Show simple item record

Creation and Extension of Meaning in Professional Communication

dc.contributor.authorIļinska, Larisa
dc.contributor.authorIvanova, Oksana
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-29T15:33:30Z
dc.date.available2021-07-29T15:33:30Z
dc.date.issued2020-09-30
dc.identifier.issn1731-7533
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/38350
dc.description.abstractThe application of different language resources in professional communication reveals the role of cognition in information processing, the interpretive function of language in knowledge construction, and the interrelation of linguistic and extra-linguistic environments. The aim of the present paper is to examine the development of the language of science and the way it is influenced by history, technology, media, genre, and culture. Integrating cognitive approach and pragmatic analysis, the ways of meaning creation and meaning extension have been studied in the popular science texts. Creative thinking and imagination are considered responsible for innovative, creative and insightful thought in general, and, sometimes, for a much wider range of mental activities.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesResearch in Language;3en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectprofessional communicationen
dc.subjectcognitionen
dc.subjectmeaning creationen
dc.subjectinformation structureen
dc.subjectintertextualityen
dc.subjectassociative thinkingen
dc.titleCreation and Extension of Meaning in Professional Communicationen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number283-297
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationIļinska, Larisa - Riga Technical University, Latviaen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationIvanova, Oksana - Riga Technical University, Latviaen
dc.referencesBastien, Claude. 1999. Does context modulate or underlie human knowledge? In Anna Cristina Quelhas and Frederico Péreira (eds.), Cognition and Context. Analise psicologica: Lisbonnes.en
dc.referencesBarthes, Roland. 1968. Elements of Semiology. Hill and Wang.en
dc.referencesBhatia, Vijay K. 1993. Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.en
dc.referencesBotha, W. James. 2012. How does language create meaning? A cognitive perspective. South African Journal of Linguistics 13. 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10118063.1995.9724027en
dc.referencesBrown, Ellen Hodgson J.D. 2008. Web of Debt: The Shocking Truth about Our Money System and How We Can Break Free. Louisiana: Third Millennium Press.en
dc.referencesCarnap, Rudolf. 1937. The Logical Syntax of Language. New York: Harcourt Brace.en
dc.referencesChorafas, Dimitris N. 2011. Cloud Computing Strategies. New York: CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781439834541en
dc.referencesClark, Herbert H. 1996. Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en
dc.referencesCroft, William and D. Alan Cruse. 2012. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en
dc.referencesCroft, William. 2000. Explaining Language Change. London: Longman.en
dc.referencesDavis, Wayne A. 2002. Meaning, Expression, and Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498763en
dc.referencesDomaneschi, Filippo, Carrea, Elena, Penco Carlo and Alberto Greco. 2016. Selecting presuppositions in conditional clauses. Results from a psycholinguistic experiment. Frontiers in Psychology 6. 149–158. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02026en
dc.referencesDoncaster, Sarah. 2013. Representations of Nature in Shakespeare’s King Lear. [Online]. Available from: http://www.shakespeare-online.com [Accessed: 24th April 2018].en
dc.referencesDoniger, Wendy. 2011. The Implied Spider: Politics and Theology in Myth. New York: Columbia University Press.en
dc.referencesEinstein, Albert and Leopold Infeld. 1938[1971]. The Evolution of Physics. The Growth of Ideas from Early Concepts to Relativity and Quanta. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en
dc.referencesEllin, Nan. 2006. Integral Urbanism. London: Routledge.en
dc.referencesEskey, David E. 1986. Theoretical foundations. In Fraida Dubin, David E. Eskey and William Grabe (eds.), Teaching Second Language Reading for Academic Purposes. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.en
dc.referencesEvans, Vyvyan and Melanie Green. 2011. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.en
dc.referencesFauconnier, Gilles and Mark Turner. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.en
dc.referencesFauconnier, Gilles. 1994. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511624582en
dc.referencesFreeman, Margaret. 2006. Blending: A response. Language and Literature 15(1). 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947006063528en
dc.referencesGärdenfors, Peter. 2017. Cognitively Oriented Theories of Meaning. Oxford Research Encyclopaedia of Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.306en
dc.referencesGeeraerts, Dirk. 2016. The sociosemiotic commitment. Cognitive Linguistics 27(4). 527–542. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0058en
dc.referencesGhiazza, Silvana. 1985. Elementi di Metrica Italiana e Cenni di Retorica, Edizioni Levante. Bari: Edizioni levante.en
dc.referencesGonzalo, Roberto and Karl J. Habermann. 2012. Energy-Efficient Architecture: Basics for Planning and Construction. Boston: Birkhauser-Publishers for Architecture.en
dc.referencesHarbison, Robert. 2009. Travels in the History of Architecture. Great Britain: MPG Books Ltd.en
dc.referencesHezaveh, Leyla R., Abdullah, Nurul F. L. and Md Salleh Yaapar. 2014. Revitalizing identity in language: A Kristevan psychoanalysis of Suddenly Last Summer. GEMA Online, Journal of Language Studies 14(2). https://doi.org/10.17576/GEMA-2014-1402-01en
dc.referencesIļinska, Larisa, Platonova, Marina and Tatjana Smirnova. 2015. Information structure of contemporary popular scientific and technical text. In ICT for Language Learning (8th ed.), Italy, Florence, 12–13 November 2015 (pp. 296–300). Padova: Libreriauniversitaria.it edizioni.en
dc.referencesIrvine, Martin. 2016. The grammar of meaning making: Sign systems, symbolic cognition, and semiotics. Communication, Culture & Technology Program. Georgetown University. 1–48.en
dc.referencesJackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic Structures. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press.en
dc.referencesJanssens, Leen and Walter Schaeken. 2016. ‘But’ implicatures: A study of the effect of working memory and argument characteristics. Frontiers in Psychology 7. 159–170. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01520en
dc.referencesKövecses, Zoltán. 2015. Where Metaphors Come from. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.001.0001en
dc.referencesLakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001en
dc.referencesLakoff, George, and Mark Turner. 1989. More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: Chicago University Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001en
dc.referencesLangacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar (vol. 1). Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.en
dc.referencesLangacker, Ronald W. 1991. Concept, Image, and Symbol. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.en
dc.referencesLangacker, Ronald W. 1999. Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110800524en
dc.referencesLeech, Geoffrey. 2008. Language in Literature: Style and Foregrounding. Great Briatin: Pearson Education.en
dc.referencesLeech, Geoffrey. 1981. Semantics: The Study of Meaning. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.en
dc.referencesLeppihalme, Ritva. 1997. Cultural Bump: An Empirical Approach to the Translation of Allusions. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.en
dc.referencesLevy-Strauss, Claude. 1978 [2014]. Myth and Meaning. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442654112en
dc.referencesMontes-Alcalá, Cecilia. (2013). Writing on the border: English y español también. In Imelda Martín-Junquera (ed.), Landscapes of Writing in Chicano Literature. USA: Palgrave Macmillan, 213–230. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137353450_19en
dc.referencesPasco, Allan H. (2002). Allusion: A Literary Graft. Charlottesville: Rookwood Press.en
dc.referencesPeer, van Willie. 1986. Stylistics and Psychology: Investigations of Foregrounding. Routledge Kegan & Paul.en
dc.referencesPohl, Gabriela. 2004. Cross-cultural pragmatic failure and implications for language teaching. SLLT 4, 1–10.en
dc.referencesSchlefer, Jonathan. 2012. The Assumptions Economists Make. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674065529en
dc.referencesSkrebnev, Yury. 2000. Fundamentals of English Stylistics. М: Астрель.en
dc.referencesSperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson. 2002. Pragmatics, modularity and mind-reading. Mind & Language 17. 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00186en
dc.referencesStephens, James. 1975. Francis Bacon and the Style of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.en
dc.referencesTarski, Alfred. 1944. The semantic conception of truth. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4. 341–375. https://doi.org/10.2307/2102968en
dc.referencesTaylor, John. 2003. Polysemy’s paradoxes. Language Sciences 25. 637–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(03)00031-7en
dc.referencesTendahl, Markus and Raymond. W. Gibbs Jr. 2008. Complementary perspectives on metaphor: Cognitive linguistics and relevance theory. Journal of Pragmatics 3. 1823–1864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.02.001en
dc.referencesTrask, Robert L. 2004. Language: The Basics. UK: Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203165287en
dc.referencesWittgenstein, Ludwig. 1974. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Tras. D.F. Pears and B.F. McGuinness. New York: Humanities Press.en
dc.referencesWorton, Michael, and Judith Still. 1990. Intertextuality: Theories and Practices. Manchester: Manchester University Press.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailIļinska, Larisa - larisa.ilinska@rtu.lv
dc.contributor.authorEmailIvanova, Oksana - oksana.ivanova_1@rtu.lv
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1731-7533.18.3.03
dc.relation.volume18


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
10226-Article_Text-26644-1-10- ...
Size:
249.3Kb
Format:
PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0