Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorFoster, Johanna E.
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-21T08:43:02Z
dc.date.available2018-03-21T08:43:02Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/24250
dc.description.abstractThrough an interpretive lens that borrows from feminist postmodernist perspectives on identity and cognitive sociology, the manuscript utilizes in-depth interview data from 33 women active in the American second-wave feminist movement to explore how aging feminist activists construct their current political identities in relation to the meanings they give to the perceived progressive political identities and actions of their elders. In particular, this study examines the discursive strategies that respondents engage as they link their own feminist consciousness directly or indirectly to feminist, or otherwise progressive, parents and grandparents. Findings reveal three distinct political legacy narratives, namely 1) explicit transmission origin stories; 2) bridge narratives; and 3) paradox plots that add to both the social movement literature on the symbolic dimensions of recruitment, sustainability, and spillover, as well as cognitive sociological literature on the cultural transmission of political capital, in general, and to our understanding of American second-wave activists, more specifically.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesQualitative Sociology Review;1
dc.subjectIdentity Constructionen_GB
dc.subjectPolitical Legacyen_GB
dc.subjectIntergenerational Transmissionen_GB
dc.subjectAmerican Feminismen_GB
dc.subjectU.S. Second-Wave Activistsen_GB
dc.subjectSociology of Ancestryen_GB
dc.titleIn Keeping with Family Tradition: American Second-Wave Feminists and the Social Construction of Political Legaciesen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.rights.holder©2018 QSRen_GB
dc.page.number6-28
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationMonmouth University, U.S.A.
dc.identifier.eissn1733-8077
dc.referencesAcock, Alan C. and Vern L. Bengston. 1978. “On the Relative Influence of Mothers and Fathers: A Covariance Analysis of Political and Religious Socialization.” Journal of Marriage and Family 40(3):519-530.en_GB
dc.referencesBaumgartner, Jennifer and Amy Richards. 2000. Manifesta: Young Women, Feminism and the Future. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.en_GB
dc.referencesBeck, Paul Allen and M. Kent Jennings. 1991. “Family Traditions, Political Periods, and the Development of Partisan Orientations.” The Journal of Politics 53(3):742-763.en_GB
dc.referencesBernstein, Mary. 1997. “Celebration and Suppression: The Strategic Uses of Identity in the Lesbian and Gay Movement.” Pp. 264- 278 in The Social Movements Reader: Cases and Concepts, edited by Jeff Goodwin and James M. Jasper. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.en_GB
dc.referencesButler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.en_GB
dc.referencesCapdevila, Rose. 2000. “Motherhood and Political Involvement: The Construction of Gender and Political Identities.” Feminine Psychology 10(4):486-491.en_GB
dc.referencesConnell, Robert W. 1987. Gender and Power: Society, the Person, and Sexual Politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesDavidman, Lynn. 2000. Motherloss. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.en_GB
dc.referencesDean, Jonathan. 2009. “Who’s Afraid of Third Wave Feminism?: On the Uses of the ‘Third Wave’ in British Feminist Politics.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 11:3334-3352.en_GB
dc.referencesD’Emilio, John. 1983. Sexual Politics, Sexual Communities: The Making of a Homosexual Minority in the U.S., 1940-1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.en_GB
dc.referencesDicker, Rory C. and Alison Piepmeier, (eds.). 2003. Catching a Wave: Reclaiming Feminism for the 21st Century. Lebanon, NH: University Press of New England.en_GB
dc.referencesFindlen, Barbara. 1995. Listen Up!: Voice from the Next Feminist Generation. Emeryville, CA: Seal Press.en_GB
dc.referencesFoster, Johanna. 2004. “Strategic Ambiguity Meets Strategic Essentialism: Multiracial, Intersex, and Disability Rights Activism and the Paradoxes of Identity Politics.” Politics of Change: Sexuality, Gender and Aging Research in Political Sociology 13:139-177.en_GB
dc.referencesFoster, Johanna. 2015. “Women of a Certain Age: Second Wave Feminists Reflect Back on 50 Years of Struggle in the United States.” Women’s Studies International Forum 50:68-79.en_GB
dc.referencesFoucault, Michel. 1975. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage.en_GB
dc.referencesFoucault, Michel. 1978. The History of Sexuality, Volume 1. New York: Pantheon.en_GB
dc.referencesFowlkes, Diane L. 1992. White Political Women: Paths from Privilege to Empowerment. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.en_GB
dc.referencesFreeman, Jo. 1973. “The Origins of the Women’s Liberation Movement.” American Journal of Sociology 78(4):792-811.en_GB
dc.referencesGamson, Joshua. 1995. “Must Identity Movements Self-Destruct? A Queer Dilemma.” Social Problems 42(3):390-407.en_GB
dc.referencesGillis, Stacy, Gillian Howie, and Rebecca Munford, (eds.). 2007. Third Wave Feminism: A Critical Exploration. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.en_GB
dc.referencesGoodwin, Jeff and James M. Jasper, (eds.). 2009. The Social Movements Reader: Cases and Concepts. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.en_GB
dc.referencesHenry, Astrid. 2004. Not My Mother’s Sister: Generational Conflict and Third-Wave Feminism. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesHernandez, Daisy and Bushra Rehman. 2002. Colonize This!: Young Women of Color on Today’s Feminism. Berkeley, CA: Seal Press.en_GB
dc.referencesHeywood, Leslie and Jennifer Drake, (eds.). 2002. Third Wave Agenda: Being Feminist, Doing Feminism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.en_GB
dc.referencesJennings, M. Kent and Richard G. Niemi. 1974. Political Character of Adolescence: The Influence of Families and Schools. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesKamen, Paula. 1991. Feminist Fatale: Voices from the “Twentysomething” Generation Explore the Future of the “Women’s Movement.” New York: Donald I. Fine.en_GB
dc.referencesKelly, Rita Mae and Mary Boutilier. 1978. The Making of Political Women. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.en_GB
dc.referencesMcAdam, Douglass. 1986. “Recruitment into High-Risk Activism: The Case of Freedom Summer.” American Journal of Sociology 92(1):64-90.en_GB
dc.referencesMcCarthy, John D. and Mayer N. Zald. 1977. “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory.” American Journal of Sociology 82:1212-1241.en_GB
dc.referencesMcDevitt, Michael and Steven Chaffee. 2002. “From Top- Down to Trickle-Up Influence: Revisiting Assumptions about Family Political Socialization.” Political Communication 19(3):281-301.en_GB
dc.referencesMcIntosh, Hugh, Daniel Hart, and James Youniss. 2007. “The Influence of Family Political Discussion on Youth Civic Development: Which Parent Qualities Matter? PS: Political Science Politics 40(3):495-499.en_GB
dc.referencesOjeda, Christopher and Peter K. Hatemi. 2015. “Accounting for the Child in the Transmission of Party Identification.” American Sociological Review 80(6):1150-1174.en_GB
dc.referencesReger, Jo. 2001. “Motherhood and the Construction of Feminist Identities: Variations in a Women’s Movement Organization.” Sociological Inquiry 71(1):85-110.en_GB
dc.referencesRosen, Ruth. 2006. The World Split Open: How the Modern Women’s Movement Changed America. New York: Penguin Group.en_GB
dc.referencesSchneider, Beth E. 1988. “Political Generations and the Contemporary Women’s Movement.” Sociological Inquiry 58(1):4-21.en_GB
dc.referencesSchnittker, Jason, Jeremy Freese, and Brian Powell. 2003. “Who Are Feminists and What Do They Believe? The Role of Generations.” American Sociological Review 68:4607-4622.en_GB
dc.referencesSears, David O. and Carolyn L. Funk. 1999. “Evidence of the Long-Term Persistence of Adults’ Political Predispositions.” The Journal of Politics 61(1):1-28.en_GB
dc.referencesVerba, Sidney, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Nancy Burns. 2005. “Family Ties: Understanding the Intergenerational Transmission of Participation.” Pp. 95-114 in The Social Logic of Politics, edited by Alan Zuckerman. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesWalker, Rebecca. 1995. To Be Real: Telling the Truth and Changing the Face of Feminism. New York: Anchor Books.en_GB
dc.referencesWeber, Max. 1947. Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: Free Press.en_GB
dc.referencesWestholm, Anders. 1999. “The Perceptual Pathway: Tracing the Mechanisms of Political Value Transfer across Generations.” Political Psychology 20(3):525-551.en_GB
dc.referencesZerubavel, Eviatar. 1997. Time Maps: Collective Memory and the Social Shape of the Past. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.en_GB
dc.referencesZerubavel, Eviatar. 2012. Ancestors and Relatives: Genealogy, Identity and Community. New York: Oxford University Press.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorEmailjfoster@monmouth.edu
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1733-8077.14.1.01
dc.relation.volume14en_GB


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord