http://hdl.handle.net/11089/40749 2026-04-05T19:53:52Z 2026-04-05T19:53:52Z Kuran, Michał http://hdl.handle.net/11089/43791 2022-10-21T01:49:34Z 2018-01-01T00:00:00Z

Iwona Słomak, Retoryka miłosnej batalii „Wojsko serdecznych nowo rekrutowanych afektów” Hieronima Falęckiego, Warszawa 2017, ss. 247 Kuran, Michał

2018-01-01T00:00:00Z Rozmysł, Michał http://hdl.handle.net/11089/43790 2022-10-21T01:49:30Z 2018-01-01T00:00:00Z

Zbrodnia jako dzieło sztuki? Na marginesie African Psycho Alaina Mabanckou Rozmysł, Michał

2018-01-01T00:00:00Z Tomczok, Paweł http://hdl.handle.net/11089/43789 2022-10-21T01:49:32Z 2018-01-01T00:00:00Z

Narcyzm i historia. Narcyzm zbiorowy i narcyzm indywidualny w historiach alternatywnych i powieściach historycznych ostatnich lat Tomczok, Paweł The aim of the article is the description of the Polish historical novels of Szczepan Twardoch, Marcin Wolski and others. The theoretical basis of the research is the concept of narcissism propossed by Erich Fromm, Alexander Lowen and Christopher Lasch. Two concepts of narcissism allow to explore different novels that represent collective phantams of Polish culture and individual problems with culture of the late capitlism and consumerism.

2018-01-01T00:00:00Z Panek, Sylwia http://hdl.handle.net/11089/43788 2022-10-21T01:49:31Z 2018-01-01T00:00:00Z

“Clarity is a Fiction Made of the Fabric of Chaos”: Irzykowski Nonunderstandableness Panek, Sylwia The paper deals with a famous critical controversy of Poland’s interbellum period, the polemic about what Karol Irzykowski called “nonunderstandableness,” stirred up by his article Niezrozumialstwo (1924). Begun on the pages of the weekly “Wiadomości Literackie”, the controversy continued in other periodicals in essays by eminent writers and critics of the time (including T. Peiper, J. Przyboś, S. I. Witkiewicz, J. Ujejski, J.N. Miller, J. Hulewicz and J. Brzękowski) until the outbreak of the World War II. Its importance in the history of the nation’s literary criticism between the wars consists not only in that it promoted the category of “nonunderstandableness”, which has since then become an essential “figure of the reading” of the literary texts of that period (W. Bolecki), but also in Irzykowski’s penetrating campaign employing this category, which diagnosed and exposed the recondite affinity of the literary aesthetic principles and strategies of Young Poland and the later avant-garde. The aim of the paper is to explain Irzykowski’s attitude within this controversy: (1) to identify the personal and abstract, explicitly and implicitly named targets of his attack; (2) to place the category of “nonunderstandableness” within the system of the writer’s opinions from the area of literary criticism; and (3) to interpret the paradoxical manner in which he conducted his critical dispute.

2018-01-01T00:00:00Z