Event structure as a metonymic target and vehicle in the languages of the deaf

KOSECKI, KRZYSZTOF

dc.contributor.author	KOSECKI, KRZYSZTOF
dc.contributor.editor	Badio, Janusz
dc.date.accessioned	2021-02-01T11:15:16Z
dc.date.available	2021-02-01T11:15:16Z
dc.date.issued	2020
dc.identifier.citation	Kosecki, K. (2020). Event structure as a metonymic target and vehicle in the languages of the deaf. In. J. Badio (Ed.),Focus on events and narratives in language, psychology, social and medical practice, (pp. 77-88). Łódź: WUŁ, http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/8220-051-5.07	pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn	978-83-8220-051-5
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11089/33254
dc.description.abstract	The paper addresses the issue of event structure in the languages of the deaf. Basing on cognitive linguistic view of metonymy as a pervasive and multi-dimensional conceptual mechanism (Blank, 1999; Lakoff, 1987; Radden & Kövecses, 1999), it argues that signed languages employ parts of events to access whole events, and that actions, objects, locations and other elements of event structure also provide mental access to such concepts as animals, food, instruments, locations, professions, and sports.	pl_PL
dc.language.iso	en	pl_PL
dc.publisher	Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego	pl_PL
dc.relation.ispartof	Focus on events and narratives in language, psychology, social and medical practice;
dc.relation.ispartofseries	Łódzkie Studia z Językoznawstwa Angielskiego i Ogólnego;9
dc.rights	Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe	*
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/	*
dc.subject	articulation	pl_PL
dc.subject	metonymy	pl_PL
dc.subject	signed language	pl_PL
dc.subject	event	pl_PL
dc.subject	profession	pl_PL
dc.title	Event structure as a metonymic target and vehicle in the languages of the deaf	pl_PL
dc.type	Book chapter	pl_PL
dc.page.number	77-88	pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation	Uniwersytet Łódzki, Wydział Filologiczny	pl_PL
dc.identifier.eisbn	978-83-8220-052-2
dc.references	Blank, A. (1999). Co-presence and succession: A cognitive typology of metonymy. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in Language and Thought, (pp. 169– 191). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.	pl_PL
dc.references	Bonhomme, M. (1987). Linguistique De La Métonymie [Linguistics of metonymy]. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.	pl_PL
dc.references	Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	ESLC [European Sign Language Centre]. 2019. Sign Language Dictionary. Retrieved June 25, 2019, from http://www.spreadthesign.com.	pl_PL
dc.references	Evans, V. & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Fass, D. C. (1997). Processing Metonymy and Metaphor. Greenwich, CO: Ablex Publishing Corporation.	pl_PL
dc.references	Jacques, E. (1982). The Form of Time. New York: Crane Russak.	pl_PL
dc.references	Kalisz, R. (2001). Językoznawstwo kognitywne w świetle językoznawstwa funkcjonalnego [Cognitive Linguistics in Light of Functional Linguistics]. Gdańsk: Gdańsk University Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Johnston, T. A. & Schembri, A. (2007). Australian Sign Language (Auslan): An Introduction to Sign Language Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Kosiba, O. & Grenda, P. (2011). Leksykon Języka Migowego [Lexicon of Sign Language]. Bogatynia, Poland: Wydawnictwo “Silentium”.	pl_PL
dc.references	Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Kövecses, Z. (2006). Language, Mind, and Culture: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.	pl_PL
dc.references	Langacker, R. W. (1993). Reference-point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 4, 1–38.	pl_PL
dc.references	Narayan, S. (1997a). Embodiment in Language Understanding: Sensory-Motor Representations for Metaphoric Reasoning about Event Descriptions. PhD dissertation, Department of Computer Science, University of California, Berkeley.	pl_PL
dc.references	Narayan, S. (1997b). Talking the talk is like walking the walk: A computational model of verbal aspect. In M. G. Shafto & P. Langley (Eds.), Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, (pp. 548–553). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.	pl_PL
dc.references	Norrick, N. R. (1981). Semiotic Principles in Semantic Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.	pl_PL
dc.references	Radden, G. & Kövecses, Z. (1999). Towards a theory of metonymy. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in Language and Thought, (pp. 17–59). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.	pl_PL
dc.references	Rodríguez-Redondo, A.-L. (2018). Metonymy and the dynamics of conceptual operations in Spanish Sign Language. In O. Blanco Carrión, A. Barcelona, & R. Pannain (Eds.), Conceptual Metonymy: Methodological, Theoretical, and Descriptive Issues, (pp. 287–310). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.	pl_PL
dc.references	Seto, K. (1999). Distinguishing metonymy from synecdoche. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought, (pp. 91–120). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.	pl_PL
dc.references	Smith, C. (2010). Sign Language Companion: A Handbook of British Signs. London: Souvenir Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Taub, S. F. (2001). Language in the Body: Iconicity and Metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Taylor, J. R. (1995). Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Valli, C. & Lucas, C. (2000). Linguistics of American Sign Language: An Introduction. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Wilcox, P. P. (2004). A cognitive key: Metonymic and metaphorical mappings in ASL. Cognitive Linguistics, 15, 197–222.	pl_PL
dc.references	Wilcox, S. (2008). Signed languages. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics, (pp. 1113–1136). Oxford: Oxford University Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Wilcox, S., Wilcox, P. P., & Jarque, M. J. (2003). Mappings in conceptual space: Metonymy, metaphor, and iconicity in two signed languages. Jezikoslovlje [Linguistics], 4(1), 139–156.	pl_PL
dc.references	Zacks, J. M. & Tversky, B. (2001). Event structure in perception and conception. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 3–21.	pl_PL
dc.references	Zucchi, S. (2017). Event categorization in signed languages. In H. Cohen & C. Lefebvre (Eds.), Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science, (pp. 377–396). Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.	pl_PL
dc.identifier.doi	10.18778/8220-051-5.07