Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorGovdeli, Tuncer
dc.contributor.authorKarakuş Umar, Esra
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-10T08:41:54Z
dc.date.available2022-03-10T08:41:54Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-17
dc.identifier.issn1508-2008
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/40992
dc.description.abstractThe role of the state within the neoliberal system is discussed in the approaches developed for social expenditures. Accordingly, the question of whether the state should stand back or provide the support needed by individuals has shaped the literaturę on social expenditures. It is thought that the increase in social expenditures affects public expenditures, and public expenditures may indirectly cause budget deficits. In addition, it is said that there is a decrease in social spending during periods of economic growth. All these dilemmas show that the idea that the country needs both producers and consumers while realizing economic growth has been pushed into the background. Here, the analyses of the relationship between social spending and economic growth are the arguments for the accuracy of this assumption.The aim of this study is to empirically analyze the long-term relationship between the economic growth and social expenditures of eight Central European countries and the causality relationship for 1999 and 2019. In the empirical findings, the cointegration relationship was determined between economic growth and social spending. Based on the findings of the causality analysis, it has been concluded that there is a bidirectional causality relationship between economic growth and social expenditures. Policy proposals are given in the conclusion section of the article.en
dc.description.abstractRola państwa w systemie neoliberalnym jest omawiana w ramach koncepcji opracowanych dla wydatków społecznych. W związku z tym pytanie, czy państwo powinno pozostawać bierne, czy też udzielać obywatelom potrzebnego wsparcia, ukształtowało piśmiennictwo dotyczące zagadnienia wydatków socjalnych. Uważa się, że wzrost wydatków socjalnych wpływa na wydatki publiczne, a wydatki publiczne mogą pośrednio powodować deficyty budżetowe. Ponadto mówi się, że w okresach wzrostu gospodarczego następuje spadek wydatków socjalnych. Wszystko to wskazuje, że teoria mówiąca, że dla realizacji wzrostu gospodarczego państwo potrzebuje zarówno producentów, jak i konsumentów, została zepchnięty na dalszy plan. Analizy relacji między wydatkami socjalnymi a wzrostem gospodarczym są argumentami potwierdzającymi słuszność tego stwierdzenia.Celem niniejszego opracowania jest empiryczna analiza długookresowego związku między wzrostem gospodarczym a wydatkami socjalnymi ośmiu państw Europy Środkowej oraz związku przyczynowego dla lat 1999 i 2019. Za pomocą badań empirycznych ustalono związek kointegracji między wzrostem gospodarczym a wydatkami socjalnymi. Na podstawie wyników analizy przyczynowości stwierdzono, że istnieje dwukierunkowa zależność między wzrostem gospodarczym a wydatkami socjalnymi. Sugestie dla polityki są podane w końcowej części artykułu.pl
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesComparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe;4pl
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectsocial expendituresen
dc.subjecteconomic growthen
dc.subjectpolitical economyen
dc.subjectCentral European countriesen
dc.subjectpanel dataen
dc.subjectwydatki socjalnepl
dc.subjectwzrost gospodarczypl
dc.subjectekonomia politycznapl
dc.subjectpaństwa Europy Środkowejpl
dc.subjectdane panelowepl
dc.titleDynamic Linkages between Social Expenditures and Economic Growth: the Most Important Conclusions for Central European Countriesen
dc.title.alternativeDynamiczne powiązania między wydatkami socjalnymi a wzrostem gospodarczym: najważniejsze wnioski dla krajów Europy Środkowejpl
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number7-21
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationGovdeli, Tuncer - Assoc. Prof., Oltu Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Ataturk Oltu Yerleşkesi, Yusuf Ziyabey Mahallesi, Sanayi Caddesi, Erzurum, Turkeyen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationKarakuş Umar, Esra - Asst. Prof. Dr. Oltu Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Ataturk Oltu Yerleşkesi, Yusuf Ziyabey Mahallesi, Sanayi Caddesi, Erzurum, Turkeyen
dc.identifier.eissn2082-6737
dc.references2018 Sosyal Koruma İstatistikleri (2019), http://www.alomaliye.com/2019/12/12/2018-sosyal-koruma-istatistikleri/ (accessed: 12.12.2020).en
dc.referencesAlataş, S., Sarı, E. (2021), An Empirical Investigation on Regional Disparities in Public Expenditures: Province Level Evidence from Turkey, “Social Indicators Research”, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02691-xen
dc.referencesAltunc, O.F., Aydın, C. (2013), The relationship between optimal size of government and economic growth: Empirical evidence from Turkey, Romania and Bulgaria, “Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences”, 92, pp. 66–75, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.639en
dc.referencesArısoy, İ., Ünlükaplan, İ., Ergen, Z. (2010), Sosyal harcamalar ve iktisadi büyüme ilişkisi: Türkiye ekonomisinde 1960–2005 dönemine yönelik bir dinamik analiz, “Maliye Dergisi”, 158, pp. 398–421, https://ms.hmb.gov.tr/uploads/2019/09/20.Ibrahim.ARISOY_Ilter.UNLUKAPLAN_Zuhal.ERGEN_.pdf (accessed: 3.02.2021).en
dc.referencesBaum, N.D., Lin, S. (1993), The differential effects on economic growth of government expenditures on education, welfare, and defense, “Journal of Economic Development”, 18 (1), pp. 175–185, http://www.jed.or.kr/full-text/18-1/9.pdf (accessed: 3.02.2021).en
dc.referencesBeveridge, W. (1942), The Beveridge report in brief: [a summary of] Social insurance and allied services: report by Sir William Beveridge. “HM Stationery Office”, https://www.sochealth.co.uk/national-health-service/public-health-and-wellbeing/beveridge-report/ (accessed: 3.02.2021).en
dc.referencesBreusch, T.S., Pagan, A.R. (1980), The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics, “The Review of Economic Studies”, 47 (1), pp. 239–253, https://www.jstor.org/stable/2297111?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents (accessed: 3.02.2021).en
dc.referencesChantzaras, A.E., Yfantopoulos, J.N. (2018), Financial protection of households against health shocks in Greece during the economic crisis, “Social Science & Medicine”, 211, pp. 338–351, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.06.024en
dc.referencesCinel, E. (2021), Türkiye’de Eğitim Harcamaları ve Sürdürülebilir Büyüme İlişkisi, “Avrasya Sosyal ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi”, 8 (2), pp. 210–227.en
dc.referencesDevarajan, S., Swaroop, V., Zou, H.F. (1996), The composition of public expenditure and economic growth, “Journal of Monetary Economics”, 37 (2), pp. 313–344, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3932(96)90039-2en
dc.referencesEmirmahmutoglu, F., Kose, N. (2011), Testing for Granger causality in heterogeneous mixed panels, “Economic Modelling”, 28 (3), pp. 870–876, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2010.10.018en
dc.referencesErsin, İ., Baş, H. (2019), Güney Avrupa refah ülkelerinde sosyal harcamalar ve ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi, “SGD Sosyal Güvenlik Dergisi”, 9 (1), pp. 193–213, https://doi.org/10.32331/sgd.582752en
dc.referencesEsping-Andersen, G. (1990), The three worlds of welfare capitalism, Princeton University Press, Princeton.en
dc.referencesFerrera, M. (1996), The “Southern model” of welfare in social Europe, “Journal of European Social Policy”, 6 (1), pp. 17–37, https://doi.org/10.1177/095892879600600102en
dc.referencesGlomm, G., Ravikumar, B. (1997), Productive government expenditures and long-run growth, “Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control”, 21 (1), pp. 183–204, https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1889(95)00929-9en
dc.referencesGümüş, İ. (2018), Tarihsel perspektifte refah devleti: Doğuş, yükseliş ve yeniden yapilanma süreci, „Journal of Political Administrative and Local Studies”, 1 (1), pp. 33–66, https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/473729 (accessed: 3.02.2021).en
dc.referencesHajamini, M., Falahi, M.A. (2018), Economic growth and government size in developed European countries: A panel threshold approach, “Economic Analysis and Policy”, 58, pp. 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2017.12.002en
dc.referencesHerce, J.A., Sosvilla-Rivero IV , S., De Lucio, J.J. (2000), Social protection benefits and growth: evidence from the European Union, “Applied Economics Letters”, 7 (4), pp. 255–258, https://doi.org/10.1080/135048500351627en
dc.referencesIm, K.S., Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y. (2003), Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels, “Journal of Econometrics”, 115 (1), pp. 53–74, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7en
dc.referencesKao, C. (1999), Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data, “Journal of Econometrics”, 90 (1), pp. 1–44, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00023-2en
dc.referencesKar, M., Taban, S. (2003), Kamu harcama çeşitlerinin ekonomik büyümeye etkisi, “Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi”, 58 (3), pp. 159–175, https://doi.org/10.1501/SBFder_0000001652en
dc.referencesKaymaz, V. (2018), OECD Ülkelerinde Sosyal Harcamaların Belirleyicileri, “Gazi İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi”, 4 (2), pp. 118–130, https://doi.org/10.30855/gjeb.2018.4.2.005en
dc.referencesKelly, T. (1997), Public expenditures and growth, “The Journal of Development Studies”, 34 (1), pp. 60–84, https://doi.org/10.1080/00220389708422503en
dc.referencesKonopczynski, M. (2021), How Taxes, Education and Public Capital Influence Economic Growth in Poland, “Contemporary Economics”, 12 (3), pp. 337–360.en
dc.referencesKutluay Şahin, D. (2020), Eğitimin Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerindeki Etkileri: Ab Ülkeleri İçin Panel Veri Analizi, „Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İibf Dergisi”, 10 (2), pp. 657–672, https://doi.org/10.18074/ckuiibfd.717393en
dc.referencesLandau, D. (1986), Government and economic growth in the less developed countries: an empirical study for 1960–1980, “Economic Development and Cultural Change”, 35 (1), pp. 35–75, https://doi.org/10.1086/451572en
dc.referencesLevin, A., Lin, C.F., Chu, C.S.J. (2002), Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite‑sample properties, “Journal of Econometrics”, 108 (1), pp. 1–24, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00098-7en
dc.referencesMcCoskey, S., Kao, C. (1998), A residual-based test of the null of cointegration in panel data, “Econometric Reviews”, 17 (1), pp. 57–84, https://doi.org/10.1080/07474939808800403en
dc.referencesMoon, H.R., Perron, B. (2004), Testing for a unit root in panels with dynamic factors, “Journal of Econometrics”, 122 (1), pp. 81–126, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2003.10.020en
dc.referencesOtani, I., Villanueva, D. (1989), Theoretical aspects of growth in developing countries: External debt dynamics and the role of human capital, “Staff Papers”, 36 (2), pp. 307–342, https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451969443.001en
dc.referencesÖzdemir, S. (2007), Küreselleşme sürecinde refah devleti, İstanbul Ticaret Odası, İstanbul.en
dc.referencesPedroni, P. (1999), Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors, “Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics”, 61 (S1), pp. 653–670, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1653 (accessed: 3.02.2021).en
dc.referencesPesaran, M.H. (2007), A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence, “Journal of Applied Econometrics”, 22 (2), pp. 265–312, https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951en
dc.referencesPesaran, H.M. (2020), General diagnostic tests for cross‑sectional dependence in panels, “Empirical Economics”, 60, pp. 1–38, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-020-01875-7en
dc.referencesPesaran, M.H., Yamagata, T. (2008), Testing slope homogeneity in large panels, “Journal of econometrics”, 142 (1), pp. 50–93, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010en
dc.referencesRakıcı, C., Kurşun, A. (2016), Sosyal refah devletinin tarihi süreci ve günümüz bazı refah devletlerinin değerlendirilmesi, “Uluslararası Ekonomi ve Yenilik Dergisi”, 2 (2), pp. 135–156, https://doi.org/10.20979/ueyd.47794en
dc.referencesTorun, M., Eroğlu, E., Bayrak, R. (2021), Savunma Harcamalarının Ekonomik Büyümeye Etkisi: NATO Ülkeleri Üzerinde Panel Veri Analizi, “Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi”, 19 (40), pp. 489–507, https://doi.org/10.35408/comuybd.877219en
dc.referencesTrofimov, I.D. (2020), Health Care Spending and Economic Growth: Armey-Rahn Curve in a Panel of European Economies, “MPRA Paper No. 106705”, pp. 1–24.en
dc.referencesTutar, K.F., Ekici, M. (2020), Ekonomik Büyümenin Lokomotifi Olan Sağlık Sektörü ve Türkiye Uygulaması, “Journal of Social, Humanities and Administrative Sciences”, 6 (30), pp. 1335–1342.en
dc.referencesTürk, İ. (1979), Maliye politikası Amaçlar, Araçlar ve Çağdaş Bütçe Teorileri, Sevinç Matbaası, Ankara.en
dc.referencesÜnal, S., Afşar, B. (2021), Türkiye’de Sosyal Güvenlik Harcamaları ile Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki İlişki: Eşbütünleşme Analizi ve Granger Nedensellik Testi, “Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi”, 45, pp. 430–439, https://doi.org/10.52642/susbed.929894en
dc.referencesWang, F., Wang, J.D. (2021), Investing preventive care and economic development in ageing societies: empirical evidences from OECD countries, “Health Economics Review”, 11 (1), https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-021-00321-3en
dc.referencesWang, K.M., Lee, Y.M., Lin, C.L., Tsai, Y.C. (2018), The effects of health shocks on life insurance consumption, economic growth, and health expenditure: A dynamic time and space analysis, “Sustainable Cities and Society”, 37, pp. 34–56, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.10.032en
dc.referencesWebber, D.J. (2002), Policies to stimulate growth: should we invest in health or education?, “Applied Economics”, 34 (13), pp. 1633–1643, https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840110115109en
dc.referencesWesterlund, J. (2008), Panel cointegration tests of the Fisher effect, “Journal of Applied Econometrics”, 23 (2), pp. 193–233, https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.967en
dc.referencesWing, Y.C. (2021), A Study on Assessing Government Size, the Composition of Public Spending on Education and Economic Growth in the USA, “Journal of Accounting, Business and Finance Research”, 11 (1), https://doi.org/10.20448/2002.111.1.8en
dc.referencesYıldırım, B., Şahin, F. (2019), Esping-Andersen’in refah devleti sınıflandırması ve makro sosyal hizmet uygulamaları temelinde Türkiye’nin konumu, “OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi”, 11 (18), pp. 2525–2554, https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.542395en
dc.contributor.authorEmailGovdeli, Tuncer - tgovdeli@gmail.com
dc.contributor.authorEmailKarakuş Umar, Esra - esra.umar@atauni.edu.tr
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1508-2008.24.28
dc.relation.volume24


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0