Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorGinter, Kazimierz
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-09T10:44:40Z
dc.date.available2018-05-09T10:44:40Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn2084-140X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/24656
dc.description.abstractThis article explores the political and cultural context of the riots provoked by changes in the Trisagion (512). Along with the advancing integration of the Byzantine Empire with Christianity, the state’s interest in theological problems increased; these problems were also reflected in the liturgy. Worship was used as a tool of imperial policy. This mutual interaction between politics and liturgy can be observed particularly clearly in the history of the Trisagion. This hymn, in its primitive form appearing in the book of Isaiah (as the familiar Sanctus Sanctus Sanctus), had two interpretations from the first centuries. According to the first one, the hymn referred to God, or – with the development of theology – to the whole Holy Trinity. According to the second interpretation (probably originating from Antioch), it referred to Christ. Already in the 4th century, the Trisagion entered the liturgy. In the middle of the 5th century, we encounter a new version of the Trisagion (known as SanctusDeus, Sanctus Fortis), which was an elaboration of the above-mentioned hymn. It also found use in the liturgy and originally had a Trinitarian sense. The Monophysites, in order to give the hymn an anti-Chalcedonian sense, added to it the expression who was crucified for us; this makes the hymn unambiguously Christological, but it may also suggest theopaschism (all of the Trinity was crucified). In Antioch, where the Trisagion first appeared in that form (and where the hymn had always been interpreted as referring to Christ), this addition did not provoke protests from the Chalcedonians. However, when the Monophysite emperor Anastasius decided to introduce this version to the liturgy in Constantinople, the inhabitants of the capital – accustomed to understanding the Trisagion in the Trinitarian sense – interpreted the change as an offence against the Trinity. This caused the outbreak of the Trisagion riots (512). Not long afterwards, restoring the anthem in the version without the addition became one of the postulates of military commander Vitalian’s rebellion against Anastasius. Thus, in the case under analysis, we see theology and liturgy blending with current politics; one and the same hymn could be understood as heretical in one city and as completely orthodox in another.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipPublication of English-language versions of the volumes of the yearly Studia Ceranea. Journal of the Waldemar Ceran Research Centre for the History and Culture of the Mediterranean Area and South-East Europe financed through contract no. 501/1/P-DUN/2017 from the funds of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education devoted to the promotion of scholarship.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStudia Ceranea;7
dc.subjectTrisagionen_GB
dc.subjectliturgyen_GB
dc.subjectAntiochen_GB
dc.subjectConstantinopleen_GB
dc.subjectAnastasius Ien_GB
dc.subjectMonophysitismen_GB
dc.subjecttheopaschismen_GB
dc.subjectstate-Church relationsen_GB
dc.subjectEcclesiastical politicsen_GB
dc.titleThe Trisagion Riots (512) as an Example of Interaction between Politics and Liturgyen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.rights.holder© Copyright by Authors, Łódź 2017; © Copyright for this edition by Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź 2017en_GB
dc.page.number[41]-57
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationPontificia Università della Santa Croce, Istituto di Liturgia, Via dei Farnesi, 83, 00186 Roma
dc.identifier.eissn2449-8378
dc.referencesActa conciliorum oecumenicorum, ed. E. Schwartz, vol. II, Concilium Chalcedonense (451), Berlin ²1962.en_GB
dc.referencesAthanasius Theologus, In illud: Omnia mihi tradita sunt, ed. J.-P. Migne, Paris 1857, col. 209–220 [= Patrologiae cursus completus, Series graeca, 25].en_GB
dc.referencesThe Chronicle of John, bishop of Nikiu, ed. R. Charles, London 1916.en_GB
dc.referencesClemens Romanus, Èpitre aux Corinthiens, ed. A. Jaubert, Paris 1971 [= Sources chrétiennes, 167].en_GB
dc.referencesThe Ecclesiastical History of Evagrius Scholasticus, trans. M. Whitby, Liverpool 2000.en_GB
dc.referencesThe Ecclesiastical History of Evagrius with Scholia, ed. J. Bidez, L. Parmentier, London 1898.en_GB
dc.referencesEusebius, Über des leben des Kaisers Konstantin, ed. F. Winkelmann, Berlin 1975 [= Die griechischen christlichen Schriftsteller der ersten [drei] Jahrhunderte, 6].en_GB
dc.referencesFlavius Iustinianus, Contra monophysitas, [in:] Drei dogmatische Schriften lustinians, ed. M. Amelotti, R. Albertella, Milano ²1973, p. 6–78.en_GB
dc.referencesGregorius Nazanensius, In theophania (orat. 38), ed. J.-P. Migne, Paris 1858, col. 311–334 [= Patrologiae cursus completus, Series graeca, 36].en_GB
dc.referencesJames of Edessa, The Hymns of Severus and Others, 136 a 365, ed. E.W. Brooks, Paris 1911 [= Patrologia orientalis, 7], p. 595–802.en_GB
dc.referencesJean Chrysostome, Homélies sur Ozias, Paris 1981 [= Sources chrétiennes, 277].en_GB
dc.referencesJoannes Damascenus, Epistula de hymno trisagio, [in:] Die Schriften des Johannes Damaskos, ed. B. Kotter, Berlin 1981.en_GB
dc.referencesJoannes Damascenus, Expositio Fidei, [in:] Die Schriften des Johannes von Damaskos, ed. B. Kotter, vol. II, Berlin–New York 1973.en_GB
dc.referencesJobius Monachus, De Verbo incarnato commentarius, [in:] Photius, Bibliothèque, cod. 222, vol. III, ed. R. Henry, Paris 2003.en_GB
dc.referencesJohn Damascene, An Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith, trans. F.H. Chase, Washington, DC 1958, p. 165–406.en_GB
dc.referencesNestorius, Bazaar of Heracleides, trans. O. Driver, L. Hodgson, Oxford 1925.en_GB
dc.referencesOrigenes vier Bucher von den Prinzipien, ed. H. Gorgemanns, H. Karpp, Darmstadt 1976.en_GB
dc.referencesLes homilae cathedrales de Sévère d’Antioche, ed. M. Brière, Paris 1961 [= Patrologia orientalis, 29].en_GB
dc.referencesTheodores Anagnostes, Kirchengeschichte, ed. G.C. Hansen, Berlin 1971 [= Die griechischen christlichen Schriftsteller der ersten [drei] Jahrhunderte, 54].en_GB
dc.referencesTheophanis Confessori Chronographia, ed. C. de Boor, Leipzig 1883.en_GB
dc.referencesAbramowski L., Untersuchungen zum “Liber Heraclidis” des Nestorius, Louvain 1963 [= Corpus scriptorum christianorum orientalium, 224, Subs. 22].en_GB
dc.referencesAlvisatos H.S., Die Kirchliche Gesetzgebung des Kaisers Justinian I, Aalen 1973.en_GB
dc.referencesBralewski S., Sobór w Chalcedonie w polityce wewnętrznej cesarza Marcjana, “Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Historica” 44, 1992, p. 53–74.en_GB
dc.referencesCameron Av., Procopius and the sixth century, London 1985.en_GB
dc.referencesCharanis P., Church and State in the Later Roman Empire. The Religious Policy of Anastatsius the First, 491–518, Thessaloniki 1974.en_GB
dc.referencesCroke B., The Early Byzantine Earthquakes and Their Liturgical Commemoration, “Byzantion. Revue internationale des études byzantines” 41, 1981, p. 122–147.en_GB
dc.referencesDagron G., La Chiesa e la cristianitá bizantine tra invasioni e iconoclasmo (VII secolo – inizi dell’ VIII), [in:] Storia del Cristianesimo, vol. IV, Vescovi, monaci e imperatori (610–1054), ed. G. Dagron, Roma 1999, p. 28–76.en_GB
dc.referencesDe Decker D., Dupuis-Massay G., L’épiscopat de l’empereur Constantin, “Byzantion. Revue internationale des études byzantines” 50, 1980, p. 118–157.en_GB
dc.referencesDijkstra J., Greatrex G., Patriarchs and Politics in Constantinople in the Reign of Anastasius (with a Reedition of “O.Mon.Epiph.” 59), “Millennium. Jahrbuch zu Kultur und Geschichte des erstenJahrtausends n.Chr. / Yearbook on the Culture and History of the First Millennium C.E.” 6, 2009,p. 223–264.en_GB
dc.referencesDuchesne L., Histoire de l’Eglise, vol. III, Paris 1911.en_GB
dc.referencesDugmore C.W., The Influence of the Synagogue upon the Divine Office, Oxford 1944.en_GB
dc.referencesDzielska M., Hypatia of Alexandria, Cambridge 1996.en_GB
dc.referencesElliott T.G., The Christianity of Constantine the Great, Scranton, PA 1996.en_GB
dc.referencesFraisse-Coué Ch., Da Efeso a Calcedonia: “la pace illusoria”(433–451), [in:] Storia del Cristianesimo, vol. III, Le chiese d’Oriente e d’Occidente (432–610), ed. L. Pietri, Roma 2000, p. 29–92.en_GB
dc.referencesFrend W.H.C., The Rise of Monophysite Movement. Chapters in the History of the Church in the Fifth and Sixth Centuries, Cambridge 1972.en_GB
dc.referencesGerhards A., Le phenomene du Sanctus adresse au Christ. Son origine, sa signification et sa persistance dans les Anaphores de l’eglise d’Orient, [in:] Le Christ dans la liturgie, ed. A.M. Triacca,A. Pistoia, Rome 1981, p. 65–83.en_GB
dc.referencesGinter K., Spór o ‘Trisagion’, “Res Historica” 14, 2002, p. 221–231.en_GB
dc.referencesGreatrex G., The Fall of Macedonius Reconsidered, “Studia Patristica” 44, 2010, p. 125–132.en_GB
dc.referencesGregory T.E., Vox Populi. Violence and Popular Involvment in the Religious Controversies of the Fifth Century AD, Columbus, Ohio 1979, p. 163–201.en_GB
dc.referencesGrillmeier A., Gesu il Cristo nella fede della Chiesa, Roma 1982–2001.en_GB
dc.referencesHaarer F.K., Anastasius I. Politics and Empire in the Late Roman World, Cambridge 2006.en_GB
dc.referencesHass Ch., Alexandria in Late Antiquity, Baltimore–London 1997.en_GB
dc.referencesJaneras S., Le Trisagion: une formule breve en liturgie comparée, [in:] Acts of International Congress. Comparative Liturgy fifty Years after Anton Baumstark (1872–1948), ed. R. Taft, G. Winkler, Roma 2001 [= Orientalia Christiana Analecta, 265], p. 495–562.en_GB
dc.referencesJaneras S., Les Byzantins et le Trisagion christologique, [in:] Miscellanea Liturgica in onore di sua Eminenza il cardinale Giacomo Lercaro, Roma 1967, vol. II, p. 469–499.en_GB
dc.referencesKarim A., The Meaning of the Trisagion in East and West, “Musicological Studies” 105, 2014, p. 23–38.en_GB
dc.referencesKing A.A., The Rites of Eastern Christendom, vol. I, Piscataway, NJ 2007.en_GB
dc.referencesLebon J., Le Monophysisme sévérien, Louvain 1909.en_GB
dc.referencesLiebeschuetz J.H.W.G., Decline and Fall of the Roman City, Oxford–New York 2001.en_GB
dc.referencesMaraval P., La ricezione di Calcedonia nell’impero d’Oriente, [in:] Storia del Cristianesimo, vol. III, Le chiese d’Oriente e d’Occidente (432–610), ed. L. Pietri, Roma 2000, p. 119–153.en_GB
dc.referencesMeier M., Anastasios I. Die Enstehung des Byzantinischen Reiches, Stuttgart 2010.en_GB
dc.referencesMeyendorff J., Imperial Unity and Christian Divisions, Crestwood–New York 1989.en_GB
dc.referencesMoeller Ch., Le chalcedonisme et neo-chalcedonisme en Orient de 451 a la fin du VI siecle, [in:] Das Konzil von Chalkedon, ed. A. Grillmeier, R. Bacht, vol. 1, Würzburg 1951, p. 637–721.en_GB
dc.referencesMorgan R., History of the Coptic Orthodox People and the Church of Egypt, Victoria 2016.en_GB
dc.referencesNeunheuser B., Storia della liturgia attraverso le epoche culturali, Roma 1983 [= Bibliotheca Ephemerides liturgicae. Subsidia, 11].en_GB
dc.referencesPietri Ch., La conversione: propaganda e realta, [in:] Storia del Cristianesimo, vol. II, La nascita di una cristianita (250–432), ed. Ch. Pietri, L. Pietri, Roma 2000, p. 187–223.en_GB
dc.referencesRapp C., Imperial ideology in the making. Eusebius of Caesarea on Constantine as “Bishop”, “The Journal of Theological Studies” 49, 1998, p. 685–695.en_GB
dc.referencesTaft R., The Interpolation of Sanctus into the Anaphora, 1, “Orientalia Christiana Periodica” 57, 1991, p. 281–308; 2, “Orientalia Christiana Periodica” 58, 1992, p. 83–121.en_GB
dc.referencesWybrew H., The Orthodox liturgy. The development of the eucharistic liturgy in the Byzantine rite, Crestwood, NY 1990.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorEmailk.ginter@pusc.it
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/2084–140X.07.03


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord