<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny Hybris 16 (1/2012)</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/1119" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/1119</id>
<updated>2026-04-08T16:13:31Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-08T16:13:31Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Was können Intuition und Diskurs leisten? Eine epistemologisch-phänomenologische Analyse mit Blick auf Husserl und Foucault</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/1552" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Rynkiewicz, Kazimierz</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/1552</id>
<updated>2018-02-01T11:18:32Z</updated>
<published>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Was können Intuition und Diskurs leisten? Eine epistemologisch-phänomenologische Analyse mit Blick auf Husserl und Foucault
Rynkiewicz, Kazimierz
With a view of Husserl and Foucault the article ist seeking a critical epistemological&#13;
phenomenological analysis of the relationship between the notions of intuition and&#13;
discourse. The central question is: what can intuition and discourse afford? The&#13;
epistemological performance of these terms is determined both generally and specifically.&#13;
While the general performance highlights the establishment of the human subjects in the&#13;
real world, it is the special performance with the access of subjects to the ideal objects.&#13;
This situation requires the complementary pursuit, i.e., a synthesis of the intuition and the&#13;
mind.
</summary>
<dc:date>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Ideology, Politics and Society in Antonio Gramsci's Theory of Hegemony</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/1551" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Leśniak, Tomasz</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/1551</id>
<updated>2018-02-01T11:18:32Z</updated>
<published>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Ideology, Politics and Society in Antonio Gramsci's Theory of Hegemony
Leśniak, Tomasz
In this article, I examine Antonio Gramsci's theory of hegemony by situating it in relation to&#13;
a more general intellectual and socio-political context involving orthodox Marxism,&#13;
October Revolution and Italian fascism. I first briefly outline the problem of economism in&#13;
Marxist theory, as it is the main object of Gramsci's critique developed fully in the Prison&#13;
Notebooks. The next two sections are devoted to October Revolution and Italian fascism,&#13;
interpreted as two elements of the socio-political conjuncture which called into question&#13;
Marx's 'base/superstructure' model of society and its mechanistic rearticulation. Finally, I&#13;
discuss Gramsci's mature political theory as an attempt to break with economic&#13;
determinism and class reductionism of classical and orthodox Marxist theory. I argue that&#13;
his original conception of hegemony constitutes an advance towards a non-essentialist and&#13;
relational conception of politics and society.
</summary>
<dc:date>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Chantal Mouffe vs. Carl Schmitt: The Political, Democracy, and the Question of Sovereignty</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/1550" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Smoleński, Jan</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/1550</id>
<updated>2018-02-01T11:18:32Z</updated>
<published>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Chantal Mouffe vs. Carl Schmitt: The Political, Democracy, and the Question of Sovereignty
Smoleński, Jan
In this paper I compare political theories of Carl Schmitt and Chantal Mouffe in three&#13;
important aspects - the conceptualization of the political, their attitude towards liberal&#13;
democracy and the conception of political process - and point to significant discrepancies.&#13;
Schmitt's concept of the political is deeply existential and essentially involves real&#13;
possibility of death, whereas Mouffe's is more domesticated, centered around the&#13;
struggle, not physical elimination. Schmitt sees liberal democracy as inherently&#13;
contradictory, because it is grounded on contradictory principles: democratic equality and&#13;
particularism, and liberal freedom and universalism. Mouffe perceives this contradiction as&#13;
a locus of tension with emancipatory potential. I trace these differences to their different&#13;
perception of history. Schmitt's vision of history is marked with ruptures created by the&#13;
political emergencies, which correlates with his eventual, decisionistic conception of&#13;
politics. Mouffe's processual conception of politics corresponds rather with the conception&#13;
of the end of history.
</summary>
<dc:date>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>W miejsce filozofii</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/1549" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Korobczak, Paweł</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/1549</id>
<updated>2018-02-01T11:18:32Z</updated>
<published>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">W miejsce filozofii
Korobczak, Paweł
In my paper, I refer to the Martin Heidegger's Letter on "Humanism", trying to reconsider&#13;
the nature of philosophical thinking. I trace the motif of Heidegger's indication of the&#13;
place of essential thinking as located before the separation of areas of theoria and&#13;
praksis. It allows me to attempt a re-constitution of philosophy understood as a gesture&#13;
related to both of them. It is significant in this contex to note the meaning of the name of&#13;
philosophy itself in which emerges a strict relation between love and wisdom. So I focus&#13;
on the question of love, as well as of related to it issues of humility or gift.
</summary>
<dc:date>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
