Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWitczak-Plisiecka, Iwona
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-09T11:31:12Z
dc.date.available2019-10-09T11:31:12Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationWitczak-Plisiecka I., From Speech Acts to Speech Actions, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2013, doi: 10.18778/7969-092-3pl_PL
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/30513
dc.description.abstractFrom speech acts to speech actions- and back’ outlines recent developments in speech act theory (and pragmatics). It ties together many strands from classical thinking and earlier conceptions, with a new view on how speech theory could be further developed. I am impressed by the width and depth of the author’s knowledge and insight – on many occasions I found myself overtaken by her considerations, such as when she deftly combines my concept of the pragmeme with the independently developed notion of the ‘meme’. I find chapter five (and the entire book for that matter) extremely well researched and well-written. It will be suitable as a text in postgraduate and graduate courses, but will also stand out as an independent an important theoretical contributionpl_PL
dc.description.sponsorshipUdostępnienie publikacji Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego finansowane w ramach projektu „Doskonałość naukowa kluczem do doskonałości kształcenia”. Projekt realizowany jest ze środków Europejskiego Funduszu Społecznego w ramach Programu Operacyjnego Wiedza Edukacja Rozwój; nr umowy: POWER.03.05.00-00-Z092/17-00.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectspeech actpl_PL
dc.subjectspeech actionpl_PL
dc.subjectconcept of language as actionpl_PL
dc.subjectethnolinguisticpl_PL
dc.subjectphilosophical-linguistic perspectivepl_PL
dc.subjectphenomenologist perspectivepl_PL
dc.titleFrom Speech Acts to Speech Actionspl_PL
dc.typeBookpl_PL
dc.page.number318pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Łódź, Faculty of Philology, Institute of English Studies, Department of English and General Linguisticspl_PL
dc.referencesAikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (2010) Imperatives and Commands. [Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory] Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesAlexander, Jeffrey C. (2004) “Cultural pragmatics: Social performance between ritual and strategy”. Sociological Theory, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 527-573.pl_PL
dc.referencesAllan, Keith (2010) “Referring as a pragmatic act” Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 42, pp. 2919–2931.pl_PL
dc.referencesAllen, James F. & C. Raymond Perrault. (1980). “Analyzing intention in utterances”. Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 15, pp. 143-178.pl_PL
dc.referencesAllwood, Jens (1977) “A Critical Look at Speech Act Theory” In Logic, Pragmatics and Grammar, ed. by Dahl, pp.53-99. Lund: Studentlitteatur.pl_PL
dc.referencesAllwood, Jens (1980) “On power in communication”. In: ALVAR: a Festshift to Alvar Ellegård [SPELL I], ed. by J. Allwood & M. Ljung. University of Stockholm, Department of English, pp. 1-20.pl_PL
dc.referencesAllwood, Jens (1995) “An activity based approach to pragmatics”, Gothenburg Papers in Theoretical Linguistics, 76, pp. 1-38.pl_PL
dc.referencesAllwood, Jens (2001) “Capturing differences between social activities in spoken language” In: Perspectives on Semantics, Pragmatics, and Discourse: a Festschrift for Ferenc Kiefer, ed. by István Kenesei & Robert M. Harnish. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 301- 319.pl_PL
dc.referencesAlston, William P. (1963) “Meaning and Use” The Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 51, pp. 107-124.pl_PL
dc.referencesAlston, William P. (1964) “Linguistic Acts” American Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 138-146.pl_PL
dc.referencesAlston, William. P. (1994) “Illocutionary acts and linguistic meaning”. In: Tsohatzidis (ed.), pp. 29-49.pl_PL
dc.referencesAlston, William P. (2000) Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesAnderson, Stephen R. (1971; reprinted 1976) “On the linguistic status of the performative/constative distinction” (ms; Harvard University & Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, Indiana) Reproduced by Indiana University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesAnscombre, Jean-Claude, François Létoublon & Alain Pierrot (1987) “Speech act verbs, linguistic action verbs, and delocutivity”. In: Verschueren (ed.), pp. 45-67.pl_PL
dc.referencesAristotle (350 BC.) De Interpretatione, On Interpretation, translated by E. M. Edghill. Available online at The Internet Classic Archive http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/interpretation.1.1.html (accessed 27 June 2010).pl_PL
dc.referencesAristotle. (1908) Nicomachean Ethics. [translated by William David Ross] Oxford: Clarendon Press. Available on-line at: http://nothingistic.org/library/aristotle/nicomachean/nicomachean34.html (accessed May 2012).pl_PL
dc.referencesArnovick, Leslie K. (1999) Diachronic Pragmatics: Seven Case Studies in English Illocutionary Development. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesAsher, Nicholas & Alex Lascarides (2001) “Indirect speech acts” Synthese, Vol. 128, pp. 183-228.pl_PL
dc.referencesAstington, J.W. (1988) “Children’s understanding of the speech act of promising”. Journal of Child Language. 15, pp. 157-173.pl_PL
dc.referencesAtiyah, P.S. (1981) Promises, Morals and Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesAtkins, Beryl T., Judy Kegl & Beth Levin (1988) “Anatomy of a verb entry: From linguistic theory to lexicographic practice”. International Journal of Lexicography. Vol.1, No. 2, pp. 84- 126; doi: 10.1093/ijl/1.2.84pl_PL
dc.referencesAtlas, Jay David (1989) Philosophy without Ambiguity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesAustin, John Langshaw (1962/1975 2nd ed.) How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesAustin, John Langshaw (1964) Sense and Sensibilia (Reconstructed from the manuscript notes by G.J. Warnock). Oxford: Clarendon Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesAustin, John Langshaw (1970) Philosophical Papers 2nd ed. [first published in 1961; ed. by J.O. Urmson & G.J. Warnock] Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesAvramides, Anita (2005 [1997]) “Intention and convention” In: A Companion to the Philosophy of Language, ed. by Bob Hale & Crispin Wright. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 60-86.pl_PL
dc.referencesBach, Kent (1975) “Performatives are statements too” Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, Vol. 28, No.4, pp. 229-236.pl_PL
dc.referencesBach, Kent (1994a) “Conversational impliciture”. Mind and Language, Vol. 9, pp. 124-162.pl_PL
dc.referencesBach, Kent (1994b) “Semantic slack: What is said and more”. In Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives, ed. by S. L. Tsohatzidis. London: Routledge, pp. 267–291.pl_PL
dc.referencesBach, Kent (1995) “Standardization vs. conventionalization”. Linguistics and Philosophy, Vol. 18, pp. 677–686.pl_PL
dc.referencesBach Kent (1997) “The Semantics-Pragmatics Distinction: What It Is and Why It Matters” In: Pragmatik: Implikaturen und Sprechakte, ed. by Eckard Rolf. Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 33- 50.pl_PL
dc.referencesBach, Kent (1998) “Standardization revisited”. In: Pragmatics: Critical Assessment, ed. by Asa Kasher. London: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesBach, Kent (1999) “The myth of conventional implicature”. Linguistics and Philosophy, Vol. 22, Issue 4, pp. 327-366.pl_PL
dc.referencesBach, Kent (2001) “You don’t say?”. Synthese, Vol. 128, No.1/2: Pragmatics, pp. 15-44.pl_PL
dc.referencesBach, Kent (2005) “Context ex Machina” In: Semantics versus Pragmatics, ed. by Zoltán Gendler Szabó. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 15-44.pl_PL
dc.referencesBach, Kent (2006) “The excluded middle: Semantic minimalism without minimal propositions”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 73, pp. 435-442.pl_PL
dc.referencesBach, Kent & Robert M. Harnish (1979) Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBach, Kent & Robert M. Harnish (1992) “How Performatives Really Work” Linguistics and Philosophy. Vol. 15, No.1, pp. 93-110.pl_PL
dc.referencesBakewell, Liza. (1998) “Image acts”. American Anthropologist, Vol. 100, No. 1., pp. 22-32.pl_PL
dc.referencesBakhtin, Mikhail M. (1986 [reprint of 1975]). “The problem of speech genres”. In M. Bakhtin, Speech Genres and Other Essays (ed. by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist). Austin: University of Texas Press, pp. 60-102.pl_PL
dc.referencesBallmer, Thomas T. & Waltraud Brennenstuhl (1981) Speech Act Classification: A study in the lexical analysis of English speech activity verbs. Berlin/New York: Springer Verlag.pl_PL
dc.referencesBarker, Stephen (2004) Renewing Meaning: A Speech-Act Theoretic Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBarker, Stephen (2007) “Semantics without the distinction between sense and force”. In John Searle's Philosophy of Language: Force, Meaning and Mind, ed. by Savas L. Tsohatzidis, pp.190-210. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBates, Elisabeth (1976). Language and context: The acquisition of pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBates, Elisabeth, Luigia Camaioni, & Virginia Volterra (1975) “The acquisition of performatives prior to speech”. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 205-226. [Reprinted in E. Ochs & B. Schieffelin (eds.) Developmental pragmatics. New York: Academic Press (1979), pp. 111-128 and in Pragmatics: Critical concepts, edited by Asa Kasher. London: Routledge, 1998, pp. 274-295.]pl_PL
dc.referencesBauman, Richard (1977) Verbal Art as Performance. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.pl_PL
dc.referencesBeaney, Michael (1997) The Frege Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.pl_PL
dc.referencesBell, David. (1997) “Innuendo”. Journal of Pragmatics 27: 35-59.pl_PL
dc.referencesBenveniste, Émile. (1971) [The original French version, under the title Problèmes de linguistique générale, was published in Paris by Editions Gallimard, 1966] Problems in General Linguistics [translated by Mary Elizabeth Meek]. Coral Gables, Florida: University of Miami Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBerlin, Brent & Paul Kay (1969) Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBerlin, Isaiah (1973) “Austin and the Early Beginnings of Oxford Philosophy” In: Berlin et al., pp. 1-16.pl_PL
dc.referencesBerlin, Isaiah et al. (1973) Essays on J.L. Austin. Oxford : Clarendon Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBernicot, Josie & Virginie Laval. (2004) “Speech acts in children: The example of promises” In: Noveck, Ira & Dan Sperber, pp. 207-227.pl_PL
dc.referencesBertuccelli-Papi, Marcella (2000) “Is a diachronic speech act theory possible?” Journal of Historical Pragmatics, Vol.1, No.1, pp. 57–66.pl_PL
dc.referencesBezuidenhout, Anne L. & Robin K. Morris. (2004) “Implicature, relevance and default pragmatic inference” In: Noveck, Ira & Dan Sperber (eds.), pp. 257-282.pl_PL
dc.referencesBiber, Douglas (1988) Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBird, Alexander (2002) “Illocutionary silencing”. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. Vol. 83, pp. 1- 15.pl_PL
dc.referencesBlack, Max (1963) “Austin on performatives”. Philosophy Vol. 38, pp. 217-263.pl_PL
dc.referencesBlackmore, Susan (1999) The Meme Machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBlum-Kulka, Shosana, Juliane House & Gabriele Kasper (eds.) (1989) Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.pl_PL
dc.referencesBoër, Steven & William G. Lycan (1980) “A performadox in truth-conditional semantics”. Linguistics and Philosophy, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 71-100.pl_PL
dc.referencesBogusławski, Andrzej (1983a) “An analysis of ‘promise’”. Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 7, pp. 607-627.pl_PL
dc.referencesBogusławski, Andrzej. (1983b) “A reply to Jeff Verschueren” Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 7, pp. 633-635.pl_PL
dc.referencesBohr, Hans (1967) “My Father” In: Niels Bohr: His Life and Work as Seen by His Friends and Colleagues, ed. by Stefan Rozental. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 325-399.pl_PL
dc.referencesBrandom, Robert (1994) Making it Explicit: Reasoning, representing, and discursive commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBrandom, Robert (2000) Articulating Reasons: An introduction to inferentialism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBratman, Michael E. (1994) “Moore on Intention and Volition”. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 142, No. 5, pp. 1705-1718.pl_PL
dc.referencesBriggs, Richard (2004) Words in Action: Speech Act Theory and Biblical Interpretation. London: Continuum.pl_PL
dc.referencesBrown, Gillian & George Yule (1983) Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBrown, Penelope & Stephen Levinson. (1987) Politeness: Some Universals of Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBühler, Karl (2001) Theory of Language: The representational function of language. [Sprachtheorie] Translated by Donald Fraser Goodwin. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins B.V.pl_PL
dc.referencesBurge, Tyler (1979) “Individualism and the mental”. In: Midwest Studies in Philosophy, ed. by Peter French, Theodore Uehling & Howard Wettstein. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 73-121; available on-line; doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4975.1979.tb00374.x.pl_PL
dc.referencesBurge, Tyler (2007 [1975]) “On knowledge and convention” In: Tyler Burge (2007) Foundations of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 32-37. [originally published in The Philosophical Review, vol. 84 (1975), pp. 249–355]pl_PL
dc.referencesButler, Judith. (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesButler, Judith (1993) Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘‘Sex’’. Routledge, New York, London.pl_PL
dc.referencesButler, Judith (1995) “Burning Acts – Injurious Speech” In: Performativity and Performance, ed. by Andrew Parker & Eve Kosofsky. London: Routledge, pp. 197-227.pl_PL
dc.referencesButler, Judith (1997) Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. Routledge, New York, London.pl_PL
dc.referencesCampbell, Robin (1981) “Language acquisition, psychological dualism and the definition of pragmatics”. In: Possibilities and Limitations of Pragmatics, ed. by Herman Parret, Marina Sbisà & Jeff Verschueren. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 93-104.pl_PL
dc.referencesCappelen, Herman & Ernie Lepore (2005) Insensitive Semantics. A defence of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism. Oxford: Blackwell.pl_PL
dc.referencesCappelen, Herman & Ernie Lepore (2006) “Précis of Insensitive Semantics”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. LXXIII, No. 2, pp. 424-433.pl_PL
dc.referencesCapone, Alessandro (2005) “Pragmemes: a study with reference to English and Italian”. Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 37, pp. 1355-1371.pl_PL
dc.referencesCapone, Alessandro (2010a) “Barack Obama’s South Carolina speech” Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 42, pp. 2964–2977.pl_PL
dc.referencesCapone, Alessandro (2010b) “Introduction”. Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 42, pp. 2861–2869.pl_PL
dc.referencesCapone, Alessandro (2010c) (ed.) Journal of Pragmatics: Pragmemes [special issue], Vol. 42, Issue 11, pp. 2861–3162.pl_PL
dc.referencesCarston, Robyn (2002) Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.pl_PL
dc.referencesCarston, Robyn (2008) “Linguistic Communication and the semantics/pragmatics distinction” Synthese. Vol. 165/3, pp.321-346; doi: 10.1007/s11229-007-9191-8.pl_PL
dc.referencesCavell, Stanley (2002a) Must We Mean What We Say?A Book of Essays. [Updated Edition]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesCavell, Stanley (2002b) “Austin at criticism” In: (Cavell 2002a), pp. 97-114.pl_PL
dc.referencesCavell, Stanley (2002c) “Must we mean what we say?” In: Cavell (2002a), pp. 1-43.pl_PL
dc.referencesChapman, Siobhan (2008) Language and Empiricism: After the Vienna Circle. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.pl_PL
dc.referencesChapman, Siobhan (2011) Pragmatics. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.pl_PL
dc.referencesChapman, Siobhan & Christopher Routledge (2005) Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesCharnock, Ross (2009) “Overruling as a speech act: Performativity and normative discourse” Journal of Pragmatics 41: 401-426.pl_PL
dc.referencesChrzanowska-Kluczewska, Elżbieta (2004) Language-games: Pro and against. Kraków: Universitas.pl_PL
dc.referencesChudzik, Anna (2002) Mowne zachowania magiczne w ujęciu pragmatyczno-kognitywnym. Kraków: Universitas.pl_PL
dc.referencesClark, Herbert H. (1987) “Four dimensions of language use”. In: The Pragmatic Perspective, ed. by Jef Verschueren & Marcella Bertuccelli-Papi. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 9-25.pl_PL
dc.referencesClark, Herbert H. (1992) Arenas of Language Use. Chicago: Chicago University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesClark, Herbert H. (1996) Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesClark, Herbert H. (1979) “Responding to indirect speech acts”. Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 11, pp. 430-477.pl_PL
dc.referencesClark, Herbert H. & T. B. Carlson (1982) “Hearers and speech acts”. Language, Vol. 58, pp. 333- 373.pl_PL
dc.referencesClark Herbert H. & Peter Lucy (1975) “Understanding what is meant from what is said: A study in conversationally conveyed requests”. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, Vol. 14, pp. 56–72.pl_PL
dc.referencesClark, Herbert H. & Dale H. Schunk (1980) “Polite responses to polite requests”. Cognition, Vol. 8, pp. 111–143.pl_PL
dc.referencesCohen, L. Jonathan (1964) “Do illocutionary forces exist?” The Philosophical Quaterly, Vol. 14, No. 55, pp. 118-137.pl_PL
dc.referencesCohen, L. Jonathan. (1973) “The non-existence of illocutionary forces: A reply to Mr. Burch.” Ratio, Vol. 15(1), pp. 125-131.pl_PL
dc.referencesCole, Peter & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.) (1975) Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesCollins, John (2007) “Review of Language: a Biological Model—Ruth Garret Millikan”. The Philosophical Quaterly, Vol. 57, Issue 226, pp. 142–145; doi: 10.1111/j.1467- 9213.2007.476_5.x.pl_PL
dc.referencesCorrigan, Roberta, Edith A. Moravcsik, Hamid Ouali & Kathleen M. Wheatley (eds.) (2009a) Formulaic Language, Volume 1: Distribution and historical change. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesCorrigan, Roberta, Edith A. Moravcsik, Hamid Ouali & Kathleen M. Wheatley (eds.) (2009b) Formulaic Language, Volume 2: Acquisition, loss, psychological reality, and functional explanations. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesCroft, William (1994) “Speech act classification, language typology and cognition”. In: Tsohatzidis (ed.), pp. 460-477.pl_PL
dc.referencesCuller, Jonathan (1981) “Convention and Meaning: Derrida and Austin”. New Literary History, Vol. 13, No. 1, On Convention: I, pp. 15-30 (Published by: The Johns Hopkins University Press) Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/468640; an excerpt from On Deconstruction: Literary Theory in the 1970s).pl_PL
dc.referencesCulpeper, Jonathan & Dawn Archer (2008) “Requests and directness in Early Modern English trial proceedings and play-texts, 1640-1760”. In: Speech Acts in the History of English, ed. by Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 45-84.pl_PL
dc.referencesCummings, Louise (2007) “Clinical pragmatics: a field in search of phenomena?” Language and Communication, Vol. 27, pp. 396-432.pl_PL
dc.referencesCummings, Louise (2009) Clinical Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesDanet, Brenda (1980) “Language in the legal process”. Law and Society Review 14, pp. 445-564.pl_PL
dc.referencesDascal, Marcelo (2003) Interpretation and Understanding. Amsterdam: Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesDavidson, Donald (1963) “Actions, Reasons and Causes” Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 60, pp. 685–700 (reprinted in Davidson 2001, pp. 3-19).pl_PL
dc.referencesDavidson, Donald (1979 [2001b]) “Moods and Performances” In: Davidson (1984/2001b), pp. 109-122.pl_PL
dc.referencesDavidson, Donald (2001a; 2nd ed.) Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Clarendon Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesDavidson, Donald (1984/2001b) Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesDavies, Bethan (2005) “Communities of practice: Legitimacy not choice”. Journal of Sociolinguistics, Vol. 9: 4, pp. 557-581.pl_PL
dc.referencesDavies, Martin (2003) “Philosophy of language” The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy, 2nd ed., ed. by Nicholas Bunnin & Eric P. Tsui-James. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 90–146.pl_PL
dc.referencesDavies, Martin (2006) “Foundational Issues in the Philosophy of Language”. In: The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Language, ed. by Michael Devitt & Richard Hanley. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 19-40.pl_PL
dc.referencesDavis, Steven (1979) “Perlocutions”. Linguistics & Philosophy, Vol. 3, Issue 2, pp. 225-243. [reprinted in: Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics, ed. by J. R. Searle, F. Kiefer & M. Bierwisch. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel, pp. 37–55].pl_PL
dc.referencesDawkins, Richard (1989 [1976]) The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesde Beaugrande, Robert (1988) “Performative soeech acts in linguistic theory: The rationality of Noam Chomsky”. Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 765-803.pl_PL
dc.referencesde Beaugrande, Robert (1991) Linguistic Theory: The discourse of fundamental works. London & New York: Longman (converted to web pages and uploaded 2002; references in the text to the web-based edition http://www.beaugrande.com/LINGTHERLinguistic%20Theory%20Title. htm).pl_PL
dc.referencesde Beaugrande, Robert. (1998) “Performative speech acts in linguistic theory: The rationality of Noam Chomsky”. Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 29, pp. 765-803.pl_PL
dc.referencesde Saussure, Ferdinand. (1966 [1916]) Course in General Linguistics, ed. by Charles Bally & Albert Sechehaye in collaboration with Albert Riedlinger, translated and with an introduction and notes by Wade Baskin. New York, Toronto & London: McGraw-Hill Book Company [earlier published in 1959; New York: Philosophical Library].pl_PL
dc.referencesde Saussure, Ferdinand (1983 [1916]) Course in General Linguistics (ed. by Charles Bally & Albert Sechehaye in collaboration with Albert Riedlinger; translated and annotated by Roy Harris). New York: London: Duckworth.pl_PL
dc.referencesDennett, Daniel (1991) Consciousness Explained. London: Penguin.pl_PL
dc.referencesDerrida, Jacques (1977/1982) “Signature Event Context” [“Signature évnément context”] Glyph, [Baltimore, MD: Johns] Vol.1, pp. 191-192, Reprinted in Jacques Derrida. Margins of Philosophy. Trans. Alan Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 307-330.pl_PL
dc.referencesDerrida, Jacques (1988) Limited Inc. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. Hopkins Press, pp. 172–97. Reproduced in Jacques Derrida, Margins of Philosophy, trans. by Alan Bass. Brighton: Harvester Press, pp. 307–30.pl_PL
dc.referencesDerrida, Jacques (2000) “Performative powerlessness—A response to Simon Critchley”. Constellations, Vol. 7, pp. 466-468.pl_PL
dc.referencesDik, Simon C. (1978) Functional Grammar. Amsterdam: North Holland.pl_PL
dc.referencesDik, Simon C. (1987) “Some principles of functional grammar” In: Functionalism in Linguistics, ed. by René Dirven & Vilém Fried, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 81-100.pl_PL
dc.referencesDore, John (1979) “Conversational acts and the acquisition of language”. In: E. Keenan & B. Schieffelin (eds.), Developmental pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 339-62.pl_PL
dc.referencesDoty, Kathleen L. & Risto Hiltunen (2009) “Formulaic discourse and speech acts in the witchcraft trial records of Salem, 1692”. Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 41, pp. 458–469.pl_PL
dc.referencesDosse, François (1997) History of Structuralism, Vol. 2: The Sign Sets, 1967-present. Translated by Deborah Glassman. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesDrabik, Beata (2004) Komplement i komplementowanie jako akt mowy i komunikacyjna strategia. [Book series: Pragmatyka i semantyka mowy, No.3] Kraków: Universitas.pl_PL
dc.referencesDummett, Michael (1981) The Interpretation of Frege’s Philosophy. London: Duckworth.pl_PL
dc.referencesEco, Umberto (1978) Theory of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesEnglish, Parker (2007) “Performative speech acts, ethnography and fiction”. Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 39, pp. 1624-1637.pl_PL
dc.referencesErvin-Tripp, Susan (1976) “Is Sybil there? The structure of some American English directives” Language in Society, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 25-66.pl_PL
dc.referencesEverett, Daniel (2012) Language: The Cultural Tool. New York: The Panthenon Books.pl_PL
dc.referencesFaller, Martina T. (2002). Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. PhD dissertation, Stanford University; available on-line: http://personalpages.manchester.ac.uk/staff/martina.t.faller/documents/thesis-a4.pdf (July 2013).pl_PL
dc.referencesFarkas, Katalin (2006) “Semantic internalism and externalism”. In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language, ed. by Ernest Lepore & Barry Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 323-340.pl_PL
dc.referencesFauconnier, Gilles (1985) Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesFauconnier, Gilles (1997) Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesFauconnier, Gilles (1999) “Methods and generalisations” In: Scope and Foundations of Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Theo Janssen & Gisela Redeker, pp. 96-127.pl_PL
dc.referencesFauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner (1996 [2001]) “Blending as a Central Process of Grammar” In: Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language, ed. by Adele Goldberg, Stanford: CSLI, 1996, 113-130 (an updated version of the text was published in: Wojciech Kubiński & Danuta Stanulewicz (eds.) (2001) Językoznawstwo kognitywne II. Zjawiska pragmatyczne. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego, pp. 173-211.pl_PL
dc.referencesFein, Ofer & Asa Kasher (1996) “How to do things with words and gestures in comics”. Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 26, 793-808; doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00023-9.pl_PL
dc.referencesFelman, Shoshana (2003) The Scandal of the Speaking Body: Don Juan with J. L. Austin, or Seduction in Two Languages. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesFetzer, Anita (2004) Recontextualizing Context: Grammaticality meets Appropriateness. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesFetzer, Anita (2007a) “Context, contexts and appropriateness” In Fetzer (2007b), pp. 3-27.pl_PL
dc.referencesFetzer, Anita (ed.) (2007b) Context and Appropriateness: Micro meets macro. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesFeyereisen, Pierre & Jacques-Dominique de Lannoy (1991) Gestures and speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesFillmore, Charles J. (1977a) “Topics in lexical semantics”. In: Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, ed. by Roger W. Cole, Bloomington & London: Indiana University Press, pp. 76-138.pl_PL
dc.referencesFillmore, Charles J. (1977b) “Scenes-and-frames semantics”. In: Linguistic Structures Processing, ed. by Antonio Zampolli. Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 55-81.pl_PL
dc.referencesFillmore, Charles J. (1977c) “The case for case reopened”. In: Grammatical Relations [Syntax and Semantics 8], ed. by Peter Cole & Jerrold M. Sadock, New York: Academic Press, pp. 59-81.pl_PL
dc.referencesFinnegan, Ruth (1992) Oral Traditions and Verbal Arts. London: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesFirth, John R. (1964) The Tongues of Men and Speech. [Language and Language Learning 3] London: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesFish, Stanley (1989) Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesForguson, L.W. (1973) “Locutionary and illocutionary acts” In: Berlin et al. (eds.), pp. 160-185.pl_PL
dc.referencesFrank, Roslyn M. (2008) “Introduction: Sociocultural situatedness” In: Cognitive Linguistics Research: Sociocultural Situatedness, Volume 2, ed. by Roslyn M. Frank, René Dirven & Tom Ziemke. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1-18.pl_PL
dc.referencesFraser, Bruce (1974a) “An examination of the performative hypothesis”. Papers in Linguistics Vol.7, pp. 1-40.pl_PL
dc.referencesFraser, Bruce (1974b) “An analysis of vernacular performative verbs”. In: Towards Tomorrow’s Linguistics, ed. by Roger W. Shuy & Charles-James N. Bailey. Washington: Georgetown University Press, pp. 139-158.pl_PL
dc.referencesFraser, Bruce (2001) “An account of innuendo” In: Perspectives on Semantics, Pragmatics, and Discourse: a Festschrift for Ferenc Kiefer, ed. by István Kenesei & Robert M. Harnish. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 321-336.pl_PL
dc.referencesFrege, Gottlob. 1892/1994. “On Sense and Reference” In: Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, ed. by P. Geach & M. Black. 1960, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 56-78. [Reprinted in: Basic Topics in the Philosophy of Language, ed. by Robert M. Harnish. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, pp. 142-160.]pl_PL
dc.referencesFried, Charles (1981) Contract as Promise: A Theory of Contractual Obligation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesFurberg, Mats (1963) Locutionary and Illocutionary Acts: A main theme in J. L. Austin’s Philosophy [Gothenburg Studies in Philosophy]. Gothenburg: Almqvist & Wiksell [Reprinted in an extended version in 1971 by Basil Blackwell as Saying and Meaning: A main theme in J. L. Austin’s philosophy].pl_PL
dc.referencesGarfinkel, Harold (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall (Reissued 1984, Cambridge: Polity).pl_PL
dc.referencesGarfinkel, Harold (1972) “Remarks on ethnomethodology” In: Directions in Sociolinguistics, ed. by John J. Gumperz & Dell H. Hymes, pp. 301-324.pl_PL
dc.referencesGass, S.M. & J. Neu (1995) Speech Acts across Cultures: Challenges to Communication in a Second Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.pl_PL
dc.referencesGauker, Christopher (1994) Thinking Out Loud. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesGauker, Christopher (2007) “On the alleged priority of thought over language”. In John Searle's Philosophy of Language: Force, Meaning, and Mind, ed. by Savas L. Tsohatzidis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 125-142.pl_PL
dc.referencesGauker, Christopher (2008) “Zero tolerance for pragmatics” Synthese, Vol. 165, pp. 359-371; doi: 10.1007/s11229-007-9189-2.pl_PL
dc.referencesGazdar, Gerald (1981) “Speech act assignment” In: Elements of Discourse Understanding, ed. by Aravind Joshi, Bonnie Webber & Ivan Sag. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 64- 83.pl_PL
dc.referencesGibbs, Raymond W. (2004) “Psycholinguistic experiments and linguistic-pragmatics” In: Noveck, Ira & Dan Sperber (eds.), pp. 50-71.pl_PL
dc.referencesGibbs, Raymond W. & Suzanne M. Delaney (1987) “Pragmatic factors in making and understanding promises”. Discourse Processes, Vol. 10, pp. 107-126.pl_PL
dc.referencesGibson, James J. (1977) “The Theory of Affordances”. In: Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology, ed. by Robert Shaw & John Bransford. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 67-82.pl_PL
dc.referencesGibson, James J. (1979/1986) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsday, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc (first edition: Boston: Houghton Mifflin).pl_PL
dc.referencesGilbert, Margaret (1989/1992) On Social Facts. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press [reprinted after New York: Routledge, 1989].pl_PL
dc.referencesGilbert, Margaret (1990) “Rationality, Coordination and Convention”. Synthese, Vol. 84, pp. 1-21.pl_PL
dc.referencesGinet, Carl. (1979) “Performativity”. Linguistics and Philosophy. Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 245-265; doi: 10.1007/BF00126512 .pl_PL
dc.referencesGlendinning, Simon. (2011) “Unmasking the Tradition” In: M. Gustaffson & R. Sørli (eds.), pp. 32-50.pl_PL
dc.referencesGoffman, Erving (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesGoffman, Erving (1976) “Replies and responses”. Language in Society, Vol. 5, pp. 257-313.pl_PL
dc.referencesGordon David & George Lakoff (1975) “Conversational postulates”. In: Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan, pp. 83-106.pl_PL
dc.referencesGrice, Herbert P. (1975) “Logic and conversation.” In Cole & Morgan (eds.), pp. 41-58. [Reprinted in Grice (1989), pp. 22-40.]pl_PL
dc.referencesGrice, Herbert P. (1989) Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesGu, Yueguo (1993) “The Impasse of Perlocution.” Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 20, pp. 405–32.pl_PL
dc.referencesGustaffson, Martin (2011) “Introduction: Inheriting Austin” In: M. Gustaffson & R. Sørli (eds.), pp. 1-31.pl_PL
dc.referencesGustaffson, Martin & Richard Sørli (eds.) (2011) The Philosophy of J.L. Austin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesHabermas, Jürgen (1984 [1981]) The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society (translated by Thomas McCarthy). London: Heinemann.pl_PL
dc.referencesHabermas, Jürgen (1987 [1985]) The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures (translated by Frederick Lawrence). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesHabermas, Jürgen (1998) “Actions, Speech Acts, Linguistically Mediated Interactions, and the Lifeworld”; In: Jürgen Habermas, On the Pragmatics of Communication, ed. by Maeve Cooke. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 216-255 [first published in German in 1988].pl_PL
dc.referencesHagen, Rose-Marie & Rainer Hagen (2005) “Counsel for the afterlife” In: What Great Paintings Say. From Bayeux Tapestry to Diego Rivera – Vol.1. (English translation), ed. by Rose-Marie Hagen & Rainer Hagen. Köln: Taschen, pp. 8-13.pl_PL
dc.referencesHaiman, Franklyn Saul (1993) „Speech acts” and the First Amendment. Carbondale & Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesHall, Edward T. (1976) Beyond Culture. New York: Doubleday.pl_PL
dc.referencesHancher, Michael (1979) “The classification of cooperative illocutionary acts”. Language in Society, Vol. 8, pp. 1-14.pl_PL
dc.referencesHare, Richard Mervyn (1964) “The promising game”. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, Vol. 70, pp. 389-404.pl_PL
dc.referencesHare, Richard Mervyn (1970) “Meaning and speech acts” The Philosophical Review, Vol. 79, No. 1, pp. 3-24 [also reprinted in Hare (1971)].pl_PL
dc.referencesHare, Richard Mervyn (1971) Practical Inferences. Berkeley & Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesHare, Richard Mervyn (1989) “Some subatomic particles of logic”. Mind, Vol. 98, pp. 23-37.pl_PL
dc.referencesHarnish, Robert M. (1994) “Mood, meaning and speech acts” In: Tsohatzidis (ed.), pp. 407-459.pl_PL
dc.referencesHarnish, Robert M. (2001) “Frege on mood and force” In: Perspectives on Semantics, Pragmatics, and Discourse: a Festschrift for Ferenc Kiefer, ed. by István Kenesei & Robert M. Harnish. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 203-228.pl_PL
dc.referencesHarnish, Robert M. (2006) “Mood and inference”. Research in Language, Vol. 4, pp. 57-75.pl_PL
dc.referencesHarnish, Robert M. (2009a) “Internalism and externalism in speech act theory”. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics. Special Issue on Speech Actions, ed. by Iwona Witczak-Plisiecka & Maciej Witek. Vol.5, No.1, pp. 9-31; doi: 10.2478/v10016-009-0001-2.pl_PL
dc.referencesHarnish, Robert M. (2009b) “The problem of fragments: Two interpretive strategies” Pragmatics and Cognition 17 (2), pp. 251-282.pl_PL
dc.referencesHarnish, Robert M. (2010) “Fragments and speech acts” In: Pragmatic Perspectives on Language and Linguistics 2009. Volume 1: Speech Actions in Theory and Applied Studies, ed. by Iwona Witczak-Plisiecka, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 3-38.pl_PL
dc.referencesHarris, Roy (1988) Language, Saussure and Wittgenstein: How to play games with words. London & New York: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesHarrison, Bernard (1979) An Introduction to the Philosophy of Language. London & Basingstoke: Macmillan.pl_PL
dc.referencesHart, Herbert Lionel Adolphus (1961/1994; 2nd ed.) The Concept of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesHeinz, Adam (1978/1983) Dzieje językoznawstwa w zarysie. [History of Linguistics: An Outline.] Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.pl_PL
dc.referencesHigginbotham, James (2002) “On linguistics in philosophy, and philosophy in linguistics” Linguistics and Philosophy, Vol. 25, pp. 573-584.pl_PL
dc.referencesHindriks, Frank (2007) “The status of the knowledge account of assertion” Linguistics and Philosophy, Vol. 30, pp. 393-406.pl_PL
dc.referencesHofstede, Geert (1997) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.pl_PL
dc.referencesHoldcroft, David (1974) “Performatives and statements”. Mind, Vol. LXXXIII (329), pp.1-18; doi: 10.1093/mind/LXXXIII.329.1.pl_PL
dc.referencesHoldcroft, David (1978) Words and Deeds: Problems in the Theory of Speech Acts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesHoltgraves, Thomas (2007) “Second Language Learners and Speech Act Comprehension” Language Learning. Vol. 57, No. 4, pp. 595-610.pl_PL
dc.referencesHorn, Laurence R. (2006) “More issues in neo- and post-Gricean pragmatics”. Intercultural Pragmatics. 3.1, pp.81-93; doi: 10.1515/IP.2006.004.pl_PL
dc.referencesHorn, Lawrence R. & Samuel Bayer (1984) “Short-circuited Implicature: A Negative Contribution”, Linguistics and Philosophy Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 397-414.pl_PL
dc.referencesHorn, Lawrence R. & Gregory Ward (eds.) (2004) Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell.pl_PL
dc.referencesHornsby, Jennifer (1993) “Speech acts and pornography”. Women’s Philosophical Review, [November] pp. 38-45.pl_PL
dc.referencesHornsby, Jennifer (1994) “Illocution and its significance”. In: Tsohatzidis (ed.), pp. 187-207.pl_PL
dc.referencesHornsby, Jennifer (1995) “Disempowered speech”. Philosophical Topics 23, pp. 127-147.pl_PL
dc.referencesHornsby, Jennifer (2000) “Feminism in Philosophy of Language: Communicative Speech Acts”. In: The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy, ed. by Miranda Fricker & Jennifer Hornsby. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.87-106.pl_PL
dc.referencesHornsby, Jennifer (2006), “Speech Acts and Performatives”. In: The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language, ed. by E. Lepore & B. C. Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 893–909.pl_PL
dc.referencesHornsby, Jennifer & Rae Langton (1998) “Free speech and illocution”. Legal Theory, Vol. 4, pp. 21-37.pl_PL
dc.referencesHouseholder, F.W. (1981) The Syntax of Apollonius Dyscolus, translated and with commentary by Fred W Householder. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesHuang, Yan (2007) Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesHuang, Yan (2012) The Oxford Dictionary of Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesHume, David. (1896 [originally published 1739-1740]) A Treatise of Human Nature; Reprinted from the original edition in three volumes and edited, with an analytical index, by L. A. Selby- Bigge. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (available on-line at: http://files.libertyfund.org/files/342/0213_Bk.pdf (May 2012))pl_PL
dc.referencesHusserl, Edmund (2001) The Shorter Logical Investigations (translated by J. N. Findlay from the Second German edition of Logische Untersuchungen with a new “Preface” by Michael Dummett and edited and abridged with a new “Introduction” by Dermot Moran). London & New York: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesHutton, Chris (2009) Language, Meaning and the Law. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesHymes, Dell (1967) “Models of the interaction of language and social setting”. Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 23, No.2, pp. 8-28.pl_PL
dc.referencesHymes, Dell (1972) “On communicative competence” In: Directions in Sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication, ed. by John Gumperz & Dell Hymes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, pp. 35-71.pl_PL
dc.referencesInfantidou-Trouky, Elly (1993) “Sentential adverbs and relevance”. Lingua, Vol. 90, Issue 1/2, pp.69-90.pl_PL
dc.referencesJackendoff, Ray S. (1990) Semantic Structures. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesJackson, S. (2004) Professing Performance: Theatre in the Academy from Philology to Performativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesJakobson, Roman (1960) “Closing Statement: Linguistics and poetics” In: Style in Language, ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 350-377.pl_PL
dc.referencesJary, Mark (2011) Assertion. Houndmills: Palgrave.pl_PL
dc.referencesJaszczołt, Katarzyna M. (2005) Default Semantics: Foundations of a Compositional Theory of Acts of Communication. Oxford University Press, Oxford.pl_PL
dc.referencesJaszczołt, Katarzyna M. (2009) Representing Time: An Essay on Temporality as Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesJaszczołt, Katarzyna M. (2010) “Situated temporal reference: A case for compositional pragmatics?” Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 42, pp. 2898-2909.pl_PL
dc.referencesJohnson, Barbara (1980) The Critical Difference: Essays in the contemporary rhetoric of reading. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesJucker, Andreas H. & Irma Taavitsainen (2000) “Diachronic speech acts analysis: Insults from flyting to flaming”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, Vol. 1, pp. 67–95.pl_PL
dc.referencesJucker, Andreas H., Gerold Schneider, Irma Taavitsainen, & Barb Breustedt (2008) “Fishing for compliments: Precision and recall in corpus-linguistic compliment research”. In: Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), pp. 273-294.pl_PL
dc.referencesJucker, Andreas H. & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.) (2008) Speech Acts in the History of English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesJurafsky, Daniel (2004) “Pragmatics and Computational Linguistics”; In: Horn, L.R. & G. Ward (eds.), pp. 578-604.pl_PL
dc.referencesKadmon, Nirit. (2001) Formal Pragmatics: Semantics, Pragmatics, Presupposition and Focus. Oxford: Blackwell.pl_PL
dc.referencesKalisz, Roman (1989) “On representatives as a class of illocutionary acts”. In: Contrastive Pragmatics, ed. by Wiesław Oleksy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 37-54.pl_PL
dc.referencesKalisz, Roman (1993) Pragmatyka językowa. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.pl_PL
dc.referencesKalisz, Roman (2001) “Pojęcia pragmatyki językowej w świetle językoznawstwa kognitywnego” In: Językoznawstwo kognitywne II: Zjawiska pragmatyczne, ed. by Wojciech Kubiński & Danuta Stanulewicz. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego, pp. 13-21.pl_PL
dc.referencesKalisz, Roman & Wojciech Kubiński (1993) “Speech act as a radial category”. In: Images from a cognitive scene, ed. by Elżbieta Górska. Kraków: Universitas, pp. 73-88.pl_PL
dc.referencesKant, Immanuel (1978/1798) Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View, translated by V.L. Dowdell, rev. & ed. by H.H. Rudnick. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesKannetzky, Frank (2007) “What Makes Cultural Heredity Unique? On Action-Types, Intentionality and Cooperation in Imitation” Mind and Language, vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 592-623.pl_PL
dc.referencesKasher, Asa (1994) “Modular speech act theory: Programme and results” In: Tsohatzidis (ed.), pp. 312-322.pl_PL
dc.referencesKasper, Gabriele (1984) “Pragmatic comprehension in learner-native speaker discourse”. Language Learning, Vol. 4, pp. 1-20.pl_PL
dc.referencesKatz, Jerrold J. (1972) Semantic Theory. New York: Harper & Row.pl_PL
dc.referencesKatz, Jerrold J. (1977) Propositional Structure and Illocutionary Force: A Study of the Contribution of Sentence Meaning to Speech Acts. Sussex: Harvester Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesKearns, John T. (2006) “Conditional assertion, denial, and supposition as illocutionary acts”. Linguistics and Phillosophy 29 (4), pp.455-485; doi: 10.1007/s10988-006-0007-y.pl_PL
dc.referencesKeck, Gabriele & Michael Stubbs (1984) “Koschmieder on speech act theory: A historical note”. Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 8, pp. 305-320.pl_PL
dc.referencesKecskes, Istvan (2010) “Situation-bound utterances as pragmatic acts”. Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 42, pp. 2889-2897.pl_PL
dc.referencesKendon, Adam (1995) “Gestures as illocutionary and discourse structure markers in Southern Italian conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 23, pp. 247-279.pl_PL
dc.referencesKenesei, István & Robert M. Harnish (eds.) Perspectives on Semantics, Pragmatics, and Discourse: a Festschrift for Ferenc Kiefer. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesKim, Jaegwon (1976) “Events as property exemplifications”. In: Action Theory. Proceedings of the Winnipeg Conference on Human Action, ed. by Myles Brand & Douglas Walton. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 159–177.pl_PL
dc.referencesKissine, Mikhail (2009) “Illocutionary forces and what is said”. Mind and Language, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 122-138.pl_PL
dc.referencesKissine, Mikhail, Philippe De Brabanter & Jacqueline Leybaert (2012) “Compliance with requests by children with autism: the impact of sentence type”. Autism, Vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 523-531.pl_PL
dc.referencesKlemke, Elmer Daniel (ed.) (1968) Essays on Frege. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesKorta, Kepa & John Perry (2007) “How to say things with words”. In John Searle's Philosophy of Language: Force, Meaning and Mind, ed. by Savas L. Tsohatzidis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.169-189.pl_PL
dc.referencesKorta, Kepa & John Perry (2011) Critical Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesKoschmieder, Erwin (1934) Nauka o aspektach czasownika polskiego w zarysie. Próba syntezy. [„Rozprawy i Materjały Wydziału i Towarzystwa Przyjaciół Nauk w Wilnie”, tom V, zeszyt 2] Wilno : Nakładem Towarzystwa Przyjaciół Nauk w Wilnie, Skład Główny w Księgarni św. Wojciecha w Wilnie.pl_PL
dc.referencesKryk-Kastovsky, Barbara (2000) “Orality in Early Modern English trial records”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, Vol. 1, pp. 201–230.pl_PL
dc.referencesKryk-Kastovsky, Barbara (2006a) “Impoliteness in Early Modern English courtroom discourse”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, Vol.7, pp. 213–243.pl_PL
dc.referencesKryk-Kastovsky, Barbara (2006b) “Historical courtroom discourse. Introduction”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics [Special Issue: Historical Courtroom Discourse], Vol. 7, pp. 163–179.pl_PL
dc.referencesKryk-Kastovsky, Barbara (2009) “Speech acts in Early Modern English court trials”. Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 41, pp. 440–457.pl_PL
dc.referencesKrzeszowski, Tomasz P. (1997) Angels and Devils in Hell: Elements of Axiology in Semantics. Warszawa: Energeia.pl_PL
dc.referencesKukla, Rebecca & Mark Lance (2009) ‘Yo!’ and ‘Lo!’: The Pragmatic Topography of the Space of Reasons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesKurzon, Dennis (1986) It is Hereby Performed ...: Explorations in legal speech acts. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesLabov, William (1970) “The study of language in its social context”. Studium Generale, Vol. 23, pp. 30-87.pl_PL
dc.referencesLaderman, Carol & Marina Roseman (ed.) (1996) The Performance of Healing. New York: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesLangton, Rae (1993) “Speech Acts and Unspeakable Acts”. Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 22, pp. 305-330.pl_PL
dc.referencesLaval, Virginie & Josie Bernicot (1999) “How French-speaking children understand promises: The role of future tense”. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, Vol. 28, pp.179–195.pl_PL
dc.referencesLave, Jean & Etienne Wenger (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLeech, Geoffrey (1989/1983) Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.pl_PL
dc.referencesLenneberg, Eric (1967) Biological Foundations of Language. New York: John Wiley.pl_PL
dc.referencesLevinson, Stephen (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLevinson, Stephen C. (2000) Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature Language, Speech and Communication. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Barbara (1996) Depth of Negation: A Cognitive Semantic Study. Łódź: Łódź University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLewis, David (1969) Convention: A philosophical study. Oxford: Blackwell.pl_PL
dc.referencesLewis, David K. (1983a [1975]) “Languages and language” In: Lewis (1983b), pp. 163-188 [originally published in Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, ed. by Keith Gunderson, Volume VII. University of Minnesota Press (1975), pp. 3– 35.].pl_PL
dc.referencesLewis, David K. (1983b) Philosophical Papers, Vol. I. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Oxford Scholarship Online 2003; doi: 10.1093/0195032047.001.0001)pl_PL
dc.referencesLoxley, James (2007) Performativity. London & New York: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesLycan, William, G. (2008; 2nd ed.) Philosophy of Language: A contemporary introduction. New York: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesMackenzie, I. E. (1977) Introduction to Linguistic Philosophy. Thousand Oakes: SAGE Publication.pl_PL
dc.referencesMacKinnon, Catherine (1989) Towards a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesMacKinnon, Catherine (1991) “Pornography as defamation and discrimination. Boston University Law Review, Vol. 71, pp. 793-815.pl_PL
dc.referencesMacKinnon, Catherine (1993) Only Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesMalinowski, Bronisław (1965 [1935]) Coral Gardens and their Magic. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesMarcu, Daniel (2000) “Perlocutions: The Achilles’ Heel of Speech Act Theory”. Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 32, pp. 1719–1741.pl_PL
dc.referencesMarmor, Andrei (1996) “On convention”. Synthese 107: 349-371.pl_PL
dc.referencesMarmor, Andrei (2008) “Is literal meaning conventional?” Topoi, Vol. 27, pp. 101-113; doi 10.1007/s11245-008-9027-2.pl_PL
dc.referencesMarmor, Andrei (2009) Social Conventions: From language to law. Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesMartland, T. R. (1970) “Austin, Art, and Anxiety”. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 169- 174. Published by: Blackwell Publishing on behalf of The American Society for Aesthetics; Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/428597 (Accessed: 16 January 2010; 14:49).pl_PL
dc.referencesMartinich, Aloysius P. (ed.) (1996) Philosophy of Language. 3rd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesMascaro, Olivier & Dan Sperber (2009) “The moral, epistemic, and mindreading components of children’s vigilance towards deception”. Cognition, Vol. 112(3), pp. 367-380.pl_PL
dc.referencesMcCawley, James, D. (1977) “Remarks on the Lexicography of Performative Verbs”; In: [Proceedings of the Texas Conference on] Performatives, Presuppositions, and Implicatures, ed. by A. Rogers, R. Wall & J. Murphy. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics, pp. 13-25. [Reprinted in J.D. McCawley (1979) Adverbs, Vowels, and Other Objects of Wonder. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 151-164].pl_PL
dc.referencesMcGowan, Mary Kate (2003) “Conversational exercitives and the force of pornography”. Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vo. 31, pp. 155-189; doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2003.00155.x.pl_PL
dc.referencesMcGowan, Mary Kate (2009) “On pragmatics, exercitive speech acts and pornography”. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics. Special Issue on Speech Actions, ed. by Iwona Witczak-Plisiecka & Maciej Witek. Vol. 5.1, pp. 85-106; doi: 10.2478/v10016-009-0002-1.pl_PL
dc.referencesMcGuinness, Brian (ed.) (1984) Gottlob Frege: Collected Works. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.pl_PL
dc.referencesMcHoul, Alec (1996) “Kant’s pragmatics”. Journal of Pragmatics 25: 587-592.pl_PL
dc.referencesMcHoul, Alec. (1997) “The philosophical grounds for pragmatics (and vice versa?)”. Journal of Pragmatics 27: 1-15.pl_PL
dc.referencesMeijers, Anthonie (2007) “Collective speech acts” In: Intentional Acts and Institutional Facts: Essays on John Searle’s Social Ontology, ed. by Savas L. Tsohatzidis. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 93-110.pl_PL
dc.referencesMeilijson, Sara R. & Asa Kasher (2004) “Language Performance in Chronic Schizophrenia” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, Vol. 47, pp. 695-713; doi: 10.1044/1092-4388.pl_PL
dc.referencesMey, Jacob L. (2006) “Pragmatic acts”. In: Encyclopedia of Languages and Linguistics. 2nd ed., ed. by Keith E. Brown. Oxford: Elsevier, pp.(10) 5-11.pl_PL
dc.referencesMey, Jacob (2001) Pragmatics: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.pl_PL
dc.referencesMey, Jacob (2010) “Reference and the pragmeme.” Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 42, pp. 2882– 2888.pl_PL
dc.referencesMey, Jacob (2011) “Speech acts in context” In: Context and Contexts: Parts meet whole?, ed. by Anita Fetzer & Etsuko Oishi, pp. 171-180. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesMillikan, Ruth Garrett (1984) Language, Thought and Other Biological Categories. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesMillikan, Ruth Garrett (2004) Varieties of Meaning. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesMillikan, Ruth Garrett (2005a) Language: A Biological Model. Oxford: Oxford University Press; doi: 10.1093/0199284768.003.0008.pl_PL
dc.referencesMillikan, Ruth Garrett (2005b) “The Son and the Daughter: ‘On Sellars, Brandom, and Millikan’” (chapter 4 in Millikan 2005, pp. 77-91 [also published in Pragmatics and Cognition, 13.1 (2005)].pl_PL
dc.referencesMillikan, Ruth (2005c) “Proper function and convention in speech acts.” In: Language: A Biological Model, pp.139-165. Oxford: Oxford University Press; doi: 10.1093/0199284768.003.0008.pl_PL
dc.referencesMillikan, Ruth (2005d [1998]) “Language conventions made simple.” In: Language: A Biological Model, pp. 1-23. Oxford: Oxford University Press; doi: 10.1093/0199284768.003.0008.pl_PL
dc.referencesMillikan, Ruth Garrett (2007) “Précis of Varieties of Meaning” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. LXXV, No. 3, pp. 655-662.pl_PL
dc.referencesMillikan, Ruth Garrett (2008) “The father, the son, and the daughter: Sellars, Brandom, and Millikan” In: The Pragmatics of Making it Explicit, ed. by Pirmin Stekeler-Weithofer. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins, pp. 53–64 [published earlier in 2005: in a Special Issue of Pragmatics & Cognition, vol. 13:1 and Millikan 2005 (chapter four)].pl_PL
dc.referencesMITECS. MIT Encyclopaedia of the Cognitive Sciences (1999), ed. by Robert A. Wilson & Frank C. Keil. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Available on-line at: http://ai.ato.ms/MITECS/Entry/seifert.html (accessed January 2013).pl_PL
dc.referencesMitchell, W. J. T. (1994) Picture Theory: Essays on Verbal and Visual Representation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesMittwoch, Anita (1977) “How to Refer to One’s Own Word: Speech-Act Modifying Adverbials and the Performative Analysis.” Journal of Linguistics, Vol. 13, pp. 177-189.pl_PL
dc.referencesMontminy, Martin (2010) “Context and communication: A defense of intentionalism”. Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 42, pp. 2910–2918.pl_PL
dc.referencesMorgan, Jerry L. (1977) “Two types of convention in indirect speech acts”. Technical Report No. 52. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. (later published as: Morgan, Jerry L. (1978) “Two types of convention in indirect speech acts”. In: Syntax and semantics, Vol. 9: Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, pp. 261-280. New York: Academic Press; Reprinted in Pragmatics: A reader. (1991), ed. by S. Davis. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 242-53.)pl_PL
dc.referencesMorris, Charles H. (1938 [3rd reprint, 1944]) “Foundation of the theory of signs”. In: International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Vol. 2, No. 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1-59.pl_PL
dc.referencesMorris, Desmond, Peter Collett, Peter Marsh & Marie O’Shaughnessy (1979) Gestures. London: Jonathan Cape.pl_PL
dc.referencesMorris, Desmond, Peter Collett, Peter Marsh & Marie O’Shaughnessy (1979) Gestures. London: Jonathan Cape.pl_PL
dc.referencesMulligan Kevin (1987) “Promisings and other social acts: Their constituents and structure”. In: Kevin Mulligan (ed.), pp. 29-90.pl_PL
dc.referencesMulligan, Kevin (ed.) (1987) Speech act and Sachverhalt: Reinach and the Foundations of Realist Phenomenology. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.pl_PL
dc.referencesNavarro-Reyes, Jesus (2013) “Intention and Responsibility in Speech Acts”. In: Cognitive and Pragmatic Aspects of Speech Actions, ed. by Iwona Witczak-Plisiecka. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 169-188.pl_PL
dc.referencesNeale, Stephen (2007) “Heavy hands, magic, and scene-reading traps”. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy (EUJAP), Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 77-132.pl_PL
dc.referencesNerlich, Brigitte & David D. Clarke (1994) “Language, action, and context: Linguistic pragmatics in Europe and America”. Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 22, pp. 439-463.pl_PL
dc.referencesNerlich, Brigitte & David D. Clarke (1996) Language, Action, and Context: The early history of pragmatics in Europe and America, 1780-1930. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.pl_PL
dc.referencesNietzsche, Friedrich (2003 [1913]) The Genealogy of Morals. [Translated by Horace B. Samuel]. Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications, Inc.pl_PL
dc.referencesNoveck, Ira & Dan Sperber (eds.) (2004) Experimental Pragmatics. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.pl_PL
dc.referencesOhlsson, Stellan (2007) “The separation of thought and action in Western tradition” In: The Prehistory of Cognitive Science, ed. by Andrew Brook. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 17-37.pl_PL
dc.referencesOlivecrona, Karl (1962) “Legal Language and Reality”. In Essays in Jurisprudence in Honor of Roscoe Pound, ed. by R. A. Newman,. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, pp. 151–91.pl_PL
dc.referencesOlivecrona, Karl (1971) Law as Fact. London: Stevens & Sons.pl_PL
dc.referencesOriggi, Gloria & Dan Sperber (2000) “Evolution, communication and the proper function of language”. In: Evolution and the human mind: Modularity, language and meta-cognition, ed. by Peter Carruthers & Andrew Chamberlain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 140-169.pl_PL
dc.referencesPagin, Peter (2004) “Is assertion social?” Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 36, pp. 833-859.pl_PL
dc.referencesPaul, Rhea & Donald J. Cohen (1985) “Comprehension of indirect requests in adults with autistic disorders and mental retardation”. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, Vol. 28, pp. 475–479.pl_PL
dc.referencesPeetz, Vera (1977) “Promises and threats”. Mind, Vol. 86, pp. 578-81.pl_PL
dc.referencesPerrault, C. Raymond (1990) “An application of default logic to speech act theory” In: Intentions in Communications, ed. by Philip R. Cohen, Jerry Morgan & Martha E. Pollack. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 161-186.pl_PL
dc.referencesPerry, John (2001) Reference and Reflexivity. Stanford: CSLI Publications.pl_PL
dc.referencesPitcher, George (1973) “Austin: a personal memoir” In: Berlin et al., pp. 17-30.pl_PL
dc.referencesPlato (1999 [380 BC]). Cratylus [translated by Benjamin Jowett]. The Pennsylvania State University. http://www.free-ebooks.net/ebook/Cratylus/pdf/ (accessed May 2012).pl_PL
dc.referencesPorter, Andrew P. (1993) “When Failure is Success: Counter-Performative Speech Acts”. On-line article: http://www.totse.com/en/technology/science-technology/porter.html (accessed 2 May 2008).pl_PL
dc.referencesPost, Michał (2001) “Efekty i akty perlokucyjne”. In: Językoznawstwo kognitywne II: Zjawiska pragmatyczne, ed. by Wojciech Kubiński & Danuta Stanulewicz. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego, pp. 136-147.pl_PL
dc.referencesPrichard, Harold A. (2002 [1949]) “The obligation to keep a promise” In: H. A. Prichard Moral Writings, ed. by Jim MacAdam. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 257-265.pl_PL
dc.referencesProost, Kristel (2009) “Speech Act Verbs”. In: Concise Encyclopedia of Semantics, ed. by Keith Allan. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 912-917.pl_PL
dc.referencesPrutting, Carol A. & Diane M. Kirchner (1987) “A clinical appraisal of the pragmatic aspects of language”. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, Vol. 52, pp. 105-119; doi: 10.1044/ jshd.5202.105.pl_PL
dc.referencesPutnam, Hilary (1975) “The Meaning of ‘Meaning’”. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 7, pp. 131-193.pl_PL
dc.referencesQuine, Willard V. (1965 [1969]), “J. L. Austin: Comment”, Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 62 (19), pp. 509–10 [reprinted in full in Fann (1969), pp. 86–90].pl_PL
dc.referencesQuine. Willard V. (1969a) “Foreword.” In Lewis (1969), pp. xi-xii.pl_PL
dc.referencesQuine, Willard V. (1969b) “Natural kinds” In: W.V. Quine. Ontological relativity and other essays. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 114-138.pl_PL
dc.referencesQuine, Willard V. (1976 [1936]). “Truth by Convention.” 1936. (In Philosophical Essays for A. N. Whitehead, ed. by O. H. Lee, New York: Longman, pp. 90 - 124 [reprinted in W. V. Quine (1976) The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays, 2nd. ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press].pl_PL
dc.referencesQuirk, Radolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik (1985/1992) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London/New York: Longman.pl_PL
dc.referencesRamsay, Allan (2000) “Speech act theory and epistemic planning” In: Abduction, Belief and Context in Dialogue: Studies in Computational Pragmatics, ed. by Harry Bunt & William Black. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 293-310.pl_PL
dc.referencesRaz, Joseph (1977) “Promises and Obligations”. In: Law, Morality and Society: Essays in honour of H.L.A. Hart, ed. by Peter M. Hacker & Joseph Raz. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 210-228.pl_PL
dc.referencesRaz, Joseph (1982) “Promises in Morality and Law: Review of Promises, Morals, and Law by P. S. Atiyah”. Harvard Law Review, Vol. 95, No. 4, pp. 916-938.pl_PL
dc.referencesRecanati, François (1987) Meaning and Force: The Pragmatics of Performative Utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesRecanati, François. (2003a) “Embedded implicatures”. Philosophical Perspectives, Vol. 17, No.1, pp. 299-332.pl_PL
dc.referencesRecanati, François (2003b) “The limits of expressibility”. In: John Searle, ed. by Barry Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 189-213.pl_PL
dc.referencesRecanati, François (2004) Literal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesRecanati, François (2007) Perspectival Thought: A Plea for (Moderate) Relativism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesRecanati, François. (2009; ms) “Contextualism and Systematic Semantics” A handout for a paper delivered at “Pragmatics, Semantics and Systematicity”, a workshop organized in Stockholm, 8-9- May 2009.pl_PL
dc.referencesReeder Kenneth (1980) “The emergence of illocutionary skills”. Journal of Child Language, Vol. 7, No.1, pp. 13–28.pl_PL
dc.referencesReinach, Adolf (1983 [1913]) The A Priori Foundations of Civil Law [translated by John F. Crosby]. Aletheia 3: 1-142.pl_PL
dc.referencesReiner, Toby (2009) “Texts as Performances: How to Reconstruct Webs of Beliefs from Expressed Utterances”. Journal of Philosophy of History, Vol. 3, pp. 266-289.pl_PL
dc.referencesReiss, Nira (1985) Speech Act Taxonomy as a Tool for Ethnographic Description. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesRobinson, Douglas (2003) Performative Linguistics: Speaking and translating as doing things with words. New York & London: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesRorty, R. (1967) “Introduction. Metaphilosophical difficulties of linguistic philosophy”. In: R. Rorty (ed.) The Linguistic Turn. Recent Essays in Philosophical Method. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1-39.pl_PL
dc.referencesRosaldo, Michelle Z. (1982) “The Things We Do with Words: Ilongot Speech Acts and Speech Act Theory in Philosophy”. Language in Society, Vol. 11, No.2, pp. 203-237.pl_PL
dc.referencesRoss, A.R. (2003) “Being Lucky—Virtual Performative Speech Acts”. Academic Exchange Quarterly, Vol. 7, No.4.; available on-line at: www.questia.com/read/1G1-114168115/beinglucky-virtual-performative-speech-acts (accessed May 2008).pl_PL
dc.referencesRoss, John Robert (1970) “On declarative sentences”. In: Readings in English Transformational Grammar, ed. by R. Jacobs & P. Rosenbaum. Boston: Ginn & Co., pp. 222-272.pl_PL
dc.referencesRyle, Gilbert (1956) “Introduction” In: The revolution in Philosophy, ed. by Gilbert Ryle, London: Macmillan, pp. 1-11.pl_PL
dc.referencesSadock, Jerrold M. (1970) “Whimperatives” In: Studies presented to R. B. Lees by his students, ed.by J.M.Sadock and A.L. Vanek. Edmonton: Linguistic Research, pp. 223-238.pl_PL
dc.referencesSadock, Jerrold (1974) Toward a linguistic theory of speech acts. New York: Academic Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesSadock, Jerrold M. (1985) “On the performadox, or asemantic defense of the performative hypothesis”. University of Chicago Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. I, Chicago: University of Chicago Department of Linguistics, pp. 160-69.pl_PL
dc.referencesSadock, Jerrold (1994) “Toward a grammatically realistic typology of speech acts” In: Tsohatzidis (ed.), pp. 393-406.pl_PL
dc.referencesSadock, Jerrold (2008) “Speech Acts”. In: The Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Lawrence R. Horn & Gregory Ward. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 53-73.pl_PL
dc.referencesSadock, Jerrold M. & Arnold M. Zwicky (1985) “Sentence types”; In: Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 1: Clause Structure, ed. by T. Shopen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 155-196.pl_PL
dc.referencesSaeed, John I. (2009; 3rd ed.) Semantics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.pl_PL
dc.referencesSapir, Edward (1929) “The Status of linguistics as a science”. Language, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 207- 214 (the text available on-line at http://www.bible-researcher.com/sapir1.html; May 2013).pl_PL
dc.referencesSbisà, Marina (1984) “On illocutionary types”. Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 8, pp. 93-112.pl_PL
dc.referencesSbisà, Marina (2001) “Illocutionary force and degrees of strength in language use”. Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 33, pp.1791-1814; doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00060-6.pl_PL
dc.referencesSbisà, Marina (2002) “Speech acts in context.” Language and Communication 22, pp.421-436; doi: 10.1016/S0271-5309(02)00018-6.pl_PL
dc.referencesSbisà, Marina (2007) “How to read Austin”. Pragmatics, Vol. 17, Issue 3, pp. 461-473.pl_PL
dc.referencesSbisà, Marina (2009) “Uptake and conventionality in illocution”. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics. Special Issue on Speech Actions, ed. by Iwona Witczak-Plisiecka & Maciej Witek. Vol.5, No.1, pp.33-52; doi: 10.2478/v10016-009-0003-0.pl_PL
dc.referencesSchelling Thomas C. (1960/1980) The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesSchiffer, Stephen R. (1972) Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesSchiffrin, Deborah (1980) “Meta-Talk: Organizational and Evaluative Brackets in Discourse” Sociological Inquiry, Vol. 50, Issue 3-4, pp. 199-236; doi: 10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00021.xpl_PL
dc.referencesSearle, John R. (1964) “How to derive ‘ought’ from ‘is’”, The Philosophical Review, Vol. 73, No. 1 (Jan. 1964), pp. 43-58.pl_PL
dc.referencesSearle, John R. (1965) “What is a speech act?” In: Philosophy in America, ed. by Max Black. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 221-239 [Reprinted in: Martinich, A. (1996), pp. 130- 140].pl_PL
dc.referencesSearle, John R. (1968) “Austin on locutionary and illocutionary acts” The Philosophical Review, Vol. 57, No. 4, pp. 1405-1424.pl_PL
dc.referencesSearle, John R. (1969) Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesSearle, John R. (1971) “Introduction”. In: Philosophy of Language, ed. by John R. Searle. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1-12.pl_PL
dc.referencesSearle, John R. (1975a) “Indirect speech acts”. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.) Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3, pp. 59-82.pl_PL
dc.referencesSearle, John R. (1975b) “The Logical Status of Fictional Discourse” New Literary History, Vol. 6, No. 2 [On Narrative and Narratives], pp. 319-332.pl_PL
dc.referencesSearle, John R. (1977) “Reiterating the differences: A reply to Derrida” Glyph, Vol. 1, pp. 204-205.pl_PL
dc.referencesSearle, John R. (1979a) Expression and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesSearle, John R. (1979b. [1975]) “A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts.” Reprinted in John R. Searle (1979a) Expression and Meaning, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.1-29.pl_PL
dc.referencesSearle, John R. (1983) Intentionality: An essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesSearle, John R. (1984) Interview [with G. Heyer & D. Munch]: Von der Sprechakttheorie zur Intentionalitiit. Information Philosophie (Jan. 1984), pp. 2-30.pl_PL
dc.referencesSearle, John R. (1989) “How Performatives Work”, Linguistics and Philosophy, Vol. 12, pp. 535-558.pl_PL
dc.referencesSearle, John R. (1992a) “Conversation”. In: Searle at al. (eds.), pp. 7-29.pl_PL
dc.referencesSearle, John R. (1992b) “Conversation reconsidered”. In: Searle at al. (eds.), pp. 137-148.pl_PL
dc.referencesSearle, John R. (1995) The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Free Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesSearle, J. R. (1999) Mind, Language, and Society: Doing Philosophy in the Real World. New York: Basic Books.pl_PL
dc.referencesSearle, J. R. (2001) Rationality in Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesSearle, John R. (2002a) “How performatives work” In: Essays in Speech Act Theory, ed. by Daniel Vanderveken & Susumu Kubo. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 535-558.pl_PL
dc.referencesSearle, John R. (2002b) “Speech Acts, Mind, and Social Reality”. In: Speech Acts, Mind, and Social Reality: Discussions with John Searle, ed. by Günter Grewendorf & Georg Meggle. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Press, pp. 3-16.pl_PL
dc.referencesSearle, John. R. (2007) Freedom and Neurobiology: Reflections on Free Will, Language, and Political Power. New York: Columbia University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesSearle, John R. (2010) Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesSearle, John R., Ferenc Kiefer & Manfred Bierwisch (eds.) (1980) Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics. Dordrecht: Reidel.pl_PL
dc.referencesSearle, John R., Herman Parret & Jef Verschueren (eds.) (1992) (On) Searle on Conversation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesSearle, John R. & Daniel Vanderveken (1985) The Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesSeuren, Pieter A. M. (1985) Discourse Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.pl_PL
dc.referencesSeuren, Pieter A.M. (1998) Western Linguistics: An Historical Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.pl_PL
dc.referencesSeuren Pieter A. M. (2009) Language in Cognition. Volume I: Language from Within. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesSeymour, Michel (2010) “Speech act pluralism, minimal content and pragmemes.” Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 42, pp. 2870–2881.pl_PL
dc.referencesSharifian, Farzad (2011) Cultural Conceptualisations and Language: Theoretical framework and applications. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.pl_PL
dc.referencesShuy, Roger W. (1994) “Deceit, distress, and false imprisonment”. Forensic Linguistics, Vol.1, pp. 133–149.pl_PL
dc.referencesShuy, Roger (2001) “Discourse analysis in the legal context”. In: The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen & Heidi E. Hamilton. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 437–52.pl_PL
dc.referencesShwayder, David S. (1994) “A semantics of utterance, formalized” In: Tsohatzidis (ed.), pp. 80-98.pl_PL
dc.referencesSiegel, Muffy E. A. (2006) “Buiscuit conditionals: quantification over potential literal acts” Linguistics and Philosophy, Vol. 29, pp. 167-203.pl_PL
dc.referencesSimpson, A. W. Brian (2006) “Herbert Hart elucidated”. Michigan Law Review, Vol. 104, No. 6, pp. 1437-1459. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40041443 (accessed 19 February 2010).pl_PL
dc.referencesSmith, Barry (1984) “Ten conditions on a theory of speech acts”. Theoretical Linguistics, Vol. 11, No.3, pp. 309-330.pl_PL
dc.referencesSmith, Barry (1988) “Materials towards a history of speech act theory” In: Karl Bühler’s Theory of Language, ed. by Achim Eschbach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 125-152.pl_PL
dc.referencesSmith, Barry (1990) “Towards a history of speech act theory” In: Speech Acts, Meanings and Intentions: Critical Approaches to the Philosophy of John Searle, ed. by Armin Burkhardt. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter, pp. 29-61.pl_PL
dc.referencesSoames, Scott (2010) Philosophy of Language. Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesSouza Filho, Danilo Marcondes de (1984) Language and action: A reassessment of speech act theory. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesSperber, Dan, Fabrice Clément, Christopher Heintz, Olivier Mascaro, Hugo Mercier, Gloria Origgi, & Deirdre Wilson (2010) “Epistemic vigilance”. Mind and Language, Vol. 25(4), pp. 359-393.pl_PL
dc.referencesSperber, Dan & Gloria Origgi (2012) “A pragmatic perspective on the evolution of language” In: Wilson & Sperber (2012a), pp. 331-338 [originally published in: R. Larson, V. Déprez & H. Yamakido (eds.) (2010) The Evolution of Human Language: Biolonguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 124-132].pl_PL
dc.referencesSperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson (1986/1995) Relevance. Communication and Cognition. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.pl_PL
dc.referencesSperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson (2012) “Pragmatics, modularity and mindreading” In: Wilson & Sperber (2012a), pp. 261-278 [originally published in: Mind & Language (2002), Vol. 17, pp. 3-23].pl_PL
dc.referencesStacey, Robin Chapman (2007) Dark Speech: The Performance of Law in Early Ireland. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesStainton, Robert J. (1996) Philosophical Perspectives on Language. Peterborough Ontario & London: Broadview Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesStalnaker, Robert (1978) “Assertion.” In: Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, pp. 315-332. New York: Academic Press; doi: 10.1093/0198237073.003.0005.pl_PL
dc.referencesStanley, Jason (2007) “Context and logical form” In: Stanley Jason; Language in Context: Selected Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 30-68.pl_PL
dc.referencesStrawson, Peter F. (1964) “Intention and convention in speech acts.” Philosophical Review, Vol. 73, pp.439-460; doi: 10.2307/2183301.pl_PL
dc.referencesStrawson, Peter F. (1973). “Austin and locutionary meaning”. In Berlin et al., pp. 46-68.pl_PL
dc.referencesSweetser, Eve (2002) “Blended spaces and performativity” Cognitive Linguistics 11-3/4, pp. 305- 333.pl_PL
dc.referencesSzymura, Jerzy (1982) Język, mowa i prawda w perspektywie fenomenologii lingwistycznej J.L. Austina. Wrocław: Ossolineum.pl_PL
dc.referencesTaavitsainen, Irma & Andreas Jucker (2008) “Speech acts now and then”. In: Speech Acts in the History of English, ed. by Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 1–23.pl_PL
dc.referencesTambling, Jeremy (1988) What is Literary Language? Buckingham: Open University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesTaylor, Talbot J. & Deborah Cameron (1987) Analysing Conversation: Rules and Units in the Structure of Talk. Oxford: Pergamon Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesThibault, Paul J. & Theo van Leeuwen (1996) “Grammar, society, and the speech act: Renewing the connections” Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 25, pp. 561-585.pl_PL
dc.referencesThomas, Jenny (1995) Meaning in Interaction: An introduction to pragmatics. London: Longman.pl_PL
dc.referencesTrosborg, Anna (1991) “An Analysis of Legal Speech Acts in English Contract Law”. Hermes: Journal of Linguistics, Vol. 6, pp. 65-90.pl_PL
dc.referencesTrosborg, Anna (1995) “Statutes and contracts: An analysis of legal speech acts in the English language of the law” Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 23, pp. 31-53; doi: 10.1016/0378-2166(94)00034-C.pl_PL
dc.referencesTsohatzidis, Savas L. (1994) “Ways of doing things with words: An introduction” In: Tsohatzidis (ed.), pp. 1-25.pl_PL
dc.referencesTsohatzidis, Savas L. (2010) “Speech Act Theory: Some current options” Intercultural Pragmatics, Vol. 7-2, pp. 341-362; doi: 10.1515/IPRG.2010.010.pl_PL
dc.referencesTsohatzidis, Savas L. (ed.) (1994) Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and linguistic perspectives. London: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesTurner, Roy (ed.) (1974) Ethnomethodology: Selected Readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin.pl_PL
dc.referencesUrmson, J. (1963) “Parenthetical verbs”. In: Philosophy and ordinary language, ed. by C. Caton. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, pp. 220-240.pl_PL
dc.referencesVanderveken, Daniel (1980) “Illocutionary Logic and Self-Defeating Speech Acts” In: Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics, ed. by John R. Searle, Ferenc Kiefer & Manfred Bierwisch. Springer Netherland, pp. 247-272.pl_PL
dc.referencesVanderveken, Daniel (1990) Meaning and Speech Acts. Vol.1: Principles of language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesVanderveken, Daniel (1991a) Meaning and Speech Acts. Vol.2: Formal semantics of success and satisfaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesVanderveken, Daniel (1991b) “Non-literal speech acts and conversational maxims”. In: John Searle and His Critics, ed. by Ernest Lepore & Robert Van Gulick. Oxford, Cambridge, M.A.: Basil Blackwell, pp. 371-384.pl_PL
dc.referencesVanderveken, Daniel (1994) “A complete formulation of a simple logic of elementary illocutionary acts”. In: Tsohatzidis, Savas (ed.), pp. 99-131.pl_PL
dc.referencesVanderveken, Daniel (1995) “On the ramification of the fundamental notions of meaning, analyticity, consistency, entailment and commitment to speech acts in formal semantics: A reply to Brassac and Trognon”. Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 23, pp. 563-576.pl_PL
dc.referencesVanderveken, Daniel (2001) “Illocutionary logic and discourse typology”. Revue internationale de philosophie, Vol. 55, Issue 216, pp. 243-255; text available on-line at http://www.uqtr.ca/~vandervk/DiscourseTypology.pdf (accessed May 2009).pl_PL
dc.referencesVanderveken, Daniel (2002a) “Universal grammar and speech act theory”. In: Vanderveken, Daniel & Susumu Kubo (eds.), pp. 25-62.pl_PL
dc.referencesVanderveken, Daniel (2002b) “Searle on meaning and action”. In: Speech Acts, Mind and Social Reality: Discussions with John R. Searle, ed. by Günter Grewendorf & Georg Meggle. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 141-161.pl_PL
dc.referencesVanderveken, Daniel & Susumu Kubo (eds.) (2002) Essays in Speech Act Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesVendler, Zeno (1957) “Verbs and Times” The Philosophical Review, Vol. LXVI, pp. 143-160.pl_PL
dc.referencesVendler, Zeno (1967) Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesVendler, Zeno (1972) Res Cogitans: An Essay in Rational Psychology. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesVendler, Zeno (1976) “Illocutionary Suicide”, In: Issues in the Philosophy of Language: Proceedings of the 1972 Obedin Philosophy Colloquium, ed. by Alfred F. MacKay & Daniel D. Merrill. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 135-145.pl_PL
dc.referencesVerschueren, Jeff. (1977) The Analysis of Speech Act Verbs: Theoretical Preliminaries. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Linguistics Club.pl_PL
dc.referencesVerschueren, Jeff (1983) “On Bogusławski on ‘promise’”. Journal of Pragmatics, Vol.7, pp. 629- 632.pl_PL
dc.referencesVerschueren, Jeff (1985) What People Say They Do with Words. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing Corporation.pl_PL
dc.referencesVerschueren, Jeff. (1987) “Metapragmatics and universals of linguistic action” In: Jef Verschueren (ed.), pp. 125-140.pl_PL
dc.referencesVerschueren, Jeff. (ed.) (1987) Linguistic Action: Some Empirical-Conceptual Studies. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing Corporation.pl_PL
dc.referencesVerschueren, Jeff. (ed.) (1999) Understanding Pragmatics. London & New York: Arnold.pl_PL
dc.referencesWarnock, G. J. (1971) The Object of Morality. London: Methuen.pl_PL
dc.referencesWarnock, G. J. (1973) “Some types of performative utterances” In: Berlin et al., pp. 69-89.pl_PL
dc.referencesWarnock, G. J. (1989) J.L. Austin. London & New York: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesWee, Lionel (2004) “‘Extreme communicative acts’ and the boosting of illocutionary force”. Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 36, pp. 2161-2178.pl_PL
dc.referencesWenger, Etienne (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesWierzbicka, Anna (1972) Semantic Primitives. Frankfurt: Athenaum.pl_PL
dc.referencesWierzbicka, Anna (1980) Lingua Mentalis. Sydney: Academic Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesWierzbicka, Anna (1985a) “Different cultures, different languages, different speech acts: Polish vs. English”. Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 9, pp. 145-178.pl_PL
dc.referencesWierzbicka, Anna (1985b) Lexicography and Conceptual Analysis. Ann Arbor: Karoma.pl_PL
dc.referencesWierzbicka, Anna (1987) English Speech Act Verbs: A semantic dictionary. Marrickville: Academic Press Australia.pl_PL
dc.referencesWierzbicka, Anna (1991) Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.pl_PL
dc.referencesWierzbicka, Anna (1996) Semantics: Primes and Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesWierzbicka, Anna (1997) Understanding Cultures Through Their Key Words: English, Russian, Polish, German, and Japanese. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesWierzbicka, Anna (1999) Emotions across Languages and Cultures: Diversity and Universals. Paris & Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesWilliams, Christopher (2005) Tradition and Change in Legal English. Verbal Constructions in Prescriptive Texts. Bern: Peter Lang.pl_PL
dc.referencesWilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber (2002) “Truthfulness and Relevance”. Mind, Vol. 111, pp. 583- 632. (also published in UCL Working Papers in Linguistics (2000), Vol. 12, pp. 215- 254).pl_PL
dc.referencesWilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber (2012a) Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesWilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber (2012b) “Linguistic form and relevance” In: Wilson & Sperber (2012a), pp. 149-168.pl_PL
dc.referencesWitczak-Plisiecka, Iwona (2001; ms). Semantic and Pragmatic Aspects of Speech Acts in English Legal Texts. PhD dissertation, University of Lodz, Poland.pl_PL
dc.referencesWitczak-Plisiecka, Iwona (2009a) “Speech acts and the autonomy of linguistic pragmatics”. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics. Special Issue on Speech Actions, 5.1: 85-106; doi: 10.2478/v10016-009-0008-8.pl_PL
dc.referencesWitczak-Plisiecka, Iwona (2009b) “Legal Speech Acts in a Cognitive Linguistic Perspective— Focus on Modality” Comparative Legilinguistics (International Journal for Legal Communication), No. 1 (1), pp. 159-175.pl_PL
dc.referencesWitczak-Plisiecka, Iwona (2011) “Performatywność jako znaczenie wyłaniające się w kontekście w świetle pojęć emergencji i amalgamatów językoznawstwa kognitywnego”. In: Przestrzenie kognitywnych poszukiwań, ed. by Alina Kwiatkowska. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, pp. 195-206.pl_PL
dc.referencesWitczak-Plisiecka, Iwona (2013) “Speech action in legal contexts”. In: Pragmatics of Speech Actions [Handbook of pragmatics; Part 2], ed. by Marina Sbisà & Ken Turner. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 613-658.pl_PL
dc.referencesWitek, Maciej (2011) Spór o podstawy teorii czynności mowy. Szczecin: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego.pl_PL
dc.referencesWittgenstein, Ludwig (1953/1958) (2nd revised edition). Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.pl_PL
dc.referencesWittgenstein, Ludwig (1960) The Blue and Brown Books. New York: Harper.pl_PL
dc.referencesWittgenstein, Ludwig (1878) (3rd revised edition) Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics, ed. by G.H. von Wright, R. Rhees & G.E.M. Anscombe (transl.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesWood, David (ed.) (2010) Perspectives on Formulaic Language: Acquisition and Communication. London & New York: Continuum.pl_PL
dc.referencesWray, Alison (2002) Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesŽagar, Igor Ž. (1991) “How to Do Things with Words—The Polyphonic Way” In: Speech Acts: Fiction or Reality? Proceedings of the International Conference Ljubljana, Yugoslavia, November 15, 1990, ed. by Igor Žagar. Ljubljana: IPrA Distribution Centre for Yugoslavia, Institute of Social Sciences, pp. 77-88.pl_PL
dc.referencesŽagar, Igor Ž. & Matejka Grgič (2011) How to Do Things with Tense and Aspect. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.pl_PL
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/7969-092-3
dc.identifier.doi978-83-7969-092-3


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe