dc.contributor.author | Krenc, Krzysztof | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-23T11:06:28Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-23T11:06:28Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/42883 | |
dc.description.abstract | The goal of this thesis is to analyse the notion of free will from the perspectives of various stances in the philosophy of mind. It employs an approach quite different than the more standard one, in which philosophers try to answer the question “do we have free will?” directly. The first chapter of this thesis contains an analysis of the compatibilism/incompatibilism debate – the question “is free will compatible with the determinism?” Showing that the answer to this question means something different for compatibilists and incompatibilists and the fact that it also depends on (sometimes not explicitly stated) assumptions about the mind that a researcher has, provides a rationale for the approach chosen in this thesis. The subsequent chapters contain discussions about the relation between free will and dualism, materialism and transcendental idealism. The considerations about free will in dualistic stances serve as a background for the two final chapters, which contain the most important conclusions of the thesis. In the third chapter I discuss the relation between free will and materialism with a focus on whether it is sensible to talk about free will in the context of eliminative materialism. To do that, I go more in depth into the analysis of how artificial neural networks process information. In the last chapter, devoted to transcendental idealism, I present a solution to the free will problem (and Kant’s third antinomy of reason) that incorporates eliminative materialism on the empirical level. | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | en | pl_PL |
dc.rights | Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe | * |
dc.rights | Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe | * |
dc.rights | Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | free will | pl_PL |
dc.subject | philosophy of mind | pl_PL |
dc.subject | psychophysical problem | pl_PL |
dc.subject | deep learning | pl_PL |
dc.subject | compatibilism | pl_PL |
dc.subject | incompatibilism | pl_PL |
dc.subject | transcendental idealism | pl_PL |
dc.subject | connectionism | pl_PL |
dc.title | Can Machines Have Free Will? Analysis of the Concept of Free Will in Relation to the Psychophysical Problem | pl_PL |
dc.type | PhD/Doctoral Dissertation | pl_PL |
dc.rights.holder | Krzysztof Krenc | pl_PL |
dc.page.number | 136 | pl_PL |
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | Uniwersytet Łódzki, Wydział Filozoficzno-Historyczny, Katedra Logiki i Metodologii Nauk | pl_PL |
dc.references | Baker, L., R. (2004). Cognitive suicide. In J. Heil (Ed.), Philosophy of Mind: a guide and anthology (401-416). Oxford University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Buchak, L. (2013). Free Acts and Change: Why the Rollback Argument Fails. The Philosophical Quarterly. 63(250), 20-28. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Chalmers, D. (1997), The Conscious Mind. Oxford University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Churchland, Paul (1981). Eliminative Materialism And The Propositional Attitudes. Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 78, No. 2, 67-90. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Churchland, Paul (1993). Evaluating Our Self Conception. Mind & Language, Vol. 8, No. 2, Summer 1993, 211-222. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Churchland, Paul (2013). Matter and Consciousness. The MIT Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Churchland, Patricia (2006). The Big Questions: Do we have free will? New Scientist. 2578, 42-45. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Churchland, Patricia (2012). Braintrust. Princeton University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Churchland, Patricia (2019). Conscience:The Origins of Moral Intuition. W. W. NORTON & COMPANY. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Cogley, Z. (2015). Rolling Back the Luck Problem for Libertarianism. Journal of Cognition and Neuroethics. 3(1), 121-137. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Corcoran, K. (2001). The Trouble with Searle's Biological Naturalism. Erkenntnis. 55(3), 307-324. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Davidson, D. (1973a). On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, Vol. 47 (1973-1974), 5-20. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Davidson, D. (1973b). Radical Interpretation. Dialectica, Vol. 27, No. 3/4, 313- 328. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Davidson, D. (1974). Belief and the Basis of Meaning. Synthese, Vol. 27, No. 3/4, 309-323. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Davidson, D. (2001). Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Dennett, D. (1984). I Could not have Done Otherwise – So What? The Journal of Philosophy. 81(10), 553-565. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Dennett, D. (1991). Consciousness Explained. Bay Bay Books. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Dennett, D. (2003). Freedom evolves. Penguin Books. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Dennett, D. (2017). From Bacteria to Bach and Back. The Evolution of Minds. W. W. Norton & Company. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Descartes, R. (1912). A Discourse on Method. E. P. Dutton & co.; J. M. Dent and sons. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Descartes, R. (2008). Meditations on First Philosophy. Oxford University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Eccles, J. C. (1976). Brain and Free Will. In G. G. Globus, G. Maxwell & I. Savodnik (Eds.). Consciousness and the Brain: A Scientific and Philosophical Inquiry (101-122). Plenum Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Elzein, N. (2020). Free Will & Empirical Arguments for Epiphenomenalism. In P. Róna, L. Zsolnai (eds.), Agency and Causal Explanation in Economics. Virtues and Economics, vol 5. Springer, Cham. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Fieser, J. (2009). Great Issues in Philosopy. http://springerhistory.weebly.com/uploads/2/2/0/7/22079454/great-issues.pdf | pl_PL |
dc.references | Frankfurt, H. (1969). Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility. The Journal of Philosophy. 66(33), 829-839. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Franklin, E. (2011). Farewell to the luck (and Mind) argument. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition. 156 (2), 199- 300. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Hannan, B. (1993). Don’t Stop Believing: The Case Against Eliminative Materialism. Mind & Language, Vol. 8, No. 2, Summer 1993, 165-179. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Hume, D. (2007). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Hume, D. (2009). A Treatise of Human Nature. The floating press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Jayasekera, M. (2016). Responsibility in Descartes’s Theory of Judgment. Ergo. 3(12), 321-347. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Jorati, J. (2017). Gottfried Leibniz [on Free Will]. In K. Tiempe, M. Griffith & N. Levy (Eds.). The Routledge Companion to Free Will. Routlege. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Kane, R. (1988). The Significance of Free Will. Oxford University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Kant, I. (2004). Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics That Will Be Able to Come Forward as Science. Cambridge University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Kant, I. (2007). Critique of Pure Reason. Palgrave Macmillan. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Kim, J. (2008). Physicalism, or something near enough. Princeton University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Kim, J. (1998). Mind in a Physical World: An Essay on the Mind-Body Problem and Mental Causation. The MIT Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Lange, M. (2008). Could the Laws of Nature Change? Philosophy of Science, Vol. 75, No. 1, 69-92. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Libet, B., Wright, E. W. Jr., Feinstein, B., Pearl, D. K. (1979). Subjective referral of the timing for a conscious sensory experience: a functional role for the somatosensory specific projection system in man. Brain. 102(1), 193-224. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Lockie, R. (2003). Transcendental Arguments Against Eliminativism. Brit. J. Phil. Sci. Vol. 54 (2003), 569-589. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Lokhorst, G.-J. (2013). Descartes and the Pineal Gland. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pineal-gland/ | pl_PL |
dc.references | Long, A., A., Sedley, D., N. (1987). The Hellenistic Philosophers. Cambridge University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Lycan, W. G. (2009). Giving Dualism its Due. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 87(4), 551-563. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Lycan., W. G. (2013). Is property dualism better off than substance dualism? Philosophical Studies. 164, 533-542. | pl_PL |
dc.references | McKay, T, J., Johnson, D. (1996). A Reconsideration of an Argument against Compatibilism. | pl_PL |
dc.references | McLaughlin, B., Bennett, K. (2018). Supervenience. In E. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2018 ed.). Standforrd University (Winter 2018 ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/supervenience/ | pl_PL |
dc.references | Moore, G. E. (2005). Ethics. Clarendon Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Murphy N. (2013) Nonreductive Physicalism. In: Runehov A.L.C., Oviedo L. (eds) Encyclopedia of Sciences and Religions. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8265-8_793 | pl_PL |
dc.references | Nelkin, D. (2000). Two Standpoints and the Belief in Freedom. The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 97, No. 10, 564-576. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Pitts, J. B. (2019). Conservation Laws and the Philosophy of Mind: Opening the Black Box, Finding a Mirror. Philosophia. 48, 673-707. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Ramsey, W., Stich, S., Garon, J. (1990). Connectionism, Eliminativism and The Future of Folk Psychology. Philosophical Perspectives, Vol. 4, Action Theory and Philosophy of Mind, 1990, 499-533. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Robinson, H. (2016). Dualism. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/dualism/ | pl_PL |
dc.references | Rodriguez-Pereyra, G. (2008). Descartes’s Substance Dualism and His Independence Conception of Substance. Journal of the History of Philosophy. 46(1), 69- 90. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Russell, B. (2010). The Philosophy of Logical Atomism. Taylor & Francis e- Library. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Schlosser, M., E. (2016). Reasons, Causes, and Chance-Incompatibilism. Philososphia. 45, 335-347. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Searle, J., R. (2004). Mind: A Brief Introduction. Oxford University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Searle, J., R. (2007a). Freedom and Neurobiology: Reflections on Free Will, Language and Political Power. Columbia University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Searle, J., R. (2007b). Neuroscience, intentionality and free will. Philosophical explorations, 10(1), 69-75. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Skokowski, P. (2009). Networks with attitudes. AI & Soc. 23, 461-470. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Stern, R. (2006). Metaphysical Dogmatism, Humean Scepticism, Kantian Criticism. Kantian Review, 11, 102-116. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Stoljar, D. (2015). Physicalism. In E. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2017 ed.). Standforrd University (Winter 2017 ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/physicalism/ | pl_PL |
dc.references | Swinburne, R. (2013). Mind, Brain and Free Will. Oxford University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Watson, R. A. (1982). What Moves the Mind: An Excursion in Cartesian Dualism. American Philosophical Quarterly. 19(1), 73-81. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Van Inwagen, P. (1983). An Essay on Free Will. Oxford: Clarendon Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Van Inwagen, P. (2017). Thinking about Free Will. Cambridge University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | von Wachter, D. (2006). Why the Argument from Causal Closure Against the Existence of Immaterial Things is https://epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de/1952/1/wachter_2006-causal-closure.pdf | pl_PL |
dc.contributor.authorEmail | krzysztof.krenc@gmail.com | pl_PL |
dc.dissertation.director | Kleszcz, Ryszard | |
dc.dissertation.reviewer | Łukasiewicz, Dariusz | |
dc.dissertation.reviewer | Schetz, Adriana | |
dc.dissertation.reviewer | Wróblewski, Zbigniew | |
dc.date.defence | 2022-10-05 | |
dc.discipline | filozofia | pl_PL |