Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCzarny, Elżbietaen
dc.contributor.authorŻmuda, Małgorzataen
dc.description.abstractCompetitiveness of a nation is associated with a set of characteristics that enable structural adjustment to global technological trends, and as a consequence, a rise in the living standard of its citizens. For catching-up economies, GDP convergence towards the most developed economies, constituting their developmental goal, relies upon its ability to shift production and exports structure towards specialization based on knowledge and innovation. Thus, in this paper, competitiveness is evaluated through structural adjustments of exports, and for catching-up economies (the EU–10 states) it may be understood as the ability to close the structural gap to the most developed countries (here: the strongest EU member economy: Germany). We analyse the evolution of the EU–10 nations’ exports specialization in the years 2000 and 2014, checking whether the convergence towards the German exports pattern can be observed, and which of the analysed economies shows the best ability to shift its exports structure towards high-tech specialization. We look additionally at exports structures in 2004 (the year of EU-accession of eight out of 10 countries in the sample) and in 2009 (world trade collapse during the economic crisis). The analysis is based on the Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) concept by Balassa (1965). We use the UN Trade Statistics data in the Standard International Trade Classification (SITC), Rev. 4. Commodity groups are classified following the methodology developed by Wysokińska (1997, p. 18).en
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesComparative Economic Research;1en
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.en
dc.subjectcatching-up economyen
dc.subjectexports specialization convergenceen
dc.subjectmacro competitivenessen
dc.titleCompetitiveness as the Ability to Adjust: the EU–10 Exports Structure and Its Convergence to the German Patternen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationCzarny, Elżbieta - Professor, Warsaw School of Economicsen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationŻmuda, Małgorzata - Ph.D., Professor Cologne Business Schoolen
dc.referencesAbramowitz M. (1986), Catching Up, Forging Ahead, and Falling Behind, ‘The Journal of Economic History’, 46(2), 385–406. doi: 10.1017/S0022050700046209en
dc.referencesBalassa B. (1965), Trade Liberalisation and ‘Revealed’ Comparative Advantage. The Manchester School, 33(2), 99–123. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9957.1965.tb00050.xen
dc.referencesBieńkowski W., Weresa M., Czajkowski Z., Gomułka M., Brocka-Palacz B., Latoszek E., Misala J. (Eds.). (2008). Czynniki i miary międzynarodowej konkurencyjności konkurencyjności gospodarek w kontekście globalizacji – wstępne wyniki badań (Vol. 284). Szkoła Główna Handlowa.en
dc.referencesCastellacci F. (2008). Innovation and the competitiveness of industries: Comparing the mainstream and the evolutionary approaches, ‘Technological Forecasting and Social Change’, 75(7), 984–1006. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2007.09.002en
dc.referencesCho D.S., & Moon H.C. (2008). From Adam Smith to Michael Porter: evolution of competitiveness theory (Reprinted). New Jersey: World Scientific.en
dc.referencesCohen S.S., & Zysman J. (1988). Manufacturing Innovation and American Industrial Competitiveness, ‘Science’, 239(4844), 1110–1115.en
dc.referencesCzarny E., & Śledziewska K. (2012). Międzynarodowa współpraca gospodarcza w warunkach kryzysu. Wnioski dla Polski. Warszawa: PWE Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne.en
dc.referencesEzalea-Harrison. (2005), On the Competing Notion of International Competitiveness, ‘Advances in Competitiveness Research’, 13(1), 80–87.en
dc.referencesLollar J.G., Beheshti H.M. & Whitlow B.J. (2010). The role of integrative technology in competitiveness, ‘Competitiveness Review’, 20(5), 423–433. 10595421011080797en
dc.referencesLonska J., & Boronenko V. (2015), Rethinking Competitiveness and Human Development in Global Comparative Researches, ‘Procedia Economics and Finance’, 23, 1030–1036.
dc.referencesMartin R. (2005). A Study on the Factors of Regional Competitiveness. Final Report for the Euoropean Commission.en
dc.referencesPeretto P. (1990). Technology, learning opportunity and international competitiveness: some empirical evidence with panel data, ‘Giornale Degli Economisti E Annali Di Economia’, 219–244.en
dc.referencesPorter M.E. (1985). Competitive Advantage. New York: The Free Press.en
dc.referencesPorter M.E. (1990). What Is National Competitiveness?, ‘Harvard Business Review’, 68(2), 84–85.en
dc.referencesReinert E. (1995). Competitiveness and its predecessors – a 500-year cross-national perspective, ‘Structural Change and Economic Dynamics’, 6, 23–42.en
dc.referencesWysokińska Z. (1997). Aspekty technologiczne konkurencyjności międzynarodowej Unii Europejskiej oraz Polski, ‘Studia Europejskie’, (2).en
dc.referencesŻmuda M. (2017), Taxonomy of International Competitiveness, ‘Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe’, 25(3), 97–116.en
dc.referencesŻmuda M., Czarny E. (2017), Competitiveness of a catching-up economy as ability to close technological gap: Evolution of the EU–10 exports specialization towards the German pattern, ‘CBS Working Paper’, (4),–2017-No.–4-Catching-Up-Economy-to-close-technoclogical-gap-Zmuda-Czarny.pdfen
dc.contributor.authorEmailCzarny, Elżbieta - eczary@gmail.comen
dc.contributor.authorEmailŻmuda, Małgorzata - m.zmuda@cbs.deen

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.