Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorKrenc, Krzysztof
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T11:06:28Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T11:06:28Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/42883
dc.description.abstractThe goal of this thesis is to analyse the notion of free will from the perspectives of various stances in the philosophy of mind. It employs an approach quite different than the more standard one, in which philosophers try to answer the question “do we have free will?” directly. The first chapter of this thesis contains an analysis of the compatibilism/incompatibilism debate – the question “is free will compatible with the determinism?” Showing that the answer to this question means something different for compatibilists and incompatibilists and the fact that it also depends on (sometimes not explicitly stated) assumptions about the mind that a researcher has, provides a rationale for the approach chosen in this thesis. The subsequent chapters contain discussions about the relation between free will and dualism, materialism and transcendental idealism. The considerations about free will in dualistic stances serve as a background for the two final chapters, which contain the most important conclusions of the thesis. In the third chapter I discuss the relation between free will and materialism with a focus on whether it is sensible to talk about free will in the context of eliminative materialism. To do that, I go more in depth into the analysis of how artificial neural networks process information. In the last chapter, devoted to transcendental idealism, I present a solution to the free will problem (and Kant’s third antinomy of reason) that incorporates eliminative materialism on the empirical level.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.rightsAttribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe*
dc.rightsAttribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe*
dc.rightsAttribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectfree willpl_PL
dc.subjectphilosophy of mindpl_PL
dc.subjectpsychophysical problempl_PL
dc.subjectdeep learningpl_PL
dc.subjectcompatibilismpl_PL
dc.subjectincompatibilismpl_PL
dc.subjecttranscendental idealismpl_PL
dc.subjectconnectionismpl_PL
dc.titleCan Machines Have Free Will? Analysis of the Concept of Free Will in Relation to the Psychophysical Problempl_PL
dc.typePhD/Doctoral Dissertationpl_PL
dc.rights.holderKrzysztof Krencpl_PL
dc.page.number136pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniwersytet Łódzki, Wydział Filozoficzno-Historyczny, Katedra Logiki i Metodologii Naukpl_PL
dc.referencesBaker, L., R. (2004). Cognitive suicide. In J. Heil (Ed.), Philosophy of Mind: a guide and anthology (401-416). Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBuchak, L. (2013). Free Acts and Change: Why the Rollback Argument Fails. The Philosophical Quarterly. 63(250), 20-28.pl_PL
dc.referencesChalmers, D. (1997), The Conscious Mind. Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesChurchland, Paul (1981). Eliminative Materialism And The Propositional Attitudes. Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 78, No. 2, 67-90.pl_PL
dc.referencesChurchland, Paul (1993). Evaluating Our Self Conception. Mind & Language, Vol. 8, No. 2, Summer 1993, 211-222.pl_PL
dc.referencesChurchland, Paul (2013). Matter and Consciousness. The MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesChurchland, Patricia (2006). The Big Questions: Do we have free will? New Scientist. 2578, 42-45.pl_PL
dc.referencesChurchland, Patricia (2012). Braintrust. Princeton University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesChurchland, Patricia (2019). Conscience:The Origins of Moral Intuition. W. W. NORTON & COMPANY.pl_PL
dc.referencesCogley, Z. (2015). Rolling Back the Luck Problem for Libertarianism. Journal of Cognition and Neuroethics. 3(1), 121-137.pl_PL
dc.referencesCorcoran, K. (2001). The Trouble with Searle's Biological Naturalism. Erkenntnis. 55(3), 307-324.pl_PL
dc.referencesDavidson, D. (1973a). On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, Vol. 47 (1973-1974), 5-20.pl_PL
dc.referencesDavidson, D. (1973b). Radical Interpretation. Dialectica, Vol. 27, No. 3/4, 313- 328.pl_PL
dc.referencesDavidson, D. (1974). Belief and the Basis of Meaning. Synthese, Vol. 27, No. 3/4, 309-323.pl_PL
dc.referencesDavidson, D. (2001). Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesDennett, D. (1984). I Could not have Done Otherwise – So What? The Journal of Philosophy. 81(10), 553-565.pl_PL
dc.referencesDennett, D. (1991). Consciousness Explained. Bay Bay Books.pl_PL
dc.referencesDennett, D. (2003). Freedom evolves. Penguin Books.pl_PL
dc.referencesDennett, D. (2017). From Bacteria to Bach and Back. The Evolution of Minds. W. W. Norton & Company.pl_PL
dc.referencesDescartes, R. (1912). A Discourse on Method. E. P. Dutton & co.; J. M. Dent and sons.pl_PL
dc.referencesDescartes, R. (2008). Meditations on First Philosophy. Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesEccles, J. C. (1976). Brain and Free Will. In G. G. Globus, G. Maxwell & I. Savodnik (Eds.). Consciousness and the Brain: A Scientific and Philosophical Inquiry (101-122). Plenum Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesElzein, N. (2020). Free Will & Empirical Arguments for Epiphenomenalism. In P. Róna, L. Zsolnai (eds.), Agency and Causal Explanation in Economics. Virtues and Economics, vol 5. Springer, Cham.pl_PL
dc.referencesFieser, J. (2009). Great Issues in Philosopy. http://springerhistory.weebly.com/uploads/2/2/0/7/22079454/great-issues.pdfpl_PL
dc.referencesFrankfurt, H. (1969). Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility. The Journal of Philosophy. 66(33), 829-839.pl_PL
dc.referencesFranklin, E. (2011). Farewell to the luck (and Mind) argument. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition. 156 (2), 199- 300.pl_PL
dc.referencesHannan, B. (1993). Don’t Stop Believing: The Case Against Eliminative Materialism. Mind & Language, Vol. 8, No. 2, Summer 1993, 165-179.pl_PL
dc.referencesHume, D. (2007). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesHume, D. (2009). A Treatise of Human Nature. The floating press.pl_PL
dc.referencesJayasekera, M. (2016). Responsibility in Descartes’s Theory of Judgment. Ergo. 3(12), 321-347.pl_PL
dc.referencesJorati, J. (2017). Gottfried Leibniz [on Free Will]. In K. Tiempe, M. Griffith & N. Levy (Eds.). The Routledge Companion to Free Will. Routlege.pl_PL
dc.referencesKane, R. (1988). The Significance of Free Will. Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesKant, I. (2004). Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics That Will Be Able to Come Forward as Science. Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesKant, I. (2007). Critique of Pure Reason. Palgrave Macmillan.pl_PL
dc.referencesKim, J. (2008). Physicalism, or something near enough. Princeton University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesKim, J. (1998). Mind in a Physical World: An Essay on the Mind-Body Problem and Mental Causation. The MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLange, M. (2008). Could the Laws of Nature Change? Philosophy of Science, Vol. 75, No. 1, 69-92.pl_PL
dc.referencesLibet, B., Wright, E. W. Jr., Feinstein, B., Pearl, D. K. (1979). Subjective referral of the timing for a conscious sensory experience: a functional role for the somatosensory specific projection system in man. Brain. 102(1), 193-224.pl_PL
dc.referencesLockie, R. (2003). Transcendental Arguments Against Eliminativism. Brit. J. Phil. Sci. Vol. 54 (2003), 569-589.pl_PL
dc.referencesLokhorst, G.-J. (2013). Descartes and the Pineal Gland. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pineal-gland/pl_PL
dc.referencesLong, A., A., Sedley, D., N. (1987). The Hellenistic Philosophers. Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLycan, W. G. (2009). Giving Dualism its Due. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 87(4), 551-563.pl_PL
dc.referencesLycan., W. G. (2013). Is property dualism better off than substance dualism? Philosophical Studies. 164, 533-542.pl_PL
dc.referencesMcKay, T, J., Johnson, D. (1996). A Reconsideration of an Argument against Compatibilism.pl_PL
dc.referencesMcLaughlin, B., Bennett, K. (2018). Supervenience. In E. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2018 ed.). Standforrd University (Winter 2018 ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/supervenience/pl_PL
dc.referencesMoore, G. E. (2005). Ethics. Clarendon Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesMurphy N. (2013) Nonreductive Physicalism. In: Runehov A.L.C., Oviedo L. (eds) Encyclopedia of Sciences and Religions. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8265-8_793pl_PL
dc.referencesNelkin, D. (2000). Two Standpoints and the Belief in Freedom. The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 97, No. 10, 564-576.pl_PL
dc.referencesPitts, J. B. (2019). Conservation Laws and the Philosophy of Mind: Opening the Black Box, Finding a Mirror. Philosophia. 48, 673-707.pl_PL
dc.referencesRamsey, W., Stich, S., Garon, J. (1990). Connectionism, Eliminativism and The Future of Folk Psychology. Philosophical Perspectives, Vol. 4, Action Theory and Philosophy of Mind, 1990, 499-533.pl_PL
dc.referencesRobinson, H. (2016). Dualism. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/dualism/pl_PL
dc.referencesRodriguez-Pereyra, G. (2008). Descartes’s Substance Dualism and His Independence Conception of Substance. Journal of the History of Philosophy. 46(1), 69- 90.pl_PL
dc.referencesRussell, B. (2010). The Philosophy of Logical Atomism. Taylor & Francis e- Library.pl_PL
dc.referencesSchlosser, M., E. (2016). Reasons, Causes, and Chance-Incompatibilism. Philososphia. 45, 335-347.pl_PL
dc.referencesSearle, J., R. (2004). Mind: A Brief Introduction. Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesSearle, J., R. (2007a). Freedom and Neurobiology: Reflections on Free Will, Language and Political Power. Columbia University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesSearle, J., R. (2007b). Neuroscience, intentionality and free will. Philosophical explorations, 10(1), 69-75.pl_PL
dc.referencesSkokowski, P. (2009). Networks with attitudes. AI & Soc. 23, 461-470.pl_PL
dc.referencesStern, R. (2006). Metaphysical Dogmatism, Humean Scepticism, Kantian Criticism. Kantian Review, 11, 102-116.pl_PL
dc.referencesStoljar, D. (2015). Physicalism. In E. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2017 ed.). Standforrd University (Winter 2017 ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/physicalism/pl_PL
dc.referencesSwinburne, R. (2013). Mind, Brain and Free Will. Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesWatson, R. A. (1982). What Moves the Mind: An Excursion in Cartesian Dualism. American Philosophical Quarterly. 19(1), 73-81.pl_PL
dc.referencesVan Inwagen, P. (1983). An Essay on Free Will. Oxford: Clarendon Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesVan Inwagen, P. (2017). Thinking about Free Will. Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesvon Wachter, D. (2006). Why the Argument from Causal Closure Against the Existence of Immaterial Things is https://epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de/1952/1/wachter_2006-causal-closure.pdfpl_PL
dc.contributor.authorEmailkrzysztof.krenc@gmail.compl_PL
dc.dissertation.directorKleszcz, Ryszard
dc.dissertation.reviewerŁukasiewicz, Dariusz
dc.dissertation.reviewerSchetz, Adriana
dc.dissertation.reviewerWróblewski, Zbigniew
dc.date.defence2022-10-05
dc.disciplinefilozofiapl_PL


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe