Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHerczeg-Deli, Ágnesen
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-12T11:21:38Z
dc.date.available2015-06-12T11:21:38Z
dc.date.issued2012-01-02en
dc.identifier.issn1731-7533en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/9591
dc.description.abstractIndirect elicitations in talk radio programmes on BBC Radio are not uncommon, notwithstanding, misunderstanding between the host and his conversational partner is not frequent. Investigating some of the reasons this paper focuses on how the socio-cultural and cognitive factors of the context interweave in discourse. The author suggests that valid interpretation and appropriate response to inferred elicitations can be best explained within the framework of Relevance Theory, and more specifically, with the presumption of accessibility of schemas obtained from the cognitive environment of the discourse partners. Through examples of empirical research the paper aims to reveal how the mutual knowledge of the participants controls discourse via the mental processes occurring in the interaction of two minds.en
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesResearch in Language;9en
dc.rightsThis content is open access.en
dc.title"Implicature-Laden" Elicitations in Talk Radio Showsen
dc.page.number53-68en
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationEszterházy Károly College, Eger, Hungaryen
dc.identifier.eissn2083-4616
dc.referencesAllison, D. 1991. "Textual explicitness and paragmatic inferencing: The case of ‘Hypothetical - Real’ contrasts in written instructional scientific discourse in English." Journal of Pragmatics 15: 373-393. doi: 10.1016/0378-2166(91)90037-Xen
dc.referencesCarston, R. 2002. "Linguistic Meaning, Communicated Meaning and Cognitive Pragmatics." Mind and Language 17 (1&2): 127-148.en
dc.referencesCarston, R. 2004. "Explicature and Semantics." In Semantics: A Reader, S. Davis & B. Gillon (eds), 817-845. Oxford: Oxford University Press.en
dc.referencesCoupland, J. 1986. Writing texts: Cohesion in scientific abd technical writing. In Common ground: Shared interest sin ESP and communication studies, ELT Documents 117. R. Wiliams, J. Swales and J. Kirkman (eds), 55-62. Oxford: Pergamon.en
dc.referencesGrice, H. P. 1975. "Logic and conversation." In Syntax and Semantics Volume 3 Speech Acts, Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan (eds), 41-58. New York, San Francisco, London: Academic Press.en
dc.referencesHerczeg-Deli, Á. 2009a. "Interactive knowledge in dialogue." In Kalba ir kontextai III (1) Language in Different Contexts. Research papers 2009 Volume III (1), Račiené, E. et al. (eds), 103-111. Vilnius: Vilnius Pedagogical University.en
dc.referencesHerczeg-Deli, Á. 2009b. "A Cognitive Pragmatic Review of Natural Discourse." In Eger Journal of English Studies Vol. IX, Éva Antal & Csaba Czeglédi (eds), 61-78. Eger: EKF Líceum Kiadó.en
dc.referencesHoey, M. 1983. On the Surface of Discourse. London: George Allen & Unwin.en
dc.referencesHoey, M. 1994. "Signalling in discourse." In Advances in Written Text Analysis, Coulthard, M. (ed.). 26-45. London & New York: Routledge.en
dc.referencesOchs, E. 1979. "Planned and unplanned discourse." In Syntax and semantics vol. 12. Discourse and Syntax, Givón, T. (ed.). 51-80. New York: Academic Press.en
dc.referencesSearle, J. R. 1975. "Indirect speech acts." In Syntax and Semantics Volume 3 Speech Acts, Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan (eds), 59-82. New York: Academic Press.en
dc.referencesSperber, D. and D. Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.en
dc.referencesSperber, D. and D. Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.en
dc.referencesStubbs, M. 2001. "On inference theories and code theories: Corpus evidence for semantic schemas." Text 21(3): 437-65.en
dc.referencesvan Dijk, Teun A. 1977. Text and context. London: Longman.en
dc.referencesvan Dijk, Teun A. 2006. "Discourse, context and cognition." Discourse Studies 8(1): 159-177.en
dc.referencesWilson, D. and D. Sperber. 1993. "Linguistic form and relevance." Lingua 90: 1-25.en
dc.referencesWilson, D. & D. Sperber. 2004. "Relevance Theory." In The Handbook of Pragmatics, L. Horn & G. Ward (eds), 607-632. Oxford: Blackwell.en
dc.referencesWinter, E. 1982. Towards a Contextual Grammar of English. The Clause and its Place in the Definition of Sentence. London: George Allen & Unwin.en
dc.referencesWinter, E. O. 1992. "The Notion of Unspecific versus Specific as one Way of Analysing the Information of a Fund-Raising Letter." In Discourse Description. Diverse linguistic analyses of a fund-raising text, Mann, W.C. and Thompson, Sandra A. (eds), 131-170. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.en
dc.referencesWinter, E. 1994. "Clause Relations and Information Structure: Two Basic Text Structures in English." In Advances in Written Text Analysis, Coulthard, M. (ed.). 46-68. London & New York: Routledge.en
dc.identifier.doi10.2478/v10015-011-0016-yen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record