<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Turystyka i Hotelarstwo 2005, nr 7</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/46323" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/46323</id>
<updated>2026-04-09T01:48:50Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-09T01:48:50Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Wykaz literatury z zakresu hotelarstwa z lat 1980–2005</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/46726" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Milewska, Mariola</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Skrzypczyński, Marek</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/46726</id>
<updated>2023-04-18T01:50:43Z</updated>
<published>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Wykaz literatury z zakresu hotelarstwa z lat 1980–2005
Milewska, Mariola; Skrzypczyński, Marek
Stasiak, Andrzej
</summary>
<dc:date>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Historia i stan obecny hotelarstwa w regionie łódzkim</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/46725" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Milewska, Mariola</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Włodarczyk, Bogdan</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/46725</id>
<updated>2023-04-18T01:50:35Z</updated>
<published>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Historia i stan obecny hotelarstwa w regionie łódzkim
Milewska, Mariola; Włodarczyk, Bogdan
Stasiak
Despite the mediaeval origins of numerous towns and villages of Łódź region,&#13;
it is difficult to discuss a particular development of services in accommodation&#13;
and catering. Like in other Poland’s regions, the beginnings of hotel industry in&#13;
Łódź environs should be associated with the development of inns and taverns.&#13;
In the Middle Ages and in later periods their location was related to more&#13;
significant places such as Rawa Mazowiecka, Piotrków Trybunalski, Wolbórz,&#13;
Inowłódz and Łowicz, or more important trade routes crossing the region.&#13;
In times of the Gentry Republic of Poland, Piotrków Trybunalski took the lead&#13;
as regards the number of inns and taverns, initially due to gatherings and&#13;
regional gentry diets, then due to Crown tribunals, which took place in this town.&#13;
Together with the development of postal communication in the 19th century&#13;
postal inns came into beings also in central Poland. Inns founded in Łęczyca&#13;
Rokiciny (built in 1848) (fig. 2 and 3) or Łowicz are the best examples.&#13;
The first 19th-century establishments, which indulgently might be called&#13;
hotels, were founded outside Łódź among others in Tomaszów Mazowiecki,&#13;
Łowicz and Sieradz.&#13;
The second half of the 19th and the beginnings of the 20th centuries&#13;
witnessed the development of holiday settlement outside Łódź and bigger towns&#13;
of the region. In woody areas with healthful properties (usually dry pine forests)&#13;
settlements, often referring to a well-known idea of so-called ‘towns-gardens’&#13;
were mushrooming. They were Głowno, Grotniki, Sokolniki, Tuszyn-Las,&#13;
Gomunice, Teofilów and Inowłódz and others.&#13;
The period of World War II was the time of stagnation and even decline in the&#13;
development of tourist accommodation whose part was either destroyed or&#13;
changed its functions.&#13;
Years after the war witnessed the increase in social tourism whose main&#13;
moderators in those times were most often enterprises in Łódź. Numerous&#13;
leisure centres with plenty of accommodation were founded.&#13;
In the first half of the seventies, initial attempts were made at adapting&#13;
historic buildings for hotel accommodation. In the nineties of the 20th and the&#13;
beginnings of the 21st centuries mainly private investors showed an increased&#13;
interest in adapting historic buildings to hotels. In that period numerous attempts&#13;
were made to adjust tourist accommodation to standards binding upon&#13;
European hotel industry.&#13;
The beginnings of the 21st century brought about a distinctive revival of&#13;
investments in areas considered as tourist destinations (e.g. Spała, Bronisławów).&#13;
In 2004, which is the basis for carried research, in Łódź region 231 different&#13;
establishments with 15 210 accommodation places were registered.&#13;
In the generic structure of accommodation facilities localized within the&#13;
boundaries of Łódź region, establishments classified as ‘others’ i.e. these ones which do not appear in a detailed generic classification provided in the Act of&#13;
tourist services from 1997, outnumbered other types.&#13;
The current shift of the centroid of hotel distribution to the southeast of Łódź&#13;
results from the foundation of many new hotels (Dłutów, Nowa Gdynia near&#13;
Zgierz, Spała on Sulejów artificial lake) or thorough alteration of the existing&#13;
accommodation (Spała, Polichno) and adjusting it to requirements for the hotels&#13;
in eastern and southern part of the region.&#13;
Hotels in the region have been undergoing much more dynamic changes&#13;
than the ones located in Łódź. Only in 2005 (data from the end of Sept.) in Łódź&#13;
region 14 new hotels were built (including the only in the region 4-star hotel&#13;
Mościcki in Spała). In the same time none of Łodź hotels was classified under&#13;
this category.
</summary>
<dc:date>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Działania marketingowe gospodarstw agroturystycznych w wybranych powiatach województwa warmińsko-mazurskiego</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/46724" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Turkowski, Marek</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/46724</id>
<updated>2023-04-18T01:50:25Z</updated>
<published>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Działania marketingowe gospodarstw agroturystycznych w wybranych powiatach województwa warmińsko-mazurskiego
Turkowski, Marek
Stasiak, Andrzej
Farm tourism has been a popular topic for some time now. Tourists&#13;
demonstrate an increasing tendency to choose places distant from traditional&#13;
holiday destinations because in the latter numerous attractions are accompanied&#13;
by excessive concentration of visitors on a small area and exorbitant prices.&#13;
Local politicians perceive farm tourism as an opportunity to boost the local&#13;
economy and to reduce unemployment. Farmers seek other possibilities of&#13;
obtaining income from their farms.&#13;
However, informing a prospective customer about offered services is a prerequisite&#13;
for any business activity. Like hotel clients, farm tourism clients are&#13;
scattered over a large area. This paper is an attempt to investigate the condition&#13;
of marketing activities of tourist farms.&#13;
The aim of the research conducted in March 2004 was the identification of&#13;
the methods of attracting customers employed by tourist farms on areas not&#13;
covered by any associations as well as the evaluation of the efficiency of these&#13;
methods. Based on address lists obtained from local tourist information offices,&#13;
survey questionnaires were sent to 43 tourist farms located in the Kętrzyn district&#13;
and the Węgorzewo district in the Warmia-Mazury Voivodeship. Eighteen&#13;
questionnaires (41.9%) were returned.&#13;
Tourist farms participating in the survey offered 7–24 beds, but a majority&#13;
(72.2%) possessed up to 12 beds. What is both interesting and simultaneously&#13;
surprising, it is in the areas frequently visited, for historical reasons, by German citizens, where domestic visitors are particularly expected to arrive (62.9%). A fall in the interest in foreign visitors was noticed earlier.&#13;
In the majority of cases (62.9%) tourist farm owners are geared towards&#13;
providing services for customers interested in holidays at affordable prices. This&#13;
demonstrates that they may be familiar with wealthy clients’ high requirements&#13;
and aware of their farms’ inadequacies.&#13;
According to tourist farm owners, the most important factor in attracting&#13;
customers is furnishings and equipment of the farm. 77.8% of the&#13;
farms pointed to the inadequate furnishings and equipment as the major reason&#13;
for difficulty in attracting customers. The second most important problem is the&#13;
lack of or insufficient extra services; the clients whose accommodation needs&#13;
have been satisfied notice lack of services that require considerable financial&#13;
outlays such as horses or carts. This points to the need to provide more financial&#13;
resources for the modernisation and furnishing of the buildings belonging to&#13;
tourist farms.&#13;
According to the respondents, the major factors that help attract clients&#13;
include customer recommendation (89% of answers), the Internet (61%), and&#13;
the information provided by tourist information offices and local government&#13;
offices (50%).&#13;
The questionnaire included a question concerning the cost of advertising.&#13;
Only 22.2% of respondents did not report any cost of advertising activity or did&#13;
not answer the question. The other respondents reported annual expenditure&#13;
ranging from 100 PLN to 2100 PLN. The average annual publicity expenditure&#13;
amounted to 410 PLN per farm, 32.5 PLN per bed and 1.0 PLN per night sold.&#13;
The figures appear to be low, but in many cases average publicity expenditure&#13;
constitutes approx. 10% of the price of bed per night, for each night even in the&#13;
case of a few days’ stays. This seems to suggest that a significant number of&#13;
tourist farm owners spend the money allocated to publicity inefficiently.&#13;
If the efficiency of advertising activity is measured in terms of nights sold per&#13;
bed, farms that report publicity expenditure achieve more than twice as good&#13;
results as those that do not:&#13;
– farms reporting publicity expenditure achieved 37 nights sold per bed;&#13;
– farms reporting no publicity expenditure achieved 16.6 nights sold per&#13;
bed.&#13;
One of the most important aims of the survey was the evaluation of major&#13;
problems in attracting visitors. According to the respondents, the most important&#13;
factors in this respect are as follows:&#13;
– inadequate standard of services offered by the farms;&#13;
– insufficient actions aimed at attracting customers;&#13;
– inefficient spending of money allocated to publicity.&#13;
The factors enumerated above imply that even larger financial means&#13;
allocated to publicity will not lead to better results. The improvement in the&#13;
efficiency of tourist farms requires actions in two areas.&#13;
Firstly, activities aimed at making financial resources for the development of&#13;
farm tourism more available are required. This refers to the improvement in basic facilities (e.g. the standard of rooms, the furnishing of bathrooms) as well&#13;
as providing the equipment that makes the stay on a farm more enjoyable. As&#13;
results from the survey, those farms that report the insufficiency of standard and&#13;
equipment in a lesser extent achieve better results.&#13;
Secondly, farms should be given access to information about tourist service&#13;
market. A particularly adequate assistance offered to tourist farm owners&#13;
involves training in the form of free or partially payable workshops. The training&#13;
should take account of the problem of adjusting services to customers’ needs,&#13;
including the minimum of the required standard, as well as the issue of publicity,&#13;
especially publicity via the Internet. The training of this sort is offered by the&#13;
voivodeship agriculture consultancy centres, but the survey conducted by the&#13;
author, along with the results achieved by tourist farms, demonstrates that those&#13;
who set up such farms are not aware of the distinctive character of this area of&#13;
business activity.&#13;
The conclusions drawn above should attract local government institutions’&#13;
attention to the problems of farm tourism. They also provide some information&#13;
for institutions that have financial resources for the development of agriculture at&#13;
their disposal about how to distribute the money so that farm tourism could&#13;
develop.
</summary>
<dc:date>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Programy lojalnościowe jako narzędzie kontroli ryzyka popytowego w hotelarstwie</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/46723" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Bednarska, Marlena</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/46723</id>
<updated>2023-04-18T01:50:28Z</updated>
<published>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Programy lojalnościowe jako narzędzie kontroli ryzyka popytowego w hotelarstwie
Bednarska, Marlena
Stasiak, Andrzej
Risk, being a common and objective phenomenon is an immanent feature of&#13;
all economic processes resulting from considerate complexity and changeability&#13;
of conditions in which contemporary enterprises have to function. Increasing&#13;
uncertainty of the environment brings about the need to consider the risk in the&#13;
process of enterprise management which requires a constant analysis of its&#13;
sources and activating factors together with undertaking some risk controloriented&#13;
initiatives.&#13;
Risk, which accompanies hotel activities results from the fact of functioning&#13;
both in the natural and in socioeconomic environment .In operational activity of&#13;
the hotel a lot of weight should be attached to market risk which arises as&#13;
a result of relations with representatives of the sector – suppliers, consumers&#13;
and competition. Demand risk requires a special attention. The size of demand&#13;
for services, and simultaneously the level of sale, is a key factor determining&#13;
effective commitment of human resources.&#13;
The significance of demand risk in hotel industry has been determined by&#13;
specific features of the market of hotel services, among which the following ones&#13;
are of vital importance: the distance of potential tourists from the place of the&#13;
service, instability, irrationalism and complementarities of demand, high capital-&#13;
-intensive character of the trade, unity of rendering and consumption of services,&#13;
stable service potential, prevailing share of fixed expenses in the structure of&#13;
costs.&#13;
Risk control consists in minimizing possible losses and maximizing potential&#13;
gains resulting from risk-taking. As it is commonly known, ruling bodies detest&#13;
taking risk so many initiatives in controlling the risk are based on preventive&#13;
activities inhibiting the development of any disadvantageous event by affecting&#13;
the risk sources or conditions of their activation.&#13;
Initiatives, which aim at creating the effect of brand loyalty, play a particular&#13;
role among preventive methods of controlling demand risk used by hotels. Brand&#13;
loyalty is extremely advantageous for the hotel. The need for intensive hotel&#13;
promotion falls, it is more difficult to enter the market of competition and guests’&#13;
sensitivity to room rate fluctuation drops. Loyalty programmes are the instrument&#13;
bringing about this effect. Due to the system of incentives and profits they&#13;
encourage guests to purchase hotel services once again and propagate&#13;
favourable opinions about the hotel. Profits resulting from the participation in the&#13;
programme affect both rational and emotional aspects.&#13;
Researches conducted within the Wielkopolskie province show that hotels&#13;
realize profits resulting from introducing loyalty programmes and they use this&#13;
method actively. Big hotels, of high standard, and functioning within hotel chain&#13;
structure, display more initiative in this matter. Deep interest in loyalty&#13;
programmes among researched hotels allows assuming that this method has&#13;
been permanently included into the tools used to reduce demand risk and to&#13;
create advantage over competition on the hotel market.
</summary>
<dc:date>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
