Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorWojczulanis-Jakubas, Katarzyna
dc.contributor.authorKulpińska, Monika
dc.contributor.authorMinias, Piotr
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-27T12:26:23Z
dc.date.available2015-07-27T12:26:23Z
dc.date.issued2015-03-11
dc.identifier.issn1439-5444
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/11234
dc.description.abstractInterspecific agonistic interactions are important selective factors for maintaining ecological niches of different species, but their outcome is difficult to predict a priori. Here, we examined the direction and intensity of interspecific interactions in an assemblage of small passerines at a garden feeder, focussing on three finch species of various body sizes. We found that large and mediumsized birds usually initiated and won agonistic interactions with smaller species. Also, the frequency of fights increased with decreasing differences in body size between the participants. Finally, the probability of engaging in a fight increased with the number of birds at the feeder.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherSpringer Verlagpl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Ethology;Volume 33, Issue 2
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa 3.0 Polska*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/pl/*
dc.subjectAgonistic interactionspl_PL
dc.subjectFeederpl_PL
dc.subjectFinchespl_PL
dc.subjectInterspecific competitionpl_PL
dc.titleWho bullies whom at a garden feeder? Interspecific agonistic interactions of small passerines during a cold winterpl_PL
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.page.number159-163pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationWojczulanis-Jakubas Katarzyna, University of Gdańsk Department of Vertebrate Ecology and Zoologypl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationKulpińska Monika, University of Gdańsk Department of Vertebrate Ecology and Zoologypl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationMinias Piotr, University of Łódz, Department of Teacher Training and Biodiversity Studiespl_PL
dc.referencesAlatalo RV, Gustafsson L, Linden M, Lundberg A (1985) Interspecific competition and niche shifts in tits and the goldcrest: an experiment. J Anim Ecol 54:977–984pl_PL
dc.referencesClegg SM, Owens IPF (2002) The ‘island rule’ in birds: medium body size and its ecological explanation. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:1359–1365pl_PL
dc.referencesDarlington PJ Jr (1972) Competition, competitive repulsion, and coexistence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 69:3151–3155pl_PL
dc.referencesDhondt AA, Eyckerman R (1980) Competition between the great tit and the blue tit outside the breeding season in field experiments. Ecology 61:1291–1296pl_PL
dc.referencesDubois F (2003) Resource defense in a group-foraging context. Behav Ecol 14:2–9pl_PL
dc.referencesFrench AR, Smith TB (2005) Importance of body size in determining dominance hierarchies among diverse tropical frugivores. Biotropica 37:96–101pl_PL
dc.referencesGauthreaux SA Jr (1978) The ecological significance of behavioral dominance. In: Bateson PPG, Klopfer PH (eds) Perspectives in ethology. Plenum, New York, pp 17–54pl_PL
dc.referencesGrant PR (1986) Ecology and evolution of Darwin’s finches. Princeton University, Princetonpl_PL
dc.referencesGustafsson L (1987) Interspecific competition lowers fitness in collared flycatchers Ficedula albicollis: an experimental demonstration. Ecology 68:291–296pl_PL
dc.referencesHall ET (1966) The hidden dimension. Anchor Books Editions, Americapl_PL
dc.referencesHinde A (1956) The biological significance of the territories of birds. Ibis 92:340–369pl_PL
dc.referencesHolt RD (1977) Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communities. Theor Pop Biol 12:197–229pl_PL
dc.referencesJohnson CA, Grant JWA, Giraldeau L-A (2004) The effect of patch size and competitor number on aggression among foraging house sparrows. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 15:412–418pl_PL
dc.referencesKeddy PA (2001) Competition. Kluwer, Dordrechtpl_PL
dc.referencesLeiquie´n E, de Boer WF, Cleef A (2006) Influence of body size on coexistence of bird species. Ecol Res 22:735–741pl_PL
dc.referencesMoore FR, Yong W (1991) Evidence of food-based competition among passerine migrants during stopover. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28:85–90pl_PL
dc.referencesNephew C, Romero LM (2003) Behavioral, physiological, and endocrine responses of starlings to acute increases in density. Horm Behav 44:222–232pl_PL
dc.referencesOksanen L (1987) Interspecific competition and the structure of bird guilds in boreal Europe: the importance of doing fieldwork in the right season. Trends Ecol Evol 2:376–379pl_PL
dc.referencesPerea E, Venturas M, Gil L (2014) Seed predation on the ground or in the tree? Size-related differences in behaviour and ecology of granivorous birds. Acta Ornithol 49:119–130pl_PL
dc.referencesRobinson-Wolrath SI, Owens IPF (2003) Large size in an islanddwelling bird: intraspecific competition and the dominance hypothesis. J Evol Biol 16:1106–1114pl_PL
dc.referencesSasva´ri L, To¨ro¨k J, To´th L (1987) Density dependence between three competitive bird species. Oecologia 72:127–130pl_PL
dc.referencesSlotow R (1996) Aggression in white-crowned sparrows: effects of distance from cover and group size. Condor 98:245–252pl_PL
dc.referencesStamps JA (1992) Simultaneous versus sequential settlement in territorial species. Am Nat 139:1070–1088pl_PL
dc.referencesSvensson L, Mullarney K, Zetterstro¨m D, Grant PJ (2010) Collins bird guide. Harper Collins, UKpl_PL
dc.referencesWilson DS (1975) The adequacy of body size as a niche difference. Am Nat 970:769–784pl_PL
dc.referencesWoodward G, Ebenman B, Emmerson M, Montoya JM, Olesen JM, Valido A, Warren PH (2005) Body size in ecological networks. Trends Ecol Evol 20:402–409pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorEmailbiokwj@univ.gda.plpl_PL
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10164-015-0424-x


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Uznanie autorstwa 3.0 Polska
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako Uznanie autorstwa 3.0 Polska