Pokaż uproszczony rekord

From contrastive rhetoric to intercultural rhetoric: Why intercultural rhetoric needs to reframe the concept of culture

dc.contributor.authorLehman, Iga
dc.contributor.editorSalski, Łukasz
dc.contributor.editorSzubko-Sitarek, Weronika
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-12T05:59:35Z
dc.date.available2019-07-12T05:59:35Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationLehman I., From contrastive rhetoric to intercultural rhetoric: Why intercultural rhetoric needs to reframe the concept of culture, [w:] Perspectives on Foreign Language Learning, Salski Ł., Szubko-Sitarek W. (red.), Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2013, s. 33-49, doi: 10.18778/7969-032-9.04pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn978-83-7969-032-9
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/29349
dc.description.sponsorshipUdostępnienie publikacji Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego finansowane w ramach projektu „Doskonałość naukowa kluczem do doskonałości kształcenia”. Projekt realizowany jest ze środków Europejskiego Funduszu Społecznego w ramach Programu Operacyjnego Wiedza Edukacja Rozwój; nr umowy: POWER.03.05.00-00-Z092/17-00.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofSalski Ł., Szubko-Sitarek W. (red.), Perspectives on Foreign Language Learning, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2013;
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectcontrastive rhetoricpl_PL
dc.subjectintercultural rhetoricpl_PL
dc.subjectconcept of culturepl_PL
dc.titleFrom contrastive rhetoric to intercultural rhetoric: Why intercultural rhetoric needs to reframe the concept of culturepl_PL
dc.typeBook chapterpl_PL
dc.page.number33-49pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Social Sciences, Warsaw, Polandpl_PL
dc.referencesAppadurai, A. 1996. Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesAristotle 1984. Rhetoric. In J. Barnes (Ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle. rev. Oxford ed., vol. 2, 2155. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesAtkinson, D. 1999. Culture in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 33, 625-654.pl_PL
dc.referencesAtkinson, D. 2004. Contrasting rhetorics/contrasting cultures: Why contrastive rhetoric needs a better conceptualization of culture. Journal of English for Academic Purposes: Special Issue on Contrastive Rhetoric in EAP, 3, 277-289.pl_PL
dc.referencesConnor, U. 1996. Contrastive Rhetoric: Cross-cultural Aspects of Second Language Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesConnor, U. 2002. New directions in contrastive rhetoric. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 493-510.pl_PL
dc.referencesConnor, U. 2011. Intercultural Rhetoric in the Writing Classroom. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesCooley, L. and Lewkowicz, J. 1997. Developing awareness of the rhetorical and linguistic conventions of writing a thesis in English: addressing the needs of EFL/ESL postgraduate students. In A. Duszak (Ed.), Culture and Styles of Academic Discourse, pp. 113-129. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.pl_PL
dc.referencesDuszak, A. (Ed.) 1997. Culture and Styles of Academic Discourse, In W. Winter (Ed.), Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs, 104. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.pl_PL
dc.referencesEnkvist, N.E. 1997).Why we need contrastive rhetoric. Alternation, 4, 188.pl_PL
dc.referencesHampden-Turner, C. and Trompenaars, F. 2000. Building Cross- Cultural Competence. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.pl_PL
dc.referencesHannerz, U. 1992. Cultural complexity: Studies in the Social Organization of Meaning. New York: Columbia University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesHofstede, G. H. 1980. Culture’s Consequances: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.pl_PL
dc.referencesHolliday, A. 1994. Appropriate Methodology and Social Content. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesHolliday, A. 1999. Small cultures. Applied Linguistics, 20, 237-264.pl_PL
dc.referencesKeesing, R.H. 1994. Theories of culture revisited. In R. Borofsky (Ed.), Assessing Cultural Anthropology. New York: McGraw-Hill.pl_PL
dc.referencesKennedy, G.A. 1998. Comparative Rhetoric: An Historical and Cross-cultural Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesKubota, R. 1999. Japanese culture constructed by discourses: Implications for applied linguistic research and English language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 33, 9-35. In Connor, U., Intercultural Rhetoric in the Writing Classroom. 13. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesKubota, R. 2001. Discursive construction of the images of U.S. classrooms TESOL Quarterly, 35: 9-38. In U. Connor, New directions in contrastive rhetoric, TESOL Quarterly, 36, 493-510.pl_PL
dc.referencesLusting, M.W. and Koester, J. 2010. Intercultural Competence. Interpersonal Communication across Cultures, Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.pl_PL
dc.referencesLarson, D.A. and Smalley, W.A. 1972. Becoming Bilingual: a Guide to Language Learning. New Canaan, CN: Practical Anthropology.pl_PL
dc.referencesMathews, G. 2000. Global Culture/Individual Identity: Searching for Home in the Cultural Supermarket. New York: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesPillay, V. 2006. Culture. Exploring the river. In LeBaron, Pillary V. (Eds.), Conflict across Cultures. A Unique Experience of Bridging Differences. Boston: Intercultural Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesPostman, N. 1993. Technopoly. The Surrender of Culture to Technology. New York: Vintage Books. A Division of Random House, Inc.pl_PL
dc.referencesRosinski Ph. 2010. Coaching Across Cultures. New Tools for Leveraging National, Corporate and Professional Differences, London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.pl_PL
dc.referencesScollon, R. 1997. Contrastive rhetoric, contrastive poetics, or perhaps something else? TESOL Quarterly, 31, 352-363. In U. Connor, New directions in contrastive rhetoric, TESOL Quarterly, 36, 493-510.pl_PL
dc.referencesShiffrin, D., Tannen, D., and Hamilton, H.E. 2001. Introduction. In Shiffrin, D., Tannen, D., and Hamilton, H.E. (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 1-10. Malden, MA: Blackwell.pl_PL
dc.referencesSidanius, J., and Pratto, F. 1999. Social dominance orientation and the political psychology of gender: A case of invariance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 998-1011.pl_PL
dc.referencesSkalli, L.H. 2006. Through a Local Prism. Lanham, MD: Lexington.pl_PL
dc.referencesSpack,R. 1997. The rhetorical construction of multilingual students. TESOL Quarterly, 31: 765-774. In U. Connor, New directions in contrastive rhetoric. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 493-510.pl_PL
dc.referencesTadmor, C.T, and Tetlock, P.E. 2006. Biculturalism: A model of the effects of second-culture exposure on acculturation and integrative complexity. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37(2), 173-190.pl_PL
dc.referencesTannen, D. 1985. Cross-cultural communication. In T.A. Van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 203-216. New York: Academic Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesTomlison, J. 1999. Globalization and Culture. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesWierzbicka, A. 1985. The double life of bilingual. In Sussex and Zubrzycki (Eds.), 187-223. In English: One Language, Different Cultures. eds. E. Ronowicz and C. Yallop, 5. London: Cassell.pl_PL
dc.referencesZamel, V. 1997. Toward a model of transculturation. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 341-343. In U. Connor, New directions in contrastive rhetoric. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 493-510.pl_PL
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/7969-032-9.04


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Nazwa:
license_rdf
Rozmiar:
805bajtów
Format:
application/rdf+xml
Oglądaj/Otwórz
Thumbnail
Nazwa:
33-49_From contrastive rhetoric ...
Rozmiar:
432.7KB
Format:
PDF
Oglądaj/Otwórz
Thumbnail
Nazwa:
Salski-Perspectives.jpg
Rozmiar:
202.2KB
Format:
Obraz JPEG
Opis:
okładka
Oglądaj/Otwórz

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe