Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMohammadpur, Ahmad
dc.contributor.authorCorbin, Juliet
dc.contributor.authorRasoul Sadeghi, Rasoul
dc.contributor.authorMehdi Rezaei, Mehdi
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-20T09:10:46Z
dc.date.available2020-11-20T09:10:46Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationMohammadpur, Ahmad, Juliet Corbin, Rasoul Sadeghi and Mehdi Rezaei. 2012. “Family Changes in Iranian Kurdistan: A Mixed Methods Study of Mangor and Gawerk Tribes.” Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej 8(3):76-96. Retrieved Month, Year (http://www.przegladsocjologiijakosciowej.org).pl_PL
dc.identifier.issn1733-8069
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/32572
dc.description.abstractOver the last few decades, the Iranian Kurdish society, including family and kinship systems, has experienced enormous changes as a result of government implemented modernization efforts. This paper reports the results of a quantitative/ qualitative mixed methods study aimed at exploring (a) the nature of change in family and kinship systems and (b) how people understand and interpret these changes. The sample for this study was drawn from the Mangor and Gawerk tribes residing in the Mahabad Township located in the West Azerbaijan Province of Iran. Using standardized questionnaires, 586 people were sampled as part of the quantitative portion of the study. For the qualitative portion, data was collected on 20 people using both in-depth interviews and participant observations. The quantitative data was analyzed by SPSS software and the qualitative data was interpreted using grounded theory procedures. The quantitative findings showed that the urbanization, modern education, and mass media have all contributed to the emergence of a new form of family and kinship life. In addition, while supporting quantitative findings, the qualitative results revealed that participants were aware of and sensitive to sources, processes, and effects of modernization on their family and kinship life.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherUniwersytet Łódzkipl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPrzegląd Socjologii Jakościowej;3
dc.subjectFamily Changespl_PL
dc.subjectModernization Mixed Methods Researchpl_PL
dc.subjectGrounded Theorypl_PL
dc.subjectMangor and Gawerk Tribespl_PL
dc.titleFamily Changes in Iranian Kurdistan: A Mixed Methods Study of Mangor and Gawerk Tribespl_PL
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.page.number76-96pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationBu Ali Sina University, Iranpl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Alberta, Canadapl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Tehran, Iranpl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Tehran, Iranpl_PL
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnoteAhmad Mohammadpur is an Iranian Kurdish sociologist and ethnographer at Bu Ali Sina University in Hamedan, Iran. He has conducted fieldwork on the Sardasht, Baneh, Ouraman and Mahabad Regions of Iranian Kurdistan. Mohammadpur has published several books and ethnographies including Method for Method: on Structure of Knowledge in Humanity (2010), Counter Method (2 volumes set) (2010; 2011), Meta Method (2010), From Tradition to Modernization (forthcoming) and Experience of Modernization (forthcoming).pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnoteJuliet Corbin, an Emeritus Professor; she is well-known for her leading work in qualitative research methods, and especially Grounded Theory; among her valuable publications are: Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (1990; 1998; 2008) and Grounded Theory in Practice (1997).pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnoteRasoul Sadeghi is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Demography at the University of Tehran, Iran. His research interests include demography of ethnic and migrant groups, marriage and family changes, and social research. He is currently working on migration, adaptation and family dynamics.pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnoteMehdi Rezaei is a PhD in Demography from the University of Tehran, Iran. His research interests are demographic dynamics of Iranian Kurdish populations, Kurdish studies and social research.pl_PL
dc.referencesAbbasi-Shavazi, Mohammad J. and Peter McDonald. 2007. “Family Change in Iran: Religion, Revolution, and the State.” Pp. 177-198 in International Family Change: Ideational Perspectives, edited by R. Jayakody, A. Thornton and W. Axinn. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.pl_PL
dc.referencesAl-Haj, Majid. 1988. “The Changing Arab Kinship Structure: The Effect of Modernization in an Urban Community.” The Economic Development and Cultural Change 36(2):237-258. Retrieved December 17, 2010 (http://www. jstor.org/pss/1153766).pl_PL
dc.referencesAl-Haj, Majid. 1995. “Kinship and Modernization in Developing Societies: The Emergence of Instrumentalized Kinship.” Journal of Comparative Family Studies 26(3):311- 328. Retrieved December 17, 2010 (http://www.questia. com/googleScholar.qst?docId=5000365499).pl_PL
dc.referencesArmaaki, Taghi A. and Tahereh Gazaei. 2000. “Studying Socio-Economic Developments in Three Generations of Tehranian Families.” Journal of Social Sciences Letter 16:3-29. Retrieved June 21, 2004 (http://www.sid.ir/fa/ VEWSSID/J_pdf/50613791601.pdf)pl_PL
dc.referencesBehnam, Jamshid. 1971. [Structures of Family and Kinship in Iran.] Tehran: Kharazmi Publisher. [Published in Persian]pl_PL
dc.referencesBergman, Manfred M. 2008. Advances in Mixed Methods Research: Theories and Applications. London: Sage.pl_PL
dc.referencesBernstein, Henry. 2002. “Modernization Theory and the Sociological Study of Development.” Journal of Development Studies 7(2):141-160. Retrieved Octobr 17, 2008 (http:// www.arts.ualberta.ca/~courses/PoliticalScience/670A1/ documents/HenryBernstein-ModernizationSociogyofDev.pdf)pl_PL
dc.referencesBlaikie, Norman. 2007. Approaches to Social Inquiry. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBrannen, Julia. 1992. “Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches: An Overview.” Pp. 3-37 in Mixing Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Research, edited by J. Brannen. Aldershot: Avebury.pl_PL
dc.referencesBrewer, John and Albert Hunter. 1989. Multimethod Research: A synthesis of Styles. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.pl_PL
dc.referencesBrewer, John and Albert Hunter. 2006. Foundations of Multimethod Research: Synthesizing Styles. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.pl_PL
dc.referencesBryman, Alan. 1988. Quantity and Quality in Social Research. London: Unwin Hyman.pl_PL
dc.referencesCampbell, Donald T. and Donald W. Fiske. 1959. “Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitraitmultimethod matrix.” Psychological Bulletin 56(2):81-105. Retrieved September 5, 2010 (www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/classics1987/A1987G546500001.pdf).pl_PL
dc.referencesCorbin, Juliet and Anselm Strauss. 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research. 3rd ed. London: Sage.pl_PL
dc.referencesCreswell, John W. 1994. Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.pl_PL
dc.referencesCreswell, John W. 2003. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sagepl_PL
dc.referencesCreswell, John W. and Vicki L. Plano Clark. 2007. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. London: Sage.pl_PL
dc.referencesEmber, Carol and Melvin Ember. 2002. Cultural Anthropology. 10th ed. New Jersey, NY: Prentice-Hall.pl_PL
dc.referencesErvin, Alexander M. 2000. Applied Anthropology: Tools and Perspectives for Contemporary Practice. Boston, MA: Allyn and Becon Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesGlaser, Barney and Anselm Strauss. 1967. Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Transaction.pl_PL
dc.referencesGood, William J. 1963. World Revolution and Family Patterns. London: Free Press of Glencoe.pl_PL
dc.referencesGreene, Jennifer C. 2007. Mixed Methods in Social Inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publisher.pl_PL
dc.referencesHeckmann, Lale. 1991. Tribe and Kinship among Kurds. Frankfurt: Peter Lang Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesHirschman, Charles and Huu Minh Nguyen. 2002. “Tradition and Change in Vietnemes Family Structure in The Red River Delta.” Journal of Marriage and Family 64(4):1063- 1079. Retrieved September 17, 2006 (http://faculty.washington.edu/charles/pubs/2002-TraditionChangeVietnameseFamilyStructure.pdf)pl_PL
dc.referencesHulme, David and Mark Turner. 1990. Sociology and Development. New York: Harvest Wheatsheaf.pl_PL
dc.referencesJohnson, Burke and Larry B. Christensen. 2008. Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed approaches. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesJones, Gavin W. 1981. “Malay marriage and change in peninsular Malaysia: three decades of change.” Population and Development Review 7(2):255-278. Retrieved October 22, 2009 (http://www.jstor.org/pss/1972623)pl_PL
dc.referencesLajavardi, Haleh. 1997. Sakhtare Ghodrat Dar Khanewade. Unpublished M.A thesis, Department of Sociology, Tehran University, Iran.pl_PL
dc.referencesLesthaeghe, Ron. 1983. “A Century of Demographic and Cultural Change in Western Europe: An Exploration of Underlying Dimensions.” Population and Development Review 9(3):411-436. Retrieved November 7, 2009 (http:// www.jstor.org/pss/1973316).pl_PL
dc.referencesLesthaeghe, Ron and Johan Surkyn. 2002. “New Forms of Household Formation in Central and Eastern Europe: Are They Related to Newly Emerging Value Orientations?” Interuniversity Papers in Demography, IPD-WP 2002-2. Brussels and Ghent: Interface Demographypl_PL
dc.referencesMalhotra, Anju and Amy Ong Tsui. 1996. “Marriage Timing in Sri Lanka: The Role of Modern Norms and Ideas.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 58(2):476-490. Retrieved August 13, 2010 (www.jstor.org/stable/353511).pl_PL
dc.referencesMcDonald, Peter. 2006. “Low Fertility and the State: The Efficacy of Policy.” Population and Development Review 32(3):485-510. Retrieved June 27, 2009 (http://iussp2005. princeton.edu/download.aspx?submissionId=50830).pl_PL
dc.referencesMcMichael, Philip. 2004. Development and Social Change. A Global Perspective. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesMikheeva, Anna. 2007. “Family Change and New Balance of Family Roles: The Case of Siberia.” International Review of Sociology 17(2):343-357. Retrieved December 4, 2011 (http:// www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03906700701357471).pl_PL
dc.referencesMohammadpur, Ahmad. 2001. Farayand va Payamadhaye Nosazi Dar Shahrestane Sardasht: Az 1300 ta 1379. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Department of Sociology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.pl_PL
dc.referencesMohammadpur, Ahmad. 2007. Bazsazie Maanaeie Payamadhaye Nosazi Dar Mantaghe Ouramane Takhte Kurdistan Iran. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Sociology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.pl_PL
dc.referencesMohammadpur, Ahmad, Rasoul Sadeghi, Mehdi Rezaei and Latif Partovi. 2009. “Motalee Tarkibie Taghirate Khanevade Dar Beine Ilate Gawerk va Mangoor Mahabad.” Faslname Pajohesh Zanan 7(4):71-93. Retrieved May 13, 2009 (http://sid.ir/fa/VEWSSID/J_ PDF/61713880404.pdf).pl_PL
dc.referencesMorgan, David. 1998. “Practical Strategies for Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Applications to Health Research.” Qualitative Health Research 8:362-376. Retrieved June 9, 2009 (http://srmo.sagepub.com/view/ emergent-methods-in-social-research/n8.xml)pl_PL
dc.referencesNeuman, Lawrence W. 2006. Social Research Methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. 6th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesNewman, Isadore and Carolyn R. Benz. 1998. Qualitative-Quantitative Research Methodology: Exploring The Interactive Continuum. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Presspl_PL
dc.referencesNiglas, Katrin. 2004. The Combined Use of Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Educational Research. Unpublished PhD dissertation on Social Sciences, Department of Education, Tallinn Pedagogical University, Tallinn, Estonia.pl_PL
dc.referencesOnwuegbuzie, Anthony J. and Nancy L. Leech. 2005. “Taking the “Q” Out of Research: Teaching Research Methodology Courses Without the Divide Between Quantitative and Qualitative Paradigms.” Quality and Quantity: International Journal of Methodology 39(3):267-295. Retrieved December 4, 2011 (http://www.springerlink. com/content/v267h15758153h81/).pl_PL
dc.referencesPeet, Richard and Elaine Hartwick. 1999. Theories of Development. New York: Guilford Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesSaraei, Hasan. 2007. “Tadavom va Taghir Khanevade Dar Jarian Gozare Jamiati.” Journal of Population Association of Iran 1(2):37-60. Retrieved May 21, 2009 (ttp://www.sid.ir/ fa/ViewPaperFa.asp?ID=70301&varStr=4)pl_PL
dc.referencesScupin, Raymond and David McCurdy. 2004. Anthropology: A Global Perspective. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesSeltzer, Judith A. et al. 2005. “Explaining Family Change and Variation: Challenges for Family Demographers.” Journal of Marriage and Family 67(4):908-925. Retrieved July 23, 2009 (http://www.soc.duke.edu/~efc/Docs/pubs/ ExplainingFamilyChange_JMF2005_final2.pdf).pl_PL
dc.referencesSeyyed Rabih, Farid. 2000. Barrasi Avamele Moaser Bar Tahavole Khanevade Gostarde Be Hastei Dar Tarikh Moaser Iran. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Department of Demography, Tehran University, Iranpl_PL
dc.referencesStrauss, Anselm and Juliet Corbin. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.pl_PL
dc.referencesTashakkori, Abbas and Charles Teddlie. 1998. Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.pl_PL
dc.referencesTashakkori, Abbas and Charles Teddlie. 2003. Handbook of Mixed Social and Behavioral Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.pl_PL
dc.referencesTeddlie, Charles and Fen Yu. 2007. “Mixed Methods Sampling: A Typology With Examples.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1:77-100. Retrieved May 24, 2008. (http://mmr. sagepub.com/content/1/1/77.short?rss=1&ssource=mfc).pl_PL
dc.referencesTeddlie, Charles and Abbas Tashakkori. 2009. Foundations of Mixed Method Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Techniques in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. London: Sage.pl_PL
dc.referencesThornton, Arland, Georgina Binstock and Dirgha Ghimire. 2004. “International Networks, Ideas, and Family Change.” Population Studies Center Research Report No. 04-566. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan. Retrieved December 4, 2011 (http://www.psc.isr.umich.edu/pubs/pdf/rr04-566.pdf).pl_PL
dc.referencesToren, Nina. 2003. “Tradition and Transition: Family Change in Israel.” Journal of Gender Issues 21(2):60-76. Retrieved June 27, 2010 (www.springerlink.com/index/ HWAUKWYCALAEUNKP.pdf).pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorEmailah.mohammadpur@gmail.compl_PL
dc.contributor.authorEmailjulietcorbin@hotmail.compl_PL
dc.contributor.authorEmailrassadeghi@yahoo.compl_PL
dc.contributor.authorEmailm_rezaei_05@yahoo.compl_PL
dc.relation.volume8pl_PL
dc.disciplinenauki socjologicznepl_PL


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record