Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorKoralewska, Inga
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-18T12:28:43Z
dc.date.available2021-02-18T12:28:43Z
dc.date.issued2020-05-31
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/33725
dc.description.abstractThe article herein analyzes the contemporary discourse of social sciences with regard to the presence of research on abortion within it. Abortion is a regular medical practice in the world. At the same time, it is one of the most controversial yet vivid topics of public discussions, engaging religious, feminist, and political circles. In my paper, I am looking for an answer to the question about whether the popularity of this subject in the public sphere is reflected within the discourse of social sciences. I am interested in how focusing the discourse on particular research perspectives – individual, social, institutional, and methodological – constructs ‘the sociology of abortion.’ The analysis of the discourse on abortion shows that research on abortion in the most prestigious academic journals concerns mostly the Anglo-American societies. Moreover, research on abortion constitutes a small percentage of all articles published in the analyzed social-sciences journals, while the dominant perspective involves researching abortion through the prism of social opinions. The least attention is paid to researching abortion from the individual perspective that involves the experiences of those women who have had abortion.en
dc.description.abstractW niniejszym artykule analizuję współczesny dyskurs nauk społecznych pod kątem obecności w nim badań nad przerywaniem ciąży. Aborcja jest często występującym zabiegiem medycznym, a jednocześnie stanowi jeden z najgorętszych przedmiotów debaty publicznej angażujący środowiska religijne, feministyczne i polityczne. W artykule szukam odpowiedzi na pytanie, czy popularność tego tematu w sferze publicznej znajduje odzwierciedlenie w dyskursie nauk społecznych. Interesuje mnie to, w jaki sposób skupienie dyskursu na konkretnych perspektywach badania aborcji – indywidualnej, społecznej i instytucjonalnej, a także dyskursywnej i metodologicznej – konstruuje „socjologię aborcji”. Analiza dyskursu na temat aborcji pokazuje, że badania nad aborcją w najbardziej prestiżowych czasopismach odnoszą się głównie do świata anglosaskiego. Ponadto badania aborcji stanowią niewielki procent artykułów w analizowanych czasopismach z zakresu nauk społecznych, a dominująca perspektywa to badanie aborcji przez pryzmat opinii społecznych na jej temat. Najmniej uwagi poświęca się natomiast perspektywie indywidualnej i doświadczeniom kobiet, które przerwały ciążę.pl
dc.language.isopl
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPrzegląd Socjologii Jakościowej;2pl
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectabortionen
dc.subjectsociology of abortionen
dc.subjectdiscourse of social sciencesen
dc.subjectaborcjapl
dc.subjectsocjologia aborcjipl
dc.subjectdyskurs nauk społecznychpl
dc.title„Socjologia aborcji”. Sposoby przedstawiania aborcji we współczesnym dyskursie nauk społecznychpl
dc.title.alternative‘The Sociology of Abortion’: Ways of Representing Abortion in the Contemporary Discourse of Social Sciencesen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number170-187
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationInstytut Socjologii UJpl
dc.identifier.eissn1733-8069
dc.referencesArnold Fred, Sunita Kishor, Roy Tanmay Kumar (2002) Sex Selective Abortions in India. „Population and Development Review”, vol. 2, s. 759–85.pl
dc.referencesBanaszak Ann Lee (1998) East-West Differences In German Abortion Opinion. „Public Opinion Quarterly”, vol. 62, s. 545–582.pl
dc.referencesBanks Olive (1999) Women’s History Review Some reflections on gender, sociology and Women’s history Some Reflections on Gender, Sociology and Women’s History. „Women’s History Review”, vol. 8, s. 401–410.pl
dc.referencesBaumeister Roy E., Leary Mark R. (1997) Writing Narrative Literature Reviews. „Review of General Psychology”, vol. 1, s. 311–320.pl
dc.referencesBegun Stephanie i in. (2018) “I Know They Would Kill Me”: Abortion Attitudes and Experiences Among Youth Experiencing Homelessness. „Youth & Society”, vol. s. 1– 22.pl
dc.referencesBeisel Nicola, Kay Tamara (2004) Abortion, Race, and Gender in Nineteenth-Century America. „American Sociological Review”, vol. 69, s. 498–518.pl
dc.referencesBerger Peter, Luckmann Thomas (2010) Społeczne tworzenie rzeczywistości. Przełożył Józef Niżnik. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.pl
dc.referencesBeynon-Jones Siân M. (2011) Timing is everything: The demarcation of ‘later’ abortions in Scotland. „Social Studies of Science”, vol. 42. s. 53–74.pl
dc.referencesBeynon-Jones Siân M. (2015) Re-visioning Ultrasound through Women’s Accounts of Pre-abortion Care in England. „Gender and Society”, vol. 29, s. 694–715.pl
dc.referencesBielecka-Prus Joanna, Horolets Anna (2013) Rekonstrukcja praktyk analizy dyskursu na podstawie wybranych anglojęzycznych czasopism dyskursywnych. „Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej”, t. 9, s. 153–185.pl
dc.referencesBoyle Elizabeth H., Kim Minzee, Longhofer Wesley (2015) Abortion Liberalization in World Society, 1960-2009. „American Journal of Sociology”, vol. 121, s. 882–913.pl
dc.referencesBurawoy Michael (2004) Public Sociologies: Contradictions, Dilemmas, and Possibilities. „Social Forces”, vol. 82, s. 1603–1618.pl
dc.referencesCarol Sarah, Milewski Nadja (2017) Attitudes toward Abortion among the Muslim Minority and Non-Muslim Majority in Cross-National Perspective: Can Religiosity Explain the Differences? „Sociology of Religion: A Quarterly Review”, vol. 78, s. 456–491.pl
dc.referencesCochran John K. i in. (1996) Religious Stability, Endogamy, and the Effects of Personal Religiosity on Attitudes toward Abortion. „Sociology of Religion”, vol. 57, s. 291–309.pl
dc.referencesColeman Priscilla K. (2006) Resolution of Unwanted Pregnancy During Adolescence Through Abortion Versus Childbirth: Individual and Family Predictors and Psychological Consequences. „Journal of Youth Adolescence”, vol. 35, s. 903–911pl
dc.referencesCraig C. Stephen, Kane G. James, Martinez D. Michael (2002) Sometimes You Feel Like a Nut, Sometimes You Don’t: Citizens’ Ambivalence About Abortion. „Political Psychology”, vol. 23, s. 285–301.pl
dc.referencesCurtis James E., Petras John W. (1972) The Sociology of Sociology: Some Lines of Inquiry in the Study of the Discipline. „The Sociological Quarterly”, vol. 13, s. 197–209.pl
dc.referencesDijk Teun van (1993) Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis. „Discourse & Society”, vol. 4, s. 249–283.pl
dc.referencesDillon Michelle (1996) Cultural Differences in the Abortion Discourse of the Catholic Church: Evidence from Four Countries. „Sociology of Religion”, vol. 57, s. 25–36.pl
dc.referencesDubuc Sylvie, Coleman David (2007) An Increase in the Sex Ratio of Births to India-Born Mothers inpl
dc.referencesEngland and Wales: Evidence for Sex-Selective Abortion. „Population and Development Review”, vol. 33, s. 383–400.pl
dc.referencesFoucault Michel (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Pantheon.pl
dc.referencesFoucault Michel (2002) The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. London, New York: Routledge.pl
dc.referencesGantman Ernesto, R. Yousfi Hela, Alcadipani Rafael (2015) Challenging Anglo-Saxon Dominance In Management And Organizational Knowledge. „Revista de Administração de Empresas”, vol. 55, s. 126–129.pl
dc.referencesGee Paul James (2015) Literacy, discourse, and linguistics: introduction. „The Journal of Education”, vol. 171, s. 5–176.pl
dc.referencesGouldner Alvin W. (1962) Anti-Minotaur: The Myth of Value-Free Sociology. „Social Problems”, vol. 9, s. 199–213.pl
dc.referencesHalman Loek, Ingen Erik van (2015) Secularization and Changing Moral Views. European Trends in Church Attendance and Views on Homosexuality, Divorce, Abortion, and Euthanasia. „European Sociological Review”, vol 3, s. 1–12.pl
dc.referencesHipsz Natalia (2013) Doświadczenia aborcyjne Polek. Warszawa: CBOS, s. 1–8.pl
dc.referencesHoffmann John P., Johnson Sherrie Mills (2005) Attitudes toward Abortion among Religious Traditions in the United States: Change or Continuity? „Sociology of Religion”, vol. 66, s. 161–182.pl
dc.referencesHondegneu-Sotelo Pierrette (1999) Introduction. Gender and Contemporary U.S. Immigration. „American Behavioral Scientist”, vol. 42, s. 565–576.pl
dc.referencesHuckfeldt Robert, Sprague John (2000) Political Consequences of Inconsistency: The Accessibility and Stability of Abortion Attitudes. „Political Psychology”, vol. 21, s. 57–79.pl
dc.referencesKelly Kimberly, Grant Lidia (2007) State Abortion and Nonmarital Birthrates In The Post – Welfare Reform Era. The Impact of Economic Incentives on Reproductive Behaviors of Teenage and Adult Women. „Gender and Society”, vol. 21, s. 878–904.pl
dc.referencesLara Diana i in. (2004) Measuring Induced Abortion in Mexico: A Comparison of Four Methodologies. „Sociological Methods and Research”, vol. 32, s. 529–558.pl
dc.referencesLara Diana i in. (2006) The Measure of Induced Abortion Levels in Mexico. „Sociological Methods & Research”, vol. 35, no. 2, s. 279–301.pl
dc.referencesLevels Mark i in. (2010). Unintended Pregnancy and Induced Abortion in the Netherlands 1954–2002. „European Sociological Review”, vol. 28, s. 301–318.pl
dc.referencesLie Mabel, Robson Stephen C., May Carl R. (2008) Experiences of abortion: a narrative review of qualitative studies. „BMC Health Services Research”, vol. 8, s. 1–9.pl
dc.referencesMarshall Gordon (1983) On the sociology of women’s unemployment, its neglect and significance. „The Sociological Review”, vol. 32, s. 234–259.pl
dc.referencesMouw Ted, Sobel Michael T. (2001) Culture Wars and Opinion Polarization: The Case of Abortion. „American Journal of Sociology”, vol. 106, s. 913–943.pl
dc.referencesMyrdal Gunnar (1959) Values in Social Theory. New York: Harper.pl
dc.referencesNorris Alison i in. (2011) Abortion Stigma: A Reconceptualization of Constituents, Causes, and Consequences. „Women’s Health Issues”, vol. 21, s. 49–54.pl
dc.referencesPacheco Julianna, Kreitzer Rebecca (2016) Adolescent Determinants Of Abortion Attitudes Evidence From The Children Of The National Longitudinal Survey Of Youth. „Public Opinion Quarterly”, vol. 80, s. 66–89.pl
dc.referencesPeytchev Andy, Peytcheva Emilia, Groves Robert M. (2010) Measurement Error, Unit Nonresponse, and Self-Reports of Abortion Experiences. „Public Opinion Quarterly”, vol. 74, s. 319– 327.pl
dc.referencesPurcell Carrie (2015) The Sociology of Women’s Abortion Experiences: Recent Research and Future Directions. „Social Compass”, vol. 9/7, s. 585–596.pl
dc.referencesPurcell Carrie, Hilton Shona, McDaid Lisa (2014) The stigmatisation of abortion: a qualitative analysis of print media in Great Britain in 2010. „Culture, Health & Sexuality”, vol. 16, s. 1141– 1155.pl
dc.referencesSanger Carol (2016) Talking About Abortion. „Social & Legal Studies”, vol. 25, s. 651–666.pl
dc.referencesScott Jaqueline (1998) Generational Changes in Attitudes to Abortion: A Cross-National Comparison. „European Sociological Review”, vol. 14, s. 177–190.pl
dc.referencesSedgh Gilda i in. (2016) Abortion incidence between 1990 and 2014: global, regional, and subregional levels and trends. New York: World Health Organization.pl
dc.referencesShaw Greg M. (2003) The Polls - Trends Abortion. „Public Opinion Quarterly”, vol. 67 s. 407–429.pl
dc.referencesSiddaway Andy P., Wood Alex M., Hedges Larry V. (2018) How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Syntheses. „Annual Review of Psychology”, vol. 70, s. 9.1–9.24.pl
dc.referencesSinger Eleanor, Couper Mick P. (2014) The Effect of Question Wording on Attitudes Toward Prenatal Testing And Abortion. „Public Opinion Quarterly”, vol. 78, s. 751–760.pl
dc.referencesSisson Gretchen, Kimport Katrina (2014) Telling stories about abortion: abortion-related plots in American film and television, 1916–2013. „Contraception”, vol. 89, s. 413–418.pl
dc.referencesThe Global Gender Gap Report (2018) World Economic Forum [dostęp 15 grudnia 2019 r.]. Dostępny w Internecie: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2018.pdfpl
dc.referencesTomal Anette (2001) The Effect of Religious Membership on Teen Abortion Rates. „Journal of Youth and Adolescence”, vol. 30, s. 103–116.pl
dc.referencesUnnever James D., Bartkowski John P., Cullen Francis T. (2010) God Imagery and Opposition to Abortion and Capital Punishment: A Partial Test of Religious Support for the Consistent Life Ethic. „Sociology of Religion”, vol. 71, s. 307–322.pl
dc.referencesWejbert-Wąsiewicz Ewelina (2011) Aborcja – między ideologią a doświadczeniem indywidualnym. Monografia zjawiska. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.pl
dc.referencesZaidi Batool, Morgan Philip S. (2016) In the Pursuit of Sons: Additional Births or Sex-Selective Abortion in Pakistan? „Population and Development Review”, vol. 42, s. 693–710.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailInga.koralewska@doctoral.uj.edu.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1733-8069.16.2.10
dc.relation.volume16


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0