Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHusenicova, Luciaen
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-23T15:55:25Z
dc.date.available2019-01-23T15:55:25Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-03en
dc.identifier.issn1641-4233en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/26658
dc.description.abstractAs the current administration of president Donald J. Trump published its National security strategy and was fully occupied with the situation on Korean peninsula in its first year, the aim of the paper is to analyse the changes in evolution of U.S. North Korean policy under last three administrations, look at the different strategies adopted in order to achieve the same aim, the denuclearization. The paper does not provide a thorough analysis, neither looks at all documents adopted and presented in the U.S. or within the U.N. It more focuses on the general principles of particular strategies, most significant events in mutual relations as recorded by involved governmental officials and also weaknesses of these strategies as none has achieved desirable result. In conclusion, several options for current administration are drawn, however all of them require significant compromises and could be accompanied with series of setbacks dangerous for regional stability and U.S. position in the region.en
dc.publisherLodz University Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInternational Studies. Interdisciplinary Political and Cultural Journal;22en
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0en
dc.subjectNorth Koreaen
dc.subjectnuclear programen
dc.subjectmissile programen
dc.subjectU.S. foreign policy objectivesen
dc.subjectnon-proliferation regimeen
dc.subjectsanctionsen
dc.titleU.S. Foreign Policy Towards North Koreaen
dc.page.number65-84en
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationMatej Bel Universtiy in Banska Bystrica, Slovakia, Faculty of Political Science and International Relations, Department of Security Studiesen
dc.identifier.eissn2300-8695
dc.referencesAgreed Framework between the United States of America and Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, 1994. Web. http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/Others/infcirc457.pdfen
dc.referencesAlbright, Madeleine. The Debate over How to Deal with North Korea. Interview: Frontline. 27, March 2003. Web. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/kim/interviews/albright.htmlen
dc.referencesAtlas, Terry, and Siegfried, Hecker, Dealing With Russia and North Korea: An Interview With Siegfried Hecker, “Arms Control Today”, vol. 46, no. 9 (2016), pp. 36–38. Web. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24878344en
dc.referencesBush, George W. Address Before a Joint Session of the Congress on the State of the Union. Washington: State Union Adress. Web. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=29644.en
dc.referencesBush, George W. Statement on Completion of the North Korea Policy Review. Washington. Web. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=45819.en
dc.referencesCarter, Jimmy. The Baffling “Hermit Kingdom.” Interview: Frontline. 21, March 2003. Web. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/kim/interviews/carter.html.en
dc.referencesCrail, Peter. US, North Korea hold bilateral talks, “Arms Control Today”, vol. 41, no. 7 (September 2011), pp. 39–40. Web. http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23629122.pdfen
dc.referencesDPRK FM on Its Stand to Suspend Its Participation in Six-party Talks for Indefinite Period. Korean Central News Agency, 2005. Web. http://www.kcna.co.jp/item/2005/200502/news02/11.htm.en
dc.referencesDPRK Foreign Ministry Declares Strong Counter-Measures against UNSC’s “Resolution 1874”. Korean Central News Agency, 2009. Web. http://www.kcna.co.jp/index-e.htmen
dc.referencesDPRK – Russia Joint Declaration, 2000. Web. http://www1.korea-np.co.jp/143th_issue/2000072101.htm.en
dc.referencesDPRK Successfully Conducts Underground Nuclear Test. Korean Central News Agency, 2006. Web. http://www.kcna.co.jp/index-e.htm.en
dc.referencesFitzpatrick, Mark. Leap Day in North Korea. Foreign Policy Argument. Web. http://foreignpolicy.com/2012/02/29/leap-day-in-north-korea/en
dc.referencesFitzpatrick, Mark. Obama’s Prime Nonproliferation Failure, “Arms Control Today”, vol. 46, no. 10 (2016), p. 11. Web. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44155151.en
dc.referencesGalluci, Robert L. The Debate over How to Deal with North Korea. Interview: Frontline. 5, March 2003. Web. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/kim/interviews/gallucci.html.en
dc.referencesHan, Yong-Sup. North Korea Behavior in Nuclear Negotiation, “The Nonproliferation Review”, vol. 7, no. 1, (2000), pp. 41–54. Web. https://www.nonproliferation.org/wp-content/uploads/npr/han71.pdfen
dc.referencesIndependent Task Force Report No. 64. U.S. Policy Toward Korean Peninsula (2010). Web. http://cns.miis.edu/inventory/pdfs/koreanuc.pdf.en
dc.referencesKim, Sung Chul and Kang, David. Engagement with North Korea. A Viable alternative. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2009en
dc.referencesKlinger, Bruce. Deny, decieve, and delay – North Korea’s nuclear negotiation strategy. “The Journal of East Asian Affairs”, vol. 26, no. 2, Fall/Winter 2012.en
dc.referencesLee, Chae-Jin. A Troubled Peace. U.S. policy and the two Koreas. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, 2006.en
dc.referencesLynch, Column and De Luca, Dan. With U.S. due to Trump’s latest sanktions, “Foreign Policy”, December 13, 2017. Web. http://foreignpolicy.com/2017/12/13/north-korea-had-spurned-talks-with-u-s-due-to-trumps-latest-sanctions/en
dc.referencesMeyer, Patrik K. U.S. Threat of War on North Korea: Fulfilling‚ Rocket Man‘ Kim Jong Un’s Wishes, “The Diplomat”, September 27, 2017. Web. https://thediplomat.com/2017/09/us-threat-of-war-on-north-korea-fulfilling-rocket-man-kim-jonguns-wishes/en
dc.referencesMiller, Steven E., Stephen W. Bosworth, and Siegfried S. Hecker. Dealing with North Korea’s Nuclear Program. “Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences”, vol. 65, no. 4 (2012), pp. 12–17. Web. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23359193en
dc.referencesNikish, Larry. A. Korea: U.S. – South Korea Relations: Issue for Congress, CRS Issue Brief for Congress IB98045. Washington: Congressional Research Service, 2005. Web. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/IB98045.pdfen
dc.referencesNon Proliferation Treaty. Web. https://www.un.org/disarmament/wmd/nuclear/npt/texten
dc.referencesOpening Statement by Dr. Condoleezza Rice. Senate Foreign Relation Committee, January 18, 2005. Web. http://foreign.senate.gov/testimony/2005/RiceTestimony050118.pdf.en
dc.referencesPrichard, Charles. Failed Diplomacy. The tragic story of how North Korea got the bomb. Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 2007.en
dc.referencesQiunones, Kenneth. Dualism in the Bush Administration North Korea Policy. “Asian Perspective”, vol. 27, no. 1, 2003.en
dc.referencesRemarks by President Bush and President Kwasniewski. The White House, Office of the Press Secretary, January 27, 2004. Web. http://poland.usembassy.gov/poland/bush_kwas_transcr.html.en
dc.referencesTobey, William. Obama’s ‘strategic patience’ on North Korea is turning into strategic neglect. “Foreign Policy”, February 14, 2013. Web. http://foreignpolicy.com/2013/02/14/obamas-strategic-patience-on-north-korea-is-turning-into-strategic-neglect/en
dc.referencesWit, Joel S. and Poneman, Daniel B. and Galluci, Robert L. Geoing Critical. The first North Korean nuclear crisis. Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 2004.en
dc.contributor.authorEmaillucia.husenicova@umb.sken
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1641-4233.22.05en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.