Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorRuthsatz, Vera
dc.contributor.authorNeuburger, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorQuaiser-Pohl, Claudia
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-13T12:50:25Z
dc.date.available2013-08-13T12:50:25Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.issn0208-600X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/2645
dc.description.abstractAll over the world girls are still highly underrepresented in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) subjects in school, and only a small percentage of women choose occupational careers in that field. The socially-influenced gender differences in spatial abilities – particularly in the ability to rotate two- or three-dimensional objects in one’s mind – are considered as a cognitive mediator of that gender gap. This paper gives an overview of the social causes and social consequences of the gender differences in spatial abilities. It focuses on sociocultural influences, including gender stereotypes (e.g. the phenomenon of the “stereotype threat”), and the importance of role models in family and school. Furthermore, personal factors like the ability-related self-concept and the effects of experience and training are taken into consideration. The results of empirical studies are reported which reveal that mental-rotation performance is strongly influenced by gender-specific differences in spatial experiences, role models, the ability-related selfconcept and socio-economic status. Finally, the paper discusses why and how women`s perceived lack of spatial abilities might lead to gender-typical educational and occupational choices.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesActa Universitatis Lodziensis, Folia Sociologica;43
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/*
dc.subjectgender differencespl_PL
dc.subjectspatial abilitypl_PL
dc.subjectoccupational choicespl_PL
dc.subjecttraining effectspl_PL
dc.subjectrole modelspl_PL
dc.subjectgender stereotypespl_PL
dc.titleThe social relevance and the socio-cultural origins of gender differences in spatial abilitiespl_PL
dc.title.alternativeSpołeczne znaczenie i społeczno-kulturowe pochodzenie różnic dotyczących zdolności przestrzennych kobiet i mężczyznpl_PL
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.page.number17-32
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationVera Ruthsatz -Institute of Psychology, University of Koblenz-Landau, Germany
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationSarah Neuburger -Institute of Psychology, University of Koblenz-Landau, Germany
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationClaudia Quaiser-Pohl -Institute of Psychology, University of Koblenz-Landau, Germany
dc.referencesAshby M.S., Wittmaier B.C. (1978), Attitude changes in children after exposure to stories about women in traditional or nontraditional occupations, “Journal of Educational Psychology”, vol. 70.
dc.referencesBaenninger M., Newcombe N.S. (1989), The role of experience in spatial test performance: A metaanalysis, “Sex Roles”, vol. 20.
dc.referencesBandura A. (1974), Analysis of modeling processes, [in:] A. Bandura (ed.), Psychological Modeling: Conflicting Theories, New York, N.Y.: Lieber-Atherton
dc.referencesBarke H.-D. (1993), Chemical education and spatial ability, “Journal of Chemical Engineering”, vol. 70.
dc.referencesBerry J. W. (1966), Temne and Eskimo perceptual skills, “International Journal of Psychology”, vol. 1.
dc.referencesBlanton H., Crocker J., Miller D.T. (2000), The effects of in-group versus out-group social comparisons on self-esteem in the context of a negative stereotype, “Journal of Experimental Social Psychology”, vol. 36
dc.referencesBurnett S.A., Lane D.M., Dratt L.M. (1979), Spatial visualization and sex differences in quantitative ability, “Intelligence”, vol. 3
dc.referencesBussey K., Bandura A. (1999), Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation, “Psychological Review”, vol. 106
dc.referencesCasasola M. (2008), The Development of Infants’ Spatial Categories, “Current Directions in Psychological Science”, vol. 17.
dc.referencesCasey B., Erkut S., Ceder I., Young J. M. (2008), Use of a storytelling context to improve girls’ and boys’ geometry skills in kindergarten, “Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology”, vol. 29.
dc.referencesDavies P.G., Spencer S.J., Quinn D.M., Gerhardstein, R. (2002), Consuming images: How television commercials that elicit stereotype threat can restrain women academically and professionally, “Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin”, vol. 28.
dc.referencesEuropean Commission (2009), She Figures 2009. Statistics and Indicators on Gender Equality in Science, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
dc.referencesFennema E., Sherman J. (1977), Sex-related differences in mathematics achievement, spatial visualization and affective factors, “American Educational Research Journal”, vol. 14.
dc.referencesGauvain M. (1993), The development of spatial thinking in everyday activity, “Developmental Review”, vol. 13.
dc.referencesGrimshaw G.M., Sitarenios G., Finegan J.-A.K. (1995), Mental rotation at 7 years: relations with prenatal testosterone levels and spatial play experiences, “Brain and Cognition”, vol. 29.
dc.referencesHahn N., Jansen P., Heil M. (2010), Preschoolers’ Mental Rotation: Sex Differences in Hemispheric Asymmetry, “Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience”, vol. 22, no. 6.
dc.referencesHalpern D.F. (1992), Sex differences in cognitive abilities,Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
dc.referencesHaun D.B., Rapold C.J., Janzen G., Levinson S.C. (2011), Plasticity of human spatial cognition: Spatial language and cognition covary across cultures, “Cognition”, vol. 119, no. 1.
dc.referencesHausmann M., Schoofs D., Rosenthal H.E.S., Jordan K. (2009), Interactive effects of sex hormones and gender stereotypes on cognitive sex differences – A psychobiosocial approach, “Psychoneuroendocrinology”, vol. 34
dc.referencesHoffman M., Gneezy U., List J. A. (2011), Nurture Affects Gender Differences in Spatial Abilities, “Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America”, vol. 108, no. 36.
dc.referencesHuguet P., Régner I. (2007), Stereotype threat among schoolgirls in quasi-ordinary classroom circumstances, “Journal of Educational Psychology”, vol. 99.
dc.referencesJannsen A.B., Geiser C. (2012), Cross-Cultural Differences in Spatial Abilities and Solution Strategies – An Investigation in Cambodia and Germany, “Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology”, vol. 43(4).
dc.referencesJöckel K.-H., Babitsch B., Bellach B.-M., Bloomfield K., Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik J., Winkler J., Wolf C. (1998), Messung und Quantifizierung soziodemografischer Merkmale in epidemiologischen Studien [Measuring and quantifying socio-demgraphic features in epidemiological studies], [in:] Ahrens W., Bellach B.-M., Jöckel K.-H. (eds.), „Messung soziodemografischer Merkmale in der Epidemiologie [Measuringsocio-demographicfeatures in epidemiology]”, MMV Münchner Medizin Verlag, München.
dc.referencesLinn M.C., Petersen A.C. (1985), Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis, “Child Development”, vol. 56.
dc.referencesLippa R.A., Collaer M.L., Peters M. (2010), Sex Differences in Mental Rotation and Line Angle Judgments Are Positively Associated with Gender Equality and Economic Development Across 53 Nations, “Archives of Sexual Behavior”, vol. 39.
dc.referencesLevine S.C., Huttenlocher J., Taylor A., Langrock A. (1999), Early Sex Differences in Spatial Ability, “Developmental Psychology”, vol. 35.
dc.referencesLevine S.C., Vasilyeva M., Lourenco S.F., Newcombe N.S., Huttenlocher J. (2005), Socioeconomic Status Modifies the Sex Difference in Spatial Skills, “Research Report”, vol. 16, no. 11.
dc.referencesLockwood P. (2006), Someone like me can be successful: Do college students need same gender role models?, “Psychology of Women Quarterly”, vol. 30.
dc.referencesLockwood P., Kunda Z. (1997), Superstars and me: Predicting the impact of role models on the self, “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, vol. 73.
dc.referencesLohman D.F. (1994), Spatially gifted, verbally, inconvenienced, [in:] Colangelo N., Assouline S.G., Ambroson D.L (eds.), Talent development, vol. 2, „Proceedings from the 1993 Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development”, Dayton, Ohio: Psychology Press.
dc.referencesMaccoby E.E., Jacklin C.N. (1974), The psychology of sex-differences, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
dc.referencesMatthews M.H. (1987), Sex differences in spatial competence: The ability of young children to map ‘primed’ unfamiliar environments, “Educational Psychology”, vol. 7.
dc.referencesMarx D.M., & Roman J.S. (2002), Female role models: Protecting women’s math test performance, “Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin”, vol. 28.
dc.referencesMcIntyre R.B., Paulson R.M., Taylor C., Morin A., Lord C.G. (2011), Effects of role model deservingness on overcoming performance deficits induced by stereotype threat, “European Journal of Social Psychology”, vol. 41.
dc.referencesMeinholdt C., Murray S.L. (1999), Why aren’t there more women engineers?, “Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering”, vol. 5.
dc.referencesMoè A. (2011), Gender difference does not mean genetic difference: Externalizing improves performance in mental rotation, “Learning and Individual Differences”, vol. 22.
dc.referencesMunroe R.L., R.H. Munroe (1971), Effect of environmental experience on spatial ability in an East African Society, “Journal of Social Psychology”, vol. 83.
dc.referencesNeuburger S., Jansen P., Heil M., Quaiser-Pohl C. (2011), Gender differences in pre-adolescents’ mental-rotation performance: Do they depend on grade and stimulus type? “Personality and Individual Differences”,vol. 50.
dc.referencesNeuburger S., Heuser V., Jansen P., Quaiser-Pohl C. (2011), Influence of Rotational Axis and Gender-Stereotypical Nature of Rotation Stimuli on the Mental-Rotation Performance of Male and Female Fifth Graders, [in:] Stachniss C., Schill K., Uttal D. (eds.), “Spatial Cognition” 2012, LNAI 7463, Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
dc.referencesNeuburger S., Ruthsatz V., Jansen P., Heil M., Quaiser-Pohl C. (submitted), Acceptance and Effects of Role Models in the Spatial Domain: A Storytelling Experiment with Fourth Graders.
dc.referencesNewcombe N.S., Frick A. (2010), Early Education for Spatial Intelligence: Why, What, and How, “Mind, Brain and Education”, vol. 4 (3).
dc.referencesNewcombe N.S. (2010), Picture This – Increasing Math and Science Learning by Improving Spatial thinking, “American Educator”, vol. 34
dc.referencesNorman K.L. (1994), Spatial visualization – a gateway to computer-based technology, “Journal of Special Educational Technology”, vol. 2.
dc.referencesO’Neil R., Parke R.D., McDowell D.J. (2001), Objective and Subjective Features of Children’s Neighborhoods: Relations to Parental Regulatory Strategies and Children’s Social Competence, “Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, vol. 22.
dc.referencesOppliger P. A. (2007), Effects of gender stereotyping on socialization, [in:] Preiss R. W., Gayle B. M., Burrell N., Allen M., Bryant J. (eds.), Mass media effects research. Advances through meta-analysis, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
dc.referencesPezaris E., Casey M.B. (1991), Girls who use „masculine” problem-solving strategies on a spatial task: proposed genetic and environmental factors, “Brain and Cognition”, vol. 17.
dc.referencesPruden S.M., Levine S.C., Huttenlocher J. (2011),Children’s spatial thinking: does talk about the spatial world matter?, “Developmental Science”, vol. 14, no. 6.
dc.referencesQuaiser-Pohl C. (2012),Women’s choices in STEM – statistical data and theoretical approaches explaining the gender gap, [in:] Quaiser-Pohl C., Endepohls-Ulpe M. (eds.), “Women’s choices in Europe. Influence of gender and education, occupational career and family development”, Münster, New York: Waxmann.
dc.referencesQuaiser-Pohl C., Jordan K. (2004), Warum Frauen glauben, siekönntennichteinparken – und MännerihnenRechtgeben [Why women think they cannot park their car in a line – and why men agree], München: C.H. Beck.
dc.referencesQuaiser-Pohl C., Geiser C., Lehmann W. (2006), The relationship between computer-game preference, gender, and mental-rotation ability, “Personality and Individual Differences”, vol. 40.
dc.referencesQuinn P.C., Liben L.S. (2008), A Sex Difference in Mental Rotation in Young Infants, “Psychological Science”, vol. 19 (11).
dc.referencesSander E., Quaiser-Pohl C., Stigler C. (2010), Factors influencing the development of mental-rotation ability. The role of socio-cultural background, “European Journal of Developmental Science”, vol. 4, no. 1.
dc.referencesSchmidt S. (2011). Einfluss räumlich-technischer Trainings auf Raumvorstellung, räumliches Selbstkonzept und räumlich-technische Geschlechterstereotype am Beispiel des Kinder-Technik-Feriencamps der Universität Koblenz [Influence of spatial-technical trainings on spatial thinking, spatial self-concept, and spatial-technical gender stereotypes: technology courses for children at the University of Koblenz]. Unpublished bachelor thesis, University of Koblenz-Landau.
dc.referencesScott K.P., Feldman-Summers S. (1979), Children’s reactions to textbook stories in which females are portrayed in traditionally male roles, “Journal of Educational Psychology”, vol. 71.
dc.referencesShapiro J.R., Williams Amy M. (2012), The Role of Stereotype Threat in Undermining Girls’ and Women’s performance and Interest in STEM Fields, “Sex Roles”, vol. 66.
dc.referencesShea D.L., Lubinski D., Benbow C.P. (2001), Importance of Assessing Spatial Ability in Intellectually Talented Young Adolescents: A 20-Year Longitudinal Study, “Journal of Educational Psychology”, vol. 93 (3).
dc.referencesShepard R.N., Metzler J. (1971), Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects, “Science”, vol. 171.
dc.referencesSmith I.M. (1964), Spatial ability – Its educational and social significance, London: University of London
dc.referencesSorby S.A., Leopold C., Gorska R. (1999), Cross-cultural comparisons of gender differences in the spatial skills of engineering students, “Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering”, vol. 5.
dc.referencesTerlecki M.S., Newcombe N.S., Little, M. (2008), Durable and generalized effects of spatial experience on mental rotation: Gender differences in growth patterns, “Applied Cognitive Psychology”, vol. 22.
dc.referencesTitze C., Jansen P., Heil M. (2010a), Mental rotation performance and the effect of gender in fourth graders and adults, “European Journal of Developmental Psychology”, vol. 7.
dc.referencesTitze C., Jansen P., Heil M. (2010b), Mental rotation performance in fourth graders: No effect of gender beliefs (yet)?, “Learning and Individual Differences”, vol. 20.
dc.referencesUttal D.H., Meadow N.G., Tipton E., Hand L.L., Alden A.R., Warren C., Newcombe, N.S. (2012), The Malleability of Spatial Skills: A Meta-Analysis of Training Studies, “Psychological Bulletin”( Online first publication).
dc.referencesVandenberg S.G., Kuse A.R. (1978), Mental Rotations. A Group Test of Three-Dimensional Spatial Visualization, “Perceptual and Motor Skills”, vol. 47.
dc.referencesVoyer D., Voyer S., Bryden, M.P. (1995), Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A metaanalysis and consideration of critical variables, “Psychological Bulletin”, vol. 117.
dc.referencesVetter B., Babco, E. (1986), Professional women and minorities, Washington, D.C., Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology.
dc.referencesWai J., Lubinski D., Benbow C.P. (2009), Spatial Ability for STEM Domains: Aligning Over 50 Years of Cumulative Psychological Knowledge Solidifies Its Importance, “Journal of Educational Psychology”, vol. 101, no. 4.
dc.referencesWilder D.A. (1984), Intergroup contact: The typical member and the exception to the rule, “Journal of Experimental Social Psychology”, vol. 20.
dc.referencesWhite J. (1985), Sex related differences in subject choice and intervention strategies used to reduce girls’ educational disadvantage: A comparative review, [in:] Lehrke M., Hoffmann L., Gardner P.L. (eds.), Interests in science and technology education. 12th IPN Symposium,, Kiel: Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften.


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska