Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKudelska, Marta
dc.contributor.editorSzajnert, Danuta
dc.contributor.editorIzdebska, Agnieszka
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-15T08:40:09Z
dc.date.available2023-02-15T08:40:09Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn0084-4446
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/46002
dc.descriptionArtykuł ukazał się w polskiej wersji językowej pod tytułem Analiza pojęcia widźnianatman w kontekście adwaitycznej interpretacji relacji pomiędzy podmiotem absolutnym a względnym, “Studia Litteraria Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis” 10 (2015), zesz. 3.pl_PL
dc.description.abstractThe main aim of this article is to show how some philosophical concepts developed in the period of the Upaniṣads — the most important time for building the contextual background for further philosophical speculations — as well as to contribute to the discussion how on the base of introspective experiences formed the Upaniṣadic view of the world and how that view could have been adopted in Advaita thought. The topic of this article is to show the relation between two dimensions of reality; one of them is denoted by the term akṣarātman — ‘imperishable ātman ’, which is related to the Absolute dimension, and the other by the term vijňānātman — ‘reasonable ātman ’, which is related to the empirical perspective of reality. The term vijňānātman occurs only twice in the classical Upaniṣads. We can find it in the Praśna. This analysis follows the hermeneutical methodology. All consideration are based on the main text of the Praśna with some additional remarks to the other texts belonging to the line of the Atharvaveda, to the Muṇḍaka and to the Māṇḍūkya. The leading idea of the Praśna and Muṇḍaka is the deliberation between parā (higher) and aparā vidyā (lower wisdom), and the special emphasis devoted to describing the details of yogic procedures.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherŁódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowepl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesZagadnienia Rodzajów Literackich;3
dc.subjectUpaniṣadspl_PL
dc.subjectAdvaita Vedāntapl_PL
dc.subjectakṣarātmanpl_PL
dc.subjectvijňānātmanpl_PL
dc.subjectAbsolute Subjectpl_PL
dc.subjecthigher knowledgepl_PL
dc.subjectrelative knowledgepl_PL
dc.subjectyogic procedurespl_PL
dc.titleAn Analysis of the Notion of Vijňānātman in the Context of the Advaitic Interpretation of the Relation between the Absolute Subject and the Relative Subjectpl_PL
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.page.number107-119pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniwersytet Jagielloński, Wydział Filozoficzny, Katedra Porównawczych Studiów Cywilizacjipl_PL
dc.identifier.eissn2451-0335
dc.referencesBhattacharya Narendra Nath (1999), A Glossary of Indian Religious Terms and Concepts, Manohar, New Delhi.pl_PL
dc.referencesBlack Brian (2007), The Character of the Self in Ancient India, SUNY, New York.pl_PL
dc.referencesGupta Som Raj (1991), The Word Speaks to the Faustian Man. A Translation and Interpretation of the Prasthānatrayī and Śaṁkara’s bhāṣya for the Participation of Contemporary Man, Vol. 1, Motilal Banarsidass Publishers, Delhi.pl_PL
dc.referencesGupta Som Raj (1995), The Word Speaks to the Faustian Man. A Translation and Interpretation of the Prasthānatrayī and Śaṁkara’s bhāṣya for the Participation of Contemporary Man, Vol. 5, Motilal Banarsidass Publishers, Delhi.pl_PL
dc.referencesHume Robert Ernest (1985), The Thirteen Principal Upanishads, Oxford UP, Oxford.pl_PL
dc.referencesKudelska Marta (2009), Dlaczego istnieje raczej ‘Ja’ niż ‘to’? Ontologia podmiotu w Upaniszadach, Wydawnictwo UJ, Kraków.pl_PL
dc.referencesOlivelle Patrick (2008), Upaniṣads , Oxford UP, Oxford.pl_PL
dc.referencesZysk Kenneth Gregory (2007), The Bodily Winds in Ancient India Revisited, „The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (13)”.pl_PL
dc.relation.volume59pl_PL
dc.disciplineliteraturoznawstwopl_PL
dc.disciplinenauki o kulturze i religiipl_PL


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record