Top-Down and Bottom-Up Urban and Regional Planning: Towards a Framework for The Use of Planning Standards

Pissourios, Ioannis A.

dc.contributor.author	Pissourios, Ioannis A.	en
dc.date.accessioned	2015-07-10T09:42:32Z
dc.date.available	2015-07-10T09:42:32Z
dc.date.issued	2014-06-06	en
dc.identifier.issn	1231-1952	en
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11089/10833
dc.description.abstract	The purpose of this paper is to discuss the ways that the top-down and the bottom-up approaches to planning can be combined in the practice of planning standards. In the first part, the paper examines the utilization of planning standards through time, while in the second part it aims to unravel the relationship between the use of planning standards and the top-down as well as the bottom-up planning approach. In the third part, the paper focuses on the limitations of bottom-up approaches, in order to demonstrate that they can only be used in a certain planning scale, leaving all other scales to top-down approaches. Last but not least, the paper proposes a framework for the use of planning standards in a combined top-down and bottom-up planning approach.	en
dc.publisher	Lodz Univeristy Press	en
dc.relation.ispartofseries	European Spatial Research and Policy;21	en
dc.rights	This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.	en
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/	en
dc.subject	top-down	en
dc.subject	bottom-up	en
dc.subject	planning theory	en
dc.subject	planning standards	en
dc.title	Top-Down and Bottom-Up Urban and Regional Planning: Towards a Framework for The Use of Planning Standards	en
dc.page.number	83-99	en
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation	Neapolis University of Pafos, School of Architecture, Land and Environmental Sciences, 2 Danais Avenue, 8042 Pafos, Cyprus	en
dc.identifier.eissn	1896-1525
dc.references	ALEXANDER, E. R. (1997), ‘A Mile or a Millimetre? Measuring the “Planning Theory - Practice Gap”’, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24 (1), pp. 3-6.	en
dc.references	ALEXANDER, E. R. (1999), ‘Response to Commentaries: Planning Theory and Practice - Mixing Them or Minding the Gap’, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 26 (1), pp. 1-4.	en
dc.references	ALEXANDER, E. R. (2010), ‘Introduction: Does Planning Theory Affect Practice, and If So, How?’, Planning Theory, 9 (2), pp. 99-107.	en
dc.references	ALLMENDINGER, P. (2002), Planning Theory, New York: Palgrave.	en
dc.references	ALLMENDINGER, P. and TEWDWR-JONES, M. (1997), ‘Mind the Gap: Planning Theory-Practice and the Translation of Knowledge into Action - A Comment on Alexander’, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24 (4), pp. 802-806.	en
dc.references	ARAVANTINOS, A. I. (1997), Urban Planning: For a Sustainable Development of Urban Space (in Greek), Athens: Symmetria.	en
dc.references	CHADWICK, G. (1971, 1978), A Systems View of Planning. Towards a Theory of the Urban and Regional Planning Process, Oxford: Pergamon Press.	en
dc.references	CITY OF SACRAMENTO (1988), General Plan: Public Facilities and Services Element, Sacramento.	en
dc.references	CITY OF SACRAMENTO (2005), General Plan Update: Technical Background Report - Public Services, Sacramento.	en
dc.references	CITY OF SACRAMENTO (2008a), Sacramento 2030 General Plan: Public Review Draft - Land Use and Urban Design, Sacramento.	en
dc.references	CITY OF SACRAMENTO (2008b), Sacramento 2030 General Plan: Public Review Draft - Education, Recreation and Culture, Sacramento.	en
dc.references	DAVIDOFF, P. (1996), ‘Advocacy and Pluralism in Planning’, [in:] CAMPBELL, S. and FAINSTEIN, S. (eds.), Readings in Planning Theory, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers (originally published in 1965 in Journal of American Institute of Planners, 31 (4), pp. 331-338).	en
dc.references	ERNICKE AND PARTNER (2002), Erläuterungsbericht. Flächennutzungsplan der Stadt Treuenbrietzen, Treuenbrietzen.	en
dc.references	FALUDI, A. (1973), Planning Theory, Oxford: Pergamon Press.	en
dc.references	FALUDI, A. (1986), Critical Rationalism and Planning Methodology, London: Pion.	en
dc.references	FEDER, G. (1939), Die neue Stadt: Versuch der Begründung einer Neuen Stadtplanungskunst aus der Sozialen Struktur der Bevölkerung, Berlin: Springer.	en
dc.references	GGG (2004), ‘Ministerial Degree: Approval of Urban Planning Standards and Maximum Population Densities Used in the Preparation of General Urban Plans, Spatial Organization of Open Cities Plans and Urban Plans’ (in Greek), National Printing Office, D (285), March 5.	en
dc.references	HARRIS, N. (1997), ‘Orienting Oneself to Practice: A Comment on Alexander’, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24 (4), pp. 799-801.	en
dc.references	HEALEY, P. (1996), ‘Planning Through Debate: The Communicative Turn in Planning Theory’, [in:] CAMPELL, S. and FAINSTEIN, S. (eds.), Readings in Planning Theory, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers (originally published in 1992 in Town Planning Review, 63 (2), pp. 143-162).	en
dc.references	HEALEY, P. (1997), Collaborative Planning. Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies, Vancouver: UBC Press.	en
dc.references	HEALEY, P., MCDOUGALL, G. and THOMAS, M. (1982), ‘Theoretical Debates in Planning Towards a Coherent Dialogue’, [in:] HEALEY, P., MCDOUGALL, G. and THOMAS, M. (eds.), Planning Theory. Prospects for the 1980s, Oxford: Pergamon Press.	en
dc.references	HKPD (2010), Hong Kong Planning Standards and Guidelines, Hong Kong: Hong Kong Planning Department.	en
dc.references	LAGOPOULOS, A.-Ph. (2009), ‘Urban Planning, Poleology and Land Uses’, [in:] Constantinos Doxiadis and his Work (in Greek), Athens: Technical Chamber of Greece.	en
dc.references	LAURIA, M. (2010), ‘Does Planning Theory Affect Practice, and If So, How?’, Planning Theory, 9 (2), pp. 156-159.	en
dc.references	MARCH, A. (2010), ‘Practising Theory: When Theory Affects Urban Planning’, Planning Theory, 9 (2), pp. 108-125. ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000278599100002&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3	en
dc.references	MCLOUGHLIN, J. B. (1969), Urban and Regional Planning. A Systems Approach, London: Faber.	en
dc.references	MORONI, S. (2010), ‘Rethinking the Theory and Practice of Land Use Regulation: Towards Monocracy’, Planning Theory, 9 (2), pp. 137-155. ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000278599100004&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3	en
dc.references	MURRAY, M., GREER, J., HOUSTON, D., MCKAY, S. and MURTAGH, B. (2009), ‘Bridging Top down and Bottom up: Modelling Community Preferences for a Dispersed Rural Settlement Pattern’, European Planning Studies, 17 (3), pp. 441-462. doi: 10.1080/09654310802618101 ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000263367100006&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3	en
dc.references	NÆSS, P. (2001), ‘Urban Planning and Sustainable Development’, European Planning Studies, 9 (4), pp. 503-524. doi: 10.1080/713666490	en
dc.references	NEUMAN, P. and THORNLEY, A. (1996), Urban Planning in Europe. International Competition, National Systems and Planning Projects, London: Routledge.	en
dc.references	OGRI (1968), ‘Decreto Ministeriale: Limiti inderogabili di densità edilizia, di altezza, di distanza fra i fabbricati e rapporti massimi tra gli spazi destinati agli insediamenti residenziali e produttivi e spazi pubblici o riservati alle attività collettive, al verde pubblico o a parcheggi, da osservare ai fini della formazione dei nuovi strumenti urbanistici o della revisione di quelli esistenti, ai sensi dell’art. 17 della legge n. 765 del 1967’, Official Gazette of the Republic of Italy, 1444, April 2.	en
dc.references	ÖTISHEIM and VVM (2006), Begründung. Flächennutzungsplan 2020, Mühlacker.	en
dc.references	PISSOURIOS, I. A. (2013a), ‘An Interdisciplinary Study on Indicators: A Comparative Review of Quality-of-Life, Macroeconomic, Environmental, Welfare and Sustainability Indicators’, Ecological Indicators, 34, pp. 420-427.	en
dc.references	PISSOURIOS, I. A. (2013b), ‘Whither the Planning Theory-Practice Gap? A Case Study on the Relationship between Urban Indicators and Planning Theories’, Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, 8 (2), pp. 80-92.	en
dc.references	SABATIER, P. (1986), ‘Top-down and Bottom-up Approaches to Implementation Research: A Critical Analysis and Suggested Synthesis’, Journal of Public Policy, 6 (1), pp. 21-48.	en
dc.references	SFPD (1990), San Francisco General Plan: Community Facilities Element, San Francisco.	en
dc.references	SFPD (1997a), San Francisco General Plan, San Francisco.	en
dc.references	SFPD (1997b), San Francisco General Plan: Downtown Area Plan, San Francisco.	en
dc.references	SFPD (1997c), San Francisco General Plan: Community Safety, San Francisco.	en
dc.references	SFPD (2004), San Francisco General Plan: Housing Element, San Francisco.	en
dc.references	SFPD (2007), San Francisco General Plan: Recreation and Open Space, San Francisco.	en
dc.references	SPFS (2009), Flächennutzungsplan Begründung, Plauen.	en
dc.references	TAYLOR, N. (1998), Urban Planning Theory since 1945, London: Sage.	en
dc.references	USSR (1962), Regulations and Standards for the Planning and Development of Towns, Boston: National Lending Library for Science and Technology (originally published in Russian in 1958).	en
dc.references	WATSON, V. (2008), ‘Down to Earth: Linking Planning Theory and Practice in the “Metropole” and Beyond’, International Planning Studies, 13 (3), pp. 223-237.	en
dc.contributor.authorEmail	pissourios@gmail.com	en
dc.identifier.doi	10.2478/esrp-2014-0007	en

Pliki tej pozycji

Nazwa:: esrp-2014-0007.pdf
Rozmiar:: 781.4KB
Format:: PDF

Oglądaj/Otwórz

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

European Spatial Research and Policy Volume 21 (2014) Issue 1 [10]

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.