http://hdl.handle.net/11089/24606 2026-04-13T04:43:35Z 2026-04-13T04:43:35Z Minczew, Georgi Leszka, Mirosław J. Marinow, Kirił Skowronek, Małgorzata Kompa, Andrzej Kawecka, Agata Petrov, Ivan http://hdl.handle.net/11089/24793 2023-10-18T09:19:37Z 2017-01-01T00:00:00Z

Guidelines for the authors Minczew, Georgi; Leszka, Mirosław J.; Marinow, Kirił; Skowronek, Małgorzata; Kompa, Andrzej; Kawecka, Agata; Petrov, Ivan

2017-01-01T00:00:00Z Minczew, Georgi Leszka, Mirosław J. Marinow, Kirił Skowronek, Małgorzata Kompa, Andrzej Kawecka, Agata Petrov, Ivan http://hdl.handle.net/11089/24792 2023-10-18T09:17:05Z 2017-01-01T00:00:00Z

Abbreviations Minczew, Georgi; Leszka, Mirosław J.; Marinow, Kirił; Skowronek, Małgorzata; Kompa, Andrzej; Kawecka, Agata; Petrov, Ivan

2017-01-01T00:00:00Z Majer, Marek http://hdl.handle.net/11089/24662 2021-07-02T07:50:09Z 2017-01-01T00:00:00Z

A Note on the Balto-Slavic and Indo-European Background of the Proto-Slavic Adjective *svętъ ‘Holy’ Majer, Marek The standard etymological explanation of the Proto-Slavic adjective *svętъ ‘holy, saint’ – a word of extreme literary, cultural and religious importance in the Slavic world – concentrates on the formal match with Lithuanian šventas ‘id.’ and Avestan spəṇta‑ ‘life-giving, holy’ (PIE *ḱwen‑to‑, from the root *ḱwen‑). This article highlights the verbal formation seen in Latvian svinêtsvin svinẽjo ‘celebrate, venerate’, generally recognized as another reflex of the root *ḱwen‑ in Balto-Slavic, but without due attention to the formal implications. It is argued that both in Av. and in BSl. the adjective spəṇta‑/*svętъ behaves as an item participating in the so-called ‘Caland System’ (a set of arbitrary morphological alternations reconstructible for Proto-Indo-European). 

2017-01-01T00:00:00Z Lauritzen, Frederick http://hdl.handle.net/11089/24660 2019-02-25T13:53:09Z 2017-01-01T00:00:00Z

The Layers of Composition of the Synodikon of Alexius Studites Lauritzen, Frederick The Synodikon of Orthodoxy, in its earliest version (Synodikon of Alexius Studites), has at least five different layers of composition. Beside the original one of 843/844, there is one after 845, another after 870, a fourth after 925 and finally one between 1034–1043. Since each date represents a post quem, they could be grouped together. However, the layers of composition represent different interests and objectives and therefore are difficult to conflate. On the contrary, each stratum reveals that by the 11th century the characteristic of the Synodikon was to unify different objectives and strategies into one text. It is also for this reason that the text continued to expand after Alexius Studites’ version of 1034–1043.

2017-01-01T00:00:00Z