Show simple item record

‌Research dynamics in the applicability of radiological mandibular parameters for forensic sex and age estimation: A systematic review

dc.contributor.authorSehrawat, Jagmahender Singh
dc.contributor.authorSharma, Shria
dc.contributor.authorThakur, Shubham
dc.contributor.authorTalwar, Manjit
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-05T09:37:11Z
dc.date.available2026-10-05T09:37:11Z
dc.date.issued2026-09-23
dc.identifier.issn1898-6773
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/59450
dc.description.abstractIntroductionThe mandible is the largest and strongest bone of the human facial skeleton. The absence of any overlying bony structure makes it suitable for radiological imaging in both living as well as deceased or skeletonized individuals. In this systematic review we aim to aid forensic practitioners in making informed decisions about the techniques and parameters involving the human mandible to ensure high quality and credibility of forensic analyses needed for medico-legal as well as humanitarian purposes. Aim Our review investigates the research dynamics and utility of radiological mandibular dimensions for forensic sex and age estimation. Methodology Out of 175 articles obtained from scientific databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science and Scopus, 55 full-text articles were found eligible for this systematic review. The articles were extracted systematically considering the authorship, year of publication, country, population studied, the mandibular parameters and radiological modality used, sample size, and age thresholds of the subjects. Results and DiscussionThe maximum number of studies (60%) used radiological mandibular dimensions for sex estimation and 38% researchers estimated both sex and age from these parameters. 69.1% (n=38) articles used panoramic radiographs, 21.8% (n=12) articles utilized cone beam computed tomography/computed tomography scans and only four articles used cephalometric scans for sex and/or age estimations. Orthopantograms (OPGs) were found to be the more commonly used imaging modality in clinical practice. The majority of studies reported mandibular ramus height as the most reliable parameter for sex and age estimation. Fewer than half of the studies reported accuracy percentages of their estimations; around 70% of them reported accuracies below the acceptable forensic thresholds, thus clearly indicating that sex and age estimation should not be performed based on mandibular measurements only. ConclusionThis systematic review is expected to inform future forensic anthropologists that only mandibular morphometry should not be attempted for human identification in medico-legal contexts.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAnthropological Review;3en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectForensic anthropologyen
dc.subjectidentificationen
dc.subjectmandibular radiological parametersen
dc.subjectmandible morphometryen
dc.title‌Research dynamics in the applicability of radiological mandibular parameters for forensic sex and age estimation: A systematic reviewen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number81-105
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationSehrawat, Jagmahender Singh - Department of Anthropology, Panjab University, Chandigarh, Indiaen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationSharma, Shria - Department of Anthropology, Panjab University, Chandigarh, Indiaen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationThakur, Shubham - Department of Anthropology, Panjab University, Chandigarh, Indiaen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationTalwar, Manjit - Oral Health Center, Govt. Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, Indiaen
dc.identifier.eissn2083-4594
dc.referencesAbd Elsalam, G., El-Shal, O., & Shaaban, A. (2019). Evaluation of different mandibular measurements by cone beam computed tomography as a forensic age & gender determination tools. Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls, 6(4), 445–452. https://doi.org/10.21608/adjg.2019.7749.1098en
dc.referencesAbd, M., Abouelkheir, H., & Fahmy, R. (2024). Sex determination using cone beam computed tomography measurements of mandibular ramus in an Egyptian population (retrospective study). Alexandria Dental Journal, 0(0), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.21608/adjalexu.2023.199365.1359en
dc.referencesAbu-Taleb, N.S., & El Beshlawy, D. M. (2015). Mandibular ramus and gonial angle measurements as predictors of sex and age in an Egyptian population sample: a digital panoramic study. Journal of Forensic Research, 06(05), 1000308. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7145.1000308en
dc.referencesAggarwal, I., Bagal, S., Mittal, S., Goyal, M., Vishavkarma, P., & Avasthi, A. (2024). Radiographic estimation of association between condylar morphology, ramal height, and mandibular plane angle in various growth patterns in district solan population in Himachal Pradesh. Journal of Interdisciplinary Dentistry, 14(1), 20–25. https://doi.org/10.4103/jid.jid_43_23en
dc.referencesAlbalawi, A., Alam, M., Vundavalli, S., Ganji, K., & Patil, S. (2019). Mandible: An indicator for sex determination – A three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography study. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry, 10(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_313_18en
dc.referencesAlias, A., Ibrahim, A., Abu Bakar, S. N., Swarhib Shafie, M., Das, S., Abdullah, N., Noor, H. M., Liao, I. Y., & Mohd Nor, F. (2018). Anthropometric analysis of mandible: An important step for sex determination. La Clinica Terapeutica, 169(5), e217–e223.en
dc.referencesAl-Shamout, R., Ammoush, M., Alrbata, R., et al. (2012). Age and gender differences in gonial angle, ramus height and bigonial width in dentate subjects. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal, 32, 81–87. https://www.podj.com.pk/archive/April_2012/18-Podj.Pdfen
dc.referencesAnerao, R., Parikh, N., Nandini, C., Nileshwariba, J., Dave, J., Patel, A., & Irfan, M. (2021). Evaluation of mental and mandibular foramen for age and sex determination in dental orthopantomograms. Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research, 12(6), 1441–1447. https://www.jcdronline.org/index.php/JCDR/article/view/10385en
dc.referencesArthanari, A., Senthil Kumar, A., Ramalingam, K., Prathap, L., & Ravindran, V. (2024a). Exploring age and gender identification through mandibular parameters using orthopantomography: an observational study. Cureus, 16(3), e55788. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.55788en
dc.referencesArthanari, A., Sureshbabu, S., Ramalingam, K., Ravindran, V., Prathap, L., & Sitaraman, P. (2024b). Analyzing mandibular characteristics for age and gender variation through digital radiographic techniques: a retrospective study. Cureus, 16(4), e58500. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.58500en
dc.referencesArthanari, A., Sureshbabu, S., Ramalingam, K., Prathap, L., & Ravindran, V. (2024c). Forensic gender prediction by using mandibular morphometric indices: a panoramic radiograph study. Cureus, 16(3), e56603. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.56603en
dc.referencesArthanari, A. (2022). Gonial angle in sex determination using orthopantomogram (OPG) a short study. Annals of Forest Research, 65, 4158–4165.en
dc.referencesAyesha, H., Zakaullah, S., Ara, S. A., Priyanka, A., & Fatima, A. (2022). Age estimation using panoramic radiography and lateral cephalogram – A comparative study. Indian Journal of Dental Research, 33(4), 388–392. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_264_21en
dc.referencesBagherpour, A., Anbiaee, N., Motaghi, S., & Jahanbin, A. (2020). Gender determination using digital lateral cephalograms: A discriminant function analysis. Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques, 9(4), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.22038/jdmt.2021.48358.1371en
dc.referencesBailey, C., & Vidoli, G. (2023). Age-at-death estimation: Accuracy and reliability of common age-reporting strategies in forensic anthropology. Forensic Sciences, 3(1), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.3390/forensicsci3010014en
dc.referencesBehl, A., Grewal, S., Bajaj, K., Baweja, P., Kaur, G., & Kataria, P. (2020). Mandibular ramus and gonial angle – Identification tool in age estimation and sex determination: A digital panoramic radiographic study in north Indian population. Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology, 32(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.4103/jiaomr.jiaomr_172_19en
dc.referencesBelaldavar, C., Acharya, A. B., & Angadi, P. (2019). Sex estimation in Indians by digital analysis of the gonial angle on lateral cephalographs. The Journal of Forensic Odonto-Stomatology, 37(2), 45–50.en
dc.referencesBhardwaj, D., Kumar, J. S., & Mohan, V. (2014). Radiographic evaluation of mandible to predict the gender and age. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 8(10), ZC66-69. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2014/9497.5045en
dc.referencesBhuyan, R., Mohanty, S., Bhuyan, S. K., Pati, A., Priyadarshini, S., & Das, P. (2018). Panoramic radiograph as a forensic aid in age and gender estimation: Preliminary retrospective study. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, 22(2), 266–270. https://doi.org/10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_90_17en
dc.referencesBreeland, G., Aktar, A., & Patel, B. C. (2025). Anatomy, head and neck, mandible. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK532292/en
dc.referencesBulut, O., Freudenstein, N., Hekimoglu, B., & Gurcan, S. (2019). Dilemma of gonial angle in sex determination: Sexually dimorphic or not? American Journal of Forensic Medicine & Pathology, 40(4), 361–365. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAF.0000000000000500en
dc.referencesChalkoo, A. H., Maqbool, S., & Wani, B. A. (2019). Radiographic evaluation of sexual dimorphism in mandibular ramus: A digital orthopantomography study. International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences, 5(1), 163–166.en
dc.referencesChandra, A., Singh, A., Badni, M., Jaiswal, R., & Agnihotri, A. (2013). Determination of sex by radiographic analysis of mental foramen in North Indian population. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 5(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.114556en
dc.referencesChandrasekhar, M., Charitha, M., Ayesha, Chandrasekhar, G., & Naik, N. (2021). Sex estimation from mandible using lateral cephalogram: A short study. Journal of Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine, 43(2), 114–117. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0848.2021.00030.0en
dc.referencesChaurasia, A., & Giri, S. (2017). Evaluation of mandibular condyle morphology in Indian ethnics: A cross-sectional cone beam computed tomography study. Journal of Oral Medicine, Oral Surgery, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology, 3(1), 17–22.en
dc.referencesChole, R. H., Patil, R. N., Balsaraf Chole, S., Gondivkar, S., Gadbail, A. R., & Yuwanati, M. B. (2013). Association of mandible anatomy with age, gender, and dental status: A radiographic study. ISRN Radiology, 2013, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.5402/2013/453763en
dc.referencesDamera, A., Mohanalakhsmi, J., Yellarthi, P., & Rezwana, B. (2016). Radiographic evaluation of mandibular ramus for gender estimation: Retrospective study. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 8(2), 74. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.186369en
dc.referencesDeana, N. F., Labarca, I., Torres, H., Garay, I., & Alves, N. (2023). Sex determination in the contemporary Chilean population by mandible analysis in panoramic radiographies. International Journal of Morphology, 41(6), 1660–1665. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022023000601660en
dc.referencesDeng, M., Bai, R., Dong, H., Mu, J., Lin, W., & Zhou, Y. (2017). Sexual determination of the mandible breadth in a central Chinese population sample: A three-dimensional analysis. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 49(3), 332–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2015.1134657en
dc.referencesDhaka, P., Mathur, E., Sareen, M., Baghla, P., Modi, A., & Sobti, P. (2015). Age and gender estimation from mandible using lateral cephalogram. CHRISMED Journal of Health and Research, 2(3), 208. https://doi.org/10.4103/2348-3334.158675en
dc.referencesDosi, T., Vahanwala, S., & Gupta, D. (2018). Assessment of the effect of dimensions of the mandibular ramus and mental foramen on age and gender using digital panoramic radiographs: a retrospective study. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry, 9(3), 343–348. https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_26_18en
dc.referencesDuval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and Fill: A simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56(2), 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.xen
dc.referencesEgger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 315(7109), 629–634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629en
dc.referencesEsfehani, M., Ghasemi, M., Katiraee, A., Tofangchiha, M., Alizadeh, A., Taghavi- Damghani, F., Testarelli, L., & Reda, R. (2023). Forensic gender determination by using mandibular morphometric indices an Iranian population: A panoramic radiographic cross-sectional study. Journal of Imaging, 9(2), 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging9020040en
dc.referencesFranco, A., Anees, W., Moreira, D., Blumenberg, C., Napimoga, M., & Paranhos, L. R. (2025). Literature reviews: Typology and forensic applications. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 139(5), 2503–2517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-025-03514-1en
dc.referencesGarg, R., Jacky, T., Yung, T. G., Li, Y. W., & Brahanudin, T. M. (2021). To assess the usefulness of the mandibular ramus in determining age and gender among Malaysians in digital OPGs. Journal of International Dental and Medical Research, 14(4), 1472–1477.en
dc.referencesHuumonen, S., Sipilä, K., Haikola, B., Tapio, M., Söderholm, A., Remes-Lyly, T., Oikarinen, K., & Raustia, A. M. (2010). Influence of edentulousness on gonial angle, ramus and condylar height. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 37(1), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02022.xen
dc.referencesİlgüy, D., İlgüy, M., Ersan, N., Dölekoğlu, S., & Fişekçioğlu, E. (2014). Measurements of the foramen magnum and mandible in relation to sex using CBCT. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 59(3), 601–605. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12376en
dc.referencesIndira, A.P., Markande, A., & David, M. P. (2012). Mandibular ramus: An indicator for sex determination – A digital radiographic study. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 4(2), 58–62. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.109885en
dc.referencesIngaleshwar, P., Bhosale, S., Nimbulkar, G., Smitha, T., Deepak, V., & Britto, F. (2022). Assessment of condyle-coronoid angle and gonial angle for gender determination: A digital panoramic study in Bagalkot population. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, 26(3), 414–418. https://doi.org/10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_74_22en
dc.referencesJambunath, U., Govindraju, P., Former, L., & Pachipulusu, B. (2016). Sex determination by using mandibular ramus and gonial angle – a preliminary comparative study. International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research, 3(11), 3278–3280.en
dc.referencesKallalli, B., Rawson, K., Ramaswamy, V., Zakarneh, W., Singh, A., & Zingade, J. (2016). Sex determination of human mandible using metrical parameters by computed tomography: A prospective radiographic short study. Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology, 28(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-1363.189990en
dc.referencesKanya, A. P., Kiswanjaya, B., Makes, B. N., & Bachtiar, H. (2017). Estimating sex in an Indonesian population using the mean value of eight mandibular parameters in panoramic images. Journal of International Dental and Medical Research, 10 (Special issue), 417–422.en
dc.referencesKarmarkar, P. H., Mhapuskar, A., Prasad Hiremutt, D. R., Kale, I. P., Tepan, M., & Rao, P. (2023). Mandibular ramus: an indicator for gender determination. Cureus, 15(1), e34192. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.34192en
dc.referencesKumar, N. B., Ramesh, T., Reddy, R., Chennoju, S., Kotha, P., & Sai Praveen, K. (2016). Morphometric analysis of mandible for sex determination – a retrospective study. International Journal of Science and Research Methodology, 4(3),1-9.en
dc.referencesKumari, N., Agarwal, N., Tripathi, P., Siddhartha Saxena, V., Agarwal, N., & Choudhary, K. (2023). Gender determination by radiographic evaluation of condylar length, coronoid height and gonial angle. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 121–125. https://doi.org/10.18311/jfds/13/2/2021.691en
dc.referencesLeversha, J., McKeough, G., Myrteza, A., Skjellrup-Wakefiled, H., Welsh, J., & Sholapurkar, A. (2016). Age and gender correlation of gonial angle, ramus height and bigonial width in dentate subjects in a dental school in Far North Queensland. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 8(1), e49–54. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.52683en
dc.referencesMcCollough, C. H., & Rajiah, P. S. (2023). Milestones in CT: past, present, and future. Radiology, 309(1), e230803. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.23080en
dc.referencesMcGuinness, L. A., & Higgins, J. P. T. (2021). Risk-of-bias VISualization (robvis): An R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk-of-bias assessments. Research Synthesis Methods, 12(1), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1411en
dc.referencesMeleveetil, D. B., Beena, V. T., Cheriyan, L. M., Angamuthu, K., & Charapparambath, B. (2020). Mandibular ramus: an indicator of gender and chronological age – A digital radiographic study. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 12(3), 158–164. https://doi.org/10.18311/jfds/12/3/2020.567en
dc.referencesMohammed, P. R., Jose, J., Banu, D., & Dhanya, S. (2022). Morphometric analysis of mandible for sex determination. Acta Scientific Dental Sciences, 6(10), 86–90.en
dc.referencesMoola, S., Munn, Z., Tufanaru, C., Aromataris, E., Sears, K., Sfetcu, R., & Mu, P. F. (2020). Chapter 7: Systematic reviews of etiology and risk. In JBI manual for evidence synthesis https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-08en
dc.referencesMore, C. B., Vijayvargiya, R., & Saha, N. (2017). Morphometric analysis of mandibular ramus for sex determination on digital orthopantomogram. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 9(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfo.jfds_25_15en
dc.referencesMotawei, S. M., Helaly, A. M. N., Aboelmaaty, W. M., Elmahdy, K., Shabka, O. A., & Liu, H. (2020). Length of the ramus of the mandible as an indicator of chronological age and sex: A study in a group of Egyptians. Forensic Science International: Reports, 2, 100066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsir.2020.100066en
dc.referencesMuskaan, A., & Sarkar, S. (2015). Mandible – An indicator for age and sex determination using digital orthopantomogram. Scholars Journal of Dental Sciences, 2(1), 82– 95. https://doi.org/10.36347/sjds.2015.v02i01.017en
dc.referencesOjha, B., Bajracharya, D., Koju, S., Maharja, N., Saha, A., & Baral, R. (2021). Mandibular parameters as a predictor of sex: A digital orthopantomogram study. Journal of Kathmandu Medical College, 10(4), 218–223. https://doi.org/10.3126/jkmc.v10i4.43862en
dc.referencesOkkesim, A., & Sezen Erhamza, T. (2020). Assessment of mandibular ramus for sex determination: Retrospective study. Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research, 10(4), 569–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2020.07.019en
dc.referencesPatyal, S., & Pandey, T. (2023). Forensic radiology: A spotlight on India’s current trend and Future prospects. Forensic Imaging, 34, 200561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fri.2023.200561en
dc.referencesPokhrel, R., & Bhatnagar, R. (2013). Sexing of mandible using ramus and condyle in Indian population: A discriminant function analysis. European Journal of Anatomy, 17(1),39–42. https://eurjanat.com/v1/data/pdf/eja.130007rp.pdfen
dc.referencesRaj, J. D., & Ramesh, S. (2013). Sexual dimorphism in mandibular ramus of south indian population. Antrocom Online Journal of Anthropology, 9(2), 253–258.en
dc.referencesRamesh, A., Velpula, N., Tandon, R., Zardi, F. T., Kanakagiri, M. (2020). Determination of age and gender using condylar height and coronoid height – An orthopantomographic study. IP International Journal of Maxillofacial Imaging, 4(3), 87–90. https://doi.org/10.18231/2581-3838.2018.0022en
dc.referencesSaini, V., Srivastava, R., Rai, R. K., Shamal, S. N., Singh, T. B., & Tripathi, S. K. (2011). Mandibular ramus: an indicator for sex in fragmentary mandible. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 56(s1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01599.xen
dc.referencesSairam, V., Potturi, G., Praveen, B., & Vikas, G. (2018). Assessment of effect of age, gender, and dentoalveolar changes on mandibular morphology: A digital panoramic study. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry, 9(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_704_17en
dc.referencesSaloni, Verma, P., Mahajan, P., Puri, A., Kaur, S., & Mehta, S. (2020). Gender determination by morphometric analysis of mandibular ramus in sriganganagar population: A digital panoramic study. Indian Journal of Dental Research, 31(3), 444. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_547_17en
dc.referencesSamatha, K., Byahatti, S., Ammanagi, R., Tantradi, P., Sarang, C., & Shivpuje, P. (2016). Sex determination by mandibular ramus: A digital orthopantomographic study. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 8(2), 95. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.186367en
dc.referencesSambhana, S., Sanghvi, P., Mohammed, R., Shanta, P., Thetay, A. R., & Chaudhary, V. (2016). Assessment of sexual dimorphism using digital orthopantomographs in South Indians. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 8(3), 180. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.195113en
dc.referencesSatish, B. N. V. S., Moolrajani, C., Basnaker, M., & Kumar, P. (2017). Dental sex dimorphism: Using odontometrics and digital jaw radiography. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 9(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfo.jfds_78_15en
dc.referencesSehrawat, J. S. (2018). Sex estimation from discriminant function analysis of clavicular and sternal measurements: A forensic anthropological study based on examination of two bones of Northwest Indian subjects. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 50(1), 20–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2016.1188986en
dc.referencesSehrawat, J. S., & Ahlawat, B. (2023). Systematic review on forensic craniofacial reconstruction. I. facial soft-tissue thickness. Forensic Science Review, 35(2), 107–136.en
dc.referencesShah, P., Venkatesh, R., More, C., & Vaishnavee, V. (2020). Age- and sex-related mandibular dimensional changes: A radio-morphometric analysis on panoramic radiographs. Indian Journal of Dental Research, 31(1), 113. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_327_18en
dc.referencesShakya, T., Maharjan, A., & Pradhan, L. (2022). Morphometric analysis of mandibular ramus for sex determination on orthopantomogram. Journal of Nepal Health Research Council, 20(01), 65–71. https://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.v20i01.3822en
dc.referencesShamim, T., Varghese, V., Shameena, P., & Sudha, S. (2006). Age estimation: A dental approach. Journal of Punjab Academy of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, 6, 14–16.en
dc.referencesSterne, J. A., Gavaghan, D., & Egger, M. (2000). Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: Power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 53(11), 1119– 1129. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00242-0en
dc.referencesSterne, J. A. C., Sutton, A. J., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Terrin, N., Jones, D. R., Lau, J., Carpenter, J., Rucker, G., Harbord, R. M., Schmid, C. H., Tetzlaff, J., Deeks, J. J., Peters, J., Macaskill, P., Schwarzer, G., Duval, S., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., & Higgins, J. P. T. (2011). Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. British Medical Journal, 343, d4002. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4002en
dc.referencesSuguna, S. (2021). Age and gender estimation using orthopantomogram in Chennai population: A retrospective digital study. International Journal of Dentistry and Oral Science, 8(5), 2548–2553. https://doi.org/10.19070/2377-8075-21000499en
dc.referencesTassoker, M., Akin, D., Aydin Kabakci, A. D., & Sener, S. (2019). Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography for mandibular morphometry. Folia Morphologica, 78(4), 862–870. https://doi.org/10.5603/FM.a2019.0031en
dc.referencesUlusoy, A. T., & Ozkara, E. (2022). Radiographic evaluation of the mandible to predict age and sex in subadults. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 80(6), 419–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2021.2024877en
dc.referencesVora, M., & Arthanari, A. (2022). Mandibular maximum ramus breadth in sex determination in left side using OPG – A retrospective study. Annals of Forest Research, 65(1), 3422–3427.en
dc.referencesZangouei-Booshehri, M., Aghili, H.-A., Abasi, M., & Ezoddini-Ardakani, F. (2012). Agreement between panoramic and lateral cephalometric radiographs for measuring the gonial angle. Iranian Journal of Radiology: A Quarterly Journal Published by the Iranian Radiological Society, 9(4), 178–182. https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.8444en
dc.contributor.authorEmailSehrawat, Jagmahender Singh - jagminder@pu.ac.in
dc.contributor.authorEmailSharma, Shria - sharmashria201@gmail.com
dc.contributor.authorEmailThakur, Shubham - shubham2430@gmail.com
dc.contributor.authorEmailTalwar, Manjit - talwarmanjit7@yahoo.in
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1898-6773.89.3.06
dc.relation.volume89


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
81-105_Sehrawat_et_al..pdf
Size:
3.781Mb
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Thumbnail
Name:
Sehrawat_et_al._sup.pdf
Size:
435.0Kb
Format:
PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0