| dc.contributor.author | Csurgo, Bernadett | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kovach, Imre | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2014-01-20T13:34:51Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2014-01-20T13:34:51Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013-05 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0208-600X | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/3181 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper presents a case study from Hungary about the “Nagykunságért” LEADER Local Action Group, which demonstrates the limits of an actor’s involvement in local rural
development. Project participation in this region depends on the financial and managerial capacity
of participants. Actors with capacity are involved with the project as a matter of course, but those
without capacity are crowded out and lack access to resources. Actors in rural development are
characterised by their ability to disseminate diverse kinds of information and use of knowledge. Inclusion, exclusion, and the power of local oligarchies are main concepts in this paper, which studies
LEADER as a tool which may be used either for democracy or against local democratic control over
the distribution of development funds. | pl_PL |
| dc.language.iso | en | pl_PL |
| dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego | pl_PL |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Sociologica; 44 | |
| dc.subject | involvement | pl_PL |
| dc.subject | oligarchy | pl_PL |
| dc.subject | knowledge | pl_PL |
| dc.subject | project class | pl_PL |
| dc.title | Networking leader and local oligarchies | pl_PL |
| dc.type | Article | pl_PL |
| dc.page.number | 73-88 | |
| dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | Bernadett Csurgo -Institute of Sociology, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest | |
| dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | Imre Kovach -Institute of Sociology, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest | |
| dc.references | Bruckmeier K. (2004), CORASON – Framework for the Analysis of Rural Sustainable Development, http://www.corason.hu, 21.032012. | |
| dc.references | Csite A. (2005), Reménykeltők, Századvég, Budapest. | |
| dc.references | Csurgó B., KováchI. (2000), LEADER in Hungary – Bottom-up development with top-down control. Three case studies from Hungary, HAS CSS Institute for Sociology, Budapest. | |
| dc.references | Csurgó B., Kovách I., Kučerová E. (2008), Knowledge, Power and Sustainability in Contemporary Rural Europe, „Sociologia Ruralis”, July, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 292–312. | |
| dc.references | Csurgó B., Kovách I., Légmán A., Megyesi B. (2010), Energy demand, Governance and Infrastructure in Hajdú Bihar County: The Hungarian Case, [in:] I. Gotts, I. Kovách (eds.), Climate Change and Local Governance: Alternative approaches to influencing household energy consumption: A comparative study of five European regions, MTA Politikatudományi Intézet, Budapest, pp. 185–224. | |
| dc.references | Fazekas Z., Nemes G. (2005), Kísérleti Leader-jellegű program Magyarországon, [in:] AVOP Leader+ készségek elsajátítása, Tananyag, Promei-Faluműhely Alapítvány-Szrva-ZRVA, pp. 457–482 | |
| dc.references | High Ch., Nemes G. (2007), Social learning in LEADER: Exogenous, endogenous and hybrid evaluation in rural development, „Sociologia Ruralis”, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 103–119. | |
| dc.references | Kelemen E., Boldizsár M., Nagy Kalamász I. (2008), Knowledge Dynamics and Sustainability in Rural Livelihood Strategies: Two Case Studies from Hungary, „Sociologia Ruralis”, Vol. 48, Issue 3, pp. 257–273. | |
| dc.references | Kiss K., Szekeresné Köteles R. (2010), A helyi akciócsoportok szerepe a versenyképes és fenntartható vidékfejlesztés megvalósításában, „Tér és Társadalom”, vol. 24, szá. 3, pp. 119–135. | |
| dc.references | Kovách I. (2000), LEADER, New Social Order, and the Central and East-European Countries, „Sociologia Ruralis”, Vol. 40, Issue 2, pp. 181–189. | |
| dc.references | Kovách I., Kucerová E. (2006), The Project Class in Central Europe: The Czech and Hungarian Cases, „Sociologia Ruralis”, No. 1, Vol. 46, s. 181‒189 | |
| dc.references | Kovách I., Kucerová E. (2009), The Social Context of Project Proliferation – The Rise of a Project Class, „Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning”, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 203–220. | |
| dc.references | Maurel M.-C. (2009), Local actors facing environmental issues: lessons for a bottom-up approach, http://hal.archivesouvertes.fr/docs/00/50/30/99/PDF/8_Maurel_2009_Local_actors_ facing_environmental_issues.pdf, 21.032012 | |
| dc.references | Nemes G. (2005), A Magyarországi vidékfejlesztés eddigi tapasztalatai, a Leader+ intézkedés tartalmi elemei és alkalmazásának szabályai, [in:] AVOP Leader+ készségek elsajátítása, Tananyag, Promei-Faluműhely Alapítvány-Szrva-ZRVA, pp. 331–354 | |
| dc.references | Ray C. (2001), Territorial co-operation between rural areas: elements of a political economy of EU rural development, „Sociologa Ruralis”, Vol. 41, Issue 3, pp. 279–295. | |
| dc.references | Shortall S. (2004), Social or Economic Goals, Civic Inclusion or Exclusion? An Analysis of Rural Development Theory and Practice, „Sociologia Ruralis”, Vol. 44, Issue 1, pp. 109–123. | |
| dc.references | Shucksmith M. (2000), Endogenous Development, Social Capital and Social Inclusion: perspectives from leader in the UK, „Sociologia Ruralis”, Vol. 40, Issue 2, pp. 208–218 | |
| dc.references | Shucksmith M., Chapman Pollyanna P. (1998), Rural Development and Social Exclusion, „Sociologia Ruralis”, Vol. 38, Issue 2, pp. 225–242. | |
