Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBatko, Agnieszka
dc.contributor.editorSocha, Marcin
dc.contributor.editorZaręba, Michał
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-15T16:01:37Z
dc.date.available2022-06-15T16:01:37Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationBatko A., The promise of neo-functionalism beyond Europe: the case of Japan–South Korea relations, [in:] M. Socha, M. Zaręba (ed.), Asia in World Politics: Past, Present, and Future, WUŁ, Łódź 2021, https://doi.org/10.18778/8220-793-4.13pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn978-83-8220-793-4
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/42156
dc.description.abstractNortheast Asia accounts for one of the most well-developed regions with the world’s three largest economic powers. However, as former South Korean President Park Geun-hye described, it also constitutes a “paradox.” On one hand, states are able to successfully cooperate on the economic basis. On the other hand, there are a number of obstacles, involving primarily unresolved historical issues and security concerns, that impede further regional collaboration. The aim of the article is to analyse the process of regional integration in Northeast Asia, with particular focus on Japan – Republic of Korea relations, through the lenses of neo-functionalism. The essay seeks to determine whether this approach could lead to increasing transnational ties in the region and ultimately improve international relations on bilateral and multilateral basis. Neo-functional theory of regional integration has been mostly applied to research on the European integration process. Consequently, there have been few attempts of testing its assumptions in other regions. Nevertheless, there seems to be substantial evidence to perceive neo-functionalism as a promising theoretical approach beyond Europe. Since neo-functionalists place supranational, transnational and sub-national actors at the centre of the analysis, the article, apart from the economic dimension, will elaborate on the potential of existing international structure, namely the Trilateral Cooperation Secretariat.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofAsia in World Politics: Past, Present, and Future;
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectNortheast Asiapl_PL
dc.subjectJapan–South Korea Relationspl_PL
dc.subjectNeo-functionalismpl_PL
dc.titleThe promise of neo-functionalism beyond Europe: the case of Japan–South Korea relationspl_PL
dc.typeBook chapterpl_PL
dc.page.number229-245pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationJagiellonian Universitypl_PL
dc.identifier.eisbn978-83-8220-794-1
dc.referencesAggarval, V.K. & Gyo Koo, M. 2005, “Beyond network power? The dynamics of formal economic integration in Northeast Asia”, The Pacific Review, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 189–216.pl_PL
dc.referencesAggarval, V.K. & Gyo Koo, M. 2008, “Economic and security institution building in Northeast Asia: an analytical overview” in Aggarval, V.K. [et al.] (eds), Northeast Asia: Ripe for Integration?, Springer-Verland, Berlin & Heidelberg, pp. 1–36.pl_PL
dc.referencesBörzel, T. 2016, “Theorizing regionalism. cooperation, integration and governance” in Börzel, T. & Risse, T. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism, Oxford University Press, Oxford.pl_PL
dc.referencesCha, V.D. 2000, “Abandonment, entrapment, and neoclassical realism in Asia: the United States, Japan, and Korea”, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 44, 261–291.pl_PL
dc.referencesChiriot, D., Shin, G. & Sneider, D. (eds) 2014, Confronting Memories of World War II: European and Asian Legacies, University of Washington Press, Seattle.pl_PL
dc.referencesChungsoo, J. 2001, Perceptions on Free Trade: The Korean Debate Over the Japan-Korea Free Trade Agreement, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC, 1 March, viewed 1 June 2018, https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/kim_01.pdfpl_PL
dc.referencesConzelmann, T. 2014, “Neofunctionalism” in Schieder, S. & Spindler, M. (eds), Theories of International Relations, Routledge, New York, pp. 90–106.pl_PL
dc.referencesDuus, P. 2017, “Introduction: history wars in postwar East Asia 1945–2014” in Lewis, M. (ed.),“History Wars” and Reconciliation in Japan and Korea, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp. 1–16.pl_PL
dc.referencesGehring, T. 1996, “Integrating integration theory: neo‐functionalism and international regimes”, Global Society, Vol. 10:3, pp. 225–253.pl_PL
dc.referencesGlosserman, B. & Snyder, S. 2015, The Japan – South Korea Identity Clash: East Asian Security and the United States, Columbia University Press, New York & Chichester.pl_PL
dc.referencesGrabowski, M. 2015, Rywalizacja czy integracja? Procesy i organizacje integracyjne w regionie Azji i Pacyfiku na przełomie XX i XXI wieku, Księgarnia Akademicka, Kraków.pl_PL
dc.referencesHaas, E.B. 2001, “Does constructivism subsime neo-functionalism” in Christiansen, T., Jørgensen, K.E. & Wiener, A. (eds), The Social Construction of Europe, Sage Publications, London, pp. 22–31.pl_PL
dc.referencesHaggard, S. & Noland, M. 2009, “A security and peace mechanism for Northeast Asia: the economic dimension”, The Pacific Review, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 119–137.pl_PL
dc.referencesHasegawa, T. & Togo, K. 2008 (eds), East Asia’s Haunted Present: Historical Memories and the Resurgence of Nationalism, Praeger Security International, Westport.pl_PL
dc.referencesJongdae, K. 2012, “Global standard of human rights and ‘comfort women’” in Sang Jin, H. (ed.), Divided Nations and Transitional Justice: What Germany, Japan, and South Korea Can Teach the World, Paradigm Publishers, Boulder, pp. 189–194.pl_PL
dc.referencesJung, S. 2017, “Japan’s investment in S. Korea hit 57-month high in Q3”, The Business Korea, Seoul, November 16, viewed 1 June 2018, http://www.businesskorea.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=19836pl_PL
dc.referencesKim, S.H. 2017, NAPCI and Trilateral Cooperation: Prospects for South Korea-EU Relations, Instituto Affari Internazionali Working Papers, 8 February, viewed 22 September 2018, http://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/iaiwp1708.pdfpl_PL
dc.referencesKingston, J. 2004, Japan’s Quiet Transformation: Social Change and Civil Society in the Twenty-First Century, RoutledgeCurzon, Abingdon & New York.pl_PL
dc.referencesKinhide, M. 2015, “Towards recognition of the crime of colonialism. The lesson of Japan’s violent annexation of Korea” in Doh, S. (ed.), One Hundred Years after Japan’s Forced Annexation of Korea: History and Tasks, Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main and other, pp. 171–187.pl_PL
dc.referencesMinistry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, 2018, Press Release on the Launch of the FTA.pl_PL
dc.referencesMinistry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of Korea, 2012, Dokdo: Beautiful Island of Korea, Seoul, viewed 30 June 2018, http://dokdo.mofa.go.kr/eng/index.jsppl_PL
dc.referencesMukoyama, H. 2016, “Can Japan and South Korea build a new economic relationship? Recent changes in the global environment may help to repair relations”, Pacific Business and Industries, Vol. XVI, No. 59, The Japan Research Institute, United, viewed 30 June 2018, https://www.jri.co.jp/MediaLibrary/file/english/periodical/rim/2016/59.pdfpl_PL
dc.referencesNegotiations among China, Japan and Korea, November 20, viewed 1 June 2018, https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/press/release/24/11/pdfs/20121120_02_01.pdfpl_PL
dc.referencesNye, J.S. & Keohane, R.O. 1971, “Transnational Relations and world politics: an introduction”, International Organization, Vol. 25(3), pp. 329–349.pl_PL
dc.referencesOros, A.L. 2017, Japan’s Security Renaissance: New Policies and Politics for the Twenty-First Century, Columbia University Press, New York.pl_PL
dc.referencesPark, G. 2012, “A plan for peace in North Asia”, World Street Journal, New York, viewed 30 June 2018, https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323894704578114310294100492pl_PL
dc.referencesPollack, J. 2016, Order at Risk: Japan, Korea and the Northeast Asian Paradox, Brookings Institution, viewed 30 June 2018, https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/fp_20160901_northeast_asian_paradox_v2.pdfpl_PL
dc.referencesRisse, T. 2013, “Transnational actors and world politics” in Carlsnaes, W., Risse, T. & Simmons, B.A. (eds), Handbook of International Relations, Sage Publications Ltd., London, pp. 426–452.pl_PL
dc.referencesRosamond, B. 2005, “The uniting of Europe and the foundation of the EU studies: revisiting the neofunctionalism of Ernst B. Haas”, Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 12(2), pp. 237–254.pl_PL
dc.referencesSaito, H. 2017, The History Problem. The Politics of War Commemoration in East Asia, University of Hawai’i Press, Honolulu.pl_PL
dc.referencesSchmitter, P.C. & Kim, S. 2005, “The experience of european integration and the potential for Northeast Asian integration”, East-West Center Working Papers, viewed 30 June 2018, https://www.eastwestcenter.org/system/tdf/private/PSwp010.pdf?file=1&type=node&id=32082pl_PL
dc.referencesSchneider, C. 2008, “The Japanese history textbook controversy in East Asian perspective”, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 617, pp. 107–122.pl_PL
dc.referencesSmith, S. 2018, “Can Japan and South Korea handle peace with Pyongyang?”, Council on Foreign Relations, May 9, viewed 30 June 2018, https://www.cfr.org/expert-brief/can-japan-and-south-korea-handle-peace-pyongyangpl_PL
dc.referencesStrøby Jensen, C. 2003, “Neo-functionalism” in Cini, M. (ed.), European Union Politics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.pl_PL
dc.referencesTanaka, Y. 2017, ”Comfort women bashin” and Japan’s social formation of hegemonic masculinity” in Lewis, M. (ed.), “History Wars” and Reconciliation in Japan and Korea, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp. 163–182.pl_PL
dc.referencesTrilateral Cooperation Secretariat, 2011, Agreement on Establishment of the Trilateral Cooperation Secretariat among the Governments of The People’s Republic of China, Japan and the Republic of Korea, viewed 1 September 2018, http://www.tcs-asia. org/pdf/Agreement%20on%20the%20Establishment%20of%20the%20Trilateral%20Coopera.pdfpl_PL
dc.referencesTrilateral Cooperation Secretariat, 2017, Annual Report FY2016, Seoul.pl_PL
dc.referencesTrilateral Cooperation Secretariat, 2018, Joint Declaration of the Seventh Japan-China-ROK.pl_PL
dc.referencesTrilateral Summit, Tokyo, May 9, viewed 1 September 2018, http://www.tcs-asia.org/data/file/summits/2038522331_rgaBP8IE_7th_Trilateral_Summit-Relative_Documents.pdfpl_PL
dc.referencesWiegand, K.E. 2015, “The South Korean Japanese security relationship and the Dokdo/ Takeshima islets dispute”, The Pacific Review, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 347–366.pl_PL
dc.referencesWirth, C. 2015, “‘Power’ and ‘stability’ in the China–Japan–South Korea regional security complex”, The Pacific Review, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 553–575.pl_PL
dc.referencesWissenbach, U. 2013, “Barriers to East Asian integration: North East Asia – a nonregion?”, Journal of Global Policy and Governance, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 205–221.pl_PL
dc.referencesWorld Bank, World Integrated Trade Solution, viewed 1 June 2018, https://wits.worldbank.org/pl_PL
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/8220-793-4.13


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe