From Cells to Codes: The Legal Transformation of Digital Identity, Integrity, and Self-Determination in the Digital Age
| dc.contributor.author | Hamuľák, Ondrej | |
| dc.contributor.author | Vardanyan, Lusine | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kocharyan, Hovsep | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-04-28T08:11:20Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-04-28T08:11:20Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-12-31 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0208-6069 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/58220 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This article examines the evolving relationship between the human body and digital data, particularly in light of technological advancements that blur the distinction between physical and digital identities. The research explores the implications of this transformation for legal frameworks, questioning whether current data protection laws sufficiently safeguard personal integrity and identity in the digital age. This study emphasises the limitations of existing regulations, which primarily focus on personal data rather than the broader concept of individual identity. A central argument is that the right to informational self-determination discussed in the scientific literature and recognized in German legal practice should play a critical role in ensuring autonomy and personal identity protection. The discussion also highlights the necessity of developing more effective legal mechanisms to safeguard digital identities against technological vulnerabilities, unauthorised profiling, and market-driven commodification of personal data. This study ultimately calls for a reconsideration of legal concepts such as bodily integrity, informational self-determination, and digital sovereignty, advocating for a more comprehensive legal approach to the protection of individuals in the digital sphere. This document argues that the existing legal framework inadequately protects new forms of identity in the digital environment, especially with regard to information self-determination and digital embodiment. By exploring the changing boundaries of the human body in technological and digital contexts, this article aims to promote clearer recognition of digital identity rights within legal systems. | en |
| dc.description.abstract | Artykuł analizuje ewoluującą relację między ludzkim ciałem a danymi cyfrowymi, szczególnie w kontekście postępu technologicznego, który zaciera granicę między tożsamością fizyczną a cyfrową. Badanie bada konsekwencje tej transformacji dla istniejących ram prawnych, stawiając pytanie, czy obowiązujące przepisy dotyczące ochrony danych osobowych w wystarczającym stopniu chronią integralność i tożsamość jednostki w erze cyfrowej. Autorzy podkreślają ograniczenia obecnych regulacji, które koncentrują się głównie na danych osobowych, pomijając szersze pojęcie tożsamości jednostki. Główną tezą jest to, że prawo do samostanowienia informacyjnego, omawiane w literaturze naukowej i uznane w niemieckiej praktyce prawnej, powinno odgrywać kluczową rolę w zapewnieniu autonomii i ochrony tożsamości osobistej. W artykule podkreślono również potrzebę opracowania skuteczniejszych mechanizmów prawnych chroniących tożsamości cyfrowe przed podatnościami technologicznymi, nieautoryzowanym profilowaniem i rynkową komodyfikacją danych osobowych. Ostatecznie badanie wzywa do ponownego przemyślenia takich pojęć prawnych jak integralność cielesna, samostanowienie informacyjne i suwerenność cyfrowa, postulując bardziej kompleksowe podejście prawne do ochrony jednostki w przestrzeni cyfrowej. Artykuł dowodzi, że obecne ramy prawne nie zapewniają wystarczającej ochrony nowym formom tożsamości w środowisku cyfrowym, szczególnie w odniesieniu do prawa do informacji i cyfrowego ucieleśnienia. Poprzez analizę zmieniających się granic ludzkiego ciała w kontekstach technologicznych i cyfrowych, celem artykułu jest promowanie wyraźniejszego uznania praw do tożsamości cyfrowej w systemach prawnych. | pl |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego | pl |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica | en |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 | |
| dc.subject | digital identity | en |
| dc.subject | bodily integrity | en |
| dc.subject | biometric data | en |
| dc.subject | data protection | en |
| dc.subject | digital sovereignty | en |
| dc.subject | legal frameworks | en |
| dc.subject | tożsamość cyfrowa | pl |
| dc.subject | integralność cielesna | pl |
| dc.subject | dane biometryczne | pl |
| dc.subject | ochrona danych | pl |
| dc.subject | suwerenność cyfrowa | pl |
| dc.subject | ramy prawne | pl |
| dc.title | From Cells to Codes: The Legal Transformation of Digital Identity, Integrity, and Self-Determination in the Digital Age | en |
| dc.title.alternative | Od komórek do kodów: prawna transformacja tożsamości cyfrowej, integralności i samostanowienia w erze cyfrowej | pl |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dc.page.number | 105-136 | |
| dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | Hamuľák, Ondrej - Tallinn University of Technology, School of Business and Governance; Palacký University Olomouc, Faculty of Law | en |
| dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | Vardanyan, Lusine - Palacký University Olomouc, Faculty of Law | en |
| dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | Kocharyan, Hovsep - Palacký University Olomouc, Faculty of Law | en |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2450-2782 | |
| dc.references | Agar, Nicholas. 2017. “Challenges from the Future of Human Enhancement.” In The Oxford Handbook of Law, Regulation and Technology. Edited by Roger Brownsword, Eloise Scotford, Karen Yeung. 854–873. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199680832.013.35 | en |
| dc.references | Andraško, Jozef. Matúš Mesarčík. Ondrej Hamuľák. 2021. “The regulatory intersections between artificial intelligence, data protection and cyber security: challenges and opportunities for the EU legal framework.” AI & Soc 36: 623–636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01125-5 | en |
| dc.references | Atoyan, Vardan. Nane Movsisyan. Sofya Ohanyan. Vahram Hovyan. 2023. “The Impact of Digital Technologies on the Formation of New Identity Models and Value Orientations.” Scholars Bulletin 9(8): 92–96. https://doi.org/10.36348/sb.2023.v09i08.001 | en |
| dc.references | Balogh, Zsuzsanna. 2014. Senses of Self and Senses of the Body: Phenomenological Aspects of Self – and Bodily Awareness. PhD diss., Central European University. | en |
| dc.references | Ben-Shahar, Omri. Ariel Porat. 2021. Personalized Law: Different Rules for Different People. Oxford Iniversity Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197522813.001.0001 | en |
| dc.references | Bergemann, Benjamin. 2018. “The Consent Paradox: Accounting for the Prominent Role of Consent in Data Protection.” In Privacy and Identity Management. The Smart Revolution. Privacy and Identity 2017. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. Edited by Marit Hansen, Eleni Kosta, Igor Nai-Fovino, Simone Fischer-Hübner. 111–131. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92925-5_8 | en |
| dc.references | Braidotti, Rosi. 2013. “Posthuman Humanities.” European Educational Research Journal 12(1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2013.12.1.1 | en |
| dc.references | Bublitz, Christoph. 2022. “The Body of Law: Boundaries, Extensions, and the Human Right to Physical Integrity in the Biotechnical Age.” Journal of Law and the Biosciences 9(2): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsac032 | en |
| dc.references | Burwell, Sasha. Matthew Sample. Eric Racine. “Ethical aspects of brain computer interfaces: a scoping review.” BMC Med Ethics 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0220-y | en |
| dc.references | Bygrave, Lee A. 2010. “The Body as Data? Biobank Regulation via the ‘Back Door’ of Data Protection Law.” Law, Innovation and Technology 2: 1–25. https://doi.org/10.5235/175799610791935443 | en |
| dc.references | Casini, Silvia. 2021. “Giving Bodies Back to Data: Image Makers, Bricolage, and Reinvention in Magnetic Resonance Technology.” MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12265.001.0001 | en |
| dc.references | Clarke, Roger. 1994. “The Digital Persona and Its Application to Data Surveillance.” The Information Society 10(2): 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.1994.9960160 | en |
| dc.references | Custers, Bart. 2022. “New digital rights: Imagining additional fundamental rights for the digital era.” Computer Law & Security Review 44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105636 | en |
| dc.references | Darwich, Mahmoud. Magdy Bayoumi. 2025. “Introduction to Video Streaming Systems and Challenges.” In Enhancing Video Streaming with AI, Cloud, and Edge Technologies. 3–28. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-84651-9_1 | en |
| dc.references | de Andrade, Norberto Nuno Gomes. 2011. “Right to Personal Identity: The Challenges of Ambient Intelligence and the Need for a New Legal Conceptualization.” In Computers, Privacy and Data Protection: An Element of Choice. Edited by Serge Gutwirth, Yves Poullet, Paul De Hert, Ronald Leenes. 65–97. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0641-5_4 | en |
| dc.references | de Andrade, Norberto Nuno Gomes. 2012. “The Right to be Different… from Oneself: Re-Proposing the Right to be Forgotten.” In The Ethics of Memory in a Digital Age. Palgrave Macmillan Memory Studies. Edited by Alessia Ghezzi, Ângela Guimarães Pereira, Lucia Vesnić-Alujević. 65–81. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137428455_5 | en |
| dc.references | De Vignemont, Frédérique. 2007. “Habeas Corpus: The Sense of Ownership of One’s Own Body.” Mind and Language: 22(4): 427–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2007.00315.x | en |
| dc.references | De Vignemont, Frederique. Alessandro Farne. 2010. “Widening the body to rubber hands and tools: what’s the difference?” Revue de neuropsychologie 2: 203–211. https://doi.org/10.1684/nrp.2010.0087 | en |
| dc.references | Dickens, Amy. 2020. “From Information to Valuable Asset: The Commercialization of Health Data as a Human Rights Issue.” Health Hum Rights. 22(2): 67–69. | en |
| dc.references | Ferstman, Carla. 2022. “Integrity of the Person.” In International Human Rights Law. Edited by Daniel Moeckli, Sangeeta Shah, Sandesh Sivakumaran, David Harris. Oxford Law Pro. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198860112.003.0009 | en |
| dc.references | Floridi, Luciano. 2009. “The Information Society and Its Philosophy: Introduction to the Special Issue on The Philosophy of Information, Its Nature, and Future Developments.” The Information Society 25(3): 153–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240902848583 | en |
| dc.references | Fratini, Samuele. 2024. “Performing privacy culture. The platform Threema and the contestation of surveillance made in Switzerland.” Studi culturali 1: 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1405/113065 | en |
| dc.references | Fratini, Samuele. Emmie Hine. Claudio Novelli. Huw Roberts. Luciano Floridi. 2024. “Digital Sovereignty: A Descriptive Analysis and a Critical Evaluation of Existing Models.” Digital Society 3, 59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-024-00146-7 | en |
| dc.references | Fratini, Samuele. Francesca Musiani. 2024. “Data localization as contested and narrated security in the age of digital sovereignty: The case of Switzerland.” Information, Communication & Society 28(8): 1368–1386. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2024.2362302 | en |
| dc.references | Gefenas, Eugenijus. Jurate Lekstutiene. Vilna Lukaseviciene. Et al. 2022. “Controversies between regulations of research ethics and protection of personal data: informed consent at a cross-road.” Medicine, Health Care, Philosophy 25(1): 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-021-10060-1 | en |
| dc.references | Halák, Jan. 2016. “Merleau-Ponty on embodied subjectivity from the perspective of subject-object circularity.” AUC Kinanthrophologica 52(2): 26–40. https://doi.org/10.14712/23366052.2016.9 | en |
| dc.references | Haraway, Donna. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203873106 | en |
| dc.references | Hearn, Jeff. Matthew Hall. 2022. “From physical violence to online violation: Forms, structures and effects. A comparison of the cases of ‘domestic violence’ and ‘revenge pornography’.” Aggression and Violent Behavior 67, 101779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2022.101779 | en |
| dc.references | Herring, Jonathan. Jesse Wall. 2017. “The Nature And Significance of the Right to Bodily Integrity.” The Cambridge Law Journal 76(3): 566–588. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197317000605 | en |
| dc.references | Hnit, Hussein. Ali Almanna. 2025. “Constructing identity through narratives: Personal, social, and digital dimensions.” Social Sciences & Humanities Open 12, 101692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101692 | en |
| dc.references | Hoffiani, Mansoor. 2021. Strengthening European Data Protection in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. MA diss., Örebro Universitet. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1599011/FULLTEXT01.pdf | en |
| dc.references | Hornung, Gerrit. Christoph Schnabel. 2009. “Data protection in Germany I: The population census decision and the right to informational self-determination.” Computer Law & Security Review 25(1): 84–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2008.11.002 | en |
| dc.references | Kaku, Michio. 2024. “The Golden Age of Neuroscience Has Arrived.” WSJ Opinion, 20 August, https://www.wsj.com/articles/michio-kaku-the-golden-age-of-neuroscience-has-arrived-1408577023 (accessed: February 2025). | en |
| dc.references | Käll, Jannice. 2017. Converging Human and Digital Bodies: Posthumanism, Property, Law. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg. | en |
| dc.references | Kasket, Elaine. 2019. “Mourning and Memorialization on Social Media.” In The Oxford Handbook of Cyberpsychology. Edited by Alison Attrill-Smith, Chris Fullwood, Melanie Keep, Daria J. Kuss. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198812746.013.26 | en |
| dc.references | Kim, Joohan. 2001. “Phenomenology of digital-being.” Human Studies 24: 87–111. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010763028785 | en |
| dc.references | Koops, Bert-Jaap. 2014. “On Legal Boundaries, Technologies, and Collapsing Dimensions of Privacy.” Politica & Società: 3(2): 247–264. https://doi.org/10.4476/77102 | en |
| dc.references | Lavazza, Andrea. Michaela Balconi. Marcello Ienca. 2025. “Neuralink’s brain-computer interfaces: medical innovations and ethical challenges.” Frontiers in Human Dynamics 7, 1553905. https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2025.1553905 | en |
| dc.references | Lawrence, David R. 2013. “To what extent is the use of human enhancements defended in international human rights legislation?” Medical Law International 13(4): 254–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0968533214520845 | en |
| dc.references | Linkenbach, Antje. Martin Mulsow. 2020. “Introduction: the dividual self.” In Religious Individualisation: Historical Dimensions and Comparative Perspectives. Edited by Martin Fuchs, Antje Linkenbach, Martin Mulsow, Bernd-Christian Otto, Rahul Bjørn Parson, Jörg Rüpke. 323–344. Berlin–Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110580853-015 | en |
| dc.references | Lupton, Deborah. 2017. “Personal data practices in the age of lively data.” In Digital Sociologies. Edited by Jessie Daniels, Karen Gregory, Tressie McMillan Cottom. 339–354. Bristol: Policy Press. | en |
| dc.references | Mansour, Mohammad. Saeed M. Darweesh. Ahmed Soltan. 2024. “Wearable devices for glucose monitoring: A review of state-of-the-art technologies and emerging trends.” Alexandria Engineering Journal 89: 224–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2024.01.021 | en |
| dc.references | Maras, Marie-Helen. Michelle D. Miranda. 2023. “Augmented body surveillance: Human microchip implantations and the omnipresent threat of function creep.” Technology in Society 74, 102295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102295 | en |
| dc.references | Matwyshyn, Andrea, M. 2019. “The Internet of Bodies.” William & Mary Law Review 61(1): 77–167. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3452891 (accessed: February 2025). | en |
| dc.references | Nissenbaum, Helen. 2010. Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life. Redwood City: Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804772891 | en |
| dc.references | Padden, Michaela. Andreas Öjehag-Pettersson. 2021. “Protected how? Problem representations of risk in the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).” Critical Policy Studies 15(4): 486–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2021.1927776 | en |
| dc.references | Papalois, Zoe-Athena. Kyriaki Barbara Papalois. 2020. “Bioethics and Environmental Ethics: The Story of the Human Body as a Natural Ecosystem.” The New Bioethics 26(2): 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/20502877.2020.1767919 | en |
| dc.references | Patella-Rey, PJ. 2018. “Beyond privacy: bodily integrity as an alternative framework for understanding non-consensual pornography.” Information, Communication & Society 21(5): 786–791. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1428653 | en |
| dc.references | Pauwels, Eleonore. Sarah W. Denton. 2018. “The Internet of Bodies: Life and Death in the Age of AI.” California Western Law Review 55(1): 5. https://scholarlycommons.law.cwsl.edu/cwlr/vol55/iss1/5 (accessed: February 2025). | en |
| dc.references | Purtova, Nadezhda. 2018. “The Law of Everything. Broad Concept of Personal Data and Future of EU Data Protection Law.” Tilburg University. Law, Innovation and Technology 10(1): 40–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2018.1452176 | en |
| dc.references | Quesne, Aloïse. 2022. “Corps biologique, bionique et numérique: la propriété du corps humain en débat.” La propriété 20: 37–45. https://journals.openedition.org/crdf/8399 (accessed: February 2025). | en |
| dc.references | Quinn, Paul. Malgieri Gianclaudio. “The Difficulty of Defining Sensitive Data – The Concept of Sensitive Data in the EU Data Protection Framework.” German Law Journal 22(8): 1583–1612. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2021.79 | en |
| dc.references | Reis, Oluwatosin. Nkechi Emmanuella Eneh. Benedicta Ehimuan. 2024. “Privacy Law Challenges in the Digital Age: A Global Review of Legislation And Enforcement.” International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences 6(1): 73–88. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijarss.v6i1.733 | en |
| dc.references | Rey, PJ. Whitney Erin Boesel. Eds. 2014. Routledge handbook of science, technology, and society. New York, NY: Routledge. | en |
| dc.references | Rich, Leigh E. Michael Ashby. Pierre-Olivier A. Méthot. 2012. “Rethinking the Body and Its Boundaries.” Bioethical Inquiry 9: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-011-9353-8 | en |
| dc.references | Richterich, Rachel. 2019. “L’intégrité numérique: le vrai combat pour nos données.” Le Temps, January 11. https://www.letemps.ch/cyber/lintegrite-numerique-vrai-combat-nos-donnees (accessed: February 2025). | en |
| dc.references | Roberts, Huw. Josh Cowls. Federico Casolari. 2021. “Safeguarding European values with digital sovereignty: an analysis of statements and policies.” Internet Policy Review 10(3). https://doi.org/10.14763/2021.3.1575 | en |
| dc.references | Rochel, Johan. 2021. “Digital integrity – A new lens through which to assess the impact of digital technologies.” Blog of the LexTech Institut, May 4. https://www.lextechinstitute.ch/digital-integrity-a-new-lens-through-which-to-assess-the-impact-of-digital-technologies/?lang=en (accessed: February 2025). | en |
| dc.references | Roel Lesur, Marte. Michael Gaebler. Philippe Bertrand. 2018. “The Plasticity of the Bodily Self: Head Movements in Bodily Illusions and Their Relation to Gallagher’s Body Image and Body Schema.” Constructivist Foundations 14(1): 94–105. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-162795 | en |
| dc.references | Rothhaar Markus. 2010. “Human dignity and human rights in bioethics: the Kantian approach.” Medicine, Health Care, Philosophy 13(3): 251–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-010-9249-0 | en |
| dc.references | Roussel, Alexis. 2020. “The right to digital integrity of the human person.” Digitale Bürger*innerechte, February 21. https://www.fabrikzeitung.ch/the-right-to-digital-integrity-of-the-human-person/ (accessed: February 2025). | en |
| dc.references | Rouvroy, Antoinette. Yves Poullet. 2009. “The Right to Informational Self-Determination and the Value of Self-Development: Reassessing the Importance of Privacy for Democracy.” In Reinventing Data Protection? Edited by Serge Gutwirth, Yves Poullet, Paul De Hert. 45–76. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9498-9_2 | en |
| dc.references | Russo, Maria Teresa. 2020. “The human body as a problem in post-modern culture.” Church, Communication and Culture 5(1): 74–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/23753234.2020.1713010 | en |
| dc.references | Ryan, Mark. Paula Gürtler. Artur Bogucki. 2024. “Will the real data sovereign please stand up? An EU policy response to sovereignty in data spaces.” International Journal of Law and Information Technology 32(1): 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaae006 | en |
| dc.references | Saed, Mohammad Jafar. 2011. “On Human Dignity in View of Bioethics and Human Rights.” The Journal of Human Rights 6(1): 3–18. | en |
| dc.references | Samuelson, Pamela. 2000. “Privacy As Intellectual Property?” Stanford Law Review 52(5): 1125–1173. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229511 | en |
| dc.references | Shildrick, Margrit. 2015. “‘Why Should Our Bodies End at the Skin?’: Embodiment, Boundaries, and Somatechnics.” Hypatia 30(1): 13–29. | en |
| dc.references | Shilling, Chris. 2012. The Body and Social Theory. London: SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473914810 | en |
| dc.references | Skrzypulec, Błażej. 2023. “Bodily sense and structural content.” Synthese 202(142). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04371-4 | en |
| dc.references | Sobchack, Vivian. 2010. “Living a ‘Phantom Limb: On the Phenomenology of Bodily Integrity.” Body & Society 16: 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X10373407 | en |
| dc.references | Solove, Daniel, J. 2004. The Digital Person: Technology and Privacy in the Information Age. New York–London: New York University Press. https://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2082&context=faculty_publications (accessed: February 2025). | en |
| dc.references | Solove, Daniel J. 2008. Understanding Privacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. | en |
| dc.references | Thouvenin, Florent. 2021. “Informational Self-Determination: A Convincing Rationale for Data Protection Law?” JIPITEC 12: 246–256. https://www.jipitec.eu/jipitec/article/view/323/316 (accessed: February 2025). | en |
| dc.references | Un colloque. 2020. Un colloque sur le thème “Le droit à l’intégrité numérique: réelle innovation ou simple évolution du droit?” Faculty of Law, Neuchâtel University. https://publications-droit.ch/files/colloques/programme/2020-02-21-integrite-numerique-a4.pdf (accessed: February 2025). | en |
| dc.references | Van Der Ploeg, Irma. 2005. “Biometrics and the body as information: Normative issues of the sociotechnical coding of the body.” In Surveillance as Social Sorting. Privacy, Risk and Automated Discrimination. Edited by David Lyon. 57–74. http://hdl.handle.net/1765/120117 (accessed: February 2025). | en |
| dc.references | Vardanyan, Lusine. Hovsep Kocharyan. 2022. “The GDPR and the DGA proposal: Are they in controversial relationship?” European Studies 9(1): 91–109. https://doi.org/10.2478/eustu-2022-0004 | en |
| dc.references | Vardanyan, Lusine. Vaclav Stehlík. Hovsep Kocharyan. 2022. “Digital Integrity: A Foundation for Digital Rights and the New Manifestation of Human Dignity.” TalTech Journal of European Studies 12(1): 159–185. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2022-0008 | en |
| dc.references | Vardanyan, Lusine. Ondrej Hamuľák. Hovsep Kocharyan. 2024. “Personal Autonomy and Human Corporeality: What Protects the Right to Personal Integrity?” Internet of Things 27, 101279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2024.101279 | en |
| dc.references | Viens, Adrian M. Ed. 2020. The Right to Bodily Integrity. London: Routlege. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315237367 | en |
| dc.references | Vivarelli, Angela. “The Crisis of the Right to Informational Self Determination.” The Italian Law Journal 6(1): 301–319. https://theitalianlawjournal.it/data/uploads/6-italj-1-2020/301-vivarelli.pdf (accessed: October 2025). | en |
| dc.references | Warwick, Kevin. 2015. “The Merging of Humans and Machines.” In Neurotechnology, Electronics, and Informatics. Edited by Ana Rita Londral, Pedro Encarnação, José Luis Pons Rovira. 79–89. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15997-3_6 | en |
| dc.references | Wee, Cecilia. Michael Pelczar. 2010. “Descartes’ Dualism and Contemporary Dualism.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 46(1): 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.2041-6962.2008.TB00073.X | en |
| dc.references | Wong, Sara. 2020. “You Are Not Your Data but Your Data Is Still You.” Deep Dives, August 7. https://deepdives.in/you-are-not-your-data-but-your-data-is-still-you-b41d2478ece2 (accessed: February 2025). | en |
| dc.references | Xu Shumao, Liu Yang. Hyunjin Lee. Weidong Li. 2024. “Neural interfaces: Bridging the brain to the world beyond healthcare.” Exploration (Beijing) 4(5), 2023 0146. https://doi.org/10.1002/EXP.20230146 | en |
| dc.references | Zimmermann, Daniel. Anna Wehler. Kai Kaspar. 2022. “Self-representation through avatars in digital environments.” Current Psychology 42: 21775–21789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03232-6 | en |
| dc.references | Bundesgerichtsh of 09.11.1993 – VI ZR 62/93, BGHZ 124, 52; Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 1994, p. 127. https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=BGH&Datum=09.11.1993&Aktenzeichen=VI%20ZR%2062%2F93 (accessed: February 2025). | en |
| dc.references | Judgment of the Supreme Court of Texas, Fisher v. Carrousel Motor Hotel, Inc., 424 S.W.2d 627 1967. https://law.justia.com/cases/texas/supreme-court/1967/b-342-0.html (accessed: February 2025). | en |
| dc.references | Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 10 October 2001, Price v. The United Kingdom (Application No. 33394/96). https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22docname%22:[%22Price%20v.%20The%20United%20Kingdom%22],%22documentcollectionid2%22:[%22GRANDCHAMBER%22,%22CHAMBER%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-59565%22]} (accessed: February 2025) | en |
| dc.references | Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 10 January 2012, Harutyunyan v. Russia (application No. 48977/09). https://www.stradalex.eu/en/se_src_publ_jur_eur_cedh/document/echr_48977-09 (accessed: February 2025). | en |
| dc.references | Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 12 November 2013, Söderman v. Sweden, no. 5786/08. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22fulltext%22:[%22soderman%20v.%20sweden%22],%22documentcollectionid2%22:[%22GRANDCHAMBER%22,%22CHAMBER%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-128043%22]} (accessed: February 2025). | en |
| dc.references | Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 22 September 2020, Vasilyev and Others v. Russia (application no. 38891/08). https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-209448%22]} (accessed: February 2025). | en |
| dc.references | Right to the protection of one’s image, Press Unit, November 2023. https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/FS_Own_image_ENG#:~:text=%E2%80%9C%5BA%5D%20person%E2%80%99s%20image%20constitutes%20one%20of%20the%20chief,one%20of%20the%20essential%20components%20of%20personal%20development (accessed: February 2025). | en |
| dc.contributor.authorEmail | Hamuľák, Ondrej - ondrej.hamulak@upol.cz | |
| dc.contributor.authorEmail | Vardanyan, Lusine - lucyrossetti77@gmail.com | |
| dc.contributor.authorEmail | Kocharyan, Hovsep - hovsep.kocharyan.28@gmail.com | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.18778/0208-6069.113.07 | |
| dc.relation.volume | 113 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0