the National Innovation System, Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine from 17 June 2009 # 680‑рpl_PL
dc.referencesOn Creation of the State Innovation Non‑Bank Finance and Credit Institution ≪Fund for Support of Small Innovation Business≫, the Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine from 12 December 2011, # 1396.pl_PL
dc.referencesOn Innovation Activity, Law of Ukraine from 4 July 2002, # 40‑IV.pl_PL
dc.referencesOn Scientific and Scientific‑Technical Activity, the Law of Ukraine from 26 November 2015, # 848‑VIII.pl_PL
dc.referencesOn State Budget of Ukraine for 2018, the Law of Ukraine from 7 December 2017, # 2246‑VIII.pl_PL
dc.referencesOn State Regulation of Activity in the Technology Transfer Area, the Law of Ukraine from 14 September 2006, # 143‑V.pl_PL
dc.referencesOn Strategy of Sustainable Development “Ukraine – 2020”, Decree of the President of Ukraine from 12 January 2015, # 5/2015.pl_PL
dc.referencesOn Ukrainian Fund for Entrepreneurship Support, the Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine from 27 August 1995, # 687.pl_PL
dc.referencesRaven, R. & Walrave, B. (2018), Overcoming transformational failures in the dynamics of technological innovation systems, ‘Technological Forecasting and Social Change’ (in press), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.05.008pl_PL
dc.referencesRegulation on the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, the Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine from 16 October 2014, # 630pl_PL
dc.referencesReport on the results of monitoring of SFRD projects in 2015–2017 (2018). U‑Lead with Europe.pl_PL
dc.referencesSome issues of the state fund of regional development, the Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine from 18 March 2015, # 196.pl_PL
dc.referencesThe ‘Sustainable Development Goals: Ukraine’ national baseline report (2017). Ministry of Economic Development and Trade of Ukraine, Kyiv.pl_PL
dc.referencesVerspagen, B., Hollanders, H. & Noben, L. (2018), Synthesis report on European innovation system. UNU‑MERIT.pl_PL
dc.referencesWieczorek, A.J. & Hekkert, M.P. (2012), Systemic instruments for systemic innovation problems: a framework for policy makers and innovation scholars, ‘Science and Public Policy’, 39.pl_PL
dc.referencesYegorov, I. & Ranga, M. (2014), Innovation, politics and tanks: the emergence of a Triple Helix system in Ukraine and the influence of EU cooperation on its development, ‘International Journal of Transitions and Innovation Systems’, Vol. 3, No. 3, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTIS.2014.065700pl_PL
dc.referencesZakharchenko, N.V. & Kuznietsov, E.A. (2017), The formation of the national innovation system as the basis of innovative‑investment development in Ukraine, ‘BUSINESSINFORM’, No. 10.pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorEmailkoblyanska2@gmail.com
dc.contributor.authorEmaillikalachevska@gmail.com
dc.identifier.doi10.2478/cer-2019-0004
dc.relation.volume22en_GB
dc.subject.jelO32
dc.subject.jelO38
dc.subject.jelH11
dc.subject.jelO52
dc.subject.jelO57


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.