Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchardt, Andreas
dc.contributor.editorKazik, Joanna
dc.contributor.editorMirowska, Paulina
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-10T09:26:57Z
dc.date.available2019-06-10T09:26:57Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationSchardt A., Geographic Transgression and Epic Theatre: The Subversiveness of the Pastoral Idyll in Edward Bond’s Lear, [w:] Studies in English Drama and Poetry vol. 3. Reading subversion and transgression, Kazik J., Mirowska P. (red.), Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2013, s. 55-66, doi: 10.18778/7525-994-0.05pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn978-83-7525-994-0
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/28809
dc.description.abstractThe pastoral has often been defined in terms of an idyllic retreat where man can regain his former unity with nature, from which he has been alienated as a consequence of urban life. At the same time, however, the pastoral is not merely escapist, but explores the very problems of the city, contemporary society, politics and the human condition in general. It can thus be called a subversive form, serving as a vehicle to question contemporary values, roles and morals by offering a context where these issues can be freely scrutinised and criticised. A similar interest in contemporary affairs underlies the concept of the epic theatre, which, by definition, intends to create an awareness of existing social plights in the audience, thus aspiring to political reforms. This article analyses the overlap between pastoral elements and the notion of the epic theatre using Edward Bond’s Lear (1971). Not only will it be demonstrated how Bond uses the king’s retreat into a pastoral idyll to convey his views about the origins of extreme behaviours like cruelty and violence in modern societies but also to what extent this attempt at a redefinition of received standards fits the notion of the epic theatre. Contrary to the opinion expressed by some scholars that the pastoral has become obsolete in modern times, this paper hence argues that this mode is a broad and flexible category that has survived up to the dramatic tradition of the twentieth century and is, due to its oscillation between evasiveness and subversiveness, capable of being incorporated in such a “radical” concept as Brecht’s theatre.pl_PL
dc.description.sponsorshipUdostępnienie publikacji Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego finansowane w ramach projektu „Doskonałość naukowa kluczem do doskonałości kształcenia”. Projekt realizowany jest ze środków Europejskiego Funduszu Społecznego w ramach Programu Operacyjnego Wiedza Edukacja Rozwój; nr umowy: POWER.03.05.00-00-Z092/17-00.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofKazik J., Mirowska P. (red.), Studies in English Drama and Poetry vol. 3. Reading subversion and transgression, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2013;
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStudies in English Drama and Poetry;
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectgeographic transgressionpl_PL
dc.subjectepic theatrepl_PL
dc.subjectsubversivenesspl_PL
dc.subjectPastoral Idyllpl_PL
dc.subjectEdward Bond’s Learpl_PL
dc.titleGeographic Transgression and Epic Theatre: The Subversiveness of the Pastoral Idyll in Edward Bond’s Learpl_PL
dc.typeBook chapterpl_PL
dc.page.number55-66pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Heidelbergpl_PL
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnoteAndreas Schardt holds a PhD in English literature from the University of Heidelberg, Germany. His dissertation deals with the intersection of the Gothic and the pastoral mode in a selected body of English and American texts from the late nineteenth and the twentieth centuries. He has taught courses on presentation skills and English literature at the University of Mannheim and the University of Heidelberg. Among his further research interests are the theory of genres and modes, dystopian fiction, contemporary drama and the reception of antiquity in the European literary tradition.pl_PL
dc.referencesAhrens, Rüdiger. “Das Konzept der Natur in Lear und King Lear: Edward Bond vs. William Shakespeare.” Fiktion und Geschichte in der anglo-amerikanischen Literatur. Festschrift für Heinz-Joachim Müllenbrock zum 60. Geburtstag. Ed. Rüdiger Ahrens and Fritz-Wilhelm Neumann. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag C. Winter, 1998. 357–76. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesAlpers, Paul J. What Is Pastoral? Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesBarrell, John, and John Bull. The Penguin Book of English Pastoral Verse. London: Allen Lane, 1974. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesBond, Edward. Lear. London: Methuen Drama, 1994. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesCoult, Tony. The Plays of Edward Bond. London: Eyre Methuen, 1977. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesCuddon, J. A., and Claire Preston. A Dictionary of Literary Terms and Literary Theory. 4th ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 1998. Print. Blackwell Reference.pl_PL
dc.referencesGifford, Terry. Pastoral. London: Routledge, 1999. Print. New Critical Idiom.pl_PL
dc.referencesLappin, Lou. The Art and Politics of Edward Bond. New York: Lang, 1987. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesLindenbaum, Peter. Changing Landscapes. Anti-pastoral Sentiment in the English Renaissance. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1986. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesMarinelli, Peter V. Pastoral. Ed. John D. Jump. London: Methuen, 1971. Print. Critical Idiom.pl_PL
dc.referencesMarx, Leo. The Machine in the Garden: Technology and the Pastoral Ideal in America. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1964. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesShakespeare, William. As You Like It. Ed. Juliet Dusinberre. London: Arden Shakespeare, 2006. Print. Arden Shakespeare. Third Series.pl_PL
dc.referencesShakespeare, William. King Lear. Ed. R. A. Foakes. Walton-on-Thames: Nelson, 1997. Print. Arden Shakespeare. Third Series.pl_PL
dc.referencesStratmann, Gerd. “Edward Bond: Lear.” Das zeitgenössische englische Drama: Einführung, Interpretation, Dokumentation. Ed. Klaus-Dieter Fehse and Norbert Platz. Frankfurt am Main: Athenäum Fischer, 1975. 274–98. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesVirgil. The Eclogues. Trans. Guy Lee. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1984. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesWillett, John, ed. and trans. Brecht on Theatre: The Development of an Aesthetic. London: Methuen, 1964. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesWilliams, Raymond. The Country and the City. London: Chatto & Windus, 1973. Print.pl_PL
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/7525-994-0.05
dc.relation.volume3pl_PL


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe