Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Conflict – Crisis Hierarchy in English News Discourse: Cognitive Rhetorical Perspective

dc.contributor.authorPotapenko, Serhiy I.
dc.contributor.authorShcherbak, Olena M.
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-29T15:29:21Z
dc.date.available2021-07-29T15:29:21Z
dc.date.issued2020-03-30
dc.identifier.issn1731-7533
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/38337
dc.description.abstractThe paper argues that in English on-line news the meanings of the conflict and crisis terms serve as reference points for the construction of a confrontation hierarchy. It is based on the interaction of the relations of force, serving as primes for meaning formation, with three levels of discourse prominence meant to attract, focus and keep the addressee’s attention in headings, headlines and throughout the text respectively. It is found that news stories arrange the units of conflict – crisis hierarchy according to three patterns: zoom-in, offering a detailed textual representation of confrontation with support of the argumentation sections of evidence, explanation or commentary; zoom-out, generalizing on the forces, underlying confrontation construction; multiperspectivation, aimed at a multifaceted representation of conflict – crisis hierarchy.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesResearch in Language;1en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectcrisien
dc.subjectconflicten
dc.subjectconfrontationen
dc.subjectEnglish news discourseen
dc.subjectcognitive rhetoricen
dc.titleConflict – Crisis Hierarchy in English News Discourse: Cognitive Rhetorical Perspectiveen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number53-67
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationPotapenko, Serhiy I. - Kyiv National Linguistic University, Ukraineen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationShcherbak, Olena M. - Nikolai Gogol State University at Nizhyn, Ukraineen
dc.referencesAdkins, Gabriel L. 2010. Organizational Networks in Disaster Response: An Examination of the US Government Network’s Efforts in Hurricane Katrina. In: W. Timothy Coombs and Sherry J. Holladay (eds.), The Handbook of Crisis Communication, 93-114. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444314885.ch4en
dc.referencesAczél, Petra. 2016. Virtual rhetoric. A theoretical approach. Res Rhetorica, 3(4), 1-15. Available from: https://resrhetorica.com/index.php/RR/article/view/168 [Accessed: 18th September 2020]en
dc.referencesBitzer, Lloyd. 1968. The Rhetorical Situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1, 1-14.en
dc.referencesBray, Peter and Marta Rzepecka. 2018. Introduction. Communication and conflict. In P. Bray and M. Rzepecka (eds.), Communication and Conflict in Multiple Settings, 1-12. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004373679en
dc.referencesBrowse, Sam. 2018. Cognitive Rhetoric: The Cognitive Poetics of Political Discourse. Amsterdam (Phil.): John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.31en
dc.referencesBurke, Michael. 2016. Discourse implicature, Quintilian and the Lucidity Principle: rhetorical phenomena in pragmatics. Topics in Linguistics, 17(1), 1-16. Available from: https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/topling/17/1/article-p1.xml [Accessed: 18th September 2020] https://doi.org/10.1515/topling-2016-0001en
dc.referencesCoombs, W. Timothy. 2010. Parameters for crisis communication. In W. T. Coombs and S. J. Holladay (eds.), The Handbook of Crisis Communication, 17-53. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.en
dc.referencesCramer, Peter A. 2011. Controversy as News Discourse. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer Science + Business Media.en
dc.referencesCroucher, Stephen M. 2017. Changes in conflict over time. A longitudinal examination of conflict-style approaches. In B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, P. A. Wilson, S. M. Croucher (eds.), Approaches to Conflict: Theoretical, Interpersonal, and Discursive Dynamics, 33-42. Lanham: Lexington Books.en
dc.referencesDąbrovska, Ewa and Dagmar Divijak. 2019. Introduction. In E. Dąborvska and D. Divijak (ed.), Cognitive Linguistics Foundations of Language, 1-10. Berlin / Boston: Walter de Gruyter.en
dc.referencesDancygier, Barbara and Eve Sweetser. 2014. Figurative Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en
dc.referencesDemmers, Jolle. 2012. Theories of Violent Conflict: An Introduction. London, New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203869512en
dc.referencesDijk, Teun van. 1985. Structures of News in the Press. In Teun Dijk van (ed.), Discourse and Communication, 69-93. Berlin: De Gruyter.en
dc.referencesFreedman, Des. 2019. "Public service" and the journalism crisis: Is the BBC the answer? Television and News Media, 20 (3), 203-218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476418760985en
dc.referencesHeath, Robert. 2010. Introduction. In W. T. Coombs and S. J. Holladay (eds.), The Handbook of Crisis Communication, 1-13. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.en
dc.referencesHolladay, Sherry. 2010. Are They Practicing What We Are Preaching? An Investigation of Crisis Communication Strategies in the Media Coverage of Chemical Accidents. In W. T. Coombs and S. J. Holladay (eds.), The Handbook of Crisis Communication, 159-180. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444314885.ch7en
dc.referencesHoxha, Abit and Thomas Hanitzsch. 2018. How conflict news comes into being: Reconstructing reality through telling stories. Media, War & Conflict, 11(1), 22-45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635217727313en
dc.referencesJohnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.en
dc.referencesJohnson, Mark. 2005. The philosophical significance of image schemas. In B. Hampe (ed.), From Perception to Meaning. Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics, 15-33. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001en
dc.referencesKnoblock, Natalia. 2020. Introduction. In N. Knoblock (ed.), Language of Conflict: Discourses of Ukrainian Crisis, 1-15. New York: Bloomsbury Academic https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350098633.0005en
dc.referencesKuypers, Jim. 1997. Presidential Crisis Rhetoric and the Press in the Post-Cold War World. Westport: Praeger Publishers.en
dc.referencesKwiatkowska, Alina. 2012. From the editor. In A.Kwiatkowska (ed.), Texts and Minds: Papers in Cognitive Poetics and Rhetoric, 7-10. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-04564-2en
dc.referencesMakhotykh, Mykola and Maryna Sydorova. 2017. Social media & visual framing of the conflict in eastern Ukraine. Media, War & Conflict, 10 (3), 359-381. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635217702539en
dc.referencesLDOCE: Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. Available from: https://www.ldoceonline.com/ [Accessed: 18th September 2020]en
dc.referencesOALD: Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. Available from: https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/ [Accessed: 18th September 2020]en
dc.referencesOjala, Marcus and Mervi Pantti. 2017. Naturalising the new cold war: The geopolitics of framing the Ukrainian conflict in four European newspapers. Global Media and Communication, 13, 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766517694472en
dc.referencesPasitselska, Olga. 2017. Ukrainian crisis through the lens of Russian media: Construction of ideological discourse. Discourse and Communication, 11, 591-609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481317714127en
dc.referencesRzepecka, Marta. 2018. Analyzing President Obama’s crisis rhetoric: The case of Syria. Tekst i Dyskurs, 11, 405-425. Available from: http://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.desklight-b901e794-d90f-4558-8e26-e553e9951b51 [Accessed: 18th September 2020]en
dc.referencesSchnabel, Albrecht and David Carment. 2004. Mainstreaming conflict prevention: From Rhetoric to reality. In S. Albrecht and D. Carment (eds.), Conflict Prevention: From Rhetoric to Reality, vol. 1, 3-21. Lanbam: Lexington Books.en
dc.referencesTalmy, Leonard. 2000. Force dynamics in language and cognition. In L. Talmy (ed.) Concept Structuring Systems, vol. 1, 409-470. Cambridge (Mass): The MIT Press.en
dc.referencesWatanabe, Kohei. 2017. Measuring news bias: Russia’s official news agency ITAR-TASS’ coverage of the Ukraine crisis. European Journal of Communication, 32, 224–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323117695735en
dc.contributor.authorEmailPotapenko, Serhiy I. - potapenkoknlu@gmail.com
dc.contributor.authorEmailShcherbak, Olena M. - lenadfkz2@ukr.net
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1731-7533.18.1.04
dc.relation.volume18


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Nazwa:
9950-Article_Text-25934-1-10-2 ...
Rozmiar:
441.2KB
Format:
PDF
Oglądaj/Otwórz

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0