Shortcomings in the Workplace Whistleblower Protection in France: What to Expect from the Transposition of Directive 2019/1937?

Bargain, Gwenola

dc.contributor.author	Bargain, Gwenola
dc.contributor.editor	Skupień, Dagmara
dc.date.accessioned	2021-11-19T09:27:30Z
dc.date.available	2021-11-19T09:27:30Z
dc.date.issued	2021
dc.identifier.citation	Bargain G., Shortcomings in the Workplace Whistleblower Protection in France: What to Expect from the Transposition of Directive 2019/1937?, [in:] Towards a Better Protection of Workplace Whistleblowers in the Visegrad Countries, France and Slovenia, D. Skupień (ed.), WUŁ–WN PWN, Łódź 2021, https://doi.org/10.18778/8220-639-5.04	pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn	978-83-8220-639-5
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11089/39807
dc.description.abstract	At first glance, the French legal framework for whistleblower protection may appear to be particularly well developed. Indeed, since the so-called Sapin II Law, it has offered general criteria to qualify a person as a whistleblower and set procedural and substantive guarantees against possible retaliatory measures. Although advanced, the system is not complete. Its shortcomings are repeatedly mentioned, to the extent that the transposition of European Directive (EU) 2019/1937 of 23 October 2019 is an opportunity to correct the limitations of the current system. No matter if the criteria may be too restrictive, the procedure too constraining or the protective measures insufficient, there are many elements that need to be modified. However, a question may arise as to whether a unitary treatment of the alert is possible when it does not always serve the same purpose.	pl_PL
dc.description.sponsorship	The project is co-financed by the Governments of Czechia, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia through Visegrad Grants from International Visegrad Fund. The mission of the Fund is to advance ideas for sustainable regional cooperation in Central Europe.	pl_PL
dc.language.iso	en	pl_PL
dc.publisher	Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego	pl_PL
dc.relation.ispartof	Towards a Better Protection of Workplace Whistleblowers in the Visegrad Countries, France and Slovenia;
dc.rights	Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe	*
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/	*
dc.subject	Visegrad Countries	pl_PL
dc.subject	Whistleblowers	pl_PL
dc.title	Shortcomings in the Workplace Whistleblower Protection in France: What to Expect from the Transposition of Directive 2019/1937?	pl_PL
dc.type	Book chapter	pl_PL
dc.page.number	49-69	pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation	University of Tours	pl_PL
dc.identifier.eisbn	978-83-8220-640-1
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnote	Associate Professor and Director of the Master course in employment law at the University of Tours. She specializes in private law and labour law. Her research is concerned with the relationship between labour law and economics. Her PhD thesis, written at the University of Nantes, examines the economic analysis of labour law.	pl_PL
dc.references	Adam P., Libertés fondamentales et barémisation: la grande évasion, Revue de droit du travail, 2017.	pl_PL
dc.references	Adam P., A propos de la protection générale des lanceurs d’alerte dans l’entreprise privée (Commentaire de la loi dite « Sapin II » du 9 décembre 2016), Revue de jurisprudence sociale, 5/2017.	pl_PL
dc.references	Alibert J., Foegle J.-F, Première victoire d’un lanceur d’alerte en référé sous l’empire de la loi « Sapin II », La Revue des droits de l’homme [En ligne], Actualités Droits-Libertés, https://journals.openedition.org/revdh/6313, accessed 01/09/2021.	pl_PL
dc.references	Casado A., Lanceur d’alerte : maturation ou estouffade, Bulletin Joly Travail, 2020, p. 44.	pl_PL
dc.references	Chacornac J. (dir.), Lanceurs d’alerte, regards comparatistes, Collection Centre Français de Droit Comparé, Vol. 21, 2019.	pl_PL
dc.references	Frison-Roche M.-A., L’impossible unicité juridique de la catégorie des lanceurs d’alerte, [in:] Chacornac J. (dir.), Lanceurs d’alerte, regards comparatistes, Collection Centre Français de Droit Comparé, Vol. 21, 2019.	pl_PL
dc.references	Icard J., L’alerte individuelle en droit du travail, Droit social, 2017.	pl_PL
dc.references	Leblois-Happe J., La protection pénale du lanceur d’alerte – réflexions théoriques et approche comparatiste, [in:] Chacornac J. (dir.), Lanceurs d’alerte, regards comparatistes, Collection Centre Français de Droit Comparé, Vol. 21, 2019.	pl_PL
dc.references	Leclerc O., Protéger les lanceurs d’alerte: la démocratie technique à l’épreuve de la loi, LGDJ, Paris 2017.	pl_PL
dc.references	Pagnerre Y., Harcèlement, alerte et diffamation : enfin l’harmonie ?, Dalloz, Paris 2016.	pl_PL
dc.references	Pitras A., Le lanceur d’alerte: Etude comparée entre droit français et droit de l’Union européenne, Revue trimestrielle de droit européen, 2020.	pl_PL
dc.references	Robert L., Vers un statut harmonisé du lanceur d’alerte – analyse critique de la directive sur la protection des personnes qui signalent des violations du droit de l’Union, [in:] Chacornac J. (dir.), Lanceurs d’alerte, regards comparatistes, Collection Centre Français de Droit Comparé, Vol. 21, 2019.	pl_PL
dc.references	Schwartz Miralles J., Le lancement d’alertes en droits français et américain, Doctorat, Université Aix-Marseille, 2019.	pl_PL
dc.references	Toubon J., Le regime general de protection des lanceurs d’alerte est-il l’expression d’un droit fundamental?, Semaine Sociale Lamy, 20 May 2019.	pl_PL
dc.identifier.doi	10.18778/8220-639-5.04