Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorWitkowska, Janina
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-22T15:25:40Z
dc.date.available2019-11-22T15:25:40Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1508-2008
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/30940
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this paper is to discuss new trends that have occurred in the policies of the EU and China towards foreign direct investment (FDI), to examine some implications of the EU‑China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI) – which is currently being negotiated – for their bilateral relations, and to assess the role which China’s “One Belt One Road’ (OBOR) initiative might play in its relations with the new EU Member States. The EU established freedom of capital movement with third countries; however, the introduction of the common investment policy has encountered some obstacles. These are related to investor protection and ISDS issues. In turn, China is carrying out an independent state policy towards foreign investment with limited liberalization of FDI flows. The negotiated EU‑China CAI is expected to create conditions conducive to bilateral foreign investment flows, and it might bring positive effects for their economies in the future. However, the progress made thus far in the negotiations is still limited. The relations between China and the new EU Member states (CEE countries) are characterized by common interests in the field of FDI flows. The new EU countries are interested in attracting Chinese FDI and seem not to show the fears that have arisen in the old EU countries.en_GB
dc.description.abstractCelem artykułu jest analiza nowych tendencji w polityce Unii Europejskiej (UE) i Chin wobec bezpośrednich inwestycji zagranicznych (BIZ), dyskusja nad niektórymi implikacjami Wszechstronnej Umowy o Inwestycjach, negocjowanej między UE i Chinami, dla ich wzajemnych stosunków oraz ocena roli chińskiej inicjatywy „One Belt One Road’ (OBOR) w odniesieniu do nowych krajów członkowskich UE. Unia Europejska ustanowiła swobodny przepływ kapitału w stosunkach z krajami trzecimi, jednak wprowadzenie wspólnej polityki wobec inwestycji zagranicznych napotyka na przeszkody, które są związane z kwestiami ochrony inwestorów i rozstrzygania sporów między inwestorami a państwem (ISDS). Chiny prowadzą natomiast niezależną politykę wobec inwestycji zagranicznych, z pewnymi posunięciami liberalizacyjnymi wobec BIZ. Oczekuje się, że negocjowana umowa między UE i Chinami o inwestycjach może stworzyć korzystne warunki dla wzajemnych przepływów BIZ oraz w przyszłości pozytywne efekty dla całych ich gospodarek. Jednakże dotychczasowy postęp w negocjacjach jest ciągle jeszcze ograniczony. Stosunki między Chinami i nowymi krajami członkowskimi UE cechują się obopólnymi interesami w sferze bezpośrednich inwestycji zagranicznych. Nowe kraje członkowskie są zainteresowane przyciąganiem chińskich BIZ, nie okazując obaw, jakie ujawniają się wobec chińskich inwestycji w „starych” krajach członkowskich.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesComparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe; 3
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.en_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0en_GB
dc.subjectEU‑China relationsen_GB
dc.subjectpolicy towards foreign direct investment (FDI)en_GB
dc.subjectthe EU‑China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI)en_GB
dc.subject“One Belt One Road’ initiativeen_GB
dc.subjectstosunki między UE a Chinamipl_PL
dc.subjectpolityka wobec bezpośrednich inwestycji zagranicznych (BIZ)pl_PL
dc.subjectWszechstronna Umowa o Inwestycjach (CAI) między UE i Chinamipl_PL
dc.subjectinicjatywa „Nowy Jedwabny Szlak” (Inicjatywa Pasa i Szlaku)pl_PL
dc.titleThe Attitudes of the European Union and China Towards Foreign Direct Investment: Implications for Bilateral Relationsen_GB
dc.title.alternativePodejście Unii Europejskiej i Chin do bezpośrednich inwestycji zagranicznych: implikacje dla wzajemnych stosunkówpl_PL
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.page.number83-98
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology Department of World Economy and European Integration, Lodz, Poland
dc.identifier.eissn2082-6737
dc.referencesBeaumier, G., Quellet, R. (2018), Europe’s New Investment Policy Faces an Uncertain Future, “Columbia FDI Perspectives”, No. 218.en_GB
dc.referencesBorovikov, E., Crevon‑Tarassova, A., Evtimov, B. (2017), European Union, [in:] The International Arbitration Review, Edition 8, https://thelawreviews.co.uk/edition/the‑international‑arbitration‑review‑edition–8/114 (accessed: 19.04.2018).en_GB
dc.referencesCannon, A., Ambrose, H., Naish, V. (2018), Progress Towards a Multinational Investment Court? EU‑Monumentum Building and Division in UNCITRAL Working Group III , Herbert Smith Freehills “Arbitration Notes”, 15.05.2018, https://hsfnotes.com/arbitration/2018/05/115/progress‑towards‑a‑multinational‑investment (accessed: 7.12.2018).en_GB
dc.referencesChaisse, J., Vaccaro‑Incisa, M. (2018), The EU Investment Court: Challenges on the Path Ahead, “Columbia FDI Perspectives”, No. 219.en_GB
dc.referencesCheng, L.K. (2005), China’s Experience with Foreign Direct Investment: Lessons for Developing Economies, [in:] ed. H.S. Kehal, Foreign Investment in Rapidly Growing Countries. The Chinese and Indian Experiences, Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke, New York.en_GB
dc.referencesChina’s New Tax Incentives (2008), “China Briefing”, Dezan Shira & Associates, 2008/06/18.en_GB
dc.referencesClegg, J., Voss, H. (2016), The New Two‑Way Street of Chinese Direct Investment in the European Union, “China‑EU Law Journal”, Springer, DOI 10.1007/s12689–016–0063‑x.en_GB
dc.referencesDeutscher Richterbund (2016), Stellungnahme zur Errichtung eines Investitionsgerichts fur TTIP‑ Vorschlag der Europaischen Kommission vom 16.09. 2015, No. 4, February http://www.drb.de/fileadmin/docs/Stellungnahmen/2016/DRB_160201_Stn_Nr_04_Europaeisches_Investitionsgericht.pdf (accessed: 12.05.2016).en_GB
dc.referencesEC (2015), Commission Proposes New Investment Court System for TTIP and Other EU Trade and Investment Negotiations, http://europa.eu/rapid/press‑release_IP–15–5651_en.htm (accessed: 4.03.2018).en_GB
dc.referencesEC (2017), State of the Union 2017, A Multilateral Investment Court, http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2017/september/tradoc_156042.pdf (accessed: 15.03.2018).en_GB
dc.referencesEC (2017a), EU‑China Investment Agreement: Report of 16th Round of Negotiations, Brussels–12 to 15 December 2017.en_GB
dc.referencesEC (2017a), Foreign Direct Investment – An EU Screening Framework, State of the Union 2017, http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2017/september/tradoc_156040.pdf (accessed: 21.04.2018).en_GB
dc.referencesEC (2018), Note to the File. Subject: Report on the 19th round of negotiations for the EU‑China Investment Agreement, Brussels, 13 November 2018.en_GB
dc.referencesEC (2018a), Commission Staff Working Document on the Movement of Capital and the Freedom of Payments, Brussels, 11.4.2018 SWD(2018) 103 final.en_GB
dc.referencesEuropean Parliament (2018), Legislative Train Schedule. A Balanced and Progressive Trade Policy to Harness Globalisation, Multilateral Investment Court (MIC), http://www.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-train/theme-a-balanced-and-progressive-trade-policy-to-harness-globalisation/file-multilateral-investment-court-(mic)/ (accessed: 8.12.2018).en_GB
dc.referencesEuropean Parliament (2018a), Legislative Train Schedule. A Balanced and Progressive Trade Policy to Harness Globalisation. EU‑China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (EU‑China CAI), http://www.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-train/theme-a-balanced-and-progressive-trade-policy-to-harness-globalisation/file-multilateral-investment-court-(mic)/ (accessed: 8.12.2018).en_GB
dc.referencesEurostat (2017), Foreign Direct Investment stocks at the end of 2016, “Eurostat News release’ 201/2017, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/2995521/8558940/2–21122017‑BP‑EN.pdf/ee180a2c–5dd4–44c6‑b2e1–856bc8946c29 (accessed: 11.12.2018).en_GB
dc.referencesEwert, I. (2016), The EU‑China Bilateral Agreement: Between High Hopes and Real Challenges, Egmont Royal Institute for International Relations, “Security Policy Brief ’’ No. 68.en_GB
dc.referencesGarcia, M. (2017), The EU‑China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI): Risks of Politicisation, EU‑China Observer #2.17, College of Europe.en_GB
dc.referencesGarcia‑Herrero, A., Xu, J. (2017), How to handle state‑owned enterprises in EU‑China investment talks, “Policy Contribution”, Bruegel, Issue 8.en_GB
dc.referencesGoralczyk, B. (2016), Spor o gospodarkę (chińsko) rynkową, Obserwatorfinansowy.pl 19.08.2016, https://www.obserwatorfinansowy.pl/tematyka/makroekonomia/spor‑o‑gospodarke‑chinskorynkowa/ (accessed: 15.12.2018).en_GB
dc.referencesGreenpeace (2016), From ISDS to ICS: A Leopard Can’t Change its Spots. Position Paper on the Commission Proposal for an Investment Court System in TTIP, Brussels, http://www.greenpeace.org/eu‑unit/Global/eu‑unit/reports‑briefings/2016/2016_02_11_Greenpeace%20Position%20Paper%20ICS_Final.pdfen_GB
dc.referencesHale, G., Long, Ch. (2012), Foreign Direct Investment in China. Winners and Losers, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd, New Jersey, London, Singapore, Beijing, Shanghai, Hong Kong, Taipei, Chennai.en_GB
dc.referencesLe, Y. (2017), China and Poland: Economic Cooperation Under the 16+1 Formula, ’Nouvelle Europe’ (on‑line), 1. 02.2017, www.nouwelle‑europe.eu.node/1960 (accessed: 27.04.2018).en_GB
dc.referencesLi, X. (2010), China’s Outward Foreign Investment. A Political Perspective, University Press of America, Inc., Lanham, Boulder, New York, Toronto, Plymouth UK.en_GB
dc.referencesMeunier, S. (2014), “Beggars can’t be Choosers’: The European Crisis and Chinese Direct Investment in the European Union, “Journal of European Integration”, Routledge, Vol. 36, No. 3.DOI: 10.1080/07036337.2014.885754.en_GB
dc.referencesOpinion 2/15 of the Court (2017), ECLI:EU:C:2017:376, http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=190727&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&‑mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=882092 (accessed: 4.03.2018).en_GB
dc.referencesShan, W., Wang, L. (2015), The China‑EU BIT and the Emerging, ‚Global BIT 2.0”, ’ICSID Review”, Vol. 30, No. 1, doi:10.1093/icsidreview/siu035.en_GB
dc.referencesShan, W., Zhang, S. (2011), The Treaty of Lisbon: Half Way toward a Common Investment Policy, “The European Journal of International Law”, Vol. 21, No. 4.en_GB
dc.referencesThe State Council The People’s Republic of China (2015), China unveils action plan on Belt and Road Initiative, http://english.gov.cn/news/top_news/2015/03/28/content_281475079055789.htm (accessed: 18.01.2018).en_GB
dc.referencesUNCTAD (2017), Investment Dispute Settlement Navigator, https://investmentpolicyhubold.unctad.org/ISDS/ (accessed: 28.04.2018).en_GB
dc.referencesUNCTAD (2018), World Investment Report 2018. Investment and New Industrial Policies, New York and Geneva.en_GB
dc.referencesWang, Y., (2017), China’s BIT Progress and Implications for China‑Canada FTA Talks, Centre for International Governance Innovation, “Policy Brief” No. 104, April.en_GB
dc.referencesWeiniger, M., Croisant, G. (2017), The European Commission Proposes a Move Towards a Multilateral Investment Court System, https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/business‑law‑blog/blog/2017/11/european‑commission‑ (accessed: 4.03.2018).en_GB
dc.referencesYang, D., Jiang, L., Ng, A.K.Y. (2018), One Belt One Road, But Several Routes: A Case Study of New Emerging Trade Corridors Connecting the Far East to Europe, “Transportation Research” Part A 117, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.001.en_GB
dc.referencesYing, F. (2014), An Analysis of China’s Outward Foreign Direct Investment to the EU: Features and Problems, “International Journal of Management and Economics” (Zeszyty Naukowe KGS), No. 41, DOI: 102478/ijme–2014–0036.en_GB
dc.referencesZheng, J., (2017), Does Europe Matter? The Role of Europe in Chinese Narratives of “One Belt One Road and “New Type of Great Power Relations”, “Journal of Common Market Studies” Vol. 55, DOI:10.1111/jmcs.12535.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorEmailjanina.witkowska@uni.lodz.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.2478/cer-2019-0024
dc.relation.volume22en_GB
dc.subject.jelF15en_GB
dc.subject.jelF21en_GB
dc.subject.jelK00en_GB


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.