Show simple item record

The North East Adriatic Region: Territorial Cooperation and the Role of Planning Systems and Cultures

dc.contributor.authorMarcks, Jakoben
dc.contributor.authorKnieling, Jörgen
dc.contributor.authorVladova, Galyaen
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-14T10:10:11Z
dc.date.available2017-03-14T10:10:11Z
dc.date.issued2017-02-23en
dc.identifier.issn1231-1952en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/20869
dc.description.abstractThis paper aims to analyse the influence of planning systems and cultures on the process of territorial cooperation in the North East Adriatic region. Based on recent theoretical works on planning systems and cultures in Europe and on-site research, the paper proves that while territorial cooperation in the North East Adriatic is hampered by the existing differences in the institutional setting and formal structures of planning in the Croatian, Italian and Slovenian parts of the region, it is facilitated by the region’s specific cultural context. In this line, the paper argues that cooperation processes in large cross-border regions could be studied only under consideration of the specific regional conditions and planning cultural context.en
dc.publisherLodz Univeristy Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEuropean Spatial Research and Policy;2en
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0en
dc.subjectterritorial and cross-border cooperationen
dc.subjectplanning systems and culturesen
dc.subjectNorth East Adriaticen
dc.titleThe North East Adriatic Region: Territorial Cooperation and the Role of Planning Systems and Culturesen
dc.page.number5-25en
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationMarcks, Jakob - The Institute for Urban Planning and Regional Development of Hafen City University, Hamburg, Germanyen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationKnieling, Jörg - The Institute for Urban Planning and Regional Development of Hafen City University, Hamburg, Germanyen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationVladova, Galya - The Institute for Urban Planning and Regional Development of Hafen City University, Hamburg, Germanyen
dc.identifier.eissn1896-1525
dc.referencesANDREOU, G. and BACHE, I. (2010), ‘Europeanization and multi-level governance in Slovenia’, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 10 (1), pp. 29–43, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14683851003606861 (30.11.2015). doi: 10.1080/14683851003606861(30.11.2015)en
dc.referencesBALCHIN, P. N. and SÝKORA, L. (1999), Regional Policy and Planning in Europe, New York: Routledge.en
dc.referencesBARTOL, B., BRATINA-JURKOVIČ, N., FATUR, A., FON-BOŠTJANČIČ, N., KOŠAK, E., LAPANJA, A., LENARČIČ, F., PODLESNIK, F. and TORBICA, J. (2004), Spatial Development Strategy of Slovenia (SDSS), Ministry of Environment, Spatial Planning and Energy, Ljubljana, Slovenia, http://www.espon-interstrat.eu/admin/attachments/SPRS_eng.pdf (30.11.2015).en
dc.referencesBERDAVS, J. (2008), ‘European Integration and Spatial Planning: From an International to a Local Cross-Border Level’, Regions – The Newsletter of the Regional Studies Association, 270, pp. 12‒14, http://www.aesop-planning.eu/downloads/Other/en_GB/regions-n270-a-special-issue-on-new-thinking-about-regional-planning-handled-by-aesop-young-academics (30.11.2015).en
dc.referencesBUFON, M. (2002), ‘Experience of Cross-Border Cooperation in the Upper Adriatic’, Regional and Federal Studies, 12 (4), 177‒196, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/714004771 (30.11.2015). doi: 10.1080/714004771(30.11.2015)en
dc.referencesBUFON, M. and MINGHI, J. (2000), ‘The Upper Adriatic borderland: From conflict to harmony’, GeoJournal, 52, pp. 119–127.en
dc.referencesCEC (Commission of the European Communities) (1997), The EU Compendium of Spatial Planning Systems and Policies, Luxembourg: Regional Development Studies, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.en
dc.referencesCEC (Commission of the European Communities) (2014), For a prosperous and integrated Adriatic and Ionian region, Luxembourg: Regional and Urban policy, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/cooperate/adriat_ionian/pdf/brochure_250914.pdf (30.11.2015).en
dc.referencesCeSPI (Centro Studi Politica Internazionale) (2013), Cohesion and coherence of strategic development plans in Istria County, Rome, Italy, http://www.cespi.it/SEENET/Report%203/Istria_thirdreport%28rev1%29.pdf (30.11.2015).en
dc.referencesĐULABIĆ, V. and MANOJLOVIĆ, R. (2011), ‘Administrative Aspects of Regional and Cohesion Policy in Croatia – In Search of a better coordination of parallel processes’, Croatian and Comparative Public Administration, 11 (4), pp. 1041–1074, http://hrcak.srce.hr/file/194751 (30.11.2015).en
dc.referencesESPON (2006a), ESPON project 2.3.2 – Governance of Territorial and Urban Policies from EU to Local Level – Final Report Part II, Luxembourg, http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/Projects/ESPON2006Projects/PolicyImpactProjects/Governance/fr-2.3.2_final_feb2007.pdf (30.11.2015).en
dc.referencesESPON (2006b), ESPON project 2.3.2 – Governance of Territorial and Urban Policies from EU to Local Level – Annex Report B, Luxembourg, http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/Projects/ESPON2006Projects/PolicyImpactProjects/Governance/fr-2.3.2_final_feb2007.pdf (30.11.2015).en
dc.referencesEUNETMAR (European Networking Group for Integrated Maritime Policy) (2014), Analysis to support the elaboration of the Adriatic and Ionian maritime Action Plan. Report 2, Rome, Italy, https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/maritimeforum/sites/maritimeforum/files/Report%202_21_03_2014.pdf (30.11.2015).en
dc.referencesEUROSTAT (2015), Gross domestic product (GDP) at current market prices by NUTS 3 regions, http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=nama_r_e3gdp&lang=en (30.11.2015).en
dc.referencesKERSAN-ŠKABIĆ, J. (2005), ‘How prepared is Croatia to access the European Union Regional Policy Funds? The Case of Istria’, [in:] OTT, K. (ed.), Croatian Accession to the European Union 3, Zagreb: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, pp. 249–277, www.ijf.hr/eng/EU3/kersan_skabic.pdf (30.11.2015).en
dc.referencesKNIELING, J. and OTHENGRAFEN, F. (2009), ‘En route to a theoretical model for comparative research on planning cultures’, [in:] KNIELING, J. and OTHENGRAFEN, F. (eds.), Planning Cultures in Europe. Decoding Cultural Phenomena in Urban and Regional Planning, Farnham, UK: Ashgate, pp. 39–64.en
dc.referencesKNIPPSCHILD, R. (2008), ‘Inter-urban cooperation in the German-Polish-Check triangle’, [in:] LEIBENATH, M., KORCELLI-OLEJNICZAK, E. and KNIPPSCHILD, M. (eds.), Cross-border governance and sustainable spatial development – mind the gaps!, Berlin: Springer, pp. 101–111.en
dc.referencesKOVAČ, P. (2011), ‘The Public Administration Reform Agenda in Slovenia – Two Decades of Challenges and Results’, Croatian and Comparative Public Administration, 11 (3), pp. 627–650, http://hrcak.srce.hr/file/194810 (30.11.2015).en
dc.referencesKRANJČEVIĆ, J. (2005), ‘Accession to the European Union and physical (spatial) planning in Croatia’, [in:] OTT, K. (ed.), Croatian Accession to the European Union 3, Zagreb: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, pp. 229–246, http://www.ijf.hr/eng/EU3/kranjcevic.pdf (30.11.2015).en
dc.referencesLINDSTROM, N. (2005), Europeanization and sub-national governance in Slovenia, Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops on Societal Regionalism in Western and Eastern Europe in Granada, http://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/76d206bf-5659-48c4-9d57-0c6887afa72c.pdf (30.11.2015).en
dc.referencesLINGUA, V. and SERVILLO, L. (2014), ‘The modernization of the Italian Planning System’, [in:] REIMER, M., GETIMIS, P. and BLOTEVOGEL, H. H. (eds.), Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe, London, UK: Routledge, pp. 127–148.en
dc.referencesNADALUTTI, E. (2012), ‘Is Cross-Border Governance Emerging over the Border between Italy and Slovenia?’, Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 20 (2), pp. 181–197, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2012.685390 (30.11.2015). doi: 10.1080/14782804.2012.685390(30.11.2015)en
dc.referencesNEWMAN, P. and THORNLEY, G. (1996), Urban Planning in Europe, London, UK: Routledge.en
dc.referencesPERKMANN, M. (2003), ‘Cross-border regions in Europe. Significance and drivers of regional cross-border co-operation’, European Urban and Regional Studies, 10 (2), pp. 153–171, http://eur.sagepub.com/content/10/2/153.full.pdf+html (30.11.2015).en
dc.referencesRDA South Primorska (2007), Regional Development Programme of South Primorska 2007–2013 – Summary, Koper, Slovenia, http://ec.europa.eu/ourcoast/download.cfm?fileID=837 (1.11.2015).en
dc.referencesSEE (2014), South East Europe Transnational Cooperation Programme – Country Report Croatia, Bologna, Italy, http://build-see.eu/build-see/sites/default/files/BUILD-SEE_COUNTRY-REPORT_CROATIA.pdf (30.11.2015).en
dc.referencesSLUGA, G. (2011), The Problem of Trieste and the Italo-Yugoslav Border, Albany, NY: New York State University Press.en
dc.referencesTOSICS, I., SZEMZŐ, H., ILLÉS, D., GERTHEIS, A., LALENIS, K. and KALERGIS, D.(2010), National spatial planning policies and governance typology, PLUREL Deliverable Report 2.2.1, http://www.plurel.net/images/D221.pdf (30.11.2015).en
dc.contributor.authorEmailMarcks, Jakob - jakob.marcks@gmail.comen
dc.contributor.authorEmailKnieling, Jörg - joerg.knieling@hcu-hamburg.deen
dc.contributor.authorEmailVladova, Galya - galya.vladova@hcu-hamburg.deen
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/esrp-2016-0008en
dc.relation.volume23


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
esrp-2016-0008.pdf
Size:
566.0Kb
Format:
PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.