Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorBralewski, Sławomir
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-27T12:13:45Z
dc.date.available2017-04-27T12:13:45Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn2084-140X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/21405
dc.description.abstractIn subject literature there has been a discussion regarding juridical education of Socrates, the author of Ecclesiastical History. For quite long he has been believed to be a lawyer, owing to the title scholastikos, attributed to him. Recently, however, his legal education has been questioned by some scholars. The purpose of this article is to try to answer whether Socrates, as viewed from the work of Sozomen, also presumably a lawyer, could have knowledge of ecclesiastical law and distinguished between the terms of canon (used in ecclesiastical law) and nomos (used in civil law). The analysis of both Ecclesiastical Histories proves that the word canon had numerous meanings for Socrates, who used it while referring to pure ecclesiastical law, as well as to church regulations or practices, ordinances, resolutions, church registry, or even expressions of faith. Moreover, some regulations in ecclesiastical law were not always called canons by Socrates, which demonstrates some lack of precision while using legal terminology. Sozomen, on the other hand, while correcting Socrates’ narration, restricted the meaning of the term canon only to the particular church regulations, excluding those established by heterodox synods, which had a significant impact on how frequently they appeared in the text. The liberty of using legal terms by Socrates can be an additional argument to prove that he was not a professional lawyer, just like some discrepancies in the knowledge of ecclesiastical law are clearly visible in describing powers of the bishops of Rome and Constantinople.en_GB
dc.language.isofrfr_FR
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegofr_FR
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStudia Ceranea. Journal of the Waldemar Ceran Research Centre for the History and Culture of the Mediterranean Area and South-East Europe;6
dc.subjectSocrates of Constantinopleen_GB
dc.subjectHermias Sozomenen_GB
dc.subjectEcclesiastical Historyen_GB
dc.subjectecclesiastical lawen_GB
dc.titleLa connaissance de la loi ecclésiastique chez Socrate de Constantinople en confrontation avec l‘oeuvre de Hermias Sozomènefr_FR
dc.title.alternativeThe Knowledge of Ecclesiastical Law by Socrates of Constantinople Confronted with the Works by Hermias Sozomenen_GB
dc.typeArticlefr_FR
dc.rights.holder© Copyright by Authors, Łódź 2016; © Copyright for this edition by Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź 2016fr_FR
dc.page.number243-255
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniwersytet Łódzki, Wydział Filozoficzno-Historyczny, Instytut Historii, Katedra Historii Bizancjum
dc.identifier.eissn2449-8378
dc.referencesDokumenty Soborów Powszechnych, tekst grecki, łaciński, polski, t. I: Nicea I, Konstantynopol I, Efez, Chalcedon, Konstantynopol II, Konstantynopol III, Nicea II (325–787), ed. A. Baron, H. Pietras, Krakow 2002.en_GB
dc.referencesSocrates, Histoire ecclésiastique, texte grec de l’ed. G.C. Hansen (GCS), trad. francaise par P. Perichon, P. Maraval [= SC 477, 493, 505, 506], Paris 2004–2007.en_GB
dc.referencesSokrates, Kirchengeschichte, ed. G.C. Hansen, Berlin 1995 [= GCS. NF 1].en_GB
dc.referencesSozomene, Histoire ecclésiastique, t. I–IV, texte grec de l’ed. J. Bidez (GCS), trad. francaise par A-J. Festugiere, B. Grillet, intr. par B. Grillet, G. Sabbah, annot. par G. Sabbah, L. Angliviel de la Beaumelle, Paris 1983, 1996–2008 [= SC 306, 418, 495, 516].en_GB
dc.referencesSozomenus, Kirchengeschichte, ed. J. Bidez, G.C. Hansen, Berlin 1960.en_GB
dc.referencesVita Spyridonis, [in:] La Légende de S. Spyridon, éveque de Trimithonte, ed., trad. P. Van den Ven, Louvain 1953.en_GB
dc.referencesA Patristic Greek Lexicon, ed. G.W.H. Lampe, Oxford 1961.en_GB
dc.referencesBarnes T.D., Athanasius and Constantius, Cambridge 1993.en_GB
dc.referencesBeck H.-G., Nomos, Kanon und Staatsraison in Byzanz, Wien 1981 [= SOAW.PHK, 384].en_GB
dc.referencesBralewski S., Obraz papiestwa w historiografii kościelnej wczesnego Bizancjum, Łodź 2006.en_GB
dc.referencesChesnut G.F., The First Christian Histories. Eusebius, Socrates, Sozomen, Theodoret, and Evagrius, Paris 1977.en_GB
dc.referencesGaudemet J., Les sources du droit de l’Église en Occident du IIe au VIIe siecle, Paris 1985.en_GB
dc.referencesHess H., The early development of canon law and the Council of Serdica, Oxford 2002.en_GB
dc.referencesJaniszewski P., Żywioły w służbie propagandy, czyli po czyjej stronie stoi Bóg. Studium klęsk i rzadkich fenomenów przyrodniczych u historyków Kościoła w IV i V wieku, [in:] Chrześcijaństwo u schyłku starożytności. Studia źródłoznawcze, t. III, ed. T. Derda, E. Wipszycka, Krakow 2000, p. 11–191.en_GB
dc.referencesNuffelen P. van, Un Héritage de Paix et de Piété. Étude sur les histoires ecclésiastiques de Socrate et de Sozomene, Leuven–Paris–Dudley 2004.en_GB
dc.referencesOhme H., Kanon ekklesiastikos, Berlin 1998.en_GB
dc.referencesPennington K., The growth of church law, [in:] The Cambridge History of Christianity, vol. II: Constantine to c. 600, ed. A. Casiday, F.W. Norris, Cambridge 2008, p. 386–402.en_GB
dc.referencesRodopoulos P., An Overview of Orthodox Canon Law, Rollinsford 2007.en_GB
dc.referencesSimon D., Legislation as Both a World Order and a Legal Order, [in:] Law and Society in Byzantium: Ninth–Twelfth Centuries, ed. A.E. Laiou, D. Simon, Washington 1994, p. 1–27.en_GB
dc.referencesTroianos S.N., Nomos und Kanon in Byzanz, [in:] idem, Historia et Ius (1999–2004), vol. II, Athen 2004, p. 199–222.en_GB
dc.referencesUrbainczyk T., Observations on the differences between the Church Histories of Socrates and Sozomen, Hi 46, 1997, p. 355–373.en_GB
dc.referencesUrbainczyk T., Socrates of Constantinople: Historian of Church and State, Michigan 1997.en_GB
dc.referencesYoung F., From Nicaea to Chalcedon, London 1983.en_GB
dc.referencesWallraff M., Der Kirchenhistoriker Sokrates. Untersuchungen zu Geschichtsdarstellung, Methode und Person, Gottingen 1997.en_GB
dc.referencesWessel S., The Formation of Ecclesiastical Law in the Early Church, [in:] The History of Byzantine and Eastern Canon Law to 1500, ed. W. Hartmann, K. Pennington, Washington 2012, p. 1–23.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorEmailslawomir.bralewski@gmail.com
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/2084-140X.06.13


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord