Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSpyra, Piotren
dc.description.abstractThe article investigates the canonical plays of William Shakespeare—Hamlet, Macbeth, A Midsummer Night’s Dream and The Tempest—in an attempt to determine the nature of Shakespeare’s position on the early modern tendency to demonize fairy belief and to view fairies as merely a form of demonic manifestation. Fairy belief left its mark on all four plays, to a greater or lesser extent, and intertwined with the religious concerns of the period, it provides an important perspective on the problem of religion in Shakespeare’s works. The article will attempt to establish whether Shakespeare subscribed to the tendency of viewing fairies as demonic agents, as epitomized by the Daemonologie of King James, or opposed it. Special emphasis will also be put on the conflation of fairies and Catholicism that one finds best exemplified in Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan. The article draws on a wealth of recent scholarship on early modern fairies, bringing together historical reflection on the changing perception of the fairy figure, research into Shakespeare’s attitude towards Catholicism and analyses of the many facets of anti-Catholic polemic emerging from early modern Protestant discourse.en
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesText Matters;7en
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.en
dc.subjectWilliam Shakespeareen
dc.subjectProtestant Reformationen
dc.subjectThomas Hobbesen
dc.titleShakespeare and the Demonization of Fairiesen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Łódźen
dc.referencesBennett, Margaret. “Balquhidder Revisited: Fairylore in the Scottish Highlands, 1690–1990.” The Good People: New Fairylore Essays. Ed. Peter Narváez. Lexington: UP of Kentucky, 1997. 94–113. Print.en
dc.referencesBradley, A. C. Shakespearean Tragedy: Lectures on “Hamlet,” “Othello,” “King Lear,” and “Macbeth.” New York: Macmillan, 1992. Print.en
dc.referencesBriggs, Katharine. The Anatomy of Puck: An Examination of Fairy Beliefs among Shakespeare’s Contemporaries and Successors. London: Routledge, 2007 [1959]. Print.en
dc.referencesBuccola, Regina. Fairies, Fractious Women and the Old Faith: Fairy Lore in Early Modern British Drama and Culture. Selinsgrove: Susquehanna UP, 2006. Print.en
dc.referencesBuccola, Regina. “Shakespeare’s Fairy Dance with Religio-Political Controversy in The Merry Wives of Windsor.” Shakespeare and the Culture of Christianity in Early Modern England. Ed. Dennis Taylor and David N. Beauregard. New York: Fordham UP, 2003. 159–79. Print.en
dc.referencesChild, Francis James, ed. The English and Scottish Popular Ballads. Vol. 1. Mineola: Dover, 2003. Print.en
dc.referencesDaemonologie by King James the First. Ed. G. B. Harrison. London: Bodley Head, 1922. Web. 1 May 2016.en
dc.referencesHenderson, Lizanne, and Edward J. Cowan. Scottish Fairy Belief: A History. Edinburgh: John Donald, 2011. Print.en
dc.referencesHobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. Ed. J. C. A. Gaskin. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1998. Print.en
dc.referencesHolinshed, Raphael. “Selections from Chronicles of England, Scotland and Ireland.” Macbeth. Ed. Sylvan Barnet. New York: Signet, 1987. Print.en
dc.referencesHutton, Ronald. “The Making of the Early Modern British Fairy Tradition.” The Historical Journal 57.4 (2014): 1135–56. Web. 1 Apr. 2016.en
dc.referencesJohnstone, Nathan. The Devil and Demonism in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2006. Print.en
dc.referencesLamb, Mary Ellen. The Popular Culture of Shakespeare, Spenser and Jonson. London: Routledge, 2006. Print.en
dc.referencesLatham, Minor White. The Elizabethan Fairies: The Fairies of Folklore and the Fairies of Shakespeare. New York: Columbia UP, 1930. Print.en
dc.referencesMarshall, Peter. “Protestants and Fairies in Early-Modern England.” Living with Religious Diversity in Early-Modern Europe. Ed. C. Scott Dixon, Dagmar Freist and Mark Greengrass. Farnham: Ashgate, 2009. 139–60. Print.en
dc.referencesMurray, James A. H., ed. The Romance and Prophecies of Thomas of Erceldoune. London: Trübner, 1875. Print.en
dc.referencesMorgan, Gerald. “Sir Gawain and the Green Knight” and the Idea of Righteousness. Dublin: Irish AP, 1991. Print.en
dc.referencesNarváez, Peter, ed. The Good People: New Fairylore Essays. Lexington: UP of Kentucky, 1997. Print.en
dc.referencesPurkiss, Diane. At the Bottom of the Garden: A Dark History of Fairies, Hobgoblins, and Other Troublesome Things. New York: New York UP, 2000. Print.en
dc.referencesPurkiss, Diane. The Witch in History: Early Modern and Twentieth-Century Representations. London: Routledge, 2005. Print.en
dc.referencesShakespeare, William. A Midsummer Night’s Dream. Ed. Trevor R. Griffiths. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2002. Print.en
dc.referencesShakespeare, William. Hamlet. Ed. Harold Jenkins. London: Arden Shakespeare, 2003. Print.en
dc.referencesShakespeare, William. Macbeth. Ed. Sylvan Barnet. New York: Signet, 1987. Print.en
dc.referencesShakespeare, William. The Tempest. Ed. Virginia Mason Vaughan and Alden T. Vaughan. London: Arden Shakespeare, 2001. Print.en
dc.referencesShamas, Laura. “We Three”: The Mythology of Shakespeare’s Weird Sisters. New York: Peter Lang, 2007. Print.en
dc.referencesShell, Alison. “Delusion in A Midsummer Night’s Dream.” Shakespeare and Early Modern Religion. Ed. David Loewenstein and Michael Witmore. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2015. 81–95. Print.en
dc.referencesSwann, Marjorie. “The Politics of Fairylore in Early Modern English Literature.” Renaissance Quarterly 53.2 (2000): 449–73. Web. 1 Apr. 2016.en
dc.referencesStone, Brian. “The Common Enemy of Man.” Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. Trans. Brian Stone. London: Penguin, 1974. 116–28. Print.en
dc.referencesTaylor, Gary. “Macbeth and Middleton.” Macbeth: The Norton Critical Edition. Ed. Robert Miola. New York: Norton, 2014. 296–305. Print.en
dc.referencesThomas, Keith. Religion and the Decline of Magic. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1971. Print.en
dc.referencesWall, Wendy. “Why Does Puck Sweep?: Fairylore, Merry Wives, and Social Struggle.” Shakespeare Quarterly 52.1 (2001): 67–106. Web. 1 Apr. 2016.en
dc.referencesWilby, Emma. Cunning Folk and Familiar Spirits: Shamanistic Visionary Traditions in Early Modern British Witchcraft and Magic. Brighton: Sussex Academic P, 2005. Print.en
dc.referencesWilby, Emma. The Visions of Isobel Gowdie: Magic, Witchcraft and Dark Shamanism in Seventeenth-Century Scotland. Brighton: Sussex Academic P, 2010. Print.en
dc.referencesZika, Charles. The Appearance of Witchcraft: Print and Visual Culture in Sixteenth-Century Europe. London: Routledge, 2007. Print.en

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.