Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorSkica, Tomasz
dc.contributor.authorDvouletý, Ondřej
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T11:13:23Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T11:13:23Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn1231-1952
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/25241
dc.description.abstractThe issue of the size of public administration is commonly researched. Most of the times this topic is tackled from a macroeconomic perspective, considering local and central administration together. That is why this paper uniquely takes on the local perspective only, analysing the size of local government (i.e. size of public administration at the local level) in Polish regions during the period of 2009–2013. Based on the existing literature, we chose five variables of the size of local administration at the commune level connected with employment and reflecting costs related to the functioning of local administration structures. All indicators were expressed per capita. With the usage of ANOVA, we proved significant differences in the size of public administration across regions for all variables. To compare the size of local governments across regions, we ranked all variables individually, and then we calculated the average ranking for all variables. Our findings have clear implications for policy makers, providing information about the regions with the biggest/smallest size of public administration at the local level. Our study suggests simple and accessible tool for continuous reporting on the size of public administration in order to monitor costs also in the upcoming years. The results of the monitoring could also be used for the establishment of an incentive program for regional policy representatives.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherLodz Univeristy Pressen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEuropean Spatial Research and Policy;1
dc.subjectsize of local administrationen_GB
dc.subjectlocal governmenten_GB
dc.subjectmeasurement of government sizeen_GB
dc.subjectbureaucracy sizeen_GB
dc.titleQuantification of the Size of Local Public Administration: Empirical Study of Polish Regionsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.rights.holder© Copyright by Authors, Łódź 2018; © Copyright for this edition by Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź 2018en_GB
dc.page.number[75]-92
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationDepartment of Finance, University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow, The Institute for Financial Research and Analyses in Rzeszow, Sucharskiego 2, 35–225 Rzeszów, Poland
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationDepartment of Entrepreneurship, University of Economics in Prague, W. Churchill Sq. 4, 130 67 Prague 3, Czech Republic
dc.identifier.eissn1896-1525
dc.referencesAfonso, A. and Jalles, J. T. (2016), ‘Economic performance, government size, and institutional quality’, Empirica, 43 (1), pp. 83–109.en_GB
dc.referencesAnderson, J. E. (2012), Public finance, Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.en_GB
dc.referencesAndrews, R. and Boyne, G. A. (2009), ‘Size, structure and administrative overheads: An empirical analysis of English local authorities’, Urban Studies, 46 (4), pp. 739–759.en_GB
dc.referencesBaqir, R. (1999), ‘Districts, spill-overs, and government overspending’, Macroeconomics and Growth Working Paper, 2192, Development Research Group, World Bank Publications.en_GB
dc.referencesBardes, B., Shelley, M., Schmidt, S. (2014), American Government and Politics Today: The Essentials 2013–2014 Edition, Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.en_GB
dc.referencesBoex, J. (2012), ‘Exploring the measurement and effectiveness of the local public sector: Toward a classification of local public sector finances and a comparison of devolved and deconcentrated finances’, IDG Working Paper, 5, Urban Institute Center on International Development and Governance, http://www.urban.org/ publications/412474.html (18.04.2017).en_GB
dc.referencesBournakis, I. and Tsoukis, C. (2016), ‘Government size, institutions, and export performance among OECD economies’, Economic Modelling, 53, pp. 37–47.en_GB
dc.referencesDahlström, C., Lapuente, V. and Teorell, J. (2010), ‘Dimensions of bureaucracy. A cross-national dataset on the structure and behavior of public administration’, QoG Working Paper Series, 13, pp. 3–59.en_GB
dc.referencesDi Liddo, G., Magazzino, C. and Porcelli, F. (2015), ‘Decentralization, growth and optimal government size in the Italian regional framework’, CREI Working Paper, 1, Centre for Research on the Economics of Institutions, Rome, Italy.en_GB
dc.referencesDi Matteo, L. (2013), Measuring Government in the Twenty-first Century: An International Overview of the Size and Efficiency of Public Spending, Vancouver: Fraser Institute.en_GB
dc.referencesDollery, B., Robotti, L. (2008), ‘Alternative model of local government’, [in:] Dollery, B., Robotti, L. (eds.), The Theory and Practice of Local Government Reform, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 27‒33.en_GB
dc.referencesDvouletý, O. (2017), ‘Determinants of Nordic entrepreneurship’, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 24 (1), pp. 12–33.en_GB
dc.referencesEurostat (2017), Statistical Database, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database (25.04.2017).en_GB
dc.referencesEvans, P. and Rauch, J. E. (1999), ‘Bureaucracy and growth: A cross-national analysis of the effects of “Weberian” state structures on economic growth’, American Sociological Review, 64 (5), pp. 748–765.en_GB
dc.referencesForte, F. and Magazzino, C. (2011), ‘Optimal size government and economic growth in EU countries’, Economia Politica, 28 (3), pp. 295–322.en_GB
dc.referencesFukushige, M. and Shi, Y. (2016), ‘Efficient scale of prefectural government in China’, China Finance and Economic Review, 4 (2), pp. 1‒18.en_GB
dc.referencesGarand, J. C., Ulrich, J., Xu, P. (2014), ‘Fiscal policy in the American States’, [in:] Haider-Markels, D. P. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of State and Local Government, Oxford: Oxford University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesGarrett, T. A., Rhine, R. M. (2006), ‘On the Size and Growth of Government’, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 88 (1), pp. 13‒30, https://research.stlouisfed.org/ publications/review/06/01/GarrettRhine.pdf (18.04.2017).en_GB
dc.referencesHandoussa, H. and Reiffers, J. L. (2003), Femise report on the Euro-Mediterranean partnership: Analysis and Proposals of the Euro-Mediterranean Forum of Economic Institutes, Marseilles: Institut de la Méditerranée.en_GB
dc.referencesHeller, P. S., Tait, A. A. (1983), Government Employment and Pay: Some International Comparisons, Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.en_GB
dc.referencesHemming, R. (1991), ‘Public expenditure measurement’, [in:] Chu, K., Hemming, R. (eds.), Public Expenditure Handbook: A Guide to Public Policy Issues in Developing, Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, pp. 32‒41.en_GB
dc.referencesHiggins, M. J., Young, A. T., Levy, D. (2006), ‘Federal, State, and Local Governments: Evaluating their Separate Roles in US Growth’, MPRA Paper, 1014.en_GB
dc.referencesIvanov, S., Tchavdarova, G., Savov, E., Stanev, H. (2002), ‘Does Larger Mean More Effective? Size and the Functioning of Local Governments in Bulgaria’, [in:] Swianiewicz, P. (ed.), Consolidation or Fragmentation? The Size of Local Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative Open Society Institute, pp. 167‒219.en_GB
dc.referencesKalseth, J., Rattso, J. (1995), ‘Spending and overspending in local government administration: A minimum requirement approach applied to Norway’, European Journal of Political Economy, 11 (2), pp. 239‒251.en_GB
dc.referencesKarras, G. (1996), ‘The optimal government size: further international evidence on the productivity of government services’, Economic Inquiry, 34 (2), pp. 193–203.en_GB
dc.referencesKolařík, P., Šumpela, V. and Tomešová, J. (2014), ‘European Union’s Cohesion Policy – Diversity of the Multi-Level Governance Concept, the Case Study of Three European States’, European Spatial Research and Policy, 21 (2), pp. 193–211.en_GB
dc.referencesLabonte, M. (2010), The Size and Role of Government: Economic Issues, June 14, Congressional Research Service 7-5700, RL32162, http://fpc.state.gov/documents/ organization/145595.pdf (21.04.2017).en_GB
dc.referencesMackenzie, G. A. (1991), ‘Public sector employment’, [in:] Chu, K., Hemming, R. (eds.), Public Expenditure Handbook: A Guide to Public Policy Issues in Developing, Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.en_GB
dc.referencesMagazzino, C. (2012), Politiche di bilancio e crescita economica, Torino: Giappichelli, pp. 137‒169.en_GB
dc.referencesMoja Polis (2017), Moja Polis – Polska pod lupą, http://www.mojapolis.pl/ (25.04.2017).en_GB
dc.referencesObydenkova, A. V. and Salahodjaev, R. (2017), ‘Government size, intelligence and life satisfaction’, Intelligence, 61, pp. 85–91.en_GB
dc.referencesPevcin, P. (2012), ‘Local Government in Slovenia: Structure, Size, and Expenditures’,  Croatian and Comparative Public Administration, 12, pp. 705‒724.en_GB
dc.referencesPhillips, K. L., Chen, B. (2007), ‘A panel data sensivity analysis of regional growth in China’, [in:] Lin, S., Zhu, X. (eds.), Private enterprises and China’s economic development, London: Routlege, pp. 126‒141.en_GB
dc.referencesPolish Ministry of Finance (2017), www.mofnet.gov.pl (25.04.2017).en_GB
dc.referencesPolish Statistical Office (2017), http://stat.gov.pl/ (25.04.2017).en_GB
dc.referencesSabra, M. M. (2016), ‘Government size, country size, openness and economic growth in selected MENA countries’, International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research, 9 (1), pp. 39–45.en_GB
dc.referencesSalvinO, R. (2007), ‘Home Rule Effects on State and Local Government Size’, Working Paper, 701, Atlanta: Georgia State University.en_GB
dc.referencesScully, G. W. (2000), ‘The growth-maximizing tax rate’, Pacific Economic Review, 5 (1), pp. 93–96.en_GB
dc.referencesScully, G. W. (2002), ‘Economic freedom, government policy and the trade-off between equity and economic growth’, Public Choice, 113 (1), pp. 77–96.en_GB
dc.referencesScully, G. W. (2003), ‘Optimal taxation, economic growth and income inequality’, Public Choice, 115 (3), pp. 299–312.en_GB
dc.referencesSellers, J. M., Barnes, J., Hoffmann-Martinot, V., Shipper, A. (2003), Between national state and local society: Infrastructures of local governance in developed democracies, Cleveland, OH: University of South California.en_GB
dc.referencesSineviciene, L. and Railiene, G. (2015), ‘The nexus between government size, tax burden and private investment’, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, pp. 485–490.en_GB
dc.referencesSirait, S. (2017), ‘Fiscal Decentralization and Local Government Size: Evidence from Indonesia’, Public Policy and Administration Research, 7 (2), pp. 9‒14.en_GB
dc.referencesSkica, T., Rodzinka, J. and Fryc, B. (2016), ‘Selection and Assortment of the Variables Describing the Relationship between the Economy and the General Government Sector Size by Application of the LEM2 Algorithm’, e-Finanse, 12 (3), pp. 69–84.en_GB
dc.referencesSRIYANA, J. (2016). ‘Optimum size of government spending in Indonesia’, Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, 11 (3), pp. 441‒449.en_GB
dc.referencesStatistical Yearbook of The Regions – Poland (2010, 2011, 2012, 2013), Central Statistical Office of Poland, Warsaw.en_GB
dc.referencesStephan, U., Uhlaner, L. M. and Stride, C. (2015), ‘Institutions and social entrepreneurship: The role of institutional voids, institutional support, and institutional configurations’, Journal of International Business Studies, 46 (3), pp. 308–331.en_GB
dc.referencesTanzi, V. and Schuknecht, L. (2007), La spesa pubblica nel XX secolo. Una prospettiva globale, Firenze: Firenze University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesThe Central Statistical Office of Poland (2017), http://stat.gov.pl/ (2.05.2017).en_GB
dc.referencesThe Heritage Foundation (2017), http://www.heritage.org/ (2.05.2017).en_GB
dc.referencesWeiher, G. R. and Lorence, J. (1991), ‘Growth in State Government Employment: A Time Series Analysis’, Political Research Quarterly, 44 (2), pp. 373‒388.en_GB
dc.referencesYearbook of Labour Statistics (2010, 2011, 2012, 2013), Central Statistical Office of Poland, Warsaw.en_GB
dc.referencesZhang, P., Zhu, C. and Hou, Y. (2016), ‘Fiscal Decentralization, Flat Administrative Structure, and Local Government Size: Evidence and Lessons from China’, Public Administration and Development, 36 (3), pp. 198–214.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorEmailtskica@wsiz.rzeszow.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailondrej.dvoulety@vse.cz
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1231-1952.25.1.05
dc.relation.volume25en_GB


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord