Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Using Acemoglu and Robinson’s Concept to Assess Leviathans in CEECs in the Long Term

dc.contributor.authorMatera, Rafał
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-14T09:41:35Z
dc.date.available2022-09-14T09:41:35Z
dc.date.issued2022-09-14
dc.identifier.issn1508-2008
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/43191
dc.description.abstractThe main objective of the paper is to use the following terms of Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson – Despotic, Real, Paper, Shackled Leviathans – to check and evaluate the state of democracy, governance and social power in Central and Eastern European Countries (CECCs). Six states were included in the study: Poland, Czechia, Slovakia (before 1993 Czechoslovakia), Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria. Based on a historical analysis, Leviathan types were identified in the interwar period, communism, and the transition time. In the most recent period (the twenty‑first century), eight democracy and freedom indices were presented, which take into account the quality of governance, the state of institutions and the potential of social capital in the six CEECs. The usefulness of these indices for assessing whether (and when) a country managed to shackle Leviathan were checked.en
dc.description.abstractCelem artykułu było wykorzystanie następujących pojęć z koncepcji Darona Acemoglu i Jamesa Robinsona: despotyczny, realny, papierowy i poskromiony Lewiatan, do oceny stanu demokracji, siły rządów i mobilizacji społecznej w Europie Środkowo‑Wschodniej w długim okresie. W badaniu uwzględniono: Polskę, Czechy, Słowację (przed 1993 r. Czechosłowację), Węgry, Rumunię i Bułgarię. Na podstawie analizy historycznej wyodrębniono typy Lewiatanów w okresie międzywojennym, w czasach komunizmu i transformacji. W najnowszym okresie (XXI wiek) wykorzystano do tego osiem indeksów demokracji i wolności, które mierzą i oceniają jakość rządzenia, stan instytucji i potencjał kapitału społecznego w sześciu krajach Europy Środkowo‑Wschodniej. Sprawdzono przydatność tych indeksów do oceny, czy i kiedy danemu krajowi udało się poskromić Lewiatana.pl
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesComparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe;3pl
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectCEECsen
dc.subjectAcemoglu & Robinson Conceptsen
dc.subjectTypes of Leviathanen
dc.subjectShackled Leviathanen
dc.subjectkraje Europy Środkowo‑Wschodniejpl
dc.subjectkoncepcje Acemoglu i Robinsonapl
dc.subjecttypy Lewiatanówpl
dc.subjectLewiatan poskromionypl
dc.subjectwąski korytarzpl
dc.titleUsing Acemoglu and Robinson’s Concept to Assess Leviathans in CEECs in the Long Termen
dc.title.alternativeWykorzystanie koncepcji Acemoglu i Robinsona do oceny Lewiatanów w krajach Europy Środkowo‑Wschodniej w długim okresiepl
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number63-89
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationPh.D., Associate Professor at the University of Lodz, Chair of History of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Sociology, Lodz, Polanden
dc.identifier.eissn2082-6737
dc.referencesIndex of Economic Freedom (2008), https://www.heritage.org/index/pdf/2008/index2008_executivesummary.pdf (acccessed: 11.10.2021).en
dc.referencesAcemoglu, D., Robinson, J.A. (2012), Why Nations Fail. The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty, Crown Business, New York.en
dc.referencesAcemoglu, D., Robinson, J.A. (2016), Paths to Inclusive Political Institutions, [in:] J. Eloranta, E. Golson, A. Markevich, N. Wolf (eds.), Economic History of Warfare and State Formation, Springer, Singapore, pp. 3–50, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1605-9_1en
dc.referencesAcemoglu, D., Robinson, J.A. (2019), The Narrow Corridor. States, Societies and the Fate of Liberty, Penguin Random House, London.en
dc.referencesAustin, R.C. (2021), A History of Central Europe. Nations and States Since 1848, Palgrave Macmillan, Toronto, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84543-8en
dc.referencesBerend, T.I. (1996), Central and Eastern Europe, 1944–1993. Detour from the Periphery to the Periphery, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511581748en
dc.referencesBlanchard, O.J., Froot, K.A., Sachs, J.D. (1994), The Transition in Eastern Europe, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226056814.001.0001en
dc.referencesBoia, L. (2001), Romania. Borderland of Europe, Reaktion Books, London.en
dc.referencesBrada, J.C. (1993), The Transformation from Communism to Capitalism: How Far? How Fast?, “Post Soviet Affairs”, 9 (2), pp. 87–110, https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.1993.10641361en
dc.referencesBretter, Z. (2016), The Name of the Game: The Regime of National Collaboration, [in:] Z. Bretter, Z. Vörös, A. Schmidt, A. Bagieńska‑Masiota, Hungary and Poland in Times of Political Transition. Selected Issues, Faculty of Political Science and Journalism Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, pp. 39–55.en
dc.referencesCarnegie Endowment for International Peace (n.d.), Global Protest Tracker, https://carnegieendowment.org/publications/interactive/protest-tracker (accessed: 20.12.2021).en
dc.referencesCouncil of Europe (n.d.), Our member States, https://www.coe.int/en/web/about‑us/our‑member‑states (accessed: 20.12.2021).en
dc.referencesCourtois, S., Werth, N., Panné, J.‑L., Paczkowski, A., Bartošek, K., Margolin. J.‑L. (1999), The Black Book of Communism. Crimes, Terror, Repression, Harvard University Press, Cambridge–London.en
dc.referencesCrampton, R.J. (2005), A Concise History of Bulgaria, Cambridge University Press, New York, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511996870en
dc.referencesDavid, P. (1985), Clio and the Economics of QWERTY, “The American Economic Review”, 75 (2), pp. 332–337.en
dc.referencesDzionek‑Kozłowska, J., Matera, R. (2015), New Institutional Economics Perspective on Wealth and Poverty of Nations. Concise Review and General Remarks on Acemoglu and Robinson’s Concept, “Scientific Annals of the ‘Alexandru Ioan Cuza’ University of Iasi: Economic Sciences”, 62, pp. 11–18.en
dc.referencesDzionek‑Kozłowska, J., Matera, R. (2020), Which Institutions Are Really Needed to Reach Wealth? A Clarification of Acemoglu and Robinson’s Concept, “Historyka. Studia Metodologiczne”, 50, pp. 377–395.en
dc.referencesDzionek‑Kozłowska, J., Matera, R. (2021), Institutions without Culture: On Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson’s Theory of Economic Development, “Journal of Economic Issues”, 55 (3), pp. 656–676, https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2021.1945885en
dc.referencesEckstein, H., Gurr, R.T. (1975), Patterns of Authority: A Structural Basis for Political Inquiry, Wiley, New York.en
dc.referencesEUR‑Lex (2007), Rozszerzenie 2004: podjęte wyzwanie – UE 25, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PL/TXT/?uri=LEGISSUM%3Ae50017 (accessed: 20.12.2021).en
dc.referencesFragile States Index (2020), Global Data (2020), https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwiw-fqsja_4AhWKz4sKHSWaBsYQFnoECAUQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Ffreedomhouse.org%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2F2021-02%2FCountry_and_Territory_Ratings_and_Statuses_FIW1973-2021.xlsx&usg=AOvVaw0WHvGBxSi7UckPWBYiAN1E (accessed: 15.01.2022).en
dc.referencesFreedom House (n.d.), Countries and Territories, https://freedomhouse.org/countries/nations‑transit/scores (accessed: 15.01.2022).en
dc.referencesFreedom House (n.d.), https://freedomhouse.org (accessed: 15.01.2022).en
dc.referencesHenry, M. (2014), From Communism to Capitalism. Theory of Catastrophe, Bloomsbury Publishing, London–New York.en
dc.referencesHitchins, K. (2014), A Concise History of Romania, Cambridge University Press, New York, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139033954en
dc.referencesHobbes, T. (2020), Leviathan, Mint Editions, West Margin Press, Berkeley.en
dc.referencesIlonszki, G., Dudzińska, A. (2021), Opposition behaviour against the Third Wave of Autocratization: Hungary and Poland Compared, “European Political Science”, 20, pp. 603–616, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-021-00325‑xen
dc.referencesJanos, A.C. (1982), The Politics of Backwardness in Hungary, 1825–1945, Princeton University Press, New Jersey.en
dc.referencesJudson, P.M. (2016), The Habsburg Empire. A New History, The Belknap, Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674969346en
dc.referencesKaczmarczyk‑Kłak, K. (2018), System rządów w Polsce w latach 1918–1922, „Studia Prawnicze KUL”, 1 (73), pp. 57–80, https://doi.org/10.31743/sp.633en
dc.referencesKalecki, M. (1993), Collected Works, vol. IV, Clarendon Press, Oxford.en
dc.referencesKaufmann, D., Kraay, A., Mastruzzi, M. (2009), Governance Matters VIII . Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators 1996–2008, “Policy Research Working Paper”, No. 4978, World Bank, https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-4978en
dc.referencesKopeček, M. (2019), Czechoslovak Interwar Democracy and Its Critical Introspections, “Journal of Modern European History”, 17 (1), pp. 7–15, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1611894418820217 (accessed: 11.10.2021).en
dc.referencesKornai, J. (1992), The Socialist System. The Political Economy of Communism, Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press, New York, https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691228020en
dc.referencesKoryś, P. (2018), Poland from Partitions to EU Accession. A Modern Economic History, 1772–2004, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97126-1en
dc.referencesLange, O. (1962), Problems of Political Economy of Socialism, People’s Publishing House, New Delhi.en
dc.referencesLegatum Institute for Global Development (2007), The 2007 Legatum Prosperity Index. A Global Assessment of Wealth and Wellbeing, https://www.prosperity.com/download_file/view_inline/2855 (acccessed: 15.06.2022).en
dc.referencesLegatum Institute for Global Development (2015), The Legatum Prosperity Index, https://www.prosperity.com/download_file/view_inline/2833 (acccessed: 15.06.2022).en
dc.referencesLegatum Institute for Global Development (2016), The Legatum Prosperity Index, https://www.prosperity.com/download_file/view_inline/2884 (acccessed: 15.06.2022).en
dc.referencesLegatum Institute for Global Development (2017), The Legatum Prosperity Index, https://li.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/pdf55f152ff15736886a8b2ff00001f4427.pdf (acccessed: 15.06.2022).en
dc.referencesLegatum Institute for Global Development (2018), 2018 Legatum Prosperity Index,https://li.com/reports/2018-legatum-prosperity-index/ (acccessed: 15.06.2022).en
dc.referencesLegatum Institute for Global Development (2019), 2019 Legatum Prosperity Index, https://li.com/reports/2019‑legatum‑prosperity‑index/ (acccessed: 15.06.2022).en
dc.referencesLegatum Institute for Global Development (2020), The Legatum Prosperity Index. A tool for transformation, https://docs.prosperity.com/2916/0568/0539/The_Legatum_Prosperity_Index_2020.pdf (acccessed: 15.06.2022).en
dc.referencesMaerz, S.F., Luhrmann, A., Hellmeier, S., Grahn, S., Lindberg, S.I. (2020), State of the World 2019: Autocratization Surges – Resistance Grows, “Democratization”, 27 (6), pp. 909–927, https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1758670en
dc.referencesMcElroy, B. (2021), Book Review: The narrow corridor: States, societies, and the fate of liberty, Acemoglu, Daron and Robinson, James A., Penguin, New York, NY 2020. 576 pp. $20.00 (paper), “Governance. An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions”, 34 (2), pp. 592–594, https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12585en
dc.referencesMiller, T., Kim, A.B. (2015), 2015 Index of Economic Freedom. Promoting Economic Opportunity and Prosperity, The Heritage Foundation, https://www.heritage.org/index/pdf/2015/book/highlights.pdf (acccessed: 11.10.2021).en
dc.referencesMiller, T., Kim, A.B., Roberts, J.M., Tyrrell, P. (2020), Highlights of the 2020 Index of Economic Freedom, The Heritage Foundation, https://www.heritage.org/index/pdf/2020/book/2020_IndexofEconomicFreedom_Highlights.pdf (acccessed: 11.10.2021).en
dc.referencesMolnar, M. (2001), Concise History of Hungary, Cambridge University Press, New York.en
dc.referencesNATO (2022), Member countries, https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/topics_52044.htm (accessed: 15.04.2022).en
dc.referencesNorth, D.C., Wallis, J.J., Weingast, B.R. (2009), Violence and Social Orders. A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511575839en
dc.referencesPacześniak, A. (2014), Promocja demokracji i praworządności, [in:] A. Florczak, A. Lisowska, (eds.) Organizacje międzynarodowe w działaniu, Agencja Reklamowa OTO, Wrocław, pp. 227–243.en
dc.referencesPetrova, T., Pospieszna, P. (2021), Democracy Promotion in Times of Autocratization: The Case of Poland, 1989–2019, “Post‑Soviet Affairs”, 37 (6), pp. 526–543, https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2021.1975443en
dc.referencesPiątkowski, M. (2018), Europe’s Growth Champion. Insights from the Economic Rise of Poland, Oxford University Press, New York.en
dc.referencesPOLVAL1 (n.d.), The Elections to the Polish Parliament (Sejm) 1919–1947, https://web.archive.org/web/20110720181318/http://www.elisanet.fi/daglarsson/dokumentit/polval1.htm#26.1.1919 (accessed: 15.06.2022).en
dc.referencesPuffert, D.J. (2002), Path Dependence in Spatial Networks: The Standarization of Railway Track Gauge, “Explorations in Economic History”, 39 (3), pp. 282–314, https://doi.org/10.1006/exeh.2002.0786en
dc.referencesRamet, S.P. (ed.) (2020), Interwar East Central Europe, 1918–1941. The Failure of Democracy‑building, the Fate of Minorities, Routledge, New York, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429027222en
dc.referencesRummel, R. (1994), Death by Government, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick.en
dc.referencesSachs, J. (1993), Poland’s Jump to the Market Economy, MIT Press, Cambridge, https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5430.001.0001en
dc.referencesSchweickert, R., Ahlborn, M., Frank, K., Orosz, Á., Sikulová, I., Szanyi, M. (2013), Large‑Scale Transformation of Socio‑Economic Institutions – Comparative Case Studies on CEECs. Interim Report, “Working Paper”, No. 16, European Commisssion.en
dc.referencesSkodlarski, J. (2012), Historia gospodarcza, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.en
dc.referencesSzczepański, J., Kalina, P. (2019), The Road to Autocratization? Redefining Democracy in Poland, “Studia Europejskie”, 23 (3), pp. 121–132.en
dc.referencesThe Economist Intelligence Unit (2015), Democracy Index 2015. Democracy in an age of anxiety, https://www.yabiladi.com/img/content/EIU‑Democracy‑Index-2015.pdf (accessed: 11.10.2021).en
dc.referencesThe Economist Intelligence Unit (2020), Democracy Index 2020. In sickness and in health?, https://pages.eiu.com/rs/753-RIQ-438/images/democracy-index-2020.pdf (accessed: 11.10.2021).en
dc.referencesThe World in 2007. Democracy Index (2007), https://www.economist.com/media/pdf/DEMOCRACY_TABLE_2007_v3.pdf (accessed: 11.10.2021).en
dc.referencesV‑Dem Institute (2021), Autocratization Turns Viral. Democray Report 2021, https://www.v-dem.net/static/website/files/dr/dr_2021.pdf (acccessed: 15.06.2022).en
dc.referencesValentino, B. (2004), Final Solutions: Mass Killing and Genocide in the 20th Century, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.en
dc.referencesVásquez, I., McMahon, F. (2020), The Human Freedom Index 2020. A Global Measurement of Personal, Civil, and Economic Freedom, Cato Institute and the Fraser Institute, Washington–Vancouver, https://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/2021-03/human-freedom-index-2020.pdf (accessed: 11.10.2021).en
dc.referencesWikipedia (n.d.), 1920 Hungarian parliamentary election, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1920_Hungarian_parliamentary_election (accessed: 15.01.2022).en
dc.referencesWikipedia (n.d.), Category: Parliamentary elections in Bulgaria, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Parliamentary_elections_in_Bulgaria (accessed: 15.01.2022).en
dc.referencesWikipedia (n.d.), Democracy Index, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy_Index (accessed: 15.04.2022).en
dc.referencesWikipedia (n.d.), Elections in Czechoslovakia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elections_in_Czechoslovakia (accessed: 15.01.2022).en
dc.referencesWikipedia (n.d.), Elections in Romania, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elections_in_Romania (accessed: 15.01.2022).en
dc.referencesWikipedia (n.d.), Wybory parlamentarne w II Rzeczypospolitej, https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wybory_parlamentarne_w_II_Rzeczypospolitej (accessed: 15.01.2022).en
dc.referencesWorld Justice Project (2015), WJP Rule of Law Index 2015 Report, https://worldjusticeproject.org/our-work/publications/rule-law-index-reports/wjp-rule-law-index-2015-report (accessed: 15.04.2022).en
dc.referencesWorld Justice Project (2020), World Justice Project Rule of Law Index® 2020, https://worldjusticeproject.org/sites/default/files/documents/WJP-ROLI-2020-Online_0.pdf (acccessed: 15.04.2022).en
dc.contributor.authorEmailrafal.matera@uni.lodz.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1508-2008.25.22
dc.relation.volume25


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Nazwa:
63-89_Matera.pdf
Rozmiar:
785.0KB
Format:
PDF
Oglądaj/Otwórz

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0