Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorKacprzyk, Andrzej
dc.contributor.authorDoryń, Wirginia
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-04T14:44:53Z
dc.date.available2014-11-04T14:44:53Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/5713
dc.descriptionJEL Classifications: O33, O30, O47pl_PL
dc.description.abstractThis study examines the relationship between technological innovation and economic growth in European Union countries over the period 1993-2011. Using Blundell and Bond (1998) generalized method of the moments estimation technique, the study provides evidence that R&D expenditures and patent activities differ in terms of fostering economic growth between EU-15 and EU-13 countries. The main results indicate that there is no significant impact of R&D expenditures on the economic growth and that patent activities determine economic growth in EU-13 subsample and EU-28 as a whole. The study suggests that there may be no one particular recipe for growth for all EU countries and put into question whether setting common numerical targets in EU’s innovation policy makes economic sense.en
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherFaculty of Economics and Sociology, University of Lodzpl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesLodz Economics Working Paper;3/2014
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa 3.0 Polska*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/pl/*
dc.subjectEconomic growthpl_PL
dc.subjectinnovationpl_PL
dc.subjectR&Dpl_PL
dc.subjectpatentspl_PL
dc.subjectpanel datapl_PL
dc.titleInnovation and Economic Growth in European Union. Panel Data Analysispl_PL
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociologypl_PL
dc.referencesAcemoglu, D. 2009. Introduction to Modern Economic Growth. Princeton: Princeton University Press
dc.referencesAghion, P., P. Howitt. 1992. “A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction.” Econometrica 60 (2): 323–351.
dc.referencesAlvarez-Pelaez, M. J., C. Groth. 2005. “Too Little or Too Much R&D?” European Economic Review 49 (2): 437-456.
dc.referencesAng, J.B., J.B. Madsen. 2011. “Can Second-Generation Endogenous Growth Models Explain the Productivity Trends and Knowledge Production in the Asian Miracle Economies?” Review of Economics and Statistics 93 (4): 1360–1373.
dc.referencesArellano, M., S. Bond. 1991. “Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations.” Review of Economic Studies 58 (2): 277–297.
dc.referencesArundel, A., I. Kabla. 1998. “What Percentage of Innovations are Patented? Empirical Estimates for European Firms.” Research Policy 27 (2): 127–141.
dc.referencesBarcenilla‐Visús, S., J.M. Gómez‐Sancho, C. López‐Pueyo, M.J. Mancebón & J. Sanaú. 2013. “Technical Change, Efficiency Change and Institutions: Empirical Evidence for a Sample of OECD Countries.” Economic Record 89 (285): 207–227.
dc.referencesBarro, R.J. 1991. “Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (2): 407–443.
dc.referencesBarro, R.J. 1996. “Determinants of Economic Growth: a Cross-Country Empirical Study.” NBER Working Paper 5698. National Bureau of Economics Research.
dc.referencesBlundell, R., S. Bond. 1998. “Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models.” Journal of Econometrics 87 (1): 115–143.
dc.referencesBoldrin, M., D.K. Levine. 2013. “The Case Against Patents.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 27 (1): 3–22.
dc.referencesBruno, G.S.F. 2005. “Estimation and Inference in Dynamic Unbalanced Panel-Data Models with a Small Number of Individuals.” The Stata Journal 5 (4): 473–500.
dc.referencesCEC. 2000. Presidency Conclusions of the Lisbon European Council, March 23/24. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
dc.referencesCoe, D.T., E. Helpman. 1995. “International R&D Spillovers.” European Economic Review 39 (5): 859–887.
dc.referencesDoppelhofer, G., M. Weeks. 2011. Robust Growth Determinants. CESifo Working Paper No. 3354.
dc.referencesDurlauf, S.N., P.A. Johnson, J.R.W. Temple. 2005. “Growth Econometrics.” in: Handbook of Economic Growth, vol. 1A. ed. P. Aghion, S.N. Durlauf, 555–677. New York: Elsevier.
dc.referencesEngelbrecht, H.-J. 1997. “International R&D Spillovers, Human Capital and Productivity in OECD Economies: An Empirical Investigation.” European Economic Review 41 (8): 1479–1488.
dc.referencesEurostat Database. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/statistics/search_database.
dc.referencesFeenstra, R.C., R. Inklaar, M.P. Timmer. 2013. “The Next Generation of the Penn World Table” available for download at www.ggdc.net/pwt.
dc.referencesGoel, R.K., R. Ram. 1994. “Research and Development Expenditures and Economic Growth: a Cross- Country Study.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 42 (2): 403–411.
dc.referencesGriffith, R., S. Redding, J. Van Reenen. 2004. “Mapping the Two Faces of R&D: Productivity Growth in a Panel of OECD industries.” Review of Economics and Statistics 86 (4): 883–895.
dc.referencesGrossman, G.M., E. Helpman. 1991. “Quality Ladders in the Theory of Growth.” The Review of Economic Studies 58 (1): 43–61.
dc.referencesGuellec, D., B.V.P. de la Potterie. 2001. “R&D and Productivity Growth: Panel Data Analysis of 16 OECD Countries.” OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2001/3
dc.referencesGuellec, D., B.V.P. de la Potterie. 2004. “From R&D to Productivity Growth: Do the Institutional Settings and the Source of Funds of R&D Matter?” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 66 (3): 353–378.
dc.referencesHelpman, E. 2004. The Mystery of Economic Growth. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
dc.referencesIMF. 2014. World Economic Outlook - Recovery Strengthens, Remains Uneven. Washington: IMF.
dc.referencesLevine, R., D. Renelt. 1992. “A Sensitivity Analysis of Cross-Country Growth Regressions.” American Economic Review 82 (4): 942–963.
dc.referencesLichtenberg, F.R. 1992. “R&D Investment and International Productivity Differences.” NBER Working Paper 4161. National Bureau of Economic Research
dc.referencesLucas, R.E. 1988. “On the Mechanics of Economic Development.” Journal of Monetary Economics 22 (1): 3–42.
dc.referencesMadsen, J.B. 2008. “Economic Growth, TFP Convergence and the World Export of Ideas: a Century of Evidence.” The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 110 (1): 145–167.
dc.referencesMadsen, J.B. 2010. ”The Anatomy of Growth in the OECD since 1870.” Journal of Monetary Economics 57 (6): 753–767.
dc.referencesNickell, S. 1981. “Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed Effects.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 49 (6): 1417–1426.
dc.referencesOECD and Eurostat. 2005. Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data - The Oslo Manual, 3rd ed. Paris: OECD.
dc.referencesOECD. 2007. OECD Economic Surveys: Austria 2007, OECD Publishing, 2007
dc.referencesPark, J. 1995. “International R&D Spillovers and OECD Economic Growth.” Economic Inquiry 33 (4): 571–590.
dc.referencesPorter, M.E., S. Stern. 2000. “Measuring the "Ideas" Production Function: Evidence from International Patent Output.” NBER Working Paper 7891. National Bureau of Economic Research.
dc.referencesRomer, P. 2005. – interview with the author in: Snowdon, B., H.R. Vane. 2005. Modern Macroeconomics. Its Origins, Development and Current State. Edward Elgar.
dc.referencesRomer, P.M. 1986. “Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth.” Journal of Political Economy 94 (5): 1002–1037.
dc.referencesRomer, P.M. 1990. “Endogenous Technological Change.” Journal of Political Economy 98 (5): S71– S102.
dc.referencesSala-i-Martin, X., G. Doppelhofer, R.I. Miller. 2004. “Determinants of Long-Term Growth: A Bayesian Averaging of Classical Estimates (BACE) Approach.” American Economic Review 94 (4): 813–835.
dc.referencesSolow, R.M. 1956. “A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 70 (1): 65–94.
dc.referencesUlku, H. 2007. “R&D, Innovation and Output: Evidence from OECD and nonOECD Countries.” Applied Economics 39 (3): 291–307.
dc.contributor.authorEmailkacprzyk@uni.lodz.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailwirginia.doryn@uni.lodz.pl


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Uznanie autorstwa 3.0 Polska
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako Uznanie autorstwa 3.0 Polska