<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny Hybris 53 (2/2021)</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/40643" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/40643</id>
<updated>2026-04-06T16:02:18Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-06T16:02:18Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Introduction aux rapports entre photographie et peinture chez Francis Bacon selon Deleuze (dans Logique de la sensation)</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/40657" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Heusghem, Corentin</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/40657</id>
<updated>2022-02-18T02:56:40Z</updated>
<published>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Introduction aux rapports entre photographie et peinture chez Francis Bacon selon Deleuze (dans Logique de la sensation)
Heusghem, Corentin
Thé aim of this articlé is to présént a concisé summary and réviéw about&#13;
thé thésés of Déléuzé on thé rélations bétwéén painting and photography&#13;
but also about his account of Bacon through thé prism of this quéstion in&#13;
his book Francis Bacon : Logique de la sensation. This articlé could only&#13;
bé séén as an introduction and pérhaps an invitation to réad déépér&#13;
studiés about thé important and numérous links bétwéén Déléuzé's&#13;
philosophy and art.
</summary>
<dc:date>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Radykalny emocjonalizm jako stanowisko metametaetyczne</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/40656" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Hartman, Jan</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/40656</id>
<updated>2022-02-18T02:56:30Z</updated>
<published>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Radykalny emocjonalizm jako stanowisko metametaetyczne
Hartman, Jan
This paper attempts to develop a theoretical perspective which combines&#13;
ethics and metaethics jointly with their links to the rational plots of the&#13;
living moral reality. The author claims that the nature of morality is&#13;
strictly emotional and criticizes false attempts to rationalize moral&#13;
sphere, in many cases resulting from the ideas and arguments produced by the academic ethics or metaethics and subsequently infiltrating the&#13;
social life. Imposed by the very theoretical nature of philosophy,&#13;
intellectualism of the theoretical developments in ethics has a wrongful&#13;
effect for public morals, falsifying the emotional nature of morality and&#13;
providing individuals with false and rhapsodic, pseudo-theoretical topoi&#13;
of contention, justifying and assessment. The article may be read as&#13;
fundamentally undermining ethics as a historically influential moral as&#13;
well as theoretical enterprise (with exclusion of the emotionalist&#13;
tradition).
</summary>
<dc:date>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>O pewnym na nowo podniesionym nobliwym tonie w filozofii</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/40651" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Kant, Immanuel</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/40651</id>
<updated>2022-02-18T02:56:33Z</updated>
<published>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">O pewnym na nowo podniesionym nobliwym tonie w filozofii
Kant, Immanuel
</summary>
<dc:date>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Rozum versus (u)czucie. Filozofii krytycznej z (neo)platonizmem przypadki (kilka słów od tłumacza)</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/40650" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Banaszkiewicz, Artur</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/40650</id>
<updated>2022-02-18T02:56:35Z</updated>
<published>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Rozum versus (u)czucie. Filozofii krytycznej z (neo)platonizmem przypadki (kilka słów od tłumacza)
Banaszkiewicz, Artur
The following paper provides a historical and biographical introduction&#13;
to the reading of the translation of Kant’s essay Von einem neuerdings&#13;
erhobenen vornehmen Ton in der Philosophie. It consists of three parts.&#13;
In the first one, called Introductory remarks, I point out the specific role&#13;
of Kant’s polemical writings in his work. In the second, Protagonists,&#13;
I outline the biographies of both of Kant’s opponents: J. G. Schlosser and&#13;
Friedrich Leopold Graf zu Stolberg-Stolber. Finally, in the third one,&#13;
I discuss a number of translation problems with the terms “Ahnung” and&#13;
“ahnen”.
</summary>
<dc:date>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
